Abstract
Estimating the forming limit diagram (FLD) is tedious and cost-intensive. Methods driven by data and artificial intelligence are used to determine the relationship between scaled thickness and the forming rates of various cups drawn out of ETP copper sheets. Machine learning (ML) techniques have a good chance of predicting the FLD of copper alloys, and they are being used increasingly in sensitive electronic and structural applications. The current research aims to create ML-based artificial neural network (ANN) tools to model the relationship between scaled thickness and forming rates as a function of formability. The FLD is measured for copper strips of initial dimensions of 1500 mm long, 750 mm wide, and 6 mm thick, whose thickness was reduced successively by 50% in nine incremental steps. Thus, 3, 1.5, 0.75, 0.38, and 0.19 mm sheets were obtained and used to determine FLD through the Nakajima approach. An FEA model of the drawing was made in Altair Inspire Form, and the simulation results were used to train a two-step ML. A Bayesian regularization (BR) and Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm (LM) were used in the first step to predict strains’ maximum and minimum points. In the second step, the minor strains predicted in the first step are used as inputs. Using the same feature set, the BR and LM algorithms predict the major strain, showing a linear trend until the middle and then a nonlinear trend. The trained ML model was used to predict unknown intermediate values for estimating the over-learning and over-fitting problems here for 2 and 0.25 mm thick sheets and are validated experimentally. The variation between the FLDs of predicted and experimentally verified data falls between 2% and 5%. Such small changes in the FLD values show that the proposed ML model could be used to predict the FLDs of copper strips.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
