The horizontal vibration of high-speed elevators has a significant impact on ride comfort and safety stability. Plenty of intelligent methods have been implemented in horizontal vibration reduction. The conventional optimization process for vibration reduction design involves conducting numerous complex dynamics simulations to establish the correlation between design parameters and vibration response. However, this method is inefficient and costly due to the demanding computational power requirements and time-consuming nature of the simulations. This study proposes a surrogate-model-based dynamic-sensing optimization method. A Kriging model is developed based on dynamics simulations, providing an efficient approach for obtaining the vibration response with specified design parameters. The DSPSO algorithm was proposed by incorporating perceptual particles and environmental adaptation mechanisms into the PSO algorithm. The DSPSO algorithm can be nested and interact with the Kriging model to optimize design parameters. During evolution, feasible and uncertain solutions are extracted into the sample space to enhance the accuracy of the Kriging model. The effectiveness of the proposed method is validated using both the ZDT series test functions and elevators from Canny Elevator Co., Ltd.
KnezevicBZBlanusaBMarceticDP. A synergistic method for vibration suppression of an elevator mechatronic system. J Sound Vib2017; 406: 29–50.
2.
LiuMZhangRZhangQ, et al. Analysis of the gas-solid coupling horizontal vibration response and aerodynamic characteristics of a high-speed elevator. Mech Based Des Struct Mach2023; 51: 3350–3371.
3.
ZhangQYangZWangC, et al. Intelligent control of active shock absorber for high-speed elevator car. Proc IMechE, Part C: J Mechanical Engineering Science2019; 233: 3804–3815.
4.
WangCZhangRZhangQ. Analysis of transverse vibration acceleration for a high-speed elevator with random parameter based on perturbation theory. Int J Acoust Vib2017; 22: 22.
5.
SantoDBalthazarJTussetA, et al. On nonlinear horizontal dynamics and vibrations control for high-speed elevators. J Vib Control2018; 24: 825–838.
6.
CrespoRSKaczmarczykSPictonP, et al. Modelling and simulation of a stationary high-rise elevator system to predict the dynamic interactions between its components. Int J Mech Sci2018; 137: 24–45.
7.
GuoLJiangX. Research on horizontal vibration of traction elevator. In: (WangKWangYStrandhagenJO, et al., eds.), Advanced Manufacturing and Automation VIII 8Singapore: Springer, 2019, pp.131–140.
8.
YangZZhangQZhangR, et al. Transverse vibration response of a super high-speed elevator under air disturbance. Int J. Struct Stab Dy2019; 19: 1950103.
9.
ZhaoMQinCTangR, et al. An Acceleration Feedback-Based Active Control Method for High-Speed Elevator Horizontal Vibration. J. Vib Eng Technol2023: 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42417-023-00955-z
10.
OtsukiMUshijimaYYoshidaK, et al. Nonstationary sliding mode control using time-varying switching hyperplane for transverse vibration of elevator rope. In: International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, 2005, pp.925–934.
11.
HeQJiaTZhangR, et al. Adaptive sliding mode control with fuzzy adjustment of switching term based on the Takagi-sugeno model for horizontal vibration of the high-speed elevator cabin system. Proc IMechE, Part C: J Mechanical Engineering Science2022; 236: 4503–4519.
12.
MeiDDuXChenZ. Optimization of dynamic parameters for a traction-type passenger elevator using a dynamic byte coding genetic algorithm. Proc IMechE, Part C: J Mechanical Engineering Science2009; 223: 595–605.
13.
QiuLWangZZhangS, et al. A vibration-related design parameter optimization method for high-speed elevator horizontal vibration reduction. Shock Vib2020; 2020: 1–20.
14.
LmalghanRRaoMKRaoS, et al. Machining parameters optimization of AA6061 using response surface methodology and particle swarm optimization. Int J Precis Eng Manuf2018; 19: 695–704.
15.
HazirEOzcanT. Response surface methodology integrated with desirability function and genetic algorithm approach for the optimization of CNC machining parameters. Arab J Sci Eng2019; 44: 2795–2809.
16.
YıldızBS. Optimal design of automobile structures using moth-flame optimization algorithm and response surface methodology. Mater Test2020; 62: 371–377.
17.
YeWWangXLiuY, et al. Analysis and prediction of the performance of free-piston Stirling engine using response surface methodology and artificial neural network. Appl Therm Eng2021; 188: 116557.
18.
HongLLiHPengK. A combined radial basis function and adaptive sequential sampling method for structural reliability analysis. Appl Math Model2021; 90: 375–393.
19.
ShangXMaPYangM, et al. An efficient polynomial chaos-enhanced radial basis function approach for reliability-based design optimization. Struct Multidiscipl Optim2021; 63: 789–805.
20.
XuKWangGZhangL, et al. Multi-objective optimization of jet pump based on RBF neural network model. J Mar Sci Eng2021; 9: 236.
21.
LeeKH. A robust structural design method using the Kriging model to define the probability of design success. Proc IMechE, Part C: J Mechanical Engineering Science2010; 224: 379–388.
22.
JiluFZhiliSHongzheS. Optimization of structure parameters for angular contact ball bearings based on Kriging model and particle swarm optimization algorithm. Proc IMechE, Part C: J Mechanical Engineering Science2017; 231: 4298–4308.
23.
JakumeitJHerdyMNitscheM. Parameter optimization of the sheet metal forming process using an iterative parallel Kriging algorithm. Struct Multidiscipl Optim2005; 29: 498–507.
24.
KleijnenJPC. Regression and Kriging metamodels with their experimental designs in simulation: a review. Eur J Oper Res2017; 256: 1–16.
25.
FanXWangPHaoF. Reliability-based design optimization of crane bridges using Kriging-based surrogate models. Struct Multidiscipl Optim2019; 59: 993–1005.
26.
QassemWOthmanMOAbdul-MajeedS. The effects of vertical and horizontal vibrations on the human body. Med Eng Phys1994; 16: 151–161.
27.
GB/T 10058-2009. Technical conditions for lifts, National Standard Full Text Database of China, 2009.
28.
ISO 8100-34:2021. Lifts for the transport of persons and goods - Part 34: Measurement of lift ride quality, International Organization for Standardization, 2021.
29.
ISO 2631-2:2003. Mechanical vibration and shock - Evaluation of human exposure to whole-body vibration - Part 2: Vibration in buildings (1 Hz to 80 Hz), International Organization for Standardization, 2003.
30.
QiuLSuGWangZ, et al. High-speed elevator car horizontal vibration fluid–solid interaction modeling method. J Vib Control2022; 28: 2984–3000.
31.
ZhouHZhangSQiuL, et al. The multi-component coupling horizontal vibration modeling technology of the high-speed elevator and analysis of its influencing factors. Proc IMechE, Part C: J Mechanical Engineering Science2022; 236: 5850–5869.
32.
FengYZhangJZhaoY. Modeling and robust control of horizontal vibrations for high-speed elevator. J Vib Control2009; 15: 1375–1396.
33.
CaoSHeQZhangR, et al. Active control strategy of high-speed elevator horizontal vibration based on LMI optimization. J Control Eng Appl Inform2020; 22: 72–83.
34.
ZhangRWangCZhang Q. Response analysis of the composite random vibration of a high-speed elevator considering the nonlinearity of guide shoe. J. Braz Soc Mech Sci2018; 40: 1–10.
35.
EberhartRKennedyJ. A new optimizer using particle swarm theory. In: MHS’95. Proceedings of the sixth international symposium on micro machine and human science, 1995, pp.39–43. IEEE.
36.
HuangMChengSZhangH, et al. Structural damage identification under temperature variations based on PSO–CS hybrid algorithm. Int J Struct Stab Dy2019; 19: 1950139.
37.
MartinJDSimpsonTW. Use of kriging models to approximate deterministic computer models. AIAA J2005; 43: 853–863.
38.
DebKThieleLLaumannsM, et al. Scalable multi-objective optimization test problems. In: Proceedings of the 2002 Congress on Evolutionary Computation. CEC’02 (Cat. No. 02TH8600), 2002, pp.825–830. IEEE.
39.
LimWJJambekABNeohSC. Kursawe and ZDT functions optimization using hybrid micro genetic algorithm (HMGA). Soft Comput2015; 19: 3571–3580.
WangSLiuGGaoM, et al. Heterogeneous comprehensive learning and dynamic multi-swarm particle swarm optimizer with two mutation operators. Inf Sci2020; 540: 175–201.
42.
LiuRLiYWangH, et al. A noisy multi-objective optimization algorithm based on mean and Wiener filters. Knowl-Based Syst2021; 228: 107215.
YangDHKimKYKwakMK, et al. Dynamic modeling and experiments on the coupled vibrations of building and elevator ropes. J Sound Vib2017; 390: 164–191.
45.
GB/T 34146-2017. Running service of lifts, escalators and moving r, 2017.
46.
ChangRIHsuHMLinSY, et al. Query-based learning for dynamic particle swarm optimization. IEEE Access2017; 5: 7648–7658.
47.
NguyenBHXueBAndreaeP, et al. A new binary particle swarm optimization approach: momentum and dynamic balance between exploration and exploitation. IEEE Trans Cybern2021; 51: 589–603.
48.
GB/T 7588.1-2020. Safety rules for the construction and installation of lifts - Part 1 : Passenger and goods passenger lifts.
