In this paper, a new practical dynamic robust control approach for cooperative robots with inequality constraints is proposed. The controller can compensate errors caused by uncertainties and external disturbances. The inequality constraint is eliminated by choosing proper boundary function and using state transformation. In this way, the controlled output is guaranteed within the desired range. The Lyapunov minimax method is used to prove that the controller can guarantee the uniform boundedness and uniform ultimate boundedness and stability of the robot system. Experimental verifications are carried out on a 2-DOF cooperative robot experimental platform with joint modules. The experimental platform is equipped with a rapid prototyping controller system (CSPACE). Numerical simulation and experimental verification results show that the proposed practical robust controller has significant advantages of trajectory tracking performance and security for cooperative robots with inequality constraints.
PorunoVMTrifonovA.Development of a special module for an industrial collaborative robot for assembling standard threaded products. In: 2020 international multi-conference on industrial engineering and modern technologies (FarEastCon). 06–09 October 2020, Vladivostok, Russia.
2.
BaderKBHendleySABollenV.Assessment of collaborative robot (cobot)-assisted histotripsy for venous clot ablation. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng2021; 68: 1220–1228.
3.
YousufBMSaboor KhanAMunir KhanS.Dynamic modeling and tracking for nonholonomic mobile robot using PID and back-stepping. Adv Control Appl2021; 3: e71.
4.
LeeJChangPHYuB, et al. An adaptive PID control for robot manipulators under substantial payload variations. IEEE Access2020; 8: 162261–162270.
5.
CheahCCKawamuraSArimotoS.Stability of hybrid position and force control for robotic manipulator with kinematics and dynamics uncertainties. Automatica2003; 39: 847–855.
6.
PatelskiRDutkiewiczP.On the stability of adrc for manipulators with modelling uncertainties. ISA Trans2020; 102(2): 295–303.
7.
ZhuJZhangJZhuJ, et al. A composite controller for manipulator with flexible joint and link under uncertainties and disturbances. J Vib Control2022; 28(9–10): 1148–1164.
8.
YuXHeWLiH, et al. Adaptive fuzzy full-state and output-feedback control for uncertain robots with output constraint. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Syst2021; 51(11): 6994–7007.
9.
HuKYYusufAChengZ.Fuzzy adaptive backstepping control of nonlinear uncertain systems with unmeasured states and input saturation. IEEE Access2020; 8: 228442–228453.
10.
SunCLiuCFengX, et al. Visual servoing of flying robot based on fuzzy adaptive linear active disturbance rejection control. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst2021; 68: 2558–2562.
11.
TsaiSHWangJWSongES, et al. Robust h∞ control for nonlinear hyperbolic pde systems based on the polynomial fuzzy model. IEEE Trans Cybern2021; 51: 3789–3801.
12.
ChengKQinDJianJ, et al. Adaptive gearshift control of wet dual clutch transmission based on extended state observer and h∞ robust control. Proc IMechE, Part C: J Mechanical Engineering Science2021; 235(22): 6586–6598.
13.
Van DammeMVanderborghtBBeylP, et al. Sliding mode control of a “Soft” 2-DOF planar pneumatic manipulator. Int Appl Mech2008; 44(10): 1191–1199.
14.
WangHFangLHuM, et al. Adaptive funnel fast nonsingular terminal sliding mode control for robotic manipulators with dynamic uncertainties. Proc IMechE, Part C: J Mechanical Engineering Science2021; 235(18): 3678–3693.
15.
QuangLHPutovVVSheludkoVN.Adaptive robust control of a multi-degree-of-freedom mechanical plant with resilient properties. Procedia Comput Sci2021; 186: 611–619.
16.
BellmanR.Adaptive control processes. IEEE Trans Circuit Theory1964; 11(1): 13–15.
17.
RuchikaNKDinanath. Non-singular terminal sliding mode control of robot manipulators with h∞ trajectory tracking performance. Arabian J Sci Eng2019; 44(11): 9057–9065.
18.
ChenZLiJWangS, et al. Flexible gait transition for six wheel-legged robot with unstructured terrains. Robot Auton Syst2022; 150: 103989.
19.
WangSChenZLiJ, et al. Flexible motion framework of the six wheel-legged robot: experimental results. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron2022; 27: 2246–2257.
20.
HansenLPSargentTJ.Robust control and model uncertainty. Am Econ Rev2001; 91: 60–66.
21.
RaolJRAyyagariR.Robust control. In: Control systems. CRC Press, Boca Raton 2019 pp. 215–240.
22.
YenVTNanWYVan CuongP.Recurrent fuzzy wavelet neural networks based on robust adaptive sliding mode control for industrial robot manipulators. Neural Comput Appl2019; 31(11): 6945–6958.
23.
ZhaoHZhuZSunH.Adaptive robust control and optimal design for fuzzy unmanned helicopter tail reduction. Int J Fuzzy Syst2020; 22(5): 1400–1415.
24.
ZhenSPengXLiuX, et al. A new PD based robust control method for the robot joint module. Mech Syst Signal Process2021; 161: 107958.
25.
Nan Da KumarRHalikiasGDZolotasA.Robust control design of a hydraulic actuator using the QFT method. In: Control conference. 02–05 July 2007, Kos, Greece.
26.
LiaoLLiBWangY, et al. Adaptive fuzzy robust control of a bionic mechanical leg with a high gain observer. IEEE Access2021; 9: 134037–134051.
27.
WangJZhaiAXuF, et al. Dual feedforward neural networks based synchronized sliding mode controller for cooperative manipulator system under variable load and uncertainties. Proc IMechE, Part C: J Mechanical Engineering Science2020; 234(19): 3859–3872.
28.
YuXLiBHeW, et al. Adaptive-constrained impedance control for human-robot co-transportation. IEEE Trans Cybern2022; 52: 13237–13249.
29.
ChenZWangSWangJ, et al. Control strategy of stable walking for a hexapod wheel-legged robot. ISA Trans2021; 108: 367–380.
30.
BenamorABoukadidaWMessaoudH.Genetic algorithm-based multi-objective design of optimal discrete sliding mode approach for trajectory tracking of nonlinear systems. Proc IMechE, Part C: J Mechanical Engineering Science2019; 233(15): 5237–5252.
31.
ChenFLiaoJXiongJ, et al. High-precision trajectory tracking design and simulation for six degree of freedom robot based on improved active disturbance rejection control. Proc IMechE, Part C: J Mechanical Engineering Science2019; 233: 3659–3669.
32.
LiCZhaoHSunH, et al. Robust bounded control for nonlinear uncertain systems with inequality constraints. Mech Syst Signal Process2020; 140: 106665.1–106665.19.
33.
BrahmiASaadMBrahmiB, et al. Robust adaptive tracking control for uncertain nonholonomic mobile manipulator. Proc IMechE, Part I: J Systems and Control Engineering2022; 236(2): 395–405.
34.
NieSQianLChenG, et al. Tracking error constraint-based adaptive dynamic surface control of electro-hydraulic manipulator system. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng2022; 44(9): 1–13.
35.
PengJDubayRDingS.Observer-based adaptive neural control of robotic systems with prescribed performance. Appl Soft Comput2022; 114: 114.
36.
KovincicNMllerAGattringerH, et al. Dynamic parameter identification of the Universal Robots UR5. In: Austrian robotics workshop 2019, Steyr, 2019.
