This study deals with the construction of an enhanced dynamic model for a lever-arm with flexible-joint to design a feedback linearization controller. The uncertainties of reduced-order model with nominal parameters are compensated via a complementary term to upgrade it to the actual system. The proposed method uses data fusion of encoder/gyroscope to remove the measurement errors. Mathematical analyses are provided to show the stochastic stability of the proposed scheme. Accordingly, a fuzzy adaptive solution is presented to effectively schedule the free parameters of the algorithm. The enhanced reduced-order model is used to design a feedback linearization law for control of lever-arm position. The controller adapts itself to the actual system, and is reliable and cost-effective because of using less sensors. The simulation studies indicate a higher accuracy of the proposed system compared with the controller designed by the full-order model in the presence of parametric uncertainties and disturbances. Also, experimental results conducted on a fabricated platform demonstrate the effectiveness of the suggested system to control the arm position in different scenarios. The comparative results with prevalent controllers indicate higher accuracy with smaller control input for the proposed controller to reject the disturbances and other uncertainties.
YangGLiuYJiJ, et al. A model-based PID-like motion control method for flexible-joint manipulator with harmonic drives. Proc IMechE, Part C: J Mechanical Engineering Science2021; 235(24): 7880–7893.
2.
CamberaJCFeliu-BatlleV.Input-state feedback linearization control of a single-link flexible robot arm moving under gravity and joint friction. Robot Auton Syst2017; 88: 24–36.
3.
YangGLiuYJinM.A new control method of flexible-joint manipulator with harmonic drive. Proc IMechE, Part C: J Mechanical Engineering Science2020; 234(9): 1868–1883.
4.
YangTYanSHanZ.Nonlinear model of space manipulator joint considering time-variant stiffness and backlash. J Sound Vib2015; 341: 246–259.
5.
AbdollahiFTalebiHAPatelRV.A stable neural network-based observer with application to flexible-joint manipulators. IEEE Trans Neural Netw2006; 17(1): 118–129.
6.
ChaouiHSicardPGueaiebW.ANN-based adaptive control of robotic manipulators with friction and joint elasticity. IEEE Trans Ind Electron2009; 56(8): 3174–3187.
7.
ElMaraghyHALahdhiriTCiucaF.Robust linear control of flexible joint robot systems. J Intell Robot Syst2002; 34(4): 335–356.
8.
ParkCW.Robust stable fuzzy control via fuzzy modeling and feedback linearization with its applications to controlling uncertain single-link flexible joint manipulators. J Intell Robot Syst2004; 39(2): 131–147.
9.
Albu-SchafferAHirzingerG. State feedback controller for flexible joint robots: A globally stable approach implemented on DLR's light-weight robots. In: Proceedings. 2000 IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems (IROS 2000), 2000, vol. 2, pp.1087–1093. New York, NY: IEEE.
10.
SpongMW.Modeling and control of elastic joint robots. J Dyn Syst Meas1987; 109(4): 310–319.
11.
SpongMKhorasaniKKokotovicP.An integral manifold approach to the feedback control of flexible joint robots. IEEE Trans Robot Autom1987; 3(4): 291–300.
12.
WangLShiQLiuJ, et al. Backstepping control of flexible joint manipulator based on hyperbolic tangent function with control input and rate constraints. Asian J Control2020; 22(3): 1268–1279.
13.
ChenYGuoB.Sliding mode fault tolerant tracking control for a single-link flexible joint manipulator system. IEEE Access2019; 7: 83046–83057.
14.
HongMGuXLiuL, et al. Finite time extended state observer based nonsingular fast terminal sliding mode control of flexible-joint manipulators with unknown disturbance. J Franklin Inst2023; 360(1): 18–37.
15.
ChengXLiuHLuW.Chattering-suppressed sliding mode control for flexible-joint robot manipulators. Actuators2021; 10(11): 288–312.
16.
Montoya-CháirezJMoreno-ValenzuelaJSantibáñezV, et al. Combined adaptive neural network and regressor-based trajectory tracking control of flexible joint robots. IET Control Theory Appl2022; 16(1): 31–50.
17.
KelekciEKizirS.Trajectory and vibration control of a flexible joint manipulator using interval type-2 fuzzy logic. ISA Trans2019; 94: 218–233.
18.
Feliu-TalegonDFeliu-BatlleVTejadoI, et al. Stable force control and contact transition of a single link flexible robot using a fractional-order controller. ISA Trans2019; 89: 139–157.
19.
SunWDiaoSSuSF, et al. Adaptive fuzzy tracking for flexible-joint robots with random noises via command filter control. Inf Sci2021; 575: 116–132.
20.
AhmedSAzarAT.Adaptive fractional tracking control of robotic manipulator using fixed-time method. Complex Intell Syst2024; 10(1): 369–382.
21.
AhmedSAzarATTounsiM, et al. Adaptive control design for Euler–Lagrange systems using fixed-time fractional integral sliding mode scheme. Fractal Fract2023; 7(10): 712.
22.
IskandarMvan OmmerenCWuX, et al. Model predictive control applied to different time-scale dynamics of Flexible Joint Robots. IEEE Robot Autom Lett2023; 8(2): 672–679.
23.
GhiasiARAlizadehGMirzaeiM.Simultaneous design of optimal gait pattern and controller for a bipedal robot. Multibody Syst Dyn2010; 23(4): 401–429.
24.
AghasizadeSMirzaeiMRafatniaS.Novel constrained control of active suspension system integrated with anti-lock braking system based on 14-degree of freedom vehicle model. Proc IMechE, Part K: J Multi-body Dynamics2018; 232(4): 501–520.
25.
GharamalekiRMMirzaeiMRafatniaS, et al. An analytical approach to optimal control of nonlinear systems with input constraints. Int J Autom Control2020; 14(2): 213–238.
26.
TahouniAMirzaeiMNajjariB.Applied nonlinear control of vehicle stability with control and state constraints. Proc IMechE, Part D: J Automobile Engineering2020; 234(1): 191–211.
27.
MobergSHanssenS.On feedback linearization for robust tracking control of flexible joint robots. IFAC Proc Volumes2008; 41(2): 12218–12223.
28.
RafatniaSMirzaeiM.Adaptive estimation of vehicle velocity from updated dynamic model for control of anti-lock braking system. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst2022; 23(6): 5871–5880.
29.
SisiZAMirzaeiMRafatniaS.Estimation of vehicle suspension dynamics with data fusion for correcting measurement errors. Measurement2024; 231: 114438.
30.
RafatniaSMirzaeiM.Estimation of reliable vehicle dynamic model using IMU/GNSS data fusion for stability controller design. Mech Syst Signal Process2022; 168: 108593.
31.
KhasminskiiR. Stochastic stability of differential equations. Springer Science & Business Media, 2011.
32.
HanXKloedenPE.Random ordinary differential equations and their numerical solution. Singapore: Springer, 2017.
NajjariBMirzaeiMTahouniA.Decentralized integration of constrained active steering and torque vectoring systems to energy-efficient stability control of electric vehicles. J Franklin Inst2022; 359(16): 8713–8741.
35.
PakFMirzaeiMRafatniaS, et al. Novel observer-based input-constrained control of nonlinear second-order systems with stability analysis: experiment on lever arm. Iran J Sci Technol Trans Electr Eng2024; 48(3): 1111–1128.
