Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2026
Quantitative estimation of quadriceps and hamstring muscle forces from myoelectric signals during isometric knee flexion and extension: An empirical study
Accurate estimation of muscle forces is essential for understanding biomechanics, injury risk, and rehabilitation strategies. This study develops a correlation-based regression model in predicting muscle forces from surface electromyography (sEMG) data and compares it with estimations obtained from OpenSim. Data obtained from individuals clustered into seven weight categories were analyzed, with a key focus on lower-limb muscles: rectus femoris (RF), vastus lateralis (VL), vastus medialis (VM), biceps femoris (BF), and semitendinosus (ST). A total of 45 participants were recruited for this study. The participants performed maximal voluntary isometric contractions (MVIC) and submaximal voluntary isometric contractions (Sub-MVIC) from which, the sEMG data was obtained and the corresponding muscle force data was deduced. Regression equations were obtained linking the muscle forces to those of sEMG data, among various weight categories for all the five muscles. The results demonstrated a strong agreement between regression-based predictions and OpenSim simulations, reinforcing the validity of the present method. VL and VM exhibited the highest R2 values ranging from 0.80 to 0.97, with near-exact force trend replicating exponential curves. Whereas RF, BF, and ST, being bi-articular muscles, have significant linear fits with R2 ranging from 0.81 to 0.96. Interestingly, force slopes decreased progressively across higher weight categories, indicating lower muscle activations in individuals with higher body weight—a trend that may be linked to muscle fiber lengths. The present approach provides an efficient alternative to musculoskeletal modeling while maintaining good accuracy, making it suitable for performance analysis, rehabilitation, and clinical diagnostics. The strong correlation between regression-based and OpenSim-derived force predictions highlights the robustness of this method, making it a valuable tool in biomechanics research and clinical applications.
Hermosilla PeronaFMachadoLSousaF, et al. Differences in force production and EMG activity on underwater and dry land conditions in swimmers and non-swimmers. Sports Biomech2024; 23(1): 1–14.
2.
TaiWHZhangRZhaoL. Cutting-edge research in sports biomechanics: from basic science to applied technology. Bioengineering2023; 10(6): 668.
3.
WangTZhangBLiuC, et al. A review on the rehabilitation exoskeletons for the lower limbs of the elderly and the disabled. Electronics2022; 11(3): 388.
4.
GallagherSSchallMCJr. Musculoskeletal disorders as a fatigue failure process: evidence, implications and research needs. Ergonomics2017; 60(2): 255–269.
5.
Cruz-JentoftAJBahatGBauerJ, et al. Sarcopenia: revised European consensus on definition and diagnosis. Age Ageing2019; 48(4): 601.
6.
KimJSimDHJungHJ, et al. Human-robot interface to operate robotic systems via muscle synergy-based kinodynamic information transfer. arXiv preprint. arXiv:2205.05351. 2022.
7.
ZajacFEWintersJM. Modeling musculoskeletal movement: insights into coordination and control. J Biomech1990; 23(1): 1–17.
8.
ErdemirAMcLeanSHerzogW, et al. Model-based estimation of muscle forces exerted during movements. Clin Biomech2007; 22(2): 131–154.
9.
SartoriMFarinaDLloydDG. Hybrid neuromusculoskeletal modeling for the estimation of muscle forces and joint moments. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng2012; 59(9): 2528–2535.
10.
CollinsJJ. The redundant nature of locomotor optimization laws. J Biomech1995; 28(3): 251–267.
11.
TrinlerUSchwamederHBakerR, et al. Muscle force estimation in clinical gait analysis using AnyBody and OpenSim. J Biomech2019; 86: 55–63.
12.
MartinekRLadrovaMSidikovaM, et al. Advanced bioelectrical signal processing methods: past, present and future approach-part I: cardiac signals. Sensors2021; 21(15): 5186.
13.
AlexanderAMHammerSMDidierKD, et al. Neuromuscular recovery from severe-and extreme-intensity exercise in men and women. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab2022; 47(4): 458–468.
14.
ZajacFE. Muscle and tendon: properties, models, scaling, and application to biomechanics and motor control. Crit Rev Biomed Eng1989; 17(4): 359–411.
15.
De LucaCJ. The use of surface electromyography in biomechanics. J Appl Biomech1997; 13(2): 135–163.
16.
YooJIByunHKimHS, et al. Evaluating postoperative muscle strength using surface electromyography in hip fracture patient. J Bone Metab2020; 27(2): 125–132.
17.
JankaewAJanYKHwangIS, et al. Hamstring muscle stiffness affects lower extremity muscle recruitment and landing forces during double-legs vertical jump. Sports Biomech2025; 24: 1096–1114.
18.
HofALvan den BergJ. Linearity between the weighted sum of the EMGs of the human triceps surae and the total torque. J Biomech1977; 10(9): 529–539.
19.
LawrenceJHDe LucaCJ. Myoelectric signal versus force relationship in different human muscles. J Appl Physiol1983; 54(6): 1653–1659.
20.
AlknerBATeschPABergHE. Quadriceps EMG/force relationship in knee extension and leg press. Med Sci Sports Exerc2000; 32(2): 459.
21.
CampyRMCoelhoAJPinciveroDM. The EMG/Force relationship in the hamstring muscle group during isometric knee flexion. Med Sci Sports Exerc2003; 35(1): S388.
22.
AndersCBroseGHofmannGO, et al. Evaluation of the EMG–force relationship of trunk muscles during whole body tilt. J Biomech2008; 41(2): 333–339.
23.
KrishnanCWilliamsGN. Sex differences in quadriceps and hamstrings EMG-moment relationships. Med Sci Sports Exerc2009; 41(8): 1652–1660.
24.
FukudaTYEcheimbergJOPompeuJE, et al. Root mean square value of the electromyographic signal in the isometric torque of the quadriceps, hamstrings and brachial biceps muscles in female subjects. J Appl Res2010; 10(1): 32–39.
25.
RanaldiSCorviniGDe MarchisC, et al. The influence of the sEMG amplitude estimation technique on the EMG-force relationship. Sensors2022; 22(11): 3972.
26.
AbdelmoulaAMartinVBouchantA, et al. Knee extension strength in obese and nonobese male adolescents. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab2012; 37(2): 269–275.
27.
TomlinsonDJErskineRMMorseCI, et al. The impact of obesity on skeletal muscle strength and structure through adolescence to old age. Biogerontology2016; 17(3): 467–483.
28.
PowersCM. The influence of altered lower-extremity kinematics on patellofemoral joint dysfunction: a theoretical perspective. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther2003; 33(11): 639–646.
29.
WitvrouwELysensRBellemansJ, et al. Intrinsic risk factors for the development of anterior knee pain in an athletic population: a two-year prospective study. Am J Sports Med2000; 28(4): 480–489.
30.
DudaGNHellerMAlbingerJ, et al. Influence of muscle forces on femoral strain distribution. J Biomech1998; 31(9): 841–846.
31.
RudmanKEAspdenRMMeakinJR. Compression or tension? The stress distribution in the proximal femur. Biomed Eng Online2006; 5(1): 12.
32.
VicecontiMToniAZannoniC, et al. The relationship between loading conditions and fracture patterns of the proximal femur. J Biomech1996; 29(5): 575–582.
33.
MendiguchiaJAlentorn-GeliEIdoateF, et al. Rectus femoris muscle injuries in football: a clinically relevant review of mechanisms of injury, risk factors and preventive strategies. Br J Sports Med2013; 47(6): 359–366.
34.
SchmittBTimTMcHughM, et al. Hamstring injury rehabilitation and prevention of reinjury using lengthened state eccentric training: a new concept. Int J Sports Phys Ther2012; 7(3): 333–341.
35.
ZhangLQWangGNuberGW, et al. In vivo load sharing among the quadriceps components. J Orthop Res2003; 21(3): 565–571.
36.
KellisEBlazevichAJ. Hamstrings force-length relationships and their implications for angle-specific joint torques: a narrative review. BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil2022; 14(1): 166.
37.
Disselhorst-KlugCSchmitz-RodeTRauG. Surface electromyography and muscle force: limits in sEMG-force relationship and new approaches for applications. Clin Biomech2009; 24(3): 225–235.
38.
DrakeRVoglAWMitchellAW. Gray’s anatomy for students E-book. Elsevier Health Science, 2009.
39.
WinterDA. Biomechanics and motor control of human movement. 4th ed. John Wiley & Sons, 2009.
40.
SmidtGL. Biomechanical analysis of knee flexion and extension. J Biomech1973; 6(1): 79–92.
41.
ValderrabanoVNiggBMHintermannB, et al. Muscular lower leg asymmetry in middle-aged people. Foot Ankle Int2007; 28(2): 242–249.
42.
SernerAJakobsenMDAndersenLL, et al. EMG evaluation of hip adduction exercises for soccer players: implications for exercise selection in prevention and treatment of groin injuries. Br J Sports Med2014; 48(14): 1108–1114.
43.
RainoldiAMelchiorriGCarusoI. A method for positioning electrodes during surface EMG recordings in lower limb muscles. J Neurosci Methods2004; 134(1): 37–43.
44.
BarberoMMerlettiRRainoldiA. Atlas of muscle innervation zones: understanding surface electromyography and its applications. Springer Science+Business Media, 2012.
45.
SchwartzM (ed.) EMG methods for evaluating muscle and nerve function. BoD–Books on Demand, 2012.
46.
FarinaDMerlettiREnokaRM. The extraction of neural strategies from the surface EMG: an update. J Appl Physiol2014; 117(11): 1215–1230.
47.
MerlettiRFarinaD. Analysis of intramuscular electromyographic signals. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci2016; 371(1705): 20150335.
48.
DelpSLAndersonFCArnoldAS, et al. OpenSim: open-source software to create and analyze dynamic simulations of movement. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng2007; 54(11): 1940–1950.
49.
LloydDGBesierTF. An EMG-driven musculoskeletal model to estimate muscle forces and knee joint moments in vivo. J Biomech2003; 36(6): 765–776.
50.
TurnerJAChaabanCRPaduaDA. Validation of OpenCap: a low-cost markerless motion capture system for lower-extremity kinematics during return-to-sport tasks. J Biomech2024; 171: 112200.
51.
MeyerAJPattenCFreglyBJ. Lower extremity EMG-driven modeling of walking with automated adjustment of musculoskeletal geometry. PLoS One2017; 12(7): e0179698.
52.
FarinaDMerlettiREnokaRM. The extraction of neural strategies from the surface EMG: an update. J Appl Physiol. 2014; 117(11): 1215–1230.
53.
TürkerKS. Electromyography: some methodological problems and issues. Phys Ther1993; 73(10): 698–710.
54.
LanzaMBRyanASGrayV, et al. Intramuscular fat influences neuromuscular activation of the gluteus medius in older adults. Front Physiol2020; 11: 614415.
55.
Aguilera-CastellsJBuscàBArboix-AlióJ, et al. sEMG activity in superimposed vibration on suspended supine bridge and hamstring curl. Front Physiol2021; 12: 712471.
56.
LandinDThompsonMReidM. Actions of two bi-articular muscles of the lower extremity: a review. J Clin Med Res2016; 8(7): 489–494.
57.
PrilutskyBIZatsiorskyVM. Tendon action of two-joint muscles: transfer of mechanical energy between joints during jumping, landing, and running. J Biomech1994; 27(1): 25–34.
58.
WatanabeKVieiraTMGallinaA, et al. Novel insights into biarticular muscle actions gained from high-density electromyogram. Exerc Sport Sci Rev2021; 49(3): 179–187.
59.
Rodriguez-FalcesJNeyroudDPlaceN. Influence of inter-electrode distance, contraction type, and muscle on the relationship between the sEMG power spectrum and contraction force. Eur J Appl Physiol2015; 115: 627–638.
60.
HofAL. EMG and muscle force: an introduction. Hum Mov Sci1984; 3(1–2): 119–153.
61.
FuglevandAJWinterDAPatlaAE. Models of recruitment and rate coding organization in motor-unit pools. J Neurophysiol1993; 70(6): 2470–2488.
62.
EnokaRMDuchateauJ. Muscle fatigue: what, why and how it influences muscle function. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med2017; 7(10): a029702.
63.
WilsonCJNunesJPBlazevichAJ. The effect of muscle warm-up on voluntary and evoked force-time parameters: a systematic review and meta-analysis with meta-regression. J Sport Health Sci2025; 14: 101024.
64.
HerringtonLPearsonS. Does level of load affect relative activation levels of vastus medialis oblique and vastus laterialis?J Electromyogr Kinesiol2006; 16(4): 379–383.
65.
VisscherRMSRossiDFriesenbichlerB, et al. Vastus medialis and lateralis activity during voluntary and stimulated contractions. Muscle Nerve2017; 56(5): 968–974.
66.
de LevaP. Adjustments to Zatsiorsky-Seluyanov’s segment inertia parameters. J Biomech1996; 29(9): 1223–1230.
67.
HandsfieldGGMeyerCHHartJM, et al. Relationships of 35 lower limb muscles to height and body mass quantified using MRI. J Biomech2014; 47(3): 631–638.
68.
NariciM. Human skeletal muscle architecture studied in vivo by non-invasive imaging techniques: functional significance and applications. J Electromyogr Kinesiol1999; 9(2): 97–103.
RassierDEMacIntoshBRHerzogW. Length dependence of active force production in skeletal muscle. J Appl Physiol1999; 86(5): 1445–1457.
71.
NariciMVMaganarisCN. Plasticity of the muscle-tendon complex with disuse and aging. Exerc Sport Sci Rev2007; 35(3): 126–134.
72.
GastaldiLPaneroERossoV, et al. Upper limbs musculoskeletal OpenSim model: customization and assessment. In: The international conference of IFToMM ITALY, 2020, pp.162–170. Cham: Springer.
73.
EnokaRMDuchateauJ. Muscle fatigue: what, why and how it influences muscle function. J Physiol2008; 586(1): 11–23.
74.
BrodyLRPollockMTRoySH, et al. pH-induced effects on median frequency and conduction velocity of the myoelectric signal. J Appl Physiol1991; 71(5): 1878–1885.
75.
CifrekMMedvedVTonkovićS, et al. Surface EMG based muscle fatigue evaluation in biomechanics. Clin Biomech2009; 24(4): 327–340.
76.
SethAHicksJLUchidaTK, et al. OpenSim: simulating musculoskeletal dynamics and neuromuscular control to study human and animal movement. PLoS Comput Biol2018; 14(7): e1006223.
77.
AvrillonSHugFGuilhemG. Between-muscle differences in coactivation assessed using elastography. J Electromyogr Kinesiol2018; 43: 88–94.
78.
BobbertMFSchamhardtHCNiggBM. Calculation of vertical ground reaction force estimates during running from positional data. J Biomech1991; 24(12): 1095–1105.
79.
HigashiharaANaganoYOnoT, et al. Differences in activation properties of the hamstring muscles during overground sprinting. Gait Posture2015; 42(3): 360–364.
80.
HugFTuckerKGennissonJL, et al. Elastography for muscle biomechanics: toward the estimation of individual muscle force. Exerc Sport Sci Rev2015; 43(3): 125–133.
