Compound gear-bearing faults that occur in real-time conditions lead components to fail prematurely. Despite their significance in system failure, these compound faults are rarely studied since extracting accurate information from vibration signals is challenging. Therefore, it is necessary to develop reliable denoising, feature selection, and fault classification technique for forecasting compound faults in a rotor system to assure its durability. This research proposes a multi-stage diagnosis method for the identification of compound gear-bearing failures based on complementary ensemble empirical mode decomposition (CEEMD) based denoising, Artificial Bee Colony (ABC) based feature selection, and Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) based classification. The proposed method is validated through a case study, and the integrated method achieves a classification rate of 95.95%. Furthermore, the proposed method is compared with other denoising, feature selection and classification methods. All the other methods are outperformed by the proposed CEEMD-ABC-ANN method.
LiangPDengCWuJ, et al. Intelligent fault diagnosis of rotating machinery via wavelet transform, generative adversarial nets and convolutional neural network. Measurement2020; 159: 107768.
2.
Saucedo-DorantesJJDelgado-PrietoMOsornio-RiosRA, et al. Diagnosis methodology for identifying gearbox wear based on statistical time feature reduction. Proc IMechE, Part C: J Mechanical Engineering Science2018; 232(15): 2711–2722.
3.
YangJHuangDZhouD, et al. Optimal IMF selection and unknown fault feature extraction for rolling bearings with different defect modes. Measurement2020; 157: 107660.
4.
MinhasASKankarPKKumarN, et al. Bearing fault detection and recognition methodology based on weighted multiscale entropy approach. Mech Syst Signal Process2021; 147: 107073.
5.
BabouriMKDjebalaAOuelaaN, et al. Rolling bearing faults severity classification using a combined approach based on multi-scales principal component analysis and fuzzy technique. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2020; 107: 4301–4316.
6.
MedinaRMacancelaJCLuceroP, et al. Vibration signal analysis using symbolic dynamics for gearbox fault diagnosis. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2019; 104(5–8): 2195–2214.
7.
LuoJHuangJLiH.A case study of conditional deep convolutional generative adversarial networks in machine fault diagnosis. J Intell Manuf2021; 32: 407–425.
8.
GoyalDChoudharyAPablaBS, et al. Support vector machines based non-contact fault diagnosis system for bearings. J Intell Manuf2020; 31: 1275–1289.
9.
JenaDPPanigrahiSN.Automatic gear and bearing fault localization using vibration and acoustic signals. Appl Acoust2015; 98: 20–33.
10.
HuangNEShenZLongSR, et al. The empirical mode decomposition and the Hilbert spectrum for nonlinear and non-stationary time series analysis. Proc R Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci1998; 454(1971): 903–995.
11.
ChaabiLLemzadmiADjebalaA, et al. Fault diagnosis of rolling bearings in non-stationary running conditions using improved CEEMDAN and multivariate denoising based on wavelet and principal component analyses. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2020; 107: 3859–3873.
12.
RicciRPennacchiP.Diagnostics of gear faults based on EMD and automatic selection of intrinsic mode functions. Mech Syst Signal Process2011; 25(3): 821–838.
13.
CaiJH.Fault diagnosis of rolling bearing based on empirical mode decomposition and higher order statistics. Proc IMechE, Part C: J Mechanical Engineering Science2015; 229(9): 1630–1638.
14.
WuZHuangNE.Ensemble empirical mode decomposition: a noise-assisted data analysis method. Adv Adapt Data Anal2009; 1(1): 1–41.
15.
GuoJZhenDLiH, et al. Fault feature extraction for rolling element bearing diagnosis based on a multi-stage noise reduction method. Measurement2019; 139: 226–235.
16.
WangZDuWWangJ, et al. Research and application of improved adaptive MOMEDA fault diagnosis method. Measurement2019; 140: 63–75.
17.
TarekKAbderrazekDKhemissiBM, et al. Comparative study between cyclostationary analysis, EMD, and CEEMDAN for the vibratory diagnosis of rotating machines in industrial environment. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2020; 109(9–12): 2747–2775.
18.
AmarouayacheIIESaadiMNGuersiN, et al. Bearing fault diagnostics using EEMD processing and convolutional neural network methods. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2020; 107(9–10): 4077–4095.
19.
JiaYLiGDongX, et al. A novel denoising method for vibration signal of hob spindle based on EEMD and grey theory. Measurement2021; 169: 108490.
20.
WangLShaoY.Fault feature extraction of rotating machinery using a reweighted complete ensemble empirical mode decomposition with adaptive noise and demodulation analysis. Mech Syst Signal Process2020; 138: 106545.
21.
ZhangXZhouJ.Multi-fault diagnosis for rolling element bearings based on ensemble empirical mode decomposition and optimized support vector machines. Mech Syst Signal Process2013; 41(1–2): 127–140.
22.
LuNLiMZhangG, et al. Fault feature extraction method for rotating machinery based on a CEEMDAN-LPP algorithm and synthetic maximum index. Measurement2022; 189: 110636.
23.
YehJRShiehJSHuangNE.Complementary ensemble empirical mode decomposition: a novel noise enhanced data analysis method. Adv Adapt Data Anal2010; 02(02): 135–156.
24.
ChenJZhouDLyuC, et al. An integrated method based on CEEMD-SampEn and the correlation analysis algorithm for the fault diagnosis of a gearbox under different working conditions. Mech Syst Signal Process2018; 113: 102–111.
25.
LuYXieRLiangSY.CEEMD-assisted kernel support vector machines for bearing diagnosis. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2020; 106(7–8): 3063–3070.
26.
YangYLiaoYMengG, et al. A hybrid feature selection scheme for unsupervised learning and its application in bearing fault diagnosis. Expert Syst Appl2011; 38(9): 11311–11320.
27.
ShenCWangDKongF, et al. Fault diagnosis of rotating machinery based on the statistical parameters of wavelet packet paving and a generic support vector regressive classifier. Measurement2013; 46(4): 1551–1564.
28.
YanXJiaM.Intelligent fault diagnosis of rotating machinery using improved multiscale dispersion entropy and mRMR feature selection. Knowl Based Syst2019; 163: 450–471.
29.
HancerEXueBZhangM.Fuzzy filter cost-sensitive feature selection with differential evolution. Knowl Based Syst2022; 241: 108259.
30.
UrbanowiczRJMeekerMLa CavaW, et al. Relief-based feature selection: introduction and review. J Biomed Inform2018; 85: 189–203.
31.
SánchezRVLuceroPVásquezRE, et al. Feature ranking for multi-fault diagnosis of rotating machinery by using random forest and KNN. J Intell Fuzzy Syst2018; 34(6): 3463–3473.
32.
AttouiIFerganiNBoutassetaN, et al. A new time–frequency method for identification and classification of ball bearing faults. J Sound Vib2017; 397: 241–265.
33.
ZhangXZhangQChenM, et al. A two-stage feature selection and intelligent fault diagnosis method for rotating machinery using hybrid filter and wrapper method. Neurocomputing2018; 275: 2426–2439.
34.
YanKMaLDaiY, et al. Cost-sensitive and sequential feature selection for chiller fault detection and diagnosis. Int J Refrig2018; 86: 401–409.
35.
HuangCLWangCJ.A GA-based feature selection and parameters optimization for support vector machines. Exp Syst Appl2006; 31: 231–240.
36.
MolajouANouraniVAfsharA, et al. Optimal design and feature selection by genetic algorithm for Emotional Artificial Neural Network (EANN) in rainfall-runoff modeling. Water Resour Manag2021; 35: 2369–2384. Optimal.
37.
AnbuMAnandha MalaGS.Feature selection using firefly algorithm in software defect prediction. Cluster Comput2019; 22(S5): 10925–10934.
38.
Larabi Marie-SainteSAlalyaniN. Firefly algorithm based feature selection for Arabic text classification. J King Saud Univ - Comput Inf Sci2020; 32(3): 320–328.
39.
SchiezaroMPedriniH.Data feature selection based on artificial bee colony algorithm. EURASIP J Image Video Process2013; 2013(1): 1–8.
40.
HancerEXueBZhangM, et al. Pareto front feature selection based on artificial bee colony optimization. Inf Sci2018; 422: 462–479.
41.
WangXZhangYSunX, et al. Multi-objective feature selection based on artificial bee colony: an acceleration approach with variable sample size. Appl Soft Comput J2020; 88: 106041.
42.
RaoHShiXRodrigueAK, et al. Feature selection based on artificial bee colony and gradient boosting decision tree. Appl Soft Comput J2019; 74: 634–642.
43.
Shaul HameedSMuralidharanVAneBK. Comparative analysis of fuzzy classifier and ANN with histogram features for defect detection and classification in planetary gearbox. Appl Soft Comput2021; 106: 107306.
44.
SaravananNRamachandranKI.Incipient gear box fault diagnosis using discrete wavelet transform (DWT) for feature extraction and classification using artificial neural network (ANN). Expert Syst Appl2010; 37(6): 4168–4181.
45.
Michael Thomas RexFAndrewsAKrishnakumariA, et al. A hybrid approach for fault diagnosis of spur gears using hu. Metrol Measurement Syst2020; 27(3): 451–464.
46.
NahviHEsfahanianM.Fault identification in rotating machinery using artificial neural networks. Proc IMechE, Part C: J Mechanical Engineering Science2005; 219(2): 141–158.
47.
HizarciBÜmütlüRCOzturkH, et al. Vibration region analysis for condition monitoring of gearboxes using image processing and neural networks. Exp Tech2019; 43: 739–755.
48.
KumbharSGDesavaleRGDharwadkarNV.Fault size diagnosis of rolling element bearing using artificial neural network and dimension theory. Neural Comput Appl2021; 33: 16079–16093.
49.
DhamandeLSChaudhariMB.Compound gear-bearing fault feature extraction using statistical features based on time-frequency method. Measurement2018; 125: 63–77.
50.
ZhangJZhangQHeX, et al. Compound-fault diagnosis of rotating machinery: a fused imbalance learning method. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol2021; 29(4): 1462–1474.
51.
YuGWangXDaC.Compound mechanical fault diagnosis based on CMDE. Adv Mech Eng2022; 14(2): 168781322210805.
52.
LiBZhangXWuJ.New procedure for gear fault detection and diagnosis using instantaneous angular speed. Mech Syst Signal Process2017; 85: 415–428.
53.
KarabogaDBasturkB.A powerful and efficient algorithm for numerical function optimization: artificial bee colony (ABC) algorithm. J Glob Optim2007; 39(3): 459–471.
FeuchtDL. Handbook of analog circuit design. 1st ed. Academic Press, 1990, p. 659.
56.
PincusSM.Assessing serial irregularity and its implications for health. Ann N Y Acad Sci2006; 954: 245–267.
57.
LiQDingXWangT, et al. Time-frequency synthesis analysis for complex signal of rotating machinery via variational mode manifold reinforcement learning. Proc IMechE, Part C: J Mechanical Engineering Science2020; 234(7): 1438–1455.
