Investigation on flank wear,surface roughness and chip morphology in turning of AISI D7 steel with AlTiSiN coated carbide tool using zinc oxide enriched nanofluid under minimum quantity lubrication
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online June, 2026
Investigation on flank wear,surface roughness and chip morphology in turning of AISI D7 steel with AlTiSiN coated carbide tool using zinc oxide enriched nanofluid under minimum quantity lubrication
This research explores the flank wear (VB), surface roughness (Ra) and chip morphology in turning of AISI D7 steel using AlTiSiN coated carbide tool under zinc oxide (ZnO) enriched nanofluid with minimum quantity lubrication (MQL) environment, which has not been addressed before. Experiments involving 30 trials were carried out, considering machining variables, viz. feed, nose radius, depth of cut, and cutting speed. A combined approach of central composite design of response surface method (RSM), analysis of variance, and desirability function approach (DFA) was applied for experimental investigation, prediction modeling, and multiple response optimization of surface roughness and flank wear in turning. Based on the research, the most leading factor influencing surface roughness and tool wear was the cutting speed. Machining under high nose radius resulted in enhanced surface finish, reduced tool vibration and tool wear. Under nano-MQL conditions, chip morphology exhibited the formation of segmented, saw-toothed chips. At high cutting speeds, several notable changes were observed: (a) the saw-tooth profile became more pronounced, (b) the spacing between individual teeth increased, (c) chip segmentation frequency decreased, and (d) overall chip thickness was reduced. The serrated edge saw-toothed chip formation during turning led to increased flank wear. Tool vibration corresponds to deteriorated surface morphology. The combination of AlTiSiN coated tool, and effective nano-MQL cooling-lubrication contributed to lower range of VB (0.137–0.293 mm) and Ra (0.248–0.425 µm) in turning. The optimum conditions for AISI D7 steel turning under nano-MQL determined using DFA, are feed of 0.04 mm/rev, cutting speed of 124 m/min, 1.2 mm of nose radius, and doc of 0.1 mm, leading to an optimal surface roughness (Ra = 0.263 µm), and flank wear (VB = 0.1704 mm).
DashLPadhanSDasA, et al. Machinability investigation and sustainability assessment in hard turning of AISI D3 steel with coated carbide tool under nanofluid minimum quantity lubrication-cooling condition. Proc Inst Mech Eng C J Mech Eng Sci2021; 235(22): 6496–6528.
2.
DebnathSReddyMMYiQS. Environmental friendly cutting fluids and cooling techniques in machining: a review. J Clean Prod2014; 83: 33–47.
3.
PadhanSDasSRDasA, et al. Machinability investigation of nitronic 60 steel turning using SiAlON ceramic tools under different cooling/lubrication conditions. Materials2022; 15(7): 2368.
4.
SharmaAKTiwariAKDixitAR. Effects of minimum quantity lubrication (MQL) in machining processes using conventional and nanofluid based cutting fluids: a comprehensive review. J Clean Prod2016; 127: 1–18.
5.
RoySKumarRPandaA, et al. A comparative performance investigation of single- and double-nozzle pulse mode minimum quantity lubrication systems in turning super-duplex steel using a weighted pugh matrix sustainable approach. Sustainability2023; 15(20): 15160.
6.
PadhanSMishraSSahuSK, et al. Enhancing machining performance and sustainability: a comprehensive review of minimum quantity lubrication. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng2025; 47(7): 316.
7.
GürbüzHGönülaçarYE. Experimental and statistical investigation of the effects of MQL, dry and wet machining on machinability and sustainability in turning of AISI 4140 steel. Proc Inst Mech Eng E J Process Mech Eng2022; 236(5): 1808–1823.
8.
ÖzbekOSaruhanH. The effect of vibration and cutting zone temperature on surface roughness and tool wear in eco-friendly MQL turning of AISI D2. J Mater Res Technol2020; 9(3): 2762–2772.
9.
RevuruRSZhangJZPosinasettiNR. Comparative performance studies of turning 4140 steel with TiC/TiCN/TiN-coated carbide inserts using MQL, flooding with vegetable cutting fluids, and dry machining. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2020; 108(1): 381–391.
10.
PatolePBKulkarniVVBhatwadekarSG. MQL machining with nano fluid: a review. Manuf Rev2021; 8: 13.
11.
RajuRAAndhareASahuNK. Performance of multi-walled carbon nanotube-based nanofluid in turning operation. Mater Manuf Process2017; 32(13): 1490–1496.
12.
SharmaAKSinghRKDixitAR, et al. Novel uses of alumina-MoS2 hybrid nanoparticle enriched cutting fluid in hard turning of AISI 304 steel. J Manuf Process2017; 30: 467–482.
13.
LiewPJShaaroniARazakJA, et al. Comparison between carbon nanofiber (CNF) nanofluid with deionized water on tool life and surface roughness in turning of D2 steel. J Adv Res Fluid Mech Therm Sci2018; 46(1): 169–174.
14.
SinghRKSharmaAKDixitAR, et al. Performance evaluation of alumina-graphene hybrid nano-cutting fluid in hard turning. J Clean Prod2017; 162: 830–845.
15.
KhajehzadehMMoradpourJRazfarMR. Influence of nanolubricant particles’ size on flank wear in hard turning. Mater Manuf Process2019; 34(5): 494–501.
16.
DasAPatelSKDasSR. Performance comparison of vegetable oil based nanofluids towards machinability improvement in hard turning of HSLA steel using minimum quantity lubrication. Mech Ind2019; 20(5): 506.
17.
DucTMLongTTChienTQ. Performance evaluation of MQL parameters using Al2O3 and MoS2 nanofluids in hard turning 90CrSi steel. Lubricants2019; 7(5): 40.
18.
MahapatraSDasAJenaPC, et al. Turning of hardened AISI H13 steel with recently developed S3P-AlTiSiN coated carbide tool using MWCNT mixed nanofluid under minimum quantity lubrication. Proc Inst Mech Eng C J Mech Eng Sci2023; 237(4): 843–864.
19.
OussamaBYapanYFUysalA, et al. Assessment of turning AISI 316L stainless steel under MWCNT-reinforced nanofluid-assisted MQL and optimization of process parameters by NSGA-II and TOPSIS. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2023; 127(7-8): 3855–3868.
20.
MondalKDasSMandalB, et al. An investigation on turning hardened steel using different tool inserts. Mater Manuf Process2016; 31(13): 1770–1781.
21.
MondalKDasS. An investigation on machinability during turning hardened steel in dry condition. J Inst Eng (India) Ser C2018; 99(6): 637–644.
22.
de ÁvilaRFAbrãoAMde GodoyGCD. The performance of TiN coated carbide tools when turning AISI 8620 steel. J Mater Process Technol2006; 179(1-3): 161–164.
23.
SargadeVGGangopadhyaySPaulS, et al. Effect of coating thickness on the characteristics and dry machining performance of TiN film deposited on cemented carbide inserts using CFUBMS. Mater Manuf Process2011; 26(8): 1028–1033.
24.
SenthilkumarNSelvakumarVTamizharasanT. Optimization and performance analysis of uncoated and coated carbide inserts during hard turning AISI D2 steel using hybrid GRA-PCA technique. Appl Mech Mater2016; 852: 151–159.
25.
GintingASkeinRCuacaD, et al. The characteristics of CVD- and PVD-coated carbide tools in hard turning of AISI 4340 hard turning of AISI 4340. Measurement2018; 129: 548–557.
26.
DasAMohapatraSGajraniKK, et al. Comparative performance evaluation between HSN-TiAlxN and TiCN coated carbide tools in hard turning of AISI D6 steel. Proc Inst Mech Eng B J Eng Manuf2025; 239(3): 350–365.
27.
KaraFÖztürkB. Comparison and optimization of PVD and CVD method on surface roughness and flank wear in hard-machining of DIN 1.2738 mold steel. Sens Rev2019; 39(1): 24–33.
28.
BoingDde OliveiraAJSchroeterRB. Evaluation of wear mechanisms of PVD and CVD coatings deposited on cemented carbide substrates applied to hard turning. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2020; 106(11-12): 5441–5451.
29.
ZhaoJLiuZ. Influences of coating thickness on cutting temperature for dry hard turning inconel 718 with PVD TiAlN coated carbide tools in initial tool wear stage. J Manuf Process2020; 56: 1155–1165.
30.
AlokAKumarADasM. Hard turning with a new HSN2-coated carbide insert and optimization of process parameter. Trans Indian Ins Metals2021; 74(7): 1577–1591.
31.
SahooSPDattaS. Dry machining of Ti–6Al–4V using PVD Si-doped TiAlxN super nitride (HSN2) coated WC–Co tool. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng2022; 44(9): 407.
32.
DasAGuptaMKDasSR, et al. Hard turning of AISI D6 steel with recently developed HSN2-TiAlxN and conventional TiCN coated carbide tools: comparative machinability investigation and sustainability assessment. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng2022; 44(4): 138.
33.
KumarTSPrabuSBKumarTS. Comparative evaluation of performances of TiAlN-, AlCrN-and AlCrN/TiAlN-coated carbide cutting tools and uncoated carbide cutting tools on turning EN24 alloy steel. J Adv Manuf Syst2017; 16(03): 237–261.
34.
SivaiahPChakradharD. The effectiveness of a novel cryogenic cooling approach on turning performance characteristics during machining of 17-4 PH stainless steel material. Silicon2019; 11(1): 25–38.
35.
PanLWuZRFangL, et al. Investigation of surface damage and roughness for nickel-based superalloy GH4169 under hard turning processing. Proc Inst Mech Eng B J Eng Manuf2020; 234(4): 679–691.
36.
SonawaneGDSargadeVG. Machinability study of duplex stainless steel 2205 during dry turning. Int J Precis Eng Manuf2020; 21(5): 969–981.
37.
KumarCSPatelSK. Performance analysis and comparative assessment of nano-composite TiAlSiN/TiSiN/TiAlN coating in hard turning of AISI 52100 steel. Surf Coat Technol2018; 335: 265–279.
38.
ParsiPKKothaRSRouthuT, et al. Machinability evaluation of coated carbide inserts in turning of super-duplex stainless steel. SN Applied Sciences2020; 2(11): 1933.
39.
Bovas Herbert BejaxhinAPaulrajGJayaprakashG, et al. Measurement of roughness on hardened D-3 steel and wear of coated tool inserts. Trans Inst Meas Contr2021; 43(3): 528–536.
40.
DasAKumarAPadhanS, et al. Hard turning of AISI H10 steel using AlTiN and AlTiSiN coated carbide tools: comparative machining performance evaluation and economic assessment. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng2024; 46(5): 277.
41.
RoySPradhanAPadhanS, et al. Investigation on surface roughness and power consumption for sustainability assessment in hard turning of HSLA steel with SPPP-AlTiSiN–coated carbide tool under various cooling-lubrications. Lubrication Sci2024; 36(8): 571–594.
42.
IbrahimAMMOmerMAEDasSR, et al. Evaluating the effect of minimum quantity lubrication during hard turning of AISI D3 steel using vegetable oil enriched with nano-additives. Alex Eng J2022; 61(12): 10925–10938.
43.
JavidHJahanzaibMJawadM, et al. Parametric analysis of turning HSLA steel under minimum quantity lubrication (MQL) and nanofluids-based minimum quantity lubrication (NF-MQL): a concept of one-step sustainable machining. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2021; 117(5-6): 1915–1934.
44.
BagRPandaASahooAK, et al. Machinability characteristics analysis of hard turning operation on AISI 4340 steel using physical vapor deposition multilayer coated carbide cutting tool in the dry environment. Proc Inst Mech Eng E J Process Mech Eng2023; 237(6): 2222–2233.
45.
GemechuLDEfaDAAbebeR. Optimizing CNC turning of AISI D3 tool steel using Al2O3/graphene nanofluid and machine learning algorithms. Heliyon2024; 10(24): e40969.
46.
HamdiAYapanYFUysalA, et al. Machinability assessment and optimization of turning AISI H11 steel under various minimum quantity lubrication (MQL) conditions using nanofluids. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2025; 137: 4089–4107.
47.
Erdi KorkmazMKumar GuptaM. Nano lubricants in machining and tribology applications: a state of the art review on challenges and future trend. J Mol Liq2024; 407: 125261.
48.
Naim ShaikhMBRosenkranzAAliM, et al. Improving the performance of cutting fluids by using ZnO and ZrO2 nanoparticles. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1177/23977914241263453
49.
DennisonMSJebabalanSKBarikD. Applicability of nano-cutting fluids for enhanced cooling, low tool wear, and high tribological performance during machining—a review. Discov Appl Sci2024; 6(12): 663.
50.
Yu-HuaLWeiQJian-ChaoF. Temperature dependence of thermal conductivity of nanofluids. Chin Phys Lett2008; 25(9): 3319–3322.
51.
RoySPradhanAPadhanS, et al. Analysis on power consumption for life cycle sustainability assessment in hard turning of AISI 4140 steel using SPPP—AlTiSiN-coated carbide tool under various cutting environments. Surf Rev Lett2024; 31(06): 2450043.
52.
TaoZLovellMRYangJC. Evaluation of interfacial friction in material removal processes: the role of workpiece properties and contact geometry. Wear2004; 256(7-8): 664–670.
53.
DasADasSRPandaA, et al. Experimental investigation into machinability of hardened AISI D6 steel using newly developed AlTiSiN coated carbide tools under sustainable finish dry hard turning. Proc Inst Mech Eng E J Process Mech Eng2022; 236(5): 1889–1905.
54.
KishawyHAElbestawiMA. Effects of process parameters on material side flow during hard turning. Int J Mach Tools Manuf1999; 39(7): 1017–1030.
55.
Nurul FatinMRMohd HadzleyABRaja IzamshahRA, et al. An experimental study of wear mechanism on high speed machining of FC300 gray cast iron using TiAlN coated carbide cutting tool. Appl Mech Mater2015; 761: 257–261.
56.
MeloACADMilanJCGSilvaMBD, et al. Some observations on wear and damages in cemented carbide tools. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng2006; 28: 269–277.
57.
XiaoGRenMToS. A study of mechanics in brittle-ductile cutting mode transition. Micromachines2018; 9(2): 49.
58.
TangLGaoCHuangJ, et al. Experimental investigation of surface integrity in finish dry hard turning of hardened tool steel at different hardness levels. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2015; 77(9-12): 1655–1669.
59.
YousefiSZohoorM. Effect of cutting parameters on the dimensional accuracy and surface finish in the hard turning of MDN250 steel with cubic boron nitride tool, for developing a knowledged base expert system. Int J Mech Mater Eng2019; 14(1): 1.
60.
Abellán-NebotJVVila PastorCSillerHR. A review of the factors influencing surface roughness in machining and their impact on sustainability. Sustainability2024; 16(5): 1917.
61.
NiXLiWXuZ, et al. Impact of tool nose size on the performance and wear behavior of carbide tool when boring Cr17Ni2 martensitic stainless-steel parts. Ind Lubrication Tribol2024; 76(10): 1308–1318.
62.
PulM. The effect of carbon nanotube amount in machining of ZA-27 matrix carbon nanotube reinforced nano composite. Mater2022; 27: e13226.
63.
ZertiAYalleseMAMeddourI, et al. Modeling and multi-objective optimization for minimizing surface roughness, cutting force, and power, and maximizing productivity for tempered stainless steel AISI 420 in turning operations. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2019; 102(1-4): 135–157.
64.
ČepRJanásekAPetrůJ, et al. Surface roughness after machining and influence of feed rate on process. Key Eng Mater2013; 581: 341–347.
65.
KhataiSSahooAKKumarR, et al. Investigation on machinability and sustainability aspects during hard turning under GO nanofluid MQL environment for precision and cleaner manufacturing. Precis Eng2025; 95: 379–408.
66.
AouiciHKhellafASmaiahS, et al. Comparative assessment of coated and uncoated ceramic tools on cutting force components and tool wear in hard turning of AISI H11 steel using Taguchi plan and RMS. Sādhanā2017; 42(12): 2157–2170.
67.
KumarSSinghDKalsiNS. Surface quality evaluation of AISI 4340 steel having varying hardness during machining with tin-coated CBN inserts. Proc Inst Mech Eng J J Eng Tribol2017; 231(7): 925–933.
68.
AbdellaouiLKhlifiHBouzid SaiW, et al. Tool nose radius effects in turning process. Mach Sci Technol2021; 25(1): 1–30.
69.
MadariagaAEsnaolaJAFernandezE, et al. Analysis of residual stress and work-hardened profiles on Inconel 718 when face turning with large-nose radius tools. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2014; 71(9-12): 1587–1598.
70.
KrishnanGMKumarJP. Machinability and surface integrity characteristics in hard turning of high hardened steels using different types of inserts. In: Proceedings of international conference on materials, design and manufacturing for sustainable environment (ICMDMSE), 2022, pp. 257-270. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore.
71.
MallickRKumarRPandaA, et al. A novel application of MgO nano-cutting fluid in hardened AISI D2 steel machining using a chemical vapor deposition-coated carbide tool. J Mater Eng Perform2025; 34: 20262–20286.
72.
NeslušanMUríčekJMičietováA, et al. Decomposition of cutting forces with respect to chip segmentation and white layer thickness when hard turning 100Cr6. J Manuf Process2020; 50: 475–484.
73.
Fernández-AbiaAIBarreiroJLacalleLLD, et al. Effect of very high cutting speeds on shearing, cutting forces and roughness in dry turning of austenitic stainless steels. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2011; 57: 61–71.
74.
NeslušanMMrkvicaIČepR, et al. Influence of cutting speed on intensity of the plastic deformation during hard cutting. Mater Technol2013; 47(6): 745–755.
75.
BarryJByrneG. The mechanisms of chip formation in machining hardened steels. J Manuf Sci Eng2002; 124(3): 528–535.
76.
DavimJPFigueiraL. Machinability evaluation in hard turning of cold work tool steel (D2) with ceramic tools using statistical techniques. Mater Des2007; 28(4): 1186–1191.
77.
ÖzelTZerenE. Finite element modeling the influence of edge roundness on the stress and temperature fields induced by high-speed machining. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2007; 35: 255–267.
78.
YeGGXueSFMaW, et al. Cutting AISI 1045 steel at very high speeds. Int J Mach Tools Manuf2012; 56: 1–9.
79.
SutterGListG. Very high speed cutting of Ti–6Al–4V titanium alloy – change in morphology and mechanism of chip formation. Int J Mach Tools Manuf2013; 66: 37–43.
80.
TangLYinJSunY, et al. Chip formation mechanism in dry hard high-speed orthogonal turning of hardened AISI D2 tool steel with different hardness levels. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2017; 93: 2341–2356.
81.
MaWShuangF. The plastic flow stability of chip materials in metal cutting process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2019; 105: 1933–1948.
82.
YounasMJafferySHIKhanA, et al. Development and analysis of tool wear and energy consumption maps for turning of titanium alloy (Ti6Al4V). J Manuf Process2021; 62: 613–622.
83.
ZhangZWangHWangS, et al. Research on formation mechanism and behavior control of adiabatic shear of hard turning die steel. In: 2020 11th international conference on mechanical and aerospace engineering (ICMAE), Athens, July 2020, pp. 27–31. IEEE.
84.
DuanCZLiHHWangMJ, et al. Study on chip morphology and adiabatic shear in high speed cutting of alloy steels with different hardness. Appl Mech Mater2010; 26–28: 875–879.
85.
ÖzelTAltanT. Determination of workpiece flow stress and friction at the chip–tool contact for high-speed cutting. Int J Mach Tools Manuf2000; 40(1): 133–152.
86.
BäkerMRöslerJSiemersC. Finite element simulation of segmented chip formation of Ti6Al4V. J Manuf Sci Eng2002; 124(2): 485–488.
87.
CostaNRLourençoJPereiraZL. Desirability function approach: a review and performance evaluation in adverse conditions. Chemometr Intell Lab Syst2011; 107(2): 234–244.
