Aiming at the problems of poor tracking accuracy, low convergence speed, weak robustness of a 6-DOF electro-hydraulic suspension test system under system uncertainties and external disturbance, this article proposes double closed-loop control scheme. In the outer loop controller, this article designs a new decoupled adaptive fast nonsingular terminal sliding mode (DAFNTSM) control to achieve fast convergence rate, high accurate and adaptive disturbances estimation during trajectory tracking. Additionally, a coupling force compensator based on RBF neural network is employed, which can reduce online calculation quantity and guarantee accuracy. For six inner loop controllers, each hydraulic actuator can precisely follow the required force solved by outer loop controller. The hard-in-loop experiment results reveal that the control approach we proposed in this paper realize superior trajectory tracking characteristics in comparison with the conventional nonsingular terminal sliding mode (CNTSM) method.
DresslerKSpeckertMBitschG.Virtual durability test rigs for automotive engineering. Veh Syst Dyn2009; 47(4): 387–401.
2.
WangXCongDYangZ, et al. Modified quasi-newton optimization algorithm-based iterative learning control for multi-axial road durability test rig. IEEE Access2019; 7: 31286–31296.
3.
DuZMZmYBianZH, et al. Inverse dynamic analysis of 6-DOF spindle coupled road load simulators. In: 2016 International conference on aircraft utility systems (AUS), Beijing, China, 10–12 October2016, pp.68–72. New York: IEEE.
4.
FrenchM.An Introduction to road simulation testing. Exp Tech2011; 24(3): 37–38.
5.
FuYMZhouXJYangXF, et al. Kinematics and inverse dynamic analysis of a 6 channel half-axle test rig. In: 2021 6th International conference on robotics and automation engineering (ICRAE), Guangzhou, China, 19–22November2021, pp.147–155. New York: IEEE.
6.
ZhaoQWangNSpencerBF.Adaptive position tracking control of electro-hydraulic six-degree-of-freedom driving simulator subject to perturbation. Simulation2015; 91(3): 265–275.
7.
ChenZYangXLiuX.RBFNN-based nonsingular fast terminal sliding mode control for robotic manipulators including actuator dynamics. Neurocomputing2019; 362: 72–82.
8.
AmiriMSRamliRIbrahimMF.Hybrid design of PID controller for four DoF lower limb exoskeleton. Appl Math Model2019; 72: 17–27.
9.
JinXChenKZhaoY, et al. Simulation of hydraulic transplanting robot control system based on fuzzy PID controller. Measurement2020; 164: 108023.
10.
Becerra-VargasMMorgado BeloE.Application of H∞ theory to a 6 DOF flight simulator motion base. J Braz Soc Mech Sci2012; 34: 193–204.
11.
LiuHTianXWangG, et al. Finite-time H-infinity control for high-precision tracking in robotic manipulators using backstepping control. IEEE Trans Ind Electron2016; 63(9): 5501–5513.
12.
HuQXuLZhangA.Adaptive backstepping trajectory tracking control of robot manipulator. J Franklin Inst2012; 349(3): 1087–1105.
13.
ChaouiHSicardPGueaiebW.Ann-based adaptive control of robotic manipulators with friction and joint elasticity. IEEE Trans Ind Electron2009; 56(8): 3174–3187.
14.
WangH.Adaptive control of robot manipulators with uncertain kinematics and dynamics. IEEE Trans Automat Contr2017; 62(2): 948–954.
15.
AhmedSWangHAslamMS, et al. Robust adaptive control of robotic manipulator with input time-varying delay. Int J Control Autom Syst2019; 17: 2193–2202.
16.
YuSYuXShirinzadehB, et al. Continuous finite-time control for robotic manipulators with terminal sliding mode. Automatica2005; 41(11): 1957–1964.
17.
JanardhananSBandyopadhyayB.On discretization of continuous-time terminal sliding mode. IEEE Trans Automat Contr2006; 51(9): 1532–1536.
18.
YuXZhihongM.Multi-input uncertain linear systems with terminal sliding-mode control. Automatica1998; 34(3): 389–392.
19.
LiuQLHanJYangSY, et al. Adaptive terminal sliding mode control of uncertain electro-hydraulic position servo systems. Appl Math Mech2021; 42(7): 675–685.
20.
SuYZhengC.A new nonsingular integral terminal sliding mode control for robot manipulators. Int J Syst Sci2020; 51(8): 1418–1428.
21.
FengYYuXManZ.Non-singular terminal sliding mode control of rigid manipulators. Automatica2002; 38(12): 2159–2167.
22.
FengYYuXHanF.On nonsingular terminal sliding-mode control of nonlinear systems. Automatica2013; 49(6): 1715–1722.
23.
RazzaghianAKardehi MoghaddamRParizN.Fractional-order nonsingular terminal sliding mode control via a disturbance observer for a class of nonlinear systems with mismatched disturbances. J Vib Control2021; 27(1–2): 140–151.
24.
AhmedSAhmedAMansoorI, et al. Output feedback adaptive fractional-order super-twisting sliding mode control of robotic manipulator. Iran J Sci Technol Trans Electr Eng2021; 45: 335–347.
25.
AhmedSWangHTianY.Fault tolerant control using fractional-order terminal sliding mode control for robotic manipulators. Stud Inform Control2018; 27(1): 55–64.
26.
FeiJDingH.Adaptive sliding mode control of dynamic system using RBF neural network. Nonlinear Dyn2012; 70(2): 1563–1573.
27.
Jia T and Kang G. An RBF neural network-based nonsingular terminal sliding mode controller for robot manipulators. In:2012 3rd International conference on intelligent control and information processing (ICICIP), Dalian, China, 15–17July2012, pp.72–76. New York: IEEE.
28.
TranMDKangHJ.Adaptive terminal sliding mode control of uncertain robotic manipulators based on local approximation of a dynamic system. Neurocomputing2017; 228: 231–240.
29.
ZhouJZhaoXChenT, et al. Trajectory tracking control of an underactuated AUV based on backstepping sliding mode with state prediction. IEEE Access2019; 7: 181983–181993.
30.
FengHSongQMaS, et al. A new adaptive sliding mode controller based on the RBF neural network for an electro-hydraulic servo system. ISA Trans2022; 129: 472–484.
31.
HungLCChungHY.Decoupled sliding-mode with fuzzy-neural network controller for nonlinear systems. Int J Approx Reason2007; 46(1): 74–97.
32.
YinFCZhangDHHanTY, et al. Decoupling control based on sliding mode controller for looper system. In: Proceedings of the 2016 35th Chinese Control Conference (CCC), Chengdu, China, 27–29July2016, pp.2608–2613. New York: IEEE.
33.
ZhangJMeiXZhangD, et al. Application of decoupling fuzzy sliding mode control with active disturbance rejection for MIMO magnetic levitation system. Proc IMechE, Part C: J Mechanical Engineering Science2013; 227(2): 213–229.
34.
NiuXMGaoGQLiuX, et al. Decoupled sliding mode control for a novel 3-DOF parallel manipulator with actuation redundancy. Int J Adv Robot Syst2015; 12(5): 64.
35.
WuHGaoQWangC, et al. Decoupling control of chassis integrated system for electric wheel vehicle. Proc IMechE, Part D: J Automobile Engineering2020; 234(6): 1515–1531.
36.
YangKWangXGeT, et al. A dynamic model of ROV with a robotic manipulator using Kane’s method. In: 2013 The 5th international conference on measuring technology and machatronics, 2013, pp.9–12. New York: IEEE.
37.
LuSLiYDingB.Kinematics and dynamics analysis of the 3PUS-PRU parallel mechanism module designed for a novel 6-DOF gantry hybrid machine tool. J Mech Sci Technol2020; 34(1): 345–357.
38.
ZhaoDLiSZhuQ, et al. Robust adaptive terminal sliding mode-based synchronised position control for multiple motion axes systems. IET Control Theory Appl2009; 3(1): 136–150.
39.
PiYWangX.Observer-based cascade control of a 6-DOF parallel hydraulic manipulator in joint space coordinate. Mechatronics2010; 20(6): 648–655.
40.
PiYWangX.Trajectory tracking control of a 6-DOF hydraulic parallel robot manipulator with uncertain load disturbances. Control Eng Pract2011; 19(2): 185–193.
41.
HaimoVT.Finite time controllers. SIMA J Control Optim1986; 24(4): 760–770.
42.
ShaoKZhengJHuangK, et al. Finite-time control of a linear motor positioner using adaptive recursive terminal sliding mode. IEEE Trans Ind Electron2020; 67(8): 6659–6668.
43.
ParkJSandbergIW.Universal approximation using radial-basis-function networks. Neural Comput1991; 3(2): 246–257.
44.
EdwardsCSpurgeonS., Sliding Mode Control: Theory and Applications. London: Taylor and Francis, 1998.
45.
ZhengJWangHManZ, et al. Robust motion control of a linear motor positioner using fast nonsingular terminal sliding mode. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron2015; 20(4): 1743–1752.
46.
YangLYangJ.Nonsingular fast terminal sliding-mode control for nonlinear dynamical systems. Int J Robust Nonlin2011; 21(16): 1865–1879.
