When a centrifugal pump is used to transport gas-liquid two-phase flow, the surge at high gas volume fraction leads to head and efficiency decrease, as well as cause strong vibrations in the pump system. To improve the transport performance of centrifugal pumps, the closed impeller is redesigned into a semi-open impeller. The effect of the blade tip clearance size on the head and efficiency is explored. The similarities and differences in the internal gas distribution patterns between closed and semi-open impellers are analyzed. The suppression mechanism of the tip leakage flow on surge is clarified. At 5% inlet gas volume fraction, the closed impeller exhibits significant gas accumulation characteristics on the pressure surface, forming gas pocket flow patterns and gas vortex. Additionally, some gas bypasses the blade leading edge, forming gas leading edge overflow, and re-accumulates at adjacent blades, further exacerbating the gas pocket flow patterns. This results in high gas phase distribution zones and low liquid phase velocity zones, inducing surge. There is a proper tip clearance, which provides an additional flow path for the gas in the flow passage. The liquid and gas mixed tip leakage flow impacts and suppresses the gas accumulation. The gas pocket flow pattern and gas vortex are disrupted. The liquid and gas mixed fluids can smoothly flow out of the impeller. The surge is suppressed and the performance of gas-liquid mixed transport is significantly improved. The optimal tip clearance size of 1 mm increased the head and efficiency by 16.2% and 13.1% respectively under surge condition.
Fernández OroJMBarrio PerottiRGaldo VegaM, et al. Effect of the radial gap size on the deterministic flow in a centrifugal pump due to impeller-tongue interactions. Energy2023; 278: 127820.
2.
HuZChengYLiuD, et al. Broadening the operating range of pump-turbine to deep-part load by runner optimization. Renew Energy2023; 207: 73–88.
3.
ZhaoJPeiJWangZ, et al. Energy efficiency optimization of multistage centrifugal pumps based on blade loading control: insights into flow instability suppression mechanism. Energy2025; 328: 136586.
4.
WangWWangHPeiJ, et al. Artificial intelligence approach for energy and entropy analyses of a double-suction centrifugal pump. Energy2025; 324: 136046.
5.
LiuMTanLCaoS. Theoretical model of energy performance prediction and BEP determination for centrifugal pump as turbine. Energy2019; 172: 712–732.
6.
CarneiroLEMMartinsGSORoseroCMP, et al. Large and small bubble breakup in gas–liquid centrifugal pumps. Int J Multiphase Flow2024; 176: 104830.
7.
ChangLYangCSuX, et al. Investigations on interstage boosting pressure and pressurization prediction of a multistage centrifugal pump under gas-liquid condition. Geoener Sci Eng2023; 226: 211765.
8.
ShaoCLiCZhouJ. Experimental investigation of flow patterns and external performance of a centrifugal pump that transports gas-liquid two-phase mixtures. Int Heat Fluid Flow2018; 71: 460–469.
9.
CarneiroLEMMartinsGSORoseroCMP, et al. Surging parametrization for gas-liquid centrifugal pumps. Prog Nucl Energy2024; 170: 105099.
10.
HengYChenZJiangQ, et al. Performance and internal flow pattern analyses of a specific centrifugal disc pump under air-water two-phase flow conditions. Energy2024; 309: 132981.
11.
SiQShenCAliA, et al. Experimental and numerical study on gas-liquid two-phase flow behavior and flow induced noise characteristics of radial blade pumps. Processes2019; 7(12): 920.
12.
ShaoCLiCZhouJ. Experimental investigation of flow patterns and external performance of a centrifugal pump that transports gas-liquid two-phase mixtures. Int J Heat Fluid Flow2018; 71: 460–469.
13.
MurakamiMMinemuraK. Effects of entrained air on the performance of a centrifugal pump : 1st report, performance and flow conditions. Bull JSME1974; 17(110): 1047–1055.
14.
MurakamiMMinemuraK. Effects of entrained air on the performance of centrifugal pumps : 2nd report, effects of number of blades. Bull JSME1974; 17(112): 1286–1295.
15.
Monte VerdeWBiazussiJLSassimNA, et al. Experimental study of gas-liquid two-phase flow patterns within centrifugal pumps impellers. Exp Therm Fluid Sci2017; 85: 37–51.
16.
ZhangJCaiSZhuH, et al. Experimental investigation of the flow at the entrance of a rotodynamic multiphase pump by visualization. J Pet Sci Eng2015; 126: 254–261.
17.
HeDZhaoLChangZ, et al. On the performance of a centrifugal pump under bubble inflow: effect of gas-liquid distribution in the impeller. J Pet Sci Eng2021; 203: 108587.
18.
YanSLuoXSunS, et al. Influence of inlet gas volume fraction on energy conversion characteristics of multistage electric submersible pump. J Pet Sci Eng2021; 207: 109164.
19.
ZhuGTangZFengJ, et al. Effect of inlet gas volume fraction on shafting vibration of multiphase pumps under low discharge conditions. Ocean Eng2024; 294: 116803.
20.
ChangLYangCSuX, et al. Investigations on affinity law under gas–liquid conditions in multistage radial and mixed-flow multiphase pumps. International Journal of Fluid Engineering2024; 1(1): 56–70.
21.
YuZZhuBCaoS. Interphase force analysis for air-water bubbly flow in a multiphase rotodynamic pump. Eng Comput2015; 32(7): 2166–2180.
22.
ShiGLiuZXiaoY, et al. Effect of the inlet gas void fraction on the tip leakage vortex in a multiphase pump. Renew Energy2020; 150: 46–57.
23.
ShiGLiuZXiaoY, et al. Velocity characteristics in a multiphase pump under different tip clearances. Proc Inst Mech Eng J Power Energy2021; 235(3): 454–475.
24.
ShiGLiuZXiaoY, et al. Tip leakage vortex trajectory and dynamics in a multiphase pump at off-design condition. Renew Energy2020; 150: 703–711.
25.
XiaoYGuiZLiX, et al. Numerical investigation of gas-liquid flow in a multiphase pump with special emphasis on the effect of tip leakage vortex on the gas flow pattern. J Mar Sci Eng2022; 10(11): 1665.
26.
GeZHeDHuangR, et al. Application of CFD-PBM coupling model for analysis of gas-liquid distribution characteristics in centrifugal pump. J Pet Sci Eng2020; 194: 107518.
27.
ZhangWHuLLiH, et al. Numerical analysis of bubble size effect in a gas-liquid two-phase rotodynamic pump by using a bubble coalescence and collapse model. Chem Eng Res Des2023; 191: 617–629.
28.
WuXLiCChenZ, et al. Transition from quasi-periodic to chaotic pressure pulsations in gas–liquid multiphase pumps: a nonlinear dynamics perspective. Energy2025; 324: 136122.
29.
ShiGWangSXiaoY, et al. Effect of cavitation on energy conversion characteristics of a multiphase pump. Renew Energy2021; 177: 1308–1320.
30.
ShiGLiuZXiaoY, et al. Energy conversion characteristics of multiphase pump impeller analyzed based on blade load spectra. Renew Energy2020; 157: 9–23.
31.
MansourMThéveninD. Optimized inducer design for transporting air–water two-phase flows in centrifugal pumps: outperforming traditional inducers. Chem Eng Res Des2025; 215: 342–360.
32.
MansourMKopparthySThéveninD. Investigations on the effect of rotational speed on the transport of air-water two-phase flows by centrifugal pumps. Int J Heat Fluid Flow2022; 94: 108939.
33.
XiaoWTanL. Design method of controllable velocity moment and optimization of pressure fluctuation suppression for a multiphase pump. Ocean Eng2021; 220: 108402.
34.
LiXDongDLinY, et al. The design and verification of the performance of the multiphase pump as a replacement for centrifugal pumps in high gas-content fluid transport. Energy Convers Manag2025; 339: 119936.
35.
XuYCaoSLReclariM, et al. Multiphase performance and internal flow pattern of helico-axial pumps. IOP Conf Ser Earth Sci2019; 240(3): 032029.
36.
ZhouLBaiLShiW, et al. Numerical analysis and performance experiment of electric submersible pump with different diffuser vanes number. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng2018; 40: 89.
37.
LuoXXieHFengJ, et al. Influence of the balance hole on the performance of a gas–liquid two–phase centrifugal pump. Ocean Eng2022; 244: 110316.
38.
SuryawijayaPKosynaG. Schaufeldruckmessungen im rotierenden System an einer Radialpumpe bei Gas/Flüssigkeitsgemischförderung. Chem Ing Tech2000; 72(11): 1366–1371.
