Monitoring of aerodynamic parameters of the blade helps to enhance the operating capabilities of the Wells turbine. In this study, a few discrete pressure points were used to estimate the pressure patterns by fitting the exact potential-flow solution for flow over a parabola. The sectional aerodynamics was assessed by the leading-edge flow sensing (LEFS) algorithm. A characteristic parameter was employed to deduce leading-edge flow status. Moreover, the influence of rotor speeds and tip gaps on the vortex boundary was discussed in terms of the Lagrangian frame. For the rotor speed larger than 1000 rpm at the incipient stall point, there is no boundary layer separation at the suction side of the blade tip leading edge. At the same rotor speed, a large tip gap reduces the axial shear of the suction flows and the axial stretching of the tip leakage vortex, which helps to enhance the interaction time and strength of the leakage vortex and the suction flows. For the Wells turbine with attached flows, the LEFS algorithm can accurately evaluate the pressure distribution and suction parameters near the leading edge. The LEFS-derived dimensionless parameter can act as an equivalent angle of attack under different tip gaps, providing the possibility for stall warning of Wells turbines.
IRENA. Renewable Energy Roadmap for Central America: Towards a Regional Energy Transition. Report, International Renewable Energy Agency, Abu Dhabi, 2022.
2.
IRENA. NDCs and renewable energy targets in 2021: Are we on the right path to a climate-safe future?, Report, International Renewable Energy Agency, Abu Dhabi, 2022.
3.
GhisuTPudduPCambuliF. A detailed analysis of the unsteady flow within a Wells turbine. Proc IMechE, Part A: J Power and Energy2017; 231(3): 197–214.
4.
GhisuTPudduPCambuliF. Physical explanation of the hysteresis in Wells turbines: A critical reconsideration. J Fluid Eng2016; 138(11): 111105.
5.
GhisuTCambuliFPudduP, et al. A lumped parameter model to explain the cause of the hysteresis in OWC-Wells turbine systems for wave energy conversion. Appl Ocean Res2020; 94: 101994.
6.
GrattonTGhisuTParksG, et al. Optimization of blade profiles for the Wells turbine. Ocean Eng2018; 169: 202–214.
7.
ShaabanS. Wells turbine blade profile optimization for better wave energy capture. Int J Energy Res2017; 41(12): 1767–1780.
8.
LicheriFCambuliFPudduP, et al. A comparison of different approaches to estimate the efficiency of Wells turbines. J Fluid Eng2021; 143(5): 051205.
9.
ShehataAXiaoQSelimM, et al. Enhancement of performance of wave turbine during stall using passive flow control: First and second law analysis. Renew Energy2017; 113: 369–392.
10.
ShehataASSaqrKMXiaoQ, et al. Performance analysis of wells turbine blades using the entropy generation minimization method. Renew Energy2016; 86: 1123–1133.
11.
StarzmannRCarolusT. Effect of blade skew strategies on the operating range and aeroacoustic performance of the Wells turbine. J Turbomach2014; 136(1): 011003.
12.
StarzmannRCarolusT. Model-based selection of full-scale wells turbines for ocean wave energy conversion and prediction of their aerodynamic and acoustic performances. Proc IMechE, Part A: J Power and Energy2014; 228(1): 2–16.
13.
SetoguchiTTakaoM. Current status of self-rectifying air turbines for wave energy conversion. Energy Convers Manag2006; 47: 2382–2396.
14.
TorresiMCamporealeSPascazioG. Detailed CFD analysis of the steady flow in a Wells turbine under incipient and deep stall conditions. J Fluid Eng2009; 131: 071103.
15.
ShaabanSHafizA. Effect of duct geometry on Wells turbine performance. Energy Convers Manag2012; 61: 51–58.
16.
TorresiMStefanizziMGurnariL, et al. Experimental characterization of the unsteady performance behavior of a Wells turbine operating at high flow rate coefficients. In: E3S Web of Conferences, 2020, 197: 08009.
17.
MorrisWJRusakZ. Stall onset on aerofoils at low to moderately high Reynolds number flows. J Fluid Mech2013; 733: 439–472.
18.
NarsipurSHosangadiPGopalarathnamA, et al. Variation of leading-edge suction during stall for unsteady aerofoil motions. J Fluid Mech2020; 900: 1–46.
19.
ErturkEHaddadOCorkeT. Laminar incompressible flow past parabolic bodies at angles of attack. AIAA J2004; 42(11): 2254–2265.
RusakZMorrisWJ. Stall onset on airfoils at moderately high Reynolds number flows. J Fluid Eng2011; 133: 111104.
22.
RameshK. On the leading-edge suction and stagnation-point location in unsteady flows past thin aerofoils. J Fluid Mech2020; 886: A13.
23.
SainiANarsipurSGopalarathnamA. Leading-edge flow sensing for detection of vortex shedding from airfoil in unsteady flows. Phys Fluids2021; 33: 087105.
24.
RameshKGopalarathnamAOlM, et al. Augmentation of inviscid airfoil theory to predict and model 2D unsteady vortex dominated flows. In: 41st AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference and Exhibit, 27–30 June 2011, Honolulu, Hawaii.
25.
RameshKGopalarathnamAEdwardsJ, et al. Theoretical analysis of perching and hovering maneuvers. In: 43rd AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference and Exhibit, 24-27 Jun 2013, San Diego, CA, USA.
26.
SuryakumarVSBabbarYStrganacTW, et al. Unsteady aerodynamic model based on the leading-edge stagnation point. J Aircr2016; 53(6): 1626–1637.
27.
RameshKGranlundKOlMV, et al. Leading-edge flow criticality as a governing factor in leading-edge vortex initiation in unsteady airfoil flows. Theor Comput Fluid Dynam2018; 32: 109–136.
28.
HandMSimmsDFingershL, et al. Unsteady aerodynamics experiment phase VI: wind tunnel test configurations and available data campaigns. Report, National Renewable Energy lab, US, Dec.2001.
29.
TakaoMSetoguchiTNagataS, et al. A study on the effects of blade profile and non-uniform tip clearance of the Wells turbine. In: ASME 27th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, June15–20, 2008, Estoril, Portugal.
30.
TorresiMCamporealeSMStrippoliPD, et al. Accurate numerical simulation of a high solidity Wells turbine. Renew Energy2008; 33: 735–747.
31.
KimTHKinoueYSetoguchiT, et al. Effects of hub-to-tip ratio and tip clearance on hysteretic characteristics of Wells turbine for wave power conversion. J Therm Sci2002; 11(3): 207–213.
32.
GengKYangCZhangH, et al. Influence of vortex interactions on the exergy transfer and performance of OWC Wells turbine. Proc IMechE, Part M: J Engineering for the Maritime Environment2023; 237(1): 1–20.
33.
CurranRGatoLMC. The energy conversion performance of several types of Wells turbine designs. Proc IMechE, Part A: J Power and Energy1997; 211(2): 133–145.
34.
GengKYangCHeX, et al. Circulation budget analysis of the leading-edge vortex in a Wells turbine under steady inflow conditions. In: Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo 2022, Turbomachinery Technical Conference and Exposition, June 13–17, 2022, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
35.
BaoWYangCGengK, et al. Unsteady two-phase region evolution of SCO2 centrifugal compressor. Proc IMechE, Part C: J Mechanical Engineering Science2022; 236(24): 11431–11445.
36.
CelikIGhiaURoacheP. Procedure for estimation and reporting of uncertainty due to discretization in CFD applications. J Fluid Eng2008; 130: 078001.
37.
KumarPMHalderPHusainA, et al. Performance enhancement of Wells turbine: combined radiused edge blade tip, static extended trailing edge, and variable thickness modifications. Ocean Eng2019; 185: 47–58.
38.
MannaPDharavathMSinhaPK, et al. Optimization of a flight-worthy scramjet combustor through CFD. Aerosp Sci Technol2013; 27: 138–146.
39.
HalderPSamadAKimJH, et al. High performance ocean energy harvesting turbine design–A new casing treatment scheme. Energy2015; 86: 219–231.
40.
DasTKSamadA. Influence of stall fences on the performance of Wells turbine. Energy2020; 194: 116864.
41.
TahaZSawadaTSawadaT. A comparison of computational and experimental results of Wells turbine performance for wave energy conversion. Appl Ocean Res2010; 32: 83–90.
42.
TahaZSugiyonoY T, et al. Numerical investigation on the performance of Wells turbine with non-uniform tip clearance for wave energy conversion. Appl Ocean Res2011; 33: 321–331.
43.
RaghunathanS. The Wells air turbine for wave energy conversion. Prog Aerosp Sci1995; 31(4): 335–386.
44.
LekubeJGarridoAJGarridoI. Variable speed control in wells turbine-based oscillating water column devices: optimum rotational speed. IOP Conf Ser Earth Sci2018; 136: 1–9.
45.
LicheriFPudduPCambuliF, et al. Experimental investigation on a speed controlled Wells turbine for wave energy conversion. In: ASME 2022 41st International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering, June 5–10, 2022, Hamburg, Germany.
46.
PátýMLavagnoliS. A novel vortex identification technique applied to the 3D flow field of a high-pressure turbine. J Turbomach2020; 142: 031004.
47.
ShaddenSCLekienFMarsdenJE. Definition and properties of Lagrangian coherent structures from finite-time Lyapunov exponents in two-dimensional aperiodic flows. Physica2005; 212: 271–304.
48.
PengJDabiriJO. Transport of inertial particles by Lagrangian coherent structures: application to predator–prey interaction in jellyfish feeding. J Fluid Mech2009; 623: 75–84.
49.
KolářVMosesPŠístekJ. Triple decomposition method for vortex identification in two-dimensional and three-dimensional flows. In: KuzminA (ed.) Computational Fluid Dynamics, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 2010.
50.
GengKYangCHuC, et al. Numerical investigation on the loss audit of Wells turbine with exergy analysis. Renew Energy2022; 189: 273–287.
51.
LicheriFGhisuTCambuliF, et al. Detailed investigation of the local flow-field in a Wells turbine coupled to an OWC simulator. Renew Energy2022; 197: 583–593.
52.
CartaMPutzuRGhisuT. A comparison of plunging- and pitching-induced deep dynamic stall on an SD7003 airfoil using URANS and LES simulations. Aerosp Sci Technol2022; 121: 107307.
53.
HammerPRGarmannDJVisbalMR. Effect of aspect ratio on finite-wing dynamic stall. AIAA J2022; 60(12): 6581–6593.
