One of the main sources of the Sudden Cardiac Death (SCD) is termed as Fatal arrhythmia. The electric shock treatment retrieves the regular electrical and mechanical functions of the heartbeat by controlling Ventricular fibrillation (VF) and Ventricular Tachycardia (VT). Shockable arrhythmia is easily controlled by providing electrical shock treatments. On the other hand, non-shockable arrhythmia is not controlled by electrical shock treatment. It is a very complex task to accurately discriminate these two kinds of arrhythmia using human assessment of Electrocardiogram (ECG) signals within a limited span and there may be a chance to occur faults during manual inspection. An accurate ECG diagnosis is very significant as it saves the life of the patient in advance by delivering proper therapy. To address this emerging problem, an automated model using the proposed Dwarf Mongoose Gannet Optimization Algorithm-Deep Neuro-Fuzzy Network (DMGOA-DNFN) is invented for detecting the shockable ventricular cardiac arrhythmias (SVCA). The classification is performed effectively utilizing DNFN and the weight of this classifier is optimally adjusted employing a newly developed algorithm named DMGOA, which is a consolidation of Dwarf Mongoose Optimization (DMO) and Gannet Optimization Algorithm (GOA). The proposed DMGOA-DNFN has surpassed other classical models with respect to accuracy of 93.2%, sensitivity of 95.8%, and specificity of 91.7%.
HousseinEHIbrahimIENeggazN, et al. An efficient ECG arrhythmia classification method based on Manta ray foraging optimization. Expert Syst Appl2021; 181: 115131.
7.
ShiHWangHHuangY, et al. A hierarchical method based on weighted extreme gradient boosting in ECG heartbeat classification. Comput Methods Programs Biomed2019; 171: 1–10.
8.
AlharbeyRAAlsubhiSDaqrouqK, et al. The continuous wavelet transform using for natural ECG signal arrhythmias detection by statistical parameters. Alex Eng J2022; 61(12): 9243–9248.
9.
DaqrouqKAbu-IsbeihIN.Arrhythmia detection using wavelet transform. In: EUROCON 2007 the international conference on “Computer as a Tool”, Warsaw, Poland, 9–12 September 2007, pp. 122–126. New York: IEEE.
10.
ZouCMüllerAWolfgangU, et al. Heartbeat classification by random forest with a novel context feature: a segment label. IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med2022; 10: 1–8.
11.
SanninoGDe PietroG.A deep learning approach for ECG-based heartbeat classification for arrhythmia detection. Future Gener Comput Syst2018; 86: 446–455.
12.
WangJYeYPanX, et al. Parallel-type fractional zero-phase filtering for ECG signal denoising. Biomed Signal Process Control2015; 18: 36–41.
13.
LiQRajagopalanCCliffordGD.Ventricular fibrillation and tachycardia classification using a machine learning approach. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng2013; 61(6): 1607–1613.
14.
JingEZhangHLiZ, et al. ECG heartbeat classification based on an improved ResNet-18 model. Comput Math Methods Med2021; 2021: 664997.
15.
HuYHPalreddySTompkinsWJ.A patient-adaptable ECG beat classifier using a mixture of experts approach. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng1997; 44(9): 891–900.
16.
ChouhanVSMehtaSS.Threshold-based detection of P and T-wave in ECG using new feature signal. Int J Comput Sci Netw Secur2008; 8(2): 144–153.
17.
KhorramiHMoavenianM.A comparative study of DWT, CWT and DCT transformations in ECG arrhythmias classification. Expert Syst Appl2010; 37(8): 5751–5757.
18.
ChangPCLinJJHsiehJC, et al. Myocardial infarction classification with multi-lead ECG using hidden Markov models and Gaussian mixture models. Appl Soft Comput2012; 12(10): 3165–3175.
19.
LiTZhouM.ECG classification using wavelet packet entropy and random forests. Entropy2016; 18(8): 285.
20.
HuangJChenBYaoB, et al. ECG arrhythmia classification using STFT-based spectrogram and convolutional neural network. IEEE Access2019; 7: 92871–92880.
21.
AlbuAPrecupRETebanTA.Results and challenges of artificial neural networks used for decision-making and control in medical applications. FU Mech Eng2019; 17(3): 285–308.
22.
EdalatifarMTavakoliMBSetoudehF.A deep learning approach to predict the flow field and thermal patterns of nonencapsulated phase change materials suspensions in an enclosure. J Appl Comput Mech2021; 8(4): 1270–1278.
23.
AkayBKarabogaD.Artificial bee colony algorithm for large-scale problems and engineering design optimization. J Intell Manuf2012; 23(4): 1001–1014.
24.
DorigoMStützleT.The ant colony optimization metaheuristic: algorithms, applications, and advances. In: GloverFKochenbergerGA (eds) Handbook of metaheuristics. Boston, MA: Springer, 2003, pp.250–285.
25.
MirjaliliSLewisA.The whale optimization algorithm. Adv Eng Softw2016; 95: 51–67.
PandaRJainSTripathyRK, et al. Detection of shockable ventricular cardiac arrhythmias from ECG signals using FFREWT filter-bank and deep convolutional neural network. Comput Biol Med2020; 124: 103939.
29.
SharmaMSinghSKumarA, et al. Automated detection of shockable and non-shockable arrhythmia using novel wavelet-based ECG feature. Comput Biol Med2019; 115: 103446.
30.
AcharyaURFujitaHOhSL, et al. Automated identification of shockable and non-shockable life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias using convolutional neural network. Future Gener Comput Syst2018; 79: 952–959.
31.
SharmaMTanRSAcharyaUR.Detection of shockable ventricular arrhythmia using optimal orthogonal wavelet filters. Neural Comput Appl2020; 32(20): 15869–15884.
32.
ChetanATripathyRKDandapatS.A diagnostic system for detection of atrial and ventricular arrhythmia episodes from electrocardiogram. J Med Biol Eng2018; 38(2): 304–315.
33.
MjahadAFrances-VilloraJVBataller-MompeanM, et al. Ventricular fibrillation and tachycardia detection using features derived from topological data analysis. Appl Sci2022; 12(14): 7248.
34.
XuYWangDZhangW, et al. Detection of ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation using adaptive variational mode decomposition and boosted-CART classifier. Biomed Signal Process Control2018; 39: 219–229.
35.
MohantyMDashMBiswalP, et al. Classification of ventricular arrhythmias using empirical mode decomposition and machine learning algorithms. Prog Artif Intell2021; 10(4): 489–504.
36.
LeeT.EMD and LSTM hybrid deep learning model for predicting sunspot number time series with a cyclic pattern. Solar Phys2020; 295(6): 1–23.
37.
JavaidSAbdullahMJavaidN, et al. Towards buildings energy management: using seasonal schedules under time of use pricing tariff via deep neuro-fuzzy optimizer. In 2019 15th international wireless communications & mobile computing conference (IWCMC), Tangier, Morocco, 24–28 June 2019, pp. 1594–1599, New York: IEEE.
38.
AldosariFAbualigahLAlmotairiKH.A normal distributed dwarf mongooseoptimization algorithm for global optimization and data clustering applications. Symmetry2022; 14(5): 1021.
39.
PanJSZhangLGWangRB, et al. Gannet optimization algorithm: a new metaheuristic algorithm for solving engineering optimization problems. Math Comput Simul2022; 202: 343–373.
40.
MirHYSinghO.ECG denoising and feature extraction techniques–a review. J Med Eng Technol2021; 45(8): 672–684.
41.
CastellsFLagunaPSörnmoL, et al. Principal component analysis in ECG signal processing. EURASIP J Adv Signal Process2007; 2007: 1–21.
42.
TanskanenJMViikJJ.Independent component analysis in ECG signal processing. In MillisRM (eds) Advances in electrocardiograms-methods and analysis. IntechOpen, 2012, pp. 349–372.
43.
UwaechiaANRamliDA.A comprehensive survey on ECG signals as new biometric modality for human authentication: recent advances and future challenges. IEEE Access2021; 9: 97760–97802.
44.
BarmaseSDasSMukhopadhyayS.Wavelet transform-based analysis of QRS complex in ECG signals. arXiv preprint arXiv:1311.6460, 2013.
45.
PanQLiXFangL.Data augmentation for deep learning-based ECG analysis. In: LiuCLiJ (eds) Feature engineering and computational intelligence in ECG monitoring. Singapore: Springer, 2020, pp. 91–111.
46.
KumarVSharmaVNareshR.Leader Harris Hawks algorithm based optimal controller for automatic generation control in PV-hydro-wind integrated power network. Electr Power Syst Res2023; 214: 108924.
47.
KaurSAwasthiLKSangalAL, et al. Tunicate swarm algorithm: a new bio-inspired based metaheuristic paradigm for global optimization. Eng Appl Artif Intell2020; 90: 103541.
48.
SubramanianCSekarASSSubramanianK.A new engineering optimization method: African wild dog algorithm. Int J Soft Comput2013; 8(3): 163–170.
