In order to meet the needs of drivers with different driving styles and improve driving comfort and safety, a personalized design strategy of vehicle steer-by-wire (SBW) characteristics considering driving style is proposed in this paper. Firstly, based on the driver hardware-in-the-loop test bench, the driver’s driving characteristic data is collected under double lane change condition. Then, the K-means clustering algorithm is adopted to classify the driver’s driving style into cautious type, general type and radical type. Based on this, combined with the clustering results and grid search method, the support vector machine algorithm is used to construct the driving style identification model. Finally, considering the driving style, vehicle stability and steering wheel alignment characteristics, the driver personalized variable steering ratio strategy is designed based on the ideal transmission characteristics, and the personalized SBW performance is analyzed under step condition and sinusoidal condition. The results indicate that the proposed personalized design strategy of vehicle SBW characteristics considering driving style can not only accurately identify driving style, but also meet the needs of drivers with different driving styles for vehicle response.
FangY. Connected vehicles make transportation faster, safer, smarter, and greener. IEEE Trans Vehicular Technol2015; 64(12): 5409–5410.
2.
HuangSCaoWQianR, et al. Front wheel angle tracking control research of intelligent heavy vehicle steering system. Proc IMechE, Part C: J Mechanical Engineering Science2021; 235(17): 3454–3467.
3.
HuangCLiL. Architectural design and analysis of a steer-by-wire system in view of functional safety concept. Reliab Eng Syst Saf2020; 198: 106822.
4.
XingYLvCCaoD, et al. Toward human-vehicle collaboration: review and perspectives on human-centered collaborative automated driving. Transp Res Part C Emerg Technol2021; 128: 103199.
5.
WangYWangY. Discrete-time adaptive neural network control for steer-by-wire systems with disturbance observer. Expert Syst Appl2021; 183: 115395.
6.
BalachandranAGerdesJC. Designing steering feel for steer-by-wire vehicles using objective measures. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron2015; 20(1): 373–383.
7.
SunZZhengJManZ, et al. Nested adaptive super-twisting sliding mode control design for a vehicle steer-by-wire system. Mech Syst Signal Process2019; 122: 658–672.
8.
ZhangHZhaoW. Two-way H∞ control method with a fault-tolerant module for steer-by-wire system. Proc IMechE, Part C: J Mechanical Engineering Science2018; 232(1): 42–56.
9.
HuangCNaghdyFDuH. Observer-based fault-tolerant controller for uncertain steer-by-wire systems using the delta operator. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron2018; 23(6): 2587–2598.
10.
CuiTZhaoWWangC. Parametric optimization of a steering system based on dynamic constraints collaborative optimization method. Struct Multidiscip Optim2020; 61: 787–802.
11.
ChengZLuZ. Two novel reconstruction methods of sparsity adaptive adjustment for road roughness compressive signal based on I-SA and GSM. Mech Syst Signal Process2022; 171: 108915.
12.
XingYLvCCaoD, et al. Multi-scale driver behavior modeling based on deep spatial-temporal representation for intelligent vehicles. Transp Res Part C Emerg Technol2021; 130: 103288.
13.
VasconezJPViscainoMGuevaraL, et al. A fuzzy-based driver assistance system using human cognitive parameters and driving style information. Cogn Syst Res2020; 64: 174–190.
14.
LiXWangWRoettingM. Estimating driver’s lane-change intent considering driving style and contextual traffic. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst2019; 20(9): 3258–3271.
15.
GuoQZhaoZShenP, et al. Adaptive optimal control based on driving style recognition for plug-in hybrid electric vehicle. Energy2019; 186: 115824.
16.
WangWXiJChongA, et al. Driving style classification using a semisupervised support vector machine. IEEE Trans Hum Mach Syst2017; 47(5): 650–660.
17.
MiottiMNeedellZARamakrishnanS, et al. Quantifying the impact of driving style changes on light-duty vehicle fuel consumption. Transp Res D Transp Environ2021; 98: 102918.
18.
TricotNSonneratDPopieulJC. Driving styles and traffic density diagnosis in simulated driving conditions. Intell Veh Symp2002; 2: 298–303.
19.
DevikaKSridharNPatilH, et al. Delay compensated pneumatic brake controller for heavy road vehicle active safety systems. Proc IMechE, Part C: J Mechanical Engineering Science2021; 235(13): 2333–2346.
20.
LvCHuXSangiovanni-VincentelliA, et al. Driving-style-based codesign optimization of an automated electric vehicle: a cyber-physical system approach. IEEE Trans Ind Electron2019; 66(4): 2965–2975.
21.
ZorrofiSFilizadehSZanetelP. A simulation study of the impact of driving patterns and driver behavior on fuel economy of hybrid transit buses. In: 2009 IEEE vehicle power and propulsion conference, Dearborn, MI, 7–10 September 2009, pp.572–577.
22.
MurpheyYLMiltonRKiliarisL. Driver’s style classification using jerk analysis. In: 2009 IEEE workshop on computational intelligence in vehicles and vehicular systems, Nashville, TN, 30 March–2 April 2009, pp.23–28.
23.
JafariMGauchiaAZhangK, et al. Simulation and analysis of the effect of real-world driving styles in an EV battery performance and aging. IEEE Trans Transp Electrification2015; 1(4): 391–401.
24.
LiGZhuFQuX, et al. Driving style classification based on driving operational pictures. IEEE Access2019; 7: 90180–90189.
25.
LiuXWangYZhouZ, et al. Trajectory prediction of preceding target vehicles based on lane crossing and final points generation model considering driving styles. IEEE Trans Vehicular Technol2021; 70(9): 8720–8730.
26.
FengYPickeringSChappellE, et al. Driving style analysis by classifying real-world data with support vector clustering. In: 2018 3rd IEEE international conference on intelligent transportation engineering, Singapore, 3–5 September 2018, pp.264–268.
27.
ShiYCuiNDuY. Energy management strategy based on driving style recognition for plug-in hybrid electric bus. In: 2020 39th Chinese control conference, Shenyang, China, 27–29 July 2020, pp.5511–5516.
28.
LiHWuCChuD, et al. Combined trajectory planning and tracking for autonomous vehicle considering driving styles. IEEE Access2021; 9: 9453–9463.
29.
KestingATreiberMSchönhofM, et al. Extending adaptive cruise control to adaptive driving strategies. Transp Res Rec J Transp Res Board2007; 2000: 16–24.
30.
WangRLukicSM. Review of driving conditions prediction and driving style recognition based control algorithms for hybrid electric vehicles. In: 2011 IEEE vehicle power and propulsion conference, Chicago, IL, 6–9 September 2011, pp.1–7.
31.
Marina MartinezCHeuckeMWangFY, et al. Driving style recognition for intelligent vehicle control and advanced driver assistance: a survey. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst2018; 19(3): 666–676.
32.
GaoBCaiKQuT, et al. Personalized adaptive cruise control based on online driving style recognition technology and model predictive control. IEEE Trans Vehicular Technol2020; 69(11): 12482–12496.
33.
MeiYTangKLiK. Real-time identification of probe vehicle trajectories in the mixed traffic corridor. Transp Res Part C Emerg Technol2015; 57: 55–67.
34.
TongXYuSWangL. Establishment of micropit diameter prediction models based on the support vector machine optimization. Proc IMechE, Part C: J Mechanical Engineering Science2020; 234(12): 2417–2431.
35.
YuharaNTajimaJ. Advanced steering system adaptable to lateral control task and driver’s intention. Veh Syst Dyn2001; 36(2/3): 119–158.
36.
HeathershawA. Optimizing variable ratio steering for improved on-centre sensitivity and cornering control. In: SAE 2000 world congress, Detroit, MI, 6–9 March 2000, pp.1–12.
