Flexible parallel manipulators can be used as an orienting device due to its precise positioning ability. The flexibility demands the use of non-conventional actuators and noncontact type/flexible sensors for feedback measurement. This study proposes a novel 2 Degree of Freedom (DoF) parallel manipulator actuated by shape memory alloy springs (SMA) which could be used as an orienting device for a table top Cartesian robot. To mitigate the use of contact type sensor, model based feedback is proposed to obtain SMA length for the feedback control. The inclusion of SMA actuators to parallel mechanism imposes control challenges due to nonlinearities, coupling effects, and disturbances. This work also proposes a novel control scheme based on concept of partition control law to control the SMA spring position without the use of any complex mathematical model. The proposed controller is a combination of two parts Fuzzy PID servo control and the time delay estimation (TDE) based auxiliary control. The fuzzy PID control handles the error tracking and the auxiliary control tries to cancel the nonlinearities and disturbances, thus enhancing the robustness. The performance of the proposed controller is tested for a complex trajectory under disturbances and the results are compared with existing nonlinear controllers which proves superior nature of the proposed controller.
KongXGosselinC. Type synthesis of parallel mechanisms. New York: Springer, 2007.
4.
MerletJP. Still a long way to go on the road for parallel mechanisms. In: ASME 27th Biennial Mechanisms and Robotics, Montreal, 2002.
5.
AmiratYPontauJBabaciS. A flexible assembly cell integrating a parallel manipulator for accurate automatic assembly tasks. In: IEEE Industrial Automation and Control Conference, Taipei, Taiwan, 1995.
6.
JainRKMajumdarSDuttaA. SCARA based peg in hole assembly using compliant IPMC micro gripper. Robotics Autonom Sys2013; 61(3): 297–311.
7.
WeiWYunxiTLiC. Controlling bending deformation of shape memory alloy based soft planar gripper to grip deformable objects. Int J Mech Sci2021; 193: 106181.
8.
NespoliABesseghiniSPittaccioS, et al.The high potential of shape memory alloys in developing miniature mechanical devices: a review on shape memory alloy mini-actuators. Sensors Actuator A: Phys2010; 158: 149–160.
9.
ElwaleedAKMohamedNAJailaniM, et al.A new method for actuating parallel manipulators. Sensors Actuators A: Phys2008; 147: 593–599.
10.
LuADannyGVincentH. Design and comparison of high strain shape memory alloy actuators. IEEE Int Conf Robot Automation1997; 1: 260–267.
11.
AlirezaHAghilYKMajidMM, et al.Developing a novel SMA-actuated robotic module. Sensors Actuators A: Phys2010; 162: 72–81.
12.
ShiZWangTLiuD, et al.A fuzzy PID-controlled SMA actuator for a two-DOF joint. Chin J Aeronautics2014; 27: 453–460.
13.
Sunjai NakshatharanSDhanalakshmiKJosephineSR. Fuzzy based sliding surface for shape memory alloy wire actuated classical super-articulated control system. Appl Soft Comput2015; 32: 580–589.
14.
JosephineSRDhanalakshmiKSunjaiN. Bidirectional angular control of an integrated sensor/actuator shape memory alloy based system. Measurement2015; 69: 210–221.
15.
TylerRLAustinGDavidB. SMA actuator material model with self-sensing and sliding-mode control; experiment and multibody dynamics model. Smart Mater Struct2017; 26(3): 035004.
16.
SinghDChoudhuryRSinghY, et al.Workspace analysis of 3-DOF U-shape base planar parallel robotic motion stage using shape memory alloy restoration technique (SMART) linear actuators. SN Appl Sci2021; 3: 511, DOI: 10.1007/s42452-021-04490-y.
17.
MaNSongG. Control of shape memory alloy actuator using pulse width modulation. Smart Mater Struct2003; 12: 712–719.
18.
ShameliEAlastyASalaariehH. Stability analysis and nonlinearity control of a miniature shape memory alloy actuator for precise applications. Mechatronics2005; 15: 471–486.
19.
KoJJunMBGilardiG, et al.Fuzzy PWM-PID control of co-contracting antagonistic shape memory alloy. Mechatronics2011; 21(7): 1190–1202.
20.
NguyenTTKyoungKA. Adaptive proportional–integral–derivative tuning sliding mode control for a shape memory alloy actuator. Smart Mater Struct; 20: 055010.
21.
Felix OrlandoMJPodderT. Sliding mode control of a shape memory alloy actuated active flexible needle. Robotica2018; 36: 1–18.
22.
AndreIEduardoAT. A sliding mode torque and position controller for an antagonistic SMA Actuator. Mechatronics2015; 30: 126–139.
23.
MaolinJLeeJKyungKA. Continuous nonsingular terminal sliding-mode control of shape memory alloy actuators using time delay estimation. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatronics2015; 20(2): 899–908.
24.
JinohLMaolinJKyoungKA. Precise tracking control of shape memory alloy actuator systems using hyperbolic tangential sliding mode control with time delay estimation. Mechatronics2013; 23: 310–317.
25.
OuyangPRAcobJPanoV. PD with sliding mode control for trajectory tracking of robotic system. Robot Comput-Integrated Manufac2014; 30: 189–200.
26.
MajimaSKodamaKHasegawaT. Modeling of shape memory alloy actuator and tracking control system with the model. IEEE Trans on Control Syst Technol2001; 9: 54–59.
27.
NguyenBKAhnK. Feedforward control of shape memory alloy actuators using fuzzy-based inverse preisach model. IEEE Trans Con Syst Technol2009; 17: 434–441.
28.
GorbetRBWangDWLMorrisKA. Preisach model identification of a two-wire SMA actuator. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics & Automation, Leuven, Belgium, 1998:2161–2167.
29.
DuttaSMGhorbelFHDabneyJB. Modeling and control of a shape memory alloy actuator. In: International symposium on intelligent control, Limassol, Cyprus, 27–29 June 2005: 1007–1012.
30.
ElahiniaMHAshrafiuonH. Nonlinear control of a shape memory alloy actuated manipulator. J Vib Acoust2002; 124: 566–575.
31.
Pierre-AntoineGEmmanuelDJean-MatthieuB, et al.Experimental comparison of classical PID and model-free control: position control of a shape memory alloy active spring. Control Eng Pract2011; 19: 433–441.
LiHGatlandH. A new methodology for designing a fuzzy logic controller. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cyber1995; 25(3): 505–512.
34.
AbdelnourG. Design of a fuzzy controller using input and output mapping factors. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cyber1991; 21: 952–960.
35.
LiawC. Design and implementation of a fuzzy controller for a high performance induction motor drive. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cyber1991; 21(4): 921–929.
36.
MalkiHFeigenspanDMisirD, et al.Fuzzy PID control of a flexible-joint robot arm with uncertainties from time-varying load. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol1997; 5: 371–380.
37.
ChenG. Conventional and fuzzy PID controllers: an overview. Int J Intell Control Syst1996; 1: 235–246.
38.
ChenGYingH. BIBO stability of nonlinear fuzzy PI control systems. J Intell Fuzzy Syst1997; 5: 245–256.
39.
AhnKKhaN. Modeling and control of shape memory alloy actuators using Preisach model, generic algorithm and fuzzy logic. Mechatronics2008; 18: 141–152.
40.
LondhePSYogeshSSanthakumarM, et al.Robust nonlinear PID-like fuzzy logic control of a planar parallel (2PRP-PPR) manipulator. ISA Trans2016; 63: 218–232.
41.
LiH-XGatlandHB. Conventional fuzzy control and its enhancement. IEEE Trans on Systems, Man, Cybernetics1996; 26(5): 791–797.
42.
HassanSMohammadRZ. Position control of shape memory alloy actuator based on the generalized Prandtl-Ishlinskii inverse model. Mechatronics2012; 22: 945–957.
43.
Steve HsiaTC. A new technique for robust control of servo systems. IEEE Trans Ind Electron1989; 36: 1–7.
44.
Steve HsiaTCLaskyTAZhengyuG. Robust independent joint controller design for industrial robot manipulators. IEEE Trans Ind Electron1991; 38: 21–25.
45.
MaolinJJinohLPyungHC, et al.Practical nonsingular terminal sliding-mode control of robot manipulators for high-accuracy tracking control. IEEE Trans Ind Electron2009; 56: 3593–3600.
46.
MaolinJJinohLNikolaosGT. Model-free robust adaptive control of humanoid robots with flexible joints. IEEE Trans Ind Electron2016; 64: 1706–1715.
47.
YaoyaoWGaoshengLLinyiG, et al.Fractional-order nonsingular terminal sliding mode control of hydraulic manipulators using time delay estimation. J Vibration Control2015; 22: 3998–4011.
48.
PatrickHMengWKTongKT, et al.Kinematics analysis and mechatronics system design of a 3-DOF in-parallel actuated mechanism. In: Seventh International Conference on Control, Automation, Robotics And Vision (ICARCV'O2), Singapore, 2002, 950–955.
49.
SadjadianHTaghiradHD. Kinematic, singularity and stiffness analysis of the hydraulic shoulder: a 3-d.o.f. redundant parallel manipulator. Adv Robot2006; 20: 763–781.
50.
GosselinGAngelesJ. Singularity analysis of closed-loop kinematic chains. IEEE Trans Robot Automat1990; 6: 281–290.
51.
ZeinaliMNotashL. Adaptive sliding mode control with uncertainty estimator for robot manipulators. Mech Mach Theor2010; 45(1): 80–90.
52.
SuYSunDDuanB. Design of an enhanced nonlinear PID controller. Mechatronics2005; 15(8): 1005–1024.
53.
MichaelN. Artificial intelligence: a guide to intelligent systems. Harlow, England: Addison-Wesley; 2011.
54.
Ranjith PillaiRGanesanM. Modified PID like Fuzzy servo control applied to smart actuator based miniature parallel robot. J Intell Fuzzy Syst2021; 41: 735–755.
55.
LeeCC. Fuzzy logic in control systems: fuzzy logic controller—Part I. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern1990; 20(2): 404–418.
56.
SabanovicAOhnishiK. Motion control systems. Singapore: John Wiley and Sons, 2011.
57.
MichaelMGideonL. Fuzzy Lyapunov-based approach to the design of fuzzy controllers. Fuzzy Sets Syst1999; 106: 49–59.
58.
KandelALuoYZhangYQ. Stability analysis of fuzzy control systems. Fuzzy Sets Syst1999; 105: 33–48.
59.
JungSHsiaTBonitzR. Force tracking impedance control of robot manipulators under unknown environment. IEEE Trans Contr Syst Technol2004; 12(3): 474–483.
