Novel material of MXene was synthesized and prepared their ionanofluids while dispersing them into 20:80% (by mass) of ionic liquid of 1,3-Dimethylimidazolium dimethyl phosphate [MMIM][DMP] and water mixture. The thermophysical properties were studied experimentally at different particle weight loadings from 0.2% to 1.0% and at different temperatures over 20°C to 60°C. By utilizing the evaluated thermophysical properties of ionanofluids their figures-of-merit were analyzed by using three models under turbulent flow conditions. It is understood from the results, the thermal conductivity of 1.0 wt% of ionanofluid is enhanced about 56.62% at a temperature of 60°C; whereas, the dynamic viscosity is enhanced to 17.66% at 20°C compared to base fluid alone. Moreover the density of ionanofluid is raised and specific heat ionanofluid is lowered with rise of particle weight concentrations. The obtained thermophysical properties were fitted into regression equations based on the multi-linear regression method. The evaluated three models figures-of-merit show all the prepared ionanofluids in the measured weight concentrations and temperatures are beneficial heat transfer fluids because their value is greater than 1.
OmiddezyaniSGharehkhaniSYousefi-AsliV, et al. Experimental investigation on thermo-physical properties and heat transfer characteristics of green synthesized highly stable CoFe2O4/rgo nanofluid. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp2021; 610: 125923.
2.
MurshedSMSSharifpurMGiwaS, et al. Experimental research and development on the natural convection of suspensions of Nanoparticles-A comprehensive review. Nanomater2020; 10: 1855.
3.
HamzeSBerradaNCabaleiroD, et al. Few-layer graphene-based nanofluids with enhanced thermal conductivity. Nanomater2020; 10: 1258.
4.
KhanMZUUddinEAkbarB, et al. Investigation of heat transfer and pressure drop in microchannel heat sink using Al2O3 and ZrO2 nanofluids. Nanomater2020; 10: 1796.
5.
WangYAl-SaaidiHAIKongM, et al. Thermophysical performance of graphene based aqueous nanofluids. Int J Heat Mass Transf2018; 119: 408–417.
6.
KoleMDeyTK. Investigation of thermal conductivity, viscosity, and electrical conductivity of graphene based nanofluids. J Appl Phys2013; 113: 084307.
7.
AhammedNAsirvathamLGTitusJ, et al. Measurement of thermal conductivity of graphene–water nanofluid at below and above ambient temperatures. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf2016; 70: 66–74.
8.
ElsaidKAbdelkareemMAMaghrabieHM, et al. Thermophysical properties of graphene-based nanofluids. Int J Thermofluids2021; 10: 100073.
9.
HongWXSidikNASaidurR. Effect of surfactants on thermal conductivity of graphene based hybrid nanofluid. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci2020; 463: 012122.
10.
MehraliMSadeghinezhadELatibariST, et al. Investigation of thermal conductivity and rheological properties of nanofluids containing graphene nanoplatelets. Nanoscale Res Lett2014; 9: 15.
11.
HadadianMGoharshadiEKYoussefiA. Electrical conductivity, thermal conductivity, and rheological properties of graphene oxide-based nanofluids. J Nanopart Res2014; 16: 2788.
12.
ZhangYWangLZhangN, et al. Adsorptive environmental applications of mxene nanomaterials: A review. RSC Adv2018; 8: 19895–19905.
13.
MashtalirOCookKMMochalinVN, et al. Dye adsorption and decomposition on two-dimensional titanium carbide in aqueous media. J Mater Chem A2014; 2: 14334–14338.
14.
JastrzębskaAMSzuplewskaARozmysłowska-WojciechowskaA, et al. On tuning the cytotoxicity of Ti3C2 (mxene) flakes to cancerous and benign cells by post-delamination surface modifications. 2D Materials2020; 7: 025018.
15.
NasrallahGKAl-AsmakhMRasoolK, et al. Ecotoxicological assessment of Ti3C2Tx(mxene) using a zebrafish embryo model. Environ Sci Nano2018; 5: 1002–1011.
16.
AmbreenTSaleemAParkCW. Thermal efficiency of eco-friendly MXene based nanofluid for performance enhancement of a pin-fin heat sink: Experimental and numerical analyses. Int J Heat Mass Transf2022; 186: 122451.
17.
AslfattahiNSamylingamLAbdelrazikAS, et al. MXene based new class of silicone oil nanofluids for the performance improvement of concentrated photovoltaic thermal collector. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells2020; 211: 110526.
18.
BaoZBingNZhuX, et al. Ti3C2Tx MXene contained nanofluids with high thermal conductivity, super colloidal stability and low viscosity. Chem Eng J2021; 406: 126390.
19.
AslfattahiNSaidurRSabriMFM, et al. Thermal conductivity and rheological investigation of aqueous poly(ethylene) glycol/MXene as a novel heat transfer fluid. AIP Conf Proc2021; 2324: 050016.
20.
BoobalanCKannaiyanSK. A correlation to predict the thermal conductivity of MXene-silicone oil based nano-fluids and data driven modeling using artificial neural networks. Int J Energy Res2022. DOI: 10.1002/er.7786
21.
JóźwiakBDzidoGZorębskiE, et al. Remarkable thermal conductivity enhancement in carbon-based ionanofluids: Effect of nanoparticle morphology. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces2020; 12: 38113–38123.
22.
FrançaJMPLourençoMJVMurshedSMS, et al. Thermal conductivity of ionic liquids and ionanofluids and their feasibility as heat transfer fluids. Ind Eng Chem Res2018; 57: 6516–6529.
23.
WangFHanLZhangZ, et al. Surfactant-free ionic liquid-based nanofluids with remarkable thermal conductivity enhancement at very low loading of graphene. Nanoscale Res Lett2012; 7: 314.
24.
RibeiroAPCVieiraSICGoodrichP, et al. Thermal conductivity of [Cn mim][(CF3SO2)2N] and [C4mim][BF4] ionanofluids with carbon nanotubes-measurement, theory and structural characterization. J Nanofluids2013; 2: 55–62.
25.
MurshedSMSNieto de CastroCALourençoMJV, et al. Ionanofluids as novel fluids for advanced heat transfer applications. Int J Physical and Mathematical Sci2011; 5: 579–582.
26.
OsterKHardacreCJacqueminJ, et al. Thermal conductivity enhancement phenomena in ionic liquid-based nanofluids (ionanofluids). Aust J Chem2019; 72: 21–33.
27.
JóźwiakBGreerHFDzidoG, et al. Effect of ultrasonication time on microstructure, thermal conductivity, and viscosity of ionanofluids with originally ultra-long multi-walled carbon nanotubes. Ultrason Sonochem2021; 77: 105681.
28.
Nieto de CastroCALourençoMJVRibeiroAPC, et al. Thermal properties of ionic liquids and ionanofluids of imidazolium and pyrrolidinium liquids. J Chem Eng Data2010; 55: 653–661.
29.
ParasharNAslfattahiNYahyaSM, et al. ANN modeling of thermal conductivity and viscosity of mxene-based aqueous ionanofluid. Int J Thermophys2021; 42: 24.
30.
JorjaniSMozaffarianMPazukiG. A novel nanodiamond based ionanofluid: Experimental and mathematical study of thermal properties. J Mol Liq2018; 271: 211–219.
31.
PaulTCMahamudRKhanJA. Multiphase modeling approach for ionic liquids (ILs) based nanofluids: improving the performance of heat transfer fluids (HTFs). Appl Therm Eng2019; 149: 165–172.
32.
XieHZhaoZZhaoJ, et al. Measurement of thermal conductivity, viscosity and density of ionic liquid [EMIM][DEP]-based nanofluids. Chin J Chem Eng2016; 24: 331–338.
33.
MineaAAMurshedSMS. A review on development of ionic liquid based nanofluids and their heat transfer behavior. Renew Sustain Energ Rev2018; 91: 584–599.
34.
CaoPLiYWuY, et al. Role of base fluid on enhancement absorption properties of Fe3O4/ionic liquid nanofluids for direct absorption solar collector. Sol Energy2019; 194: 923–931.
35.
CherechesEISharmaKVMineaAA. A numerical approach in describing ionanofluids behavior in laminar and turbulent flow. Continuum Mech Thermodyn2018; 30: 657–666.
36.
DasLHabibKSaidurR, et al. Improved thermophysical properties and energy efficiency of aqueous ionic liquid/MXene nanofluid in a hybrid PV/T solar system. Nanomater2020; 10: 1372.
37.
YuWFranceDMTimofeevaEV, et al. Thermophysical property-related comparison criteria for nanofluid heat transfer enhancement in turbulent flow. Appl Phys Lett2010; 96: 213109.
38.
TimofeevaEVYuWFranceDM, et al. Nanofluids for heat transfer: an engineering approach. Nanoscale Res Lett2011; 6: 182.
39.
MansourRBGalanisNNguyenCT. Effect of uncertainties in physical properties on forced convection heat transfer with nanofluids. Appl Therm Eng2007; 27: 240–249.
40.
MineaAA. Comparative study of turbulent heat transfer of nanofluids. J Therm Anal Calorim2016; 124: 407–416.
41.
HanRMaXXieY, et al. Preparation of a new 2D mxene/PES composite membrane with excellent hydrophilicity and high flux. RSC Adv2017; 7: 56204–56210.
42.
PadmanabhanSKimMBlanchHW, et al. Solubility and rate of dissolution for miscanthus in hydrophilic ionic liquids. Fluid Phase Equilib2011; 309: 89–96.
43.
MashaliFLanguriEMirshekariG, et al. Nanodiamond nanofluid microstructural and thermo-electrical characterization. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf2019; 101: 82–88.
44.
SinghVGuptaM. Characterisation and zeta potential measurements of CuO-water nanofluids. In: KumarMPandeyRKumarV (eds) Advances in interdisciplinary engineering, Lecture notes in mechanical engineering. Singapore: Springer, 2019, pp. 741–747.
45.
SaidZAbdelkareemMARezkH, et al. Stability, thermophysical and electrical properties of synthesized carbon nanofiber and reduced-graphene oxide-based nanofluids and their hybrid along with fuzzy modeling approach. Powder Technol2020; 364: 795–809.
46.
VendittiR. Temperature effects on the zeta potential. In: LiD (ed.) Encyclopedia of microfluidics and nanofluidics. Boston, MA: Springer, 2008, pp.1980–1987.
47.
RevilAPezardPAGloverPWJ. Streaming potential in porous media: 1. Theory of the zeta potential. J Geophys Res1999; 104(B9): 20021–20031.
48.
SuganthiKSRajanKS. Temperature induced changes in zno–water nanofluid: zeta potential, size distribution and viscosity profiles. Int J Heat Mass Transf2012; 55: 7969–7980.
49.
PakBCChoYI. Hydrodynamic and heat transfer study of dispersed fluids with submicron metallic oxide particles. Exp Heat Transf1998; 11: 151–170.
50.
LiQXuanY. Convective heat transfer and flow characteristics of Cu-water nanofluid. Sci China Ser E Technol Sci2002; 45: 408–416.
51.
SundarLSVenkata RamanaEGraçaMP, et al. Nanodiamond-Fe3 O4 nanofluids: preparation and measurement of viscosity, electrical and thermal conductivities. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf2016; 73: 62–74.
52.
BakhtiariRKamkariBAfrandM, et al. Preparation of stable TiO2-graphene/water hybrid nanofluids and development of a new correlation for thermal conductivity. Powder Technol2021; 385: 466–477.
53.
DittusFWBoelterLM. Heat transfer in automobile radiators of the tubular type. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf1985; 12: 3–22.
54.
Kazemi-BeydokhtiAZeinali HerisS. Thermal optimization of combined heat and power (CHP) systems using nanofluids. Energy2012; 44: 241–247.
55.
MahmudSFraserR. Second law analysis of forced convection in a circular duct for non-newtonian fluids. Energy2006; 31: 2226–2244.
56.
MyatAThuKKimYD, et al. Entropy generation minimization: A practical approach for performance evaluation of temperature cascaded co-generation plants. Energy2012; 46: 493–521.
57.
PoulikakosDJohnsonJM. Second law analysis of combined heat and mass transfer phenomena in external flow. Energy1989; 14: 67–73.
58.
MouromtseffIE. Water and forced-air cooling of vacuum tubes nonelectronic problems in electronic tubes. Proc IRE1942; 30: 190–205.
59.
YehLTChuRJannaW. Thermal management of microelectronic equipment: heat transfer theory, analysis methods, and design practices. ASME press book series on electronic packaging. Appl Mech Rev2003; 56: B46–B48.
60.
SundarLSSinghMKBidkinI, et al. Experimental investigations in heat transfer and friction factor of magnetic Ni nanofluid flowing in a tube. Int J Heat Mass Transf2014; 70: 224–234.
61.
BlasiusH. The boundary layers in fluids with little friction. Z Math Phys1908; 56: 1–37.
62.
BakthavatchalamBHabibKSaidurR, et al. Optimization of thermophysical and rheological properties of Mxene ionanofluids for hybrid solar photovoltaic/thermal systems. Nanomater2021; 11: 320.
63.
AravindSSJBaskarPBabyTT, et al. Investigation of structural stability, dispersion, viscosity, and conductive heat transfer properties of functionalized carbon nanotube based nanofluids. J Phys Chem C2011; 115: 16737–16744.
64.
KoGHHeoKLeeK, et al. An experimental study on the pressure drop of nanofluids containing carbon nanotubes in a horizontal tube. Int J Heat Mass Transf2007; 50: 4749–4753.
65.
ColemanHWSteelWG. Experimental and uncertainty analysis for engineers. New York: Wiley Interscience, 1989.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
