Bolted joints are widely used in assembly of composite structures that transmit large loads. The relationship between torque (T) and preload (F) is needed to be obtained when using the torque method to tighten bolts. In this paper, the T-F relationship in the process of bolt tightening composite laminates was analyzed through bolt tightening experiments. The variation behavior of friction coefficient in this process was also studied. On this basis, a progressive damage finite element model was established using the improved LaRC05 criterion to analyze the stress and damage of the composite laminate during tightening. The various stages in the bolt tightening were divided and the mechanical properties of each stage were analyzed. The results of the study showed that the thread friction coefficient μth and the bearing friction coefficient μb change with the preload during the tightening process. Its behavior can be described using an exponential function. Serious stress concentration and assembly damage can be formed in the direct extrusion area of the outer edge of the locknut when the composite laminate is bolted. The bolt tightening process of composite laminates can be divided into five stages. Research conclusions are valuable for understanding composite structures and formulating the bolt tightening process.
BickfordJH. An introduction to the design and behavior of bolted joints. New York, NY: Marcel Dekker, 1991.
2.
BickfordJHNassarJS. Handbook of bolts and bolted joints. New York, NY: Marcel Dekker, 1998.
3.
JuvinallRCMarshekKM. Fundamentals of machine component design. 3rd ed. New York, NY: Wiley, 2000.
4.
Gerini RomagnoliMNassarSALeeJH. Formulation of bearing friction torque in threaded joints with non-flat contact. J Press Vessel Technol2020; 142(3): 301–320.
5.
NassarSAMarcoGRLeeJH. Bearing friction torque in threaded fasteners with non-flat underhead contact. In Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference, 2018, vol. 516, no. 16, pp.2–22. Prague, Czech Republic: American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
6.
ZakiANassarSAKrukS, et al. Inverse solution for bolt preload using surface deformation. J Press Vessel Technol2017; 139(4): 1–35.
7.
GaneshmurthySNassarSA. Finite element simulation of process control for bolt tightening in joints with nonparallel contact. J Manuf Sci Eng2014; 136(2): 1–10.
8.
AbboudANassarSA. Viscoelastic strain hardening model for gasket creep relaxation. J Press Vessel Technol2013; 135(3): 1–9.
9.
YangXNassarSA. Elasto-plastic clamp load analysis of bolted joint for bolt strain hardening material under separating loading. SAE Transactions2007; 1: 672–680.
10.
SimsDISiadatMRNassarSA. Toward real-time clamping load measurement using DSPI. Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng2012; 8494: 84940I.
11.
MengANassarSATempletonD. A novel optical method for real-time control of bolt tightening. J Press Vessel Technol2011; 133(6): 1–5.
12.
NassarSAAbboudA. An improved stiffness model for bolted joints. J Mech Des2009; 131(12): 1–11.
13.
NassarSAZakiAM. Effect of coating thickness on the friction coefficients and torque-tension relationship in threaded fasteners. J Tribol2009; 131(2): 253–261.
14.
ZouSASunQNassarTS. Effect of lubrication on friction and torque-tension relationship in threaded fasteners. Int Jt Tribol Conf2006; 42592: 591–602.
15.
NassarSASunTS. Surface roughness effect on the torque-tension relationship in threaded fasteners. Proc IMechE, Part J: J Engineering Tribology2007; 221(2): 95–103.
16.
MengAYangXNassarSA. Effect of bearing friction and hole clearance on the clamp load-deformation correlation in bolted joints. SAE Transactions2007; 116: 699–706.
17.
GuessousLBarberGZouQ, et al. A numerical investigation of bolt underhead temperature evolution during tightening. In: Heat transfer summer conference, 2007, vol. 42746, pp.443–451. Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada: American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
18.
GaneshmurthySNassarSA. Study of two-stage tightening of threaded fasteners using various tool speed combinations. In: ASME pressure vessels and piping conference, 2007, vol. 42800, pp.295–308. San Antonio, TX: American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
19.
EcclesWSherringtonIArnellRD. Frictional changes during repeated tightening of zinc plated threaded fasteners. Tribol Int2010; 43(4): 700–707.
20.
HoernigTKopferHWFriedrichC. Torque vibrations in automatized screw assembly: Reasons, elimination and virtual testing. In: Proceedings of the ASME 2013 international mechanical engineering congress and exposition, San Diego, CA, USA, 15–21 November 2013. San Diego, CA: American Society of Mechanical Engineers Digital Collection.
21.
FriedrichCHubbertzH. Engineering calculation of threaded fastening systems considering deviations in advanced design. In: ASME 2012 international mechanical engineering congress and exposition, 2012, pp.865–871. Houston, TX: American Society of Mechanical Engineers Digital Collection.
22.
HubbertzHFriedrichC. Thermal preload relaxation of bolted CFRP structures for flexible life time design methodology. In: 13th European conference on spacecraft structures, materials & environmental testing, 2014, vol. 727.
23.
FriedrichCHubbertzH. Friction behavior and preload relaxation of fastening systems with composite structures. Compos Struct2014; 110: 335–341.
24.
KopferHFriedrichCAgostinisMD, et al. Friction characteristics in light weight design focusing bolted joints. In: ASME 2012 international mechanical engineering congress and exposition, 2012, pp.839–846. Houston, TX: American Society of Mechanical Engineers Digital Collection.
25.
GerhardTFriedrichC. Mechanical fastening of carbon composite tubes, numerical calculation of axial loading capacity and experimental verification. Compos B Eng2014; 67: 391–399.
26.
CroccoloDDe AgostinisMVincenziN. Failure analysis of bolted joints: effect of friction coefficients in torque–preloading relationship. Eng Fail Anal2011; 18(1): 364–373.
27.
CroccoloDDe AgostinisMFiniS, et al. Threaded fasteners with applied medium or high strength threadlockers: effect of different tightening procedures on the tribological response. J Adhes2020; 96(1–4): 64–89.
28.
CroccoloDAgostinisMDFiniS, et al. Tribological properties of connecting rod high strength screws improved by surface peening treatments. Metals2020; 10(344): 1–15.
29.
StefanoFAgostinisMDCroccoloD, et al. Residual shank torque of bolted joints: a numerical investigation. In: Pressure vessels and piping conference, 2019, vol. 58936, pp.1–9. San Antonio, TX: American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
30.
CroccoloDDe AgostinisMFiniS, et al. The influence of material, hardness, roughness and surface treatment on the frictional characteristics of the underhead contact in socket-head screws. In: ASME 2018 pressure vessels and piping conference, 2018, vol. 51616, pp.1–7. Prague, Czech Republic: American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
31.
CroccoloDAgostinisMDFiniS, et al. Experimental measurement of the shank torque as a function of the stiffness and frictional characteristics of the bolted joint. In: Pressure vessels and piping conference, 2018, vol. 51616, pp.1–8, Prague, Czech Republic: American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
32.
CroccoloDDe AgostinisMFiniS, et al. Tribological properties of bolts depending on different screw coatings and lubrications: an experimental study. Tribol Int2017; 107: 199–205.
33.
CroccoloDAgostinisMDFiniS, et al. Effects of screw surface treatments and of different lubrications on the frictional properties of bolts. In: IRF2016: 5th international conference integrity-reliability-failure, Porto, 24–28 July 2016, pp.1165–1176. Porto: INEGI-INST ENGENHARIA MECANICA E GESTAO INDUSTRIAL.
34.
CroccoloDDe AgostinisMVincenziN. Influence of tightening procedures and lubrication conditions on titanium screw joints for lightweight applications. Tribol Int2012; 55: 68–76.
35.
CroccoloDAgostinisMDVincenziN. Experimental analysis on the tightening torque-Preloading force relationship in threaded fasteners. In: ASME International mechanical engineering congress and exposition, 2010, vol. 44274, pp.525–533. Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada: American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
36.
CroccoloDAgostinisMDVincenziN. Experimental study of friction in aluminium bolted joints. In: EPJ Web of Conferences, Rhodes, Greece: EDP Sciences, 2010, vol. 6, pp.1–8.
37.
McCarthyCTMcCarthyMALawlorVP. Progressive damage analysis of multi-bolt composite joints with variable bolt–hole clearances. Compos B Eng2005; 36(4): 290–305.
38.
McCarthyMALawlorVPStanleyWF, et al. Bolt-hole clearance effects and strength criteria in single-bolt, single-lap, composite bolted joints. Compos Sci Technol2002; 62(10/11): 1415–1431.
39.
McCarthyMAMcCarthyCTLawlorVP, et al. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of single-bolt, single-lap composite bolted joints: part I—model development and validation. Compos Struct2005; 71(2): 140–158.
40.
McCarthyCTMcCarthyMA. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of single-bolt, single-lap composite bolted joints: Part II—effects of bolt-hole clearance. Compos Struct2005; 71(2): 159–175.
41.
DursunTSoutisC. A finite element analysis of bolted joints loaded in tension: protruding head and countersunk fastener. Int J Struct Integr2017; 8: 35–50.
42.
SenFPakdilMSaymanO, et al. Experimental failure analysis of mechanically fastened joints with clearance in composite laminates under preload. Mater Des2008; 29(6): 1159–1169.
43.
FukuokaTNomuraM. Proposition of helical thread modeling with accurate geometry and finite element analysis. J Press Vessel Technol2008; 130(1): 135–140.
44.
HillR. A theory of the yielding and plastic flow of anisotropic metals. Proc R Soc Ser A1948; 193(1033): 281–297.
45.
TsaiSWWuEM. A general theory of strength for anisotropic materials. J Compos Mater1971; 3(2): 184–188.
46.
YamadaSESunCT. Analysis of laminate strength and its distribution. J Compos Mater1978; 12(3): 275–284.
47.
HoffmanO. The brittle strength of orthotropic materials. J Compos Mater1967; 1(2): 200–206.
48.
ChangFKChangKY. A progressive damage model for laminated composites containing stress concentrations. J Compos Mater1987; 21(9): 834–855.
49.
ChangFKLessardLB. Damage tolerance of laminated composites containing an open hole and subjected to compressive loadings: part I—analysis. J Compos Mater1991; 25(1): 2–43.
PuckASchürmannH. Failure analysis of FRP laminates by means of physically based phenomenological models. Compos Sci Technol2002; 62(12–13): 1633–1662.
52.
PinhoSTDarvizehRRobinsonP, et al. Material and structural response of polymer-matrix fibre-reinforced composites. J Compos Mater2012; 46(19–20): 2313–2341.
53.
PinhoSTVyasGMRobinsonP. Material and structural response of polymer-matrix fibre-reinforced composites: Part B. J Compos Mater2013; 47(6–7): 679–696.
DonadonMVIannucciLFalzonBG, et al. A progressive failure model for composite laminates subjected to low velocity impact damage. Comput Struct2008; 86(11–12): 1232–1252.
56.
ShiYSwaitTSoutisC. Modelling damage evolution in composite laminates subjected to low velocity impact. Compos Struct2012; 94(9): 2902–2913.
57.
FaggianiAFalzonBG. Predicting low-velocity impact damage on a stiffened composite panel. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf2010; 41(6): 737–749.
58.
GutkinRPinhoSTRobinsonP, et al. On the transition from shear-driven fibre compressive failure to fibre kinking in notched CFRP laminates under longitudinal compression. Compos Sci Technol2010; 70(8): 1223–1231.
59.
XueK. Progressive analysis of bearing failure in pin-loaded composite laminates using an elasto-plastic damage model. Mater Sci Appl2018; 9: 576–595.
60.
WiegandJPetrinicNElliottB. An algorithm for determination of the fracture angle for the three-dimensional puck matrix failure criterion for UD composites. Compos Sci Technol2008; 68(12): 2511–2517.
61.
ParviziAGarrettKWBaileyJE. Constrained cracking in glass fibre-reinforced epoxy cross-ply laminates. J Mater Sci1978; 13(1): 195–201.
62.
SchirmaierFJWeilandJKärgerL, et al. A new efficient and reliable algorithm to determine the fracture angle for Puck’s 3D matrix failure criterion for UD composites. Compos Sci Technol2014; 100: 19–25.
63.
OlmedoÁSantiusteC. On the prediction of bolted single-lap composite joints. Compos Struct2012; 94(6): 2110–2117.
64.
LuFCaiDTangJ, et al. Bearing failure of single-/double-shear composite bolted joints: an explicit finite element modeling. J Reinforced Plast Compos2018; 37: 933–944.
65.
AlfanoG. On the influence of the shape of the interface law on the application of cohesive-zone models. Compos Sci Technol2006; 66(6): 723–730.
66.
YeL. Role of matrix resin in delamination onset and growth in composite laminates. Compos Sci Technol1988; 33(4): 257–277.
67.
AtaşASoutisC. Strength prediction of bolted joints in CFRP composite laminates using cohesive zone elements. Compos B Eng2014; 58: 25–34.
