The paper focuses on incorporating the surgeon’s motion intention into impedance control, which is one of the most commonly used control schemes in master manipulation, to reduce the user’s motion efforts. To achieve this, the non-autoregressive spatio-temporal transformer network is applied to predict the surgeon’s motion trajectory, which is described by the control points of B-spline. The study investigates the effects of input data length, data feature, and feedforward data on trajectory prediction. Furthermore, a Cartesian variable impedance control strategy without force sensor is implemented by adjusting the damping parameters according to the future external force. The experiment shows a promising result, where the interactive force under this control strategy is lower than the one with the current external force, and the precise operation still performs well.
AbbottJMarayongPOkamuraA. Haptic virtual fixtures for robot-assisted manipulation. In: Robotics Research: Results of the 12th International Symposium ISRR, Berlin, Germany, 2007, pp.49–64. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer.
4.
IkeuraRInookaH. Variable impedance control of a robot for cooperation with a human. In: Proceedings of 1995 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation, Nagoya, Japan, 1995, pp.3097–3102. New York, NY: IEEE.
IkeuraRMoriguchiTMizutaniK. Optimal variable impedance control for a robot and its application to lifting an object with a human. In: Proceedings. 11th IEEE international workshop on robot and human interactive communication, Berlin, Germany, 2002, pp.500–505. New York, NY: IEEE.
7.
LecoursAMayer-St-OngeBGosselinC. Variable admittance control of a four-degree-of-freedom intelligent assist device. In: 2012 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation, St Paul, MN, 2012, pp.3903–3908. New York, NY: IEEE.
8.
ZahediFArnoldJPhillipsC, et al. Variable damping control for pHRI: considering stability, agility, and human effort in controlling human interactive robots. IEEE Trans Hum Mach Syst2021; 51(5): 504–513.
9.
ZahediFChangDLeeH.User-adaptive variable damping control using Bayesian optimization to enhance physical human-robot interaction. IEEE Robot Autom Lett2022; 7(2): 2724–2731.
10.
MullerFJanetzkyJBehrndU, et al. User force-dependent variable impedance control in human robot interaction. In: 2018 IEEE 14th international conference on automation science and engineering (CASE), Munich, Germany, 2018, pp.1328–1335. New York, NY: IEEE.
11.
TaherifarAVossoughiGSelk GhafariA.Optimal target impedance selection of the robot interacting with human. Adv Robot2017; 31(8): 428–440.
12.
TsumugiwaTYokogawaRHaraK. Variable impedance control with regard to working process for man-machine cooperation-work system. In: Proceedings 2001 IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems, Maui, HI, 2001, pp.1564–1569. New York, NY: IEEE.
13.
DuchaineVGosselinC. Safe, stable and intuitive control for physical human-robot interaction. In: 2009 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation, Kobe, 2009, pp.3383–3388. New York, NY: IEEE.
14.
LiYGeSS.Force tracking control for motion synchronization in human-robot collaboration. Robotica2016; 34(6): 1260–1281.
15.
LiYGeSS.Human–robot collaboration based on motion intention estimation. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron2014; 19(3): 1007–1014.
16.
LiuZHaoJ.Intention recognition in physical human-robot interaction based on radial basis function neural network. J Robot2019; 2019: 1–8.
17.
KhanAKhanFHanC. Estimation of desired motion intention using extreme learning machine for upper limb assist exoskeleton. In: 2016 IEEE international conference on advanced intelligent mechatronics (AIM), Banff, AB, Canada, 2016, pp.919–923. New York, NY: IEEE.
18.
LongYDuZJWangWD, et al. Human motion intent learning based motion assistance control for a wearable exoskeleton. Robot Comput Integr Manuf2018; 49: 317–327.
19.
QinYFeyzabadiSAllanM, et al. daVinciNet: joint prediction of motion and surgical state in robot-assisted surgery. In: 2020 IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems (IROS), Las Vegas, NV, 2020, pp.2921–2928. New York, NY: IEEE.
20.
LuoJHuangDLiY, et al. Trajectory online adaption based on human motion prediction for Teleoperation. IEEE Trans Autom Sci Eng2022; 19(4): 3184–3191.
21.
TatinatiSVeluvoluKCAngWT.Multistep prediction of physiological tremor based on machine learning for robotics assisted microsurgery. IEEE Trans Cybern2015; 45(2): 328–339.
22.
YuCMaXRenJ, et al. Spatio-temporal graph transformer networks for pedestrian trajectory prediction. In: Computer vision–ECCV 2020: 16th European conference, Glasgow, UK, 2020, pp.507–523. Berlin, Springer.
23.
ShengZXuYXueS, et al. Graph-based spatial-temporal convolutional network for vehicle trajectory prediction in autonomous driving. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst2022; 23(10): 17654–17665.
24.
BiagiottiLMelchiorriC. B-spline based filters for multi-point trajectories planning. In: IEEE international conference on robotics and automation, 2010, pp.3065–3070. IEEE.
25.
VakanskiAManteghIIrishA, et al. Trajectory learning for robot programming by demonstration using hidden Markov model and dynamic time warping. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern B2012; 42(4): 1039–1052.
26.
IjspeertAJNakanishiJHoffmannH, et al. Dynamical movement primitives: learning attractor models for motor behaviors. Neural Comput2013; 25(2): 328–373.
27.
WangJGaoYWuD, et al. Probabilistic movement primitive based motion learning for a lower limb exoskeleton with black-box optimization. Front Inf Technol Electron Eng2023; 24(1): 104–116.
28.
HuangYRozoLSilvérioJ, et al. Kernelized movement primitives. Int J Rob Res2019; 38(7): 833–852.
29.
AksanEKaufmannMCaoP, et al. A spatio-temporal transformer for 3d human motion prediction. In: 2021 international conference on 3D vision (3DV), 2021, pp. 565–574. New York, NY: IEEE.
30.
VaswaniAShazeerNParmarN, et al. Attention is all you need. In: Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS’17), California, USA, 2017, pp.6000–6010. New York, NY: Curran Associates Inc.
31.
Van DammeMBeylPVanderborghtB, et al. Estimating robot end-effector force from noisy actuator torque measurements. In: 2011 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation, Shanghai, China, 2011, pp.1108–1113. New York, NY: IEEE.
32.
FicucielloFVillaniLSicilianoB.Variable impedance control of redundant manipulators for intuitive human–robot physical interaction. IEEE Trans Robot2015; 31(4): 850–863.
