Utilizing multiple seals in tandem is a prevalent technique employed to enhance the reliability of hydraulic sealing systems. In this paper, based on the elastohydrodynamic lubrication simulation of a single seal interface, a methodology for evaluating the performance of tandem reciprocating rod seal systems is established by manipulating the boundary conditions of the seals based on the principle of flow conservation. Through the simulation of two sealing systems, it is observed that inadequate lubricating oil occurs in the second sealing ring when the first sealing ring surpasses its sealing performance. Conversely, if the second sealing ring outperforms the first one, pressure will be generated between them. Additionally, a self-constructed experimental platform is utilized, and the results demonstrate simulation accuracy within an error margin of less than 15% when compared to the corresponding experimental measurements.
NikasGK. Eighty years of research on hydraulic reciprocating seals: review of tribological studies and related topics since the 1930s. Proc IMechE, Part J: J Engineering Tribology2010; 224(1): 1–23.
2.
NikasGKSaylesRS. Study of leakage and friction of flexible seals for steady motion via a numerical approximation method. Tribol Int2006; 39: 921–936.
3.
ZhangMFengY. Numerical model of mixed lubrication and experimental study of reciprocating seal based on inverse lubrication theory. Lubricants2022; 10(7): 153.
4.
YangBSalantRF. Elastohydrodynamic lubrication simulation of O-ring and U-cup hydraulic seals. Proc IMechE, Part J: J Engineering Tribology2011; 225(7): 603–610.
5.
SuJKeLLWangYS. Elastohydrodynamic lubrication line contact of piezoelectric materials. Int J Mech Sci2019; 163: 105145.
6.
XiangCGuoFJiaX, et al. Thermo-elastohydrodynamic mixed-lubrication model for reciprocating rod seals. Tribol Int2019; 140: 105894.
7.
YangB. Elastohydrodynamic model of reciprocating hydraulic rod seals. Atlanta, GA: Georgia Institute of Technology, 2010.
8.
DingHLiHChenS, et al. Energy loss and mechanical efficiency forecasting model for aero-engine bevel gear power transmission. Int J Mech Sci2022; 231: 107569.
9.
MullerHK. Fluid sealing technology: principles and applications. London: Routledge, 2019.
10.
FieldGJNauBS. Interseal pressure between reciprocating rectangular rubber seals. In: Proccedings of the 5th international conference on fluid sealing, 1971, pp.21–35.
11.
FieldGJNauBS. Interseal pressure between tandem reciprocating rubber seals with back-up rings. ASLE Trans1973; 16(1): 10–15.
12.
KanzakiYNakayamaJKawaharaY, et al. Effects of interlip pressure of reciprocating seals with two lips on sealing and frictional characteristics. Trans Jpn Soc Mech Eng1996; 62(596): 1533–1539.
13.
NikasGKSaylesRS. Computational model of tandem rectangular elastomeric seals for reciprocating motion. Tribol Int2006; 39(7): 622–634.
14.
ChengDGuLSunY. Mixed lubrication modeling of multi-lip reciprocating seals based on elastohydrodynamic lubrication theory. Machines2022; 10(6): 483.
15.
ZhangS. Fluid-structure coupling analysis of non-linear reciprocating piston seals in series. J Phys Conf Ser2019; 1300(1): 012114.
16.
ShouyuanZ. Elasto-hydrodynamic analysis of reciprocating piston seals with micro-asperities on cylinder surface. Tribol Mat Surf Interface2020; 14(4): 193–206.
17.
PenasRBalmesEGaudinA. A unified non-linear system model view of hyperelasticity, viscoelasticity and hysteresis exhibited by rubber. Mech Syst Signal Process2022; 170: 108793.
18.
KitturMIAndriyanaAAngBC, et al. Inelastic response of thermo-oxidatively aged carbon black filled polychloroprene rubber. Part I: Viscoelasticity. Polym Degrad Stab2022; 205: 110118.
19.
KitturMIAndriyanaAAngBC, et al. Inelastic response of thermo-oxidatively aged carbon black filled polychloroprene rubber. Part II: Mullins effect. Polym Degrad Stab2022; 204: 110120.
20.
MüllerHKNauBS. Fluid sealing technology principles and applications. New York, NY: M. Dekker, 1998.
21.
PatirNChengHS. An average flow model for determining effects of three-dimensional roughness on partial hydrodynamic lubrication. J Lubrication Technol1978; 100(1): 12–17.
22.
PatirNChengHS. Application of average flow model to lubrication between rough sliding surfaces. J Lubrication Technol1979; 101: 220–229.
23.
JiangBGuoFMaT, et al. A mixed lubrication model for lip seals based on deterministic surface micro deformation. Tribol Trans2021: 65: 153–163.
24.
LiuSCuiYFuY, et al. Tribo-dynamic performances and vibration transmission of lubricated translational joints in marine engines. Int J Mech Sci2022; 231: 107599.
25.
WangZZhangJJiangZ, et al. A transient and time lag deformation alternating-coupling micro elastohydrodynamic lubrication model. Int J Mech Sci2021; 210: 106744.
26.
GreenwoodJAWilliamsonJBP. Contact of nominally flat surfaces. Proc R Soc Lond A Math Phys Sci1966; 295(1442): 300–319.
27.
XiangCGuoFLiuX, et al. Thermo-elastohydrodynamic lubrication simulation of reciprocating rod seals under transient condition. Tribol Int2021; 153: 106603.
28.
RanHWangSLiuD. A multiscale wear model for reciprocating rod stepseal under mixed lubricating conditions based on linear elasticity. Proc IMechE, Part J: J Engineering Tribology2021; 235(1): 161–180.
29.
PerssonBN. Relation between interfacial separation and load: a general theory of contact mechanics. Phys Rev Lett2007; 99(12): 125502.
30.
XiangCGuoFLiuX, et al. Numerical algorithm for fluid–solid coupling in reciprocating rod seals. Tribol Int2020; 143: 106078.
31.
HuangYSalantRF. Numerical analysis of a hydraulic rod seal: flooded vs. starved conditions. Tribol Int2015; 92: 577–584.
