The present research aims at investigating the influence of the cutting conditions during hard turning of AISI 52100 bearing steel using two types of mixed ceramics with different geometries. The ceramic tools used were represented by the conventional mixed ceramics (Al2O3+TiC) of conventional shape (CC650) and Wiper (CC650WG). A Taguchi L16 experimental design was applied to explore the impacts of the conditions of cutting, specifically the speed of cutting (Vc), rate of feed (f), and depth of cut (ap) on the output parameters through a statistical approach based on (ANOVA). The analysis of the results obtained enabled the development of mathematical models that predict output parameters represented by the surface roughness (Ra) and the tangential cutting force (Fz) for the two ceramics tested. Three multi-objective optimization methods represented by the Desirability Function (DF), the Evaluation based on Distance from Average Solution (EDAS) along with the VlseKriterijumska Optimizacija I kompromisno Resenje (VIKOR) were used to determine the optimal combination that ensures the minimization of both (Ra) and (Fz) along with the maximization of (MRR) simultaneously for both ceramics. The obtained results show that the Wiper CC650WG insert provides significantly superior surface quality compared to the CC650 insert. For f = 0.2mm/rev, the maximum RaCC650WG does not exceed 0.37μm, whereas RaCC650 slightly exceeds 1μm, with a ratio (RaCC650/RaCC650WG) of 2.91. Additionally, the DF approach favored achieving a maximum (MRR of 14.40cm3/min) while obtaining the best roughness Ra = 0.24μm for CC650WG. The VIKOR method allowed for a minimum roughness of Ra = 0.32μm for CC650 while maintaining a low cutting force at Fz = 67.45N. Finally, the EDAS method achieved a minimal cutting force Fz = 30.70N for the CC650WG insert.
PoulachonG.Usinabilité des matériaux difficiles - Application aux aciers durcis. Travail des matériaux - Assemblage2004; (BM7048): BM7048—-1. DOI: 10.51257/a-v1-bm7048.
2.
KundrákJMamalisAGSzabóG, et al. Numerical examination of residual stresses developing during hard turning at different rake angles. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2017; 89(5–8): 1989–1999.
3.
KiyakMSahinICakirO. Application of wiper insert in cutting tool technology. In: Proceedings of ICAS2016 1st international conference on advances in sciences, August 2016, pp.60–65.
4.
KorkmazMEGuptaMKSarikayaM, et al. Analytical modeling methods in machining: a state of the art on application, recent challenges, and future trends. Arab J Sci Eng2024; 49(8): 10287–10326.
5.
CrescenzoADDMousseigneMRubioW.Influence of wiper edge on surface integrity for end-milling of Ti-6Al-4V. Int J Machining Machinability Mater2023; 25(1): 89–110.
6.
GarianiSDaoTJegandiK.Performance evaluation of conventional and wiper carbide tools when turning 6060 aluminium alloy: analysis of surface roughness. Int J Ind Manuf Eng2023; 17(2): 36–41.
7.
SubbaiahKVRajuCS.PawadeR, et al. Machinability investigation with wiper ceramic insert and optimization during the hard turning of AISI 4340 steel. Mater Today Proc2019; 18: 445–454.
8.
D’AddonaDMRaykarSJ.Analysis of surface roughness in hard turning using wiper insert geometry. Procedia CIRP2016; 41: 841–846.
9.
CamposPHSBelinatoGPaulaTI, et al. Multivariate mean square error for the multiobjective optimization of AISI 52100 hardened steel turning with wiper ceramic inserts tool: a comparative study. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng2017; 39(10): 4021–4036.
10.
KumarAPradhanSKJainV.Experimental investigation and optimization using regression genetic algorithm of hard turning operation with wiper geometry inserts. Mater Today Proc2019; 27: 2724–2730.
11.
ZhangPLiuZ.Modeling and prediction for 3D surface topography in finish turning with conventional and wiper inserts. Measurement2016; 94: 37–45.
12.
NadafMMSheteHV. Comparative assessment of standard insert vs wiper type insert on surface roughness, diametric deviations and machining time in turning operation of cast iron. Int Res J Mod Eng Technol Sci. 2023;5(9):1351–1359. doi:10.56726/irjmets44709.
13.
RochaLCSde PaivaAPRotela JuniorP, et al. Robust weighting applied to optimization of AISI H13 hardened-steel turning process with ceramic wiper tool: a diversity-based approach. Precis Eng2017; 50: 235–247.
14.
ÇetindağHAÇiçekAUçakN, et al. Performance of conventional and wiper CBN inserts under various cooling conditions in hard turning of AISI 52100 steel. Mater Test2024; 66(2): 288–298.
15.
AbbasATAnwarSHegabH, et al. Comparative evaluation of surface quality, tool wear, and specific cutting energy for wiper and conventional carbide inserts in hard turning of aisi 4340 alloy steel. Materials2020; 13(22): 1–16.
16.
NasEGökkayaH.Experimental and statistical study on machinability of the composite materials with metal matrix Al/B 4 C/graphite. Metallurgical Mater Trans A2017; 48(10): 5059–5067.
17.
MahmoudMZeroudiMN. Optimisation multi-objectif du processus d’usinage basée sur la méthode des plans d’éxperiences pour des couples outil-matiére. In: CFM 2017-23ème Congrès Français de Mécanique. AFM, Maison de la Mécanique, 39/41 rue Louis Blanc-92400 Courbevoie.
18.
MarakiniVPaiSPBhatUK, et al. Surface integrity investigation and VIKOR optimisation during the milling of aluminiumlithium alloy using uncoated and PVD-coated carbide tools. Can Metall Q2024; 63(3): 767–778.
19.
AbbasATSharmaNSolimanMS, et al. Effect of wiper edge geometry on machining performance while turning AISI 1045 steel in dry conditions using the VIKOR-ML approach. Machines2023; 11(7): 719.
20.
IngleSVRautDN.Performance evaluation of process parameters using MCDM methods for titanium alloy (Ti6al4v) in turning operation. Aust J Mech Eng2023; 22(5): 958–1015.
21.
van ThienNTienDHTrungDD, et al. Multi-objective optimization of turning process using a combination of Taguchi and VIKOR methods. J Appl Eng Sci2021; 19(4): 868–873.
22.
TiwariAKPandaSS.Application of multi-criteria decision model to develop an optimized geometric characteristic in electrochemical discharge machining. Arab J Sci Eng2024; 49(8): 11341–11365.
23.
DhilipJDJGanesanKPSivalingamV.Machinability studies and optimization of process parameters in wire electrical discharge machining of aluminum hybrid composites by the VIKOR method. J Mater Eng Perform2024; 33(11): 5547–5562.
24.
KurinjimalarRRamachandranMVidhyaP.Optimization of welding process parameters using the VIKOR MCDM method. REST J Adv Mech Eng2023; 2(1): 26–33.
25.
RathinasuriyanCBharani ChandarJSivaR, et al. An experimental study of abrasive waterjet deep hole drilling on Inconel 718. Mater Today Proc2023; 92: 92–97.
26.
KhelfaouiFYalleseMABoucheritS, et al. Assessment of performance parameters in intermittent turning and multi-response optimization of machining conditions using DF, MOORA, VIKOR, and coupled NSGAII-VIKOR methods. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2024; 130(11–12): 5665–5691.
27.
ZhouQSivalingamVPandiyanK, et al. Machinablity analysis and optimisation of process paramater in the turining of Inconel 718 alloy using multi criteria decision making method: A comparative study. 2022. DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-1542507/v1.
28.
ShivakotiIDasPPKibriaG, et al. Selection of optimal turning parameters using multi-criteria decision methods. J Mult-Valued Logic Soft Comput2021; 37(5–6): 601–618.
29.
TrungDD.MARCOS, TOPSIS, MOORA and PIV methods for multi-criteria decision making in milling process. Strojnicky Casopis - J Mech Eng2021; 71(2): 69–84.
30.
HuyTQLinhNHnHuu DanhT, et al. Application of EDAS method for best dressing mode for internal cylindrical grinding. In: Lecture notes in networks and systems. Vol. 602. Berlin: Springer, 2022, pp.227–233.
31.
NwankitiUSOkeS.Optimal cutting conditions of abrasive waterjet cutting for Ti-6Al-2Sn-2Mo alpha-beta alloy using EDAS and DFA methods. Gazi Univ J Sci Part A Eng Innov2022; 9(3): 233–250.
32.
MangarajSRBagalDKParhiN, et al. Experimental study of a portable plasma arc cutting system using hybrid RSM-nature inspired optimization technique. Mater Today Proc2021; 50: 867–878.
33.
LaghariRALiJMiaM.Effects of turning parameters and parametric optimization of the cutting forces in machining sicp/Al 45 wt% composite. Metals2020; 10(6): 1–22.
34.
SafiKYalleseMABelhadiS, et al. Parametric study and multi-criteria optimization during turning of X210Cr12 steel using the desirability function and hybrid Taguchi-waspas method. Proc IMechE, Part C: J Mechanical Engineering Science2022; 236(15): 8401–8420.
35.
ElbahMLaouiciHBenlahmidiS, et al. Comparative assessment of machining environments (dry, wet and MQL) in hard turning of AISI 4140 steel with CC6050 tools. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2019; 105(5–6): 2581–2597.
36.
SaidiRFathallahBBMabroukiT, et al. Modeling and optimization of the turning parameters of cobalt alloy (Stellite 6) based on RSM and desirability function. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2019; 100(9–12): 2945–2968.
37.
ChihaouiSMeddourIAthmaneYalleseM, et al. Comparative assessment between DFA, NSGA-II coupled with TOPSIS, GRA, and TOPSIS for multiobjective optimization of gray cast iron turning process using CBN insert. Proc IMechE, Part E: J Process Mechanical Engineering2024; 238(4): 1765–1778.
38.
ChihaouiSYalleseMABelhadiS, et al. Coated CBN cutting tool performance in green turning of gray cast iron EN-GJL-250: modeling and optimization. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2021; 113(11–12): 3643–3665.
39.
AzziABoulanouarLLaouisiA, et al. Modelingand optimization of machining parameters to minimize surface roughness andmaximize productivity when turning polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE). Int J Adv Manuf Technol2022; 123(1–2): 407–430.
40.
UğurLKazanHÖzlüB.Investigation of the impacts of cutting parameters on power usage in cryogenic-assisted turning of AISI 52100 bearing steel by FEM. İmalat Teknolojileri ve Uygulamaları2022; 3(3): 55–61.
41.
SingalRKSingalMSingalR. Fundamentals of machining and machine tools. New Delhi: IK International Publishing House Pvt. Limited, 2008.
42.
ShawMCCooksonJO.Metal cutting principles. Vol. 2. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2005.
43.
NasE.Experimental and statistical investigation of electro-erosion machining performance of cryogenic treated hardened AISI H13 hot work tool steel. Tribol Int2024; 193: 109453.
44.
UmerUKishawyHAbidiMH, et al. Evaluation of self-propelled rotary tool in the machining of hardened steel using finite element models. Materials2020; 13(22): 1–16.
45.
MachadoÁRDinizAE. Tool wear analysis in the machining of hardened steels. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2017; 92(9–12): 4095–4109.
46.
ChuangwenXJianmingDYuzhenC, et al. The relationships between cutting parameters, tool wear, cutting force and vibration. Adv Mech Eng2018; 10(1): 1687814017750434.
47.
BembenekMDzienniakDDzindzioraA, et al. Investigation of the impact of selected face milling parameters on the roughness of the machined surface for 1.4301 steel. Adv Sci Technol Res J2023; 17(4): 299–312.
48.
KhellafAAouiciHSmaiahS, et al. Comparative assessment of two ceramic cutting tools on surface roughness in hard turning of AISI H11 steel: including 2D and 3D surface topography. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2017; 89(1-4): 333–354.
49.
SelaimiaAAYalleseMABensouilahH, et al. Modeling and optimization in dry face milling of X2CrNi18-9 austenitic stainless steel using RMS and desirability approach. Measurement2017; 107: 53–67.
50.
FnidesBYalleseMAMabroukiT, et al. Application of response surface methodology for determining cutting force model in turning hardened AISI H11 hot work tool steel. Sadhana2011; 36(1): 109–123.
51.
KhanSAUmarMSaleemMQ, et al. Experimental investigations on wiper inserts’ edge preparation, workpiece hardness and operating parameters in hard turning of AISI D2 steel. J Manuf Process2018; 34: 187–196.
52.
AbbasATEl RayesMMLuqmanM, et al. On the assessment of surface quality and productivity aspects in precision hard turning of AISI 4340 steel alloy: relative performance of wiper vs. Conventional inserts. Materials2020; 13(9): 2036.
53.
YalleseMAChaouiKZeghibN, et al. Hard machining of hardened bearing steel using cubic boron nitride tool. J Mater Process Technol2009; 209(2): 1092–1104.
54.
SafiKYalleseMABelhadiS, et al. Tool wear, 3D surface topography, and comparative analysis of GRA, MOORA, DEAR, and WASPAS optimization techniques in turning of cold work tool steel. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2022; 121(1–2): 701–721.
55.
UpadhyayCRajputSSKumarCS, et al. Performance evaluation of WC, SiAlON and sicw + Al2O3 tools in dry machining of Inconel 617. J Manuf Process2024; 109: 235–249.
56.
MuthuswamyP.An environment-friendly sustainable machining solution to reduce tool consumption and machining time in face milling using a novel wiper insert. Mater Today Sustain2023; 22: 100400.
57.
ArumugamSSriramGRajmohanT.Multi-response optimization of epoxidation process parameters of rapeseed oil using response surface methodology (RSM)-based desirability analysis. Arab J Sci Eng2012; 39(3): 2277–2287.
58.
BelbellaaYKribesNYalleseMA, et al. Comparative study to optimize surface roughness of the titanium alloy Ti-6Al-4V by applying Taguchi, RSM and TLBO methods. Period Polytechnica Mech Eng2023; 67(1): 1–11.
59.
KribesNHessainiaZYalleseMA. Optimisation of machining parameters in hard turning by desirability function analysis using response surface methodology. In: Design and Modeling of Mechanical Systems-II. Vol. 789. Cham: Springer, 2015, pp.73–81.
60.
NasEKaraF.Optimization of EDM machinability of hastelloy C22 super alloys. Machines2022; 10(12): 1131.
