The surface morphological features of a mechanical component play an essential role on its functionality while it is in usage. Further, the occurrence of poor surface morphological features on the Additively Manufactured (AM) alloys leads to invoking an adverse impact on the functional behavior of manufactured components. In this study, the impact of machining circumstances and tool terminology during slot milling operation on the surface morphological features of additively manufactured Inconel 718 alloy have been examined under dry-cutting circumstances, and found that the cutter terminology has invoked a bigger influence on the surface morphological features such as Sa, Ssk, etc. of additively manufactured Inconel 718 alloy trailed by the machining circumstances, owing to its bigger impression on the machining behavior. Moreover, the statistical tool such as ANOVA, the ratio of signal-to-noise study and regression methods are employed to determine the dominant machining factor and tool terminology which helps to achieve better machining behavior which leads to invoke greater surface features.
NieslonyPGrzesikWChudyR, et al. Meshing strategies in FEM simulation of the machining process. Arch Civil Mech Eng2015; 15(1): 62–70.
2.
HrehaPRadvanskaAKnapcikovaL, et al. Roughness parameters calculation by means of online vibration monitoring emerging from AWJ interaction with material. Metrol Meas Syst2015; 22(2): 315–326.
3.
RuggieroAMerolaMCarloneP, et al. Tribomechanical characterization of reinforced epoxy resin under dry and lubricated contact conditions. Composites Part B2015; 79: 595–603.
4.
KoyeeRDEisselerRSchmauderS. Application of Taguchi coupled Fuzzy multi attribute decision making (FMADM) for optimizing surface quality in turning austenitic and duplex stainless steels. Measurement2014; 58: 375–386.
5.
VelchevSKolevIIvanovK, et al. Empirical models for specific energy consumption and optimization of cutting parameters for minimizing energy consumption during turning. J Clean Product2014; 80: 139–149.
6.
LimaJDAvilaRFAbraoAM. Turning of hardened AISI 4340 steel using coated carbide inserts. Proc IMechE, Part B: J Engineering Manufacture2017; 221: 1359–1366.
7.
JindalPCSanthanamATSchleinkoferU, et al. Performance of PVD TiN, TiCN, and TiAlN coated cemented carbide tools in turning. Int J Refract Metals Hard Mater1999; 17: 163–170.
8.
GowthamanSJagadeeshaT. Experimental investigation of surface morphological changes during end milling of nimonic 263. Surf Topogr Metrol Proper2019; 7: 045018.
9.
GowthamanSJagadeeshaT. Effect of severe plastic deformation through machining on the microstructure and corrosion behavior of end milled nimonic 263 alloy. Mater Lett2020; 275: 128102.
10.
GowthamanSJagadeeshaT. Experimental study on the surface and interface phenomenon changes by means of contact angle measurement on slot milled nimonic 263 alloy. Mater Lett2021; 285: 129122.
11.
GowthamanSJagadeeshaT. Experimental investigations on the effect of severe plastic deformation through end milling on X-ray peak broadening and microcrystalline characteristics of nimonic 263. Trans Indian Inst Metals2020; 73: 1215–1226.
12.
GowthamanSJagadeeshaT. Effect of variation in behavioural changes during end milling on nimonic 263 elastic constants. Mater Res Express2019; 6(12): 126504.
13.
GowthamanSJagadeeshaT. An experimental investigation on the effect of radial rake angle and machining conditions during end milling on wear resistance and residual stress of nimonic 263 alloy. Mater Res Express2019; 6(12): 126568.
14.
RashidWBGoelSDavimJP, et al. Parametric design optimization of hard turning of AISI 4340 steel (69 HRC). Int J Adv Manufac Technol2016; 82(1–4): 451–462.
15.
GunnbergFEscursellMJacobsonM. The influence of cutting parameters on residual stresses and surface topography during hard turning of 18MnCr5 case carburised steel. J Mater Proc Technol2006; 82–90: 2006174.
16.
AghaSLiuCR. Optimal pre-stressing the surface of a component by superfinish hard turning for maximum fatigue life in rolling contact. Wear1998; 244: 52–59.
17.
BigerelleMNajjarDMathiaT, et al. An expert system to characterize the surfaces morphological properties according to their tribological functionalities: the relevance of a pair of roughness parameters. Tribol Int2013; 59: 190–202.
18.
NieslonyPKrolczykGMWojciechowskiS, et al. Surface quality and topographic inspection of variable compliance part after precise turning. Appl Surf Sci2018; 434: 91–101.
19.
ShiaJGuobPQiaocY, et al. The relationship between morphology of milling surface and its corrosion resistance for nickel base superalloy FGH97. IOP Conf Series Mater Sci Eng2019; 484: 012028.
20.
Arun RamnathRThylaPRHarishsharranAKR. Machining parameter selection in milling epoxy granite composites based on AHP. Mater Today Proc2020; 2(7): 319–324.
21.
MuthukrishnanNDavimJP. Optimization of machining parameters of Al/SiC-MMC with ANOVA and ANN analysis. J Mater Process Technol2009; 209: 225–232.
22.
BalamuruganKUthayakumarNGowthamanS, et al. A study on the compressive residual stress due to waterjet cavitation peening. Eng Fail Anal2018; 92: 268–277.
23.
BartaryaGChoudhurySK. Influence of machining parameters on forces and surface roughness during finish hard turning of EN 31 steel. Proc IMechE Part B2014; 228(9): 1068–1080.
24.
ZhouLLiFZhaoF, et al. Characterizing the effect of process variables on energy consumption in end milling. Int J Adv Manufac Technol2018; 101: 2837–2848.
25.
Arun RamnathRThylaPRMahendra KumarN, et al. Optimization of machining parameters of composites using multi-attribute decision-making techniques: a review. J Reinf Plast Compos2018; 37(2): 77–89.
26.
GokulkumarSThylaPRArunRamnathR, et al. Acoustical analysis and drilling process optimization of Camellia Sinensis Ananas Comosus/GFRP/epoxy composites by TOPSIS for indoor applications. J Nat Fibers2020; 18(12): 2284–2301.
27.
EzugwuEO. High speed machining of aero-engine alloys. J Brazil Soc Mech Sci Eng2004; 26: 1.
28.
GuzzoPLShinoharaAHRaslanAA. A comparative study on ultrasonic machining of hard and brittle materials. J Brazil Soc Mech Sci Eng2004; 26: 56–61.
29.
TanikićDMarinkovićV. Modelling and optimization of the surface roughness in the dry turning of the cold rolled alloyed steel using regression analysis. J Brazil Soc Mech Sci Eng2012; 34: 41–48.
30.
WangJChenYFuA, et al. Weakening the mechanical property anisotropy of additively manufactured high entropy alloy by controlling the cellular structure. Addit Manufac2024; 89: 104303.
31.
LiRJuGZhaoX, et al. Simulation of residual stress and distortion evolution in dual-robot collaborative wire-arc additive manufactured Al-Cu alloys. Virtual Phys Prototyp2024; 19(1): e2409390.
32.
GopalsamyBMMondalBGhoshS. Taguchi method and ANOVA: an approach for process optimization of hard machining while machining hardened steel. J Sci Ind Res2009; 68: 685–695.
33.
ShahSCGerogePM. Surface roughness modeling in precision turning of aluminium by polycrystalline diamond tool using response surface methodology. Int J Emerge Technol Adv Eng2012; 2: 41–45.
34.
AbhangLBHameedullahM. Optimal machining parameters for achieving the desired surface roughness in turning of steel. J Eng Res2012; 9: 37–45.
35.
DoniaviAEskandarzadeMTahmasebianM. Empirical modeling of surface roughness in turning of 1060 steel using factorial design methodology. J Appl Sci2007; 7: 2509–2513.
36.
YasirMDanishMMiaM, et al. Investigation into the surface quality and stress corrosion cracking resistance of AISI 316L stainless steel via precision end-milling operation. Int J Adv Manufac Technol2021; 112: 1065.
