Some studies have reported the effect of pre-processing temperatures (550°C and 800°C) on mixed fallow powders to assess printability with powder bed fusion (PBF). However, the underlying physics of optimal pre-processing temperature is not reported. This study examines primary (1°) and secondary (2°) recycled powder of 17-4 precipitate hardened (PH) stainless steel (SS) to understand the physics behind optimal pre-processing temperature for possible reuse in the PBF. The 1° and 2° recycled 17-4 PH SS powders were characterized post-heat treatment (at different temperatures (°C): 250, 350, 450, 550, 650 and 750) to compare their surface properties. A comprehensive microstructural analysis was performed based on scanning electron microscopy (SEM) of powders processed at various temperature ranges. Single equilibrium simulations were performed on recycled powders, with input from energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS). The outcomes identified three temperature ranges (350, 450and 550°C) with the maximum volume fraction of stable phases. Further, X-ray diffraction (XRD), differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) of fallow powder for selected temperature ranges were also performed. The results suggest that 450°C is the most suitable pre-processing temperature for 1° and 2° recycled 17-4 PH SS powder for successfully fabricating samples using PBF in the present case study.
BidulskýRBidulskáJGobberFS, et al. Case study of the tensile fracture investigation of additive manufactured austenitic stainless steels treated at cryogenic conditions. Materials2020; 13(15): 3328.
2.
LalehMSadeghiERevillaRI, et al. Heat treatment for metal additive manufacturing. Prog Mater Sci2023; 133: 101051.
3.
MondalPWazeerADasA, et al. Selective laser melted porous Ti-6Al-4 V scaffolds: modelling, manufacturing, and effect of microstructure on mechanical properties. Trans Indian Ins Metals2024; 77: 3957–3972.
4.
NgoTDKashaniAImbalzanoG, et al. Additive manufacturing (3D printing): a review of materials, methods, applications, and challenges. Compos B Eng2018; 143: 172–196.
5.
YadollahiAShamsaeiN.Additive manufacturing of fatigue resistant materials: challenges and opportunities. Int J Fatigue2017; 98: 14–31.
6.
JacobGJacobGBrownCU, et al. Effects of powder recycling on stainless steel powder and built material properties in metal powder bed fusion processes. Gaithersburg, MD: US Department of Commerce, National Institute of Standards and Technology, 2017.
7.
OliveiraJPLaLondeADMaJ.Processing parameters in laser powder bed fusion metal additive manufacturing. Mater Des2020; 193: 108762.
8.
FrazierWE.Metal additive manufacturing: a review. J Mater Eng Perform2014; 23: 1917–1928.
9.
AtzeniESalmiA.Economics of additive manufacturing for end-usable metal parts. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2012; 62: 1147–1155.
10.
BaumersMDickensPTuckC, et al. The cost of additive manufacturing: machine productivity, economies of scale and technology-push. Technol Forecast Soc Change2016; 102: 193–201.
11.
AhmedFAliUSarkerD, et al. Study of powder recycling and its effect on printed parts during laser powder-bed fusion of 17-4 PH stainless steel. J Mater Process Technol2020; 278: 116522.
12.
KaliaBHusainMSinghR, et al. On the use of 17-4 precipitate hardened stainless steel waste powder for 3D printing of implants with tuneable stress shielding capabilities. J Mater Eng Perform2025; 34: 13547–13561.
13.
SarilaVKMoinuddinSQCheepuM, et al. Characterization of microstructural anisotropy in 17–4 PH stainless steel fabricated by DMLS additive manufacturing and laser shot peening. Trans Indian Ins Metals2023; 76(2): 403–410.
14.
SimonelliMTseYYTuckC.Effect of the build orientation on the mechanical properties and fracture modes of SLM Ti–6Al–4V. Mater Sci Eng A2014; 616: 1–11.
15.
JamshidiniaMKovacevicR.The influence of heat accumulation on the surface roughness in powder-bed additive manufacturing. Surf Topogr Metrol Prop2015; 3(1): 014003.
16.
Lutter-GüntherMGebbeCKampsT, et al. Powder recycling in laser beam melting: strategies, consumption modeling and influence on resource efficiency. Prod Eng2018; 12(3–4): 377–389.
17.
SinghRKumarSBanwaitSS, et al. Effect of pre-processing temperature on the recycling of waste direct metal laser sintering powder. Trans Indian Ins Metals2024; 77: 3487–3497.
FotovvatiBNamdariNDehghanghadikolaeiA.Fatigue performance of selective laser melted Ti6Al4V components: state of the art. Mater Res Express2018; 6(1): 012002.
20.
AgiusDKourousisKIWallbrinkC.A review of the as-built SLM Ti-6Al-4V mechanical properties towards achieving fatigue resistant designs. Metals2018; 8(1): 75.
21.
FacchiniLMagaliniERobottiP, et al. Ductility of a Ti-6Al-4V alloy produced by selective laser melting of prealloyed powders. Rapid Prototyp J2010; 16(6): 450–459.
22.
QiuCAdkinsNJEAttallahMM.Microstructure and tensile properties of selectively laser-melted and of HIPed laser-melted Ti–6Al–4V. Mater Sci Eng A2013; 578: 230–239.
23.
VranckenBThijsLKruthJP, et al. Heat treatment of Ti6Al4V produced by selective laser melting: microstructure and mechanical properties. J Alloys Comp2012; 541: 177–185.
24.
TangHPQianMLiuN, et al. Effect of powder reuse times on additive manufacturing of Ti-6Al-4V by selective electron beam melting. JOM2015; 67(3): 555–563.
25.
ASTM WK19862, Standard Practices for Sampling Metal Powders, Revision of B215-04, Active Standard: B215-08.
26.
PowdersMFlowmeterHSpectrometryF.Standard guide for characterizing properties of metal powders used for additive manufacturing processes. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International, 2014.
ASTM, E112-96. Standard test methods for determining average grain size. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International, 2004.
29.
BidulskáJBidulskýRActis GrandeM, et al. Different formation routes of pore structure in aluminum powder metallurgy alloy. Materials2019; 12(22): 3724.
30.
BeissPDalgicM.Structure property relationships in porous sintered steels. Mater Chem Phys2001; 67(1-3): 37–42.
31.
WuQQiaoCWuY, et al. Numerical investigation on the reuse of recycled powders in powder bed fusion additive manufacturing. Addit Manuf2023; 77: 103821.
32.
BhambrooRRoychowdhurySKainV, et al. Effect of ageing treatment on the stress corrosion cracking susceptibility of precipitation hardenable 17–4 PH stainless steel. Trans Indian Ins Metals2023; 76(8): 2193–2200.
33.
NalçacıoğluEOzyurekDÇetinkayaK.Influence of Ta amount on wear performance of aged 17-4 PH stainless steel fabricated by powder metallurgy. Trans Indian Ins Metals2019; 72: 3081–3088.
34.
MurrLEMartinezEHernandezJ, et al. Microstructures and properties of 17-4 PH stainless steel fabricated by selective laser melting. J Mater Res Technol2012; 1(3): 167–177.
35.
RowoltCMilkereitBSpringerA, et al. Dissolution and precipitation of copper-rich phases during heating and cooling of precipitation-hardening steel X5CrNiCuNb16-4 (17-4 PH). J Mater Sci2020; 55: 13244–13257.
36.
ZapicoPGigantoSBarreiroJ, et al. Characterisation of 17-4PH metallic powder recycling to optimise the performance of the selective laser melting process. J Mater Res Technol2020; 9(2): 1273–1285.
37.
KochmanskiPNowackiJ.Influence of initial heat treatment of 17-4 PH stainless steel on gas nitriding kinetics. Surf Coat Technol2008; 202(19): 4834–4838.
38.
KascakLVargaJBidulskáJ, et al. Simulation tool for material behaviour prediction in additive manufacturing. Acta Metall Slovaca2023; 29: 113–118.
39.
GwalaniBGorsseSSoniV, et al. Role of copper on L12 precipitation strengthened fcc based high entropy alloy. Materials2019; 6: 100282.
40.
MahmoudiMElwanyAYadollahiA, et al. Mechanical properties and microstructural characterization of selective laser melted 17-4 PH stainless steel. Rapid Prototyp J2017; 23(2): 280–294.
41.
WuJHLinCK.Influence of high-temperature exposure on the mechanical behaviour and microstructure of 17-4 PH stainless steel. J Mater Sci2003; 38: 965–971.
42.
DallagoMFontanariVTorresaniE, et al. Fatigue and biological properties of Ti-6Al-4V ELI cellular structures with variously arranged cubic cells made by selective laser melting. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater2018; 78: 381–394.
43.
ZhaoXLiSZhangM, et al. Comparison of the microstructures and mechanical properties of Ti–6Al–4V fabricated by selective laser melting and electron beam melting. Mater Des2016; 95: 21–31.
