This paper investigates the performance of a micromixer by considering the combined effects of surface charge heterogeneity and the induced charge electrokinetic (ICEK) phenomenon. With the applied electric field, surface charge heterogeneity generates a recirculation zone within the microchannel, while conductive links induce micro-vortices. The main objective is to explore the influence of various control parameters on the mixing efficiency, including zeta potential, the number and orientation of conductive links, and applied electrical potential. The generated recirculation zone and induced micro vortices introduce chaotic perturbations within the microchannel, improving mixing performance. The results demonstrate that increasing the zeta potential on heterogeneously charged patches enhances the mixing performance, albeit at the expense of a reduced average outlet velocity. Additionally, a higher number of conductive links leads to increased mixing efficiency. The combination of mounting a conductive link inside the channel and applying a heterogeneous zeta potential patch on the wall substantially increased mixing efficiency. The influence of fluid rheology on mixing performance is also investigated, revealing that pseudoplastic fluids exhibit better mixing than dilatant fluids. Finally, the combined effects of all parameters are evaluated using the Taguchi method, resulting in an optimized mixing performance for the proposed micromixer. Micromixing efficiency exceeding 98% is achieved for all types of non-Newtonian fluids under optimal parametric conditions.
DehghanAGholizadehANavidbakhshM, et al. Integrated microfluidic system for efficient DNA extraction using on-disk magnetic stirrer micromixer. Sens Actuators B Chem2022; 351: 130919.
2.
JiHMSamperVChenY, et al. DNA purification silicon chip. Sens Actuators A Phys2007; 139: 139–144.
3.
LiuCLiYLiuBF. Micromixers and their applications in kinetic analysis of biochemical reactions. Talanta2019; 205: 120136.
4.
RazzackiSZThwarPKYangM, et al. Integrated microsystems for controlled drug delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev2004; 56: 185–198.
5.
ChenXCuiDLiuC, et al. Continuous flow microfluidic device for cell separation, cell lysis and DNA purification. Anal Chim Acta2007; 584: 237–243.
6.
DittrichPSManzA. Lab-on-a-chip: microfluidics in drug discovery. Nat Rev Drug Discov2006; 5: 210–218.
7.
AgarwalTWangL. Numerical analysis of vortex T micromixer with diffuser plates and obstacles. Therm Sci Eng Prog2022; 28: 101156.
8.
AfzalAKimK-Y. Flow and mixing analysis of non-Newtonian fluids in straight and serpentine microchannels. Chem Eng Sci2014; 116: 263–274.
9.
EbnerezaEHassaniKSerajM, et al. Shape optimization of a split-and-recombine micromixer by the local energy dissipation rate. Proc IMechE, Part E: J Process Mechanical Engineering2020; 234: 243–251.
10.
AghasiMAHekmatMH. A novel design of split and recombination multilayer micromixers with excellent hydraulic and mixing performance based on the baker’s transformation. Chem Eng Process Process Intensif2022; 174: 108894.
11.
AkarSTaheriABazazR, et al. Twisted architecture for enhancement of passive micromixing in a wide range of Reynolds numbers. Chem Eng Process Process Intensif2021; 160: 108251.
12.
TalebjediBGhaziMTasnimN, et al. Performance optimization of a novel passive T-shaped micromixer with deformable baffles. Chem Eng Process Process Intensif2021; 163: 108369.
13.
JiangYZhangBTianY, et al. Analysis of different shapes of cross-sections and obstacles in variable-radius spiral micromixers on mixing efficiency. Chem Eng Process Process Intensif2022; 171: 108756.
14.
KeshavarzianBCharmiyanMMoaveniA. Optimization of an active electrokinetic micromixer based on the number and arrangement of microelectrodes. J Appl Fluid Mech11(6): 1531–1541.
15.
SunJShiZLiM, et al. Numerical and experimental investigation of a magnetic micromixer under microwires and uniform magnetic field. J Magn Magn Mater2022; 551: 169141.
16.
GuerroudjFGuendouzLHreizR, et al. 3D magnetic resonance velocimetry for the characterization of hydrodynamics in microdevices: application to micromixers and comparison with CFD simulations. Chem Eng Sci2023; 269: 118473.
17.
YaraliogluGGWygantIOMarentisTC, et al. Ultrasonic mixing in microfluidic channels using integrated transducers. Anal Chem2004; 76: 3694–3698.
18.
ZhangCBrunetPRoyonL, et al. Mixing intensification using sound-driven micromixer with sharp edges. Chem Eng J2021; 410: 128252.
19.
IshiiKHiharaEMunakataT. Mechanism of temperature-difference-induced spiral flow in microchannel and investigation of mixing performance of a non-invasive micromixer. Appl Therm Eng2020; 174: 115291.
LeeJSHRenCLLiD. Effects of surface heterogeneity on flow circulation in electroosmotic flow in microchannels. Anal Chim Acta2005; 530: 273–282.
22.
NayakAK. Analysis of mixing for electroosmotic flow in micro/nano channels with heterogeneous surface potential. Int J Heat Mass Transf2014; 75: 135–144.
23.
WuZLiD. Micromixing using induced-charge electrokinetic flow. Electrochim Acta2008; 53: 5827–5835.
24.
NazariMChuangP-YAAbolfazli EsfahaniJ, et al. A comprehensive geometrical study on an induced-charge electrokinetic micromixer equipped with electrically conductive plates. Int J Heat Mass Transf2020; 146: 118892.
25.
NajjaranSRashidiSValipourMS. A new design of induced-charge electrokinetic micromixer with corrugated walls and conductive plate installation. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf2020; 114: 104564.
26.
HadigolMNosratiRNourbakhshA, et al. Numerical study of electroosmotic micromixing of non-Newtonian fluids. J Non-Newton Fluid Mech2011; 166: 965–971.
27.
AlipanahMHatamiMRamiarA. Thermal and rheological investigation of non-Newtonian fluids in an induced-charge electroosmotic micromixer. Eur J Mech B/Fluids2021; 88: 178–190.
28.
SankarDSViswanathanKKNagarAK, et al. Theoretical study on Poiseuille flow of Herschel-Bulkley fluid in porous media. J Appl Comput Mech2022; 8: 1246–1269.
29.
RabbaniKEmamzadehM. A closed-form solution for electro-osmotic flow in nano-channels. J Appl Comput Mech2022; 8: 510–517.
30.
JainMNandakumarK. Optimal patterning of heterogeneous surface charge for improved electrokinetic micromixing. Comput Chem Eng2013; 49: 18–24.
31.
BanerjeeANayakAK. Influence of varying zeta potential on non-Newtonian flow mixing in a wavy patterned microchannel. J Non-Newton Fluid Mech2019; 269: 17–27.
32.
MehtaSKMondalBPatiS, et al. Enhanced electroosmotic mixing of non-Newtonian fluids in a heterogeneous surface charged micromixer with obstacles. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp2022; 648: 129215.
33.
VasistaKNMehtaSKPatiS. Electroosmotic mixing in a microchannel with heterogeneous slip dependent zeta potential. Chem Eng Process Process Intensif2022; 176: 108940.
34.
QaderiAJamaatiJBahiraeiM. CFD simulation of combined electroosmotic-pressure driven micro-mixing in a microchannel equipped with triangular hurdle and zeta-potential heterogeneity. Chem Eng Sci2019; 199: 463–477.
35.
NazariMRashidiSEsfahaniJA. Mixing process and mass transfer in a novel design of induced-charge electrokinetic micromixer with a conductive mixing-chamber. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf2019; 108: 104293.
36.
AzimiSNazariMDaghighiY. Developing a fast and tunable micro-mixer using induced vortices around a conductive flexible link. Phys Fluids2017; 29: 32004.
ZhaoCYangC. Electroosmotic flows of non-Newtonian power-law fluids in a cylindrical microchannel. Electrophoresis2013; 34: 662–667.
40.
VakiliMASadeghiASaidiMH, et al. Electrokinetically driven fluidic transport of power-law fluids in rectangular microchannels. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp2012; 414: 440–456.
41.
BerliCLOlivaresML. Electrokinetic flow of non-Newtonian fluids in microchannels. J Colloid Interface Sci2008; 320: 582–589.
42.
EricksonDLiD. Influence of surface heterogeneity on electrokinetically driven microfluidic mixing. Langmuir2002; 18: 1883–1892.
43.
DaghighiYGaoYLiD. 3D numerical study of induced-charge electrokinetic motion of heterogeneous particle in a microchannel. Electrochim Acta2011; 56: 4254–4262.
44.
LyklemaJ.Fundamentals of interface and colloid science: soft colloids. Elsevier, Vol. 5, 2005.
45.
WuZLiD. Mixing and flow regulating by induced-charge electrokinetic flow in a microchannel with a pair of conducting triangle hurdles. Microfluid Nanofluid2008; 5: 65–76.
