Motion planning is an essential part of autonomous vehicles. The planning process should respond to environmental changes in real time to ensure safety. This paper proposes an event-triggered real-time motion planning strategy to achieve a more real-time planning effect and a scenario-based planning process. The path planning process is discretized into several parts and integrated into the behavioral planning process. A hierarchical finite state machine (HFSM) based integrated motion planning process is proposed to trigger the discrete path planning parts according to environmental events. Thus, the output reference path can be obtained. Experiment and simulation results show the efficiency of our strategy.
YongSZYershovDFrazzoliE, et al.A survey of motion planning and control techniques for self-driving urban vehicles. IEEE Trans Intell Veh2016; 1: 1–27.
2.
ArshadSSualehMKimD, et al.Clothoid: an integrated hierarchical framework for autonomous driving in a dynamic urban environment. Sensors2020; 20: 1–28.
3.
WalchMLangeKBaumannM, et al.A review of motion planning for highway autonomous driving. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst2015; 21: 11–18.
4.
FanHZhuFLiuCZhuangLZhuangLLiDZhuWHuJLiHKongQ. Baidu apollo em motion planner. arXiv preprint arXiv:1807.08048. 2018 Jul 20.
5.
MunirFAzamSHussainMI, et al.Autonomous vehicle: the architecture aspect of self driving car. ACM Int Conf Proceeding Ser2018; ■■■: 1–5.
6.
SongWSuBXiongG, et al.Intention-aware decision making in urban lane change scenario for autonomous driving. In: 2018 IEEE international conference on vehicular electronics and safety, Madrid, Spain, 12–14 Sep 2018
7.
XuHGaoYYuF, et al.End-to-end learning of driving models from large-scale video datasets. Proc - 30th IEEE Conf Comput Vis Pattern Recognition, CVPR2017; ■■■: 3530–3538.
8.
MammeriZ. Reinforcement learning based routing in networks: Review and classification of approaches. IEEE Access2019; 7: 55916–55950.
9.
JeongY. Predictive lane change decision making using bidirectional long shot-term memory for autonomous driving on highways. IEEE Access2021; 9: 144985–144998. DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3122869.
10.
KontoudisGPVamvoudakisKG. Kinodynamic motion planning with continuous-time Q-learning: an online, model-free, and safe navigation framework. IEEE Trans Neural Networks Learn Syst2019; 30: 3803–3817.
11.
GaoZYanXGaoF, et al.Driver-like decision-making method for vehicle longitudinal autonomous driving based on deep reinforcement learning. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part D J Automob Eng2021; ■■■: ■■■. DOI: 10.1177/09544070211063081.
12.
KiranBRSobhITalpaertV, et al.Deep reinforcement learning for autonomous driving: a survey. In: IEEE transactions on intelligent transportation systems, 09 Feb 2021. pp. 1–18.
13.
HuegleMKalweitGMirchevskaB, et al.Dynamic input for deep reinforcement learning in autonomous driving. In: 2019 IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems (IROS), Macau, China, 3–8 Nov 2019. pp. 7566–7573.
14.
EskandarianA. Handbook of intelligent vehicles. Handb Intell Veh2012; 1–2: 1–13.
15.
NohSAnK. Decision-making framework for automated driving in highway environments. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst2018; 19: 58–71.
16.
ChenKYangBPeiX, et al.Hierarchical control strategy towards safe driving of autonomous vehicles. J Intell Fuzzy Syst2018; 34: 2197–2212.
17.
LiuLLuSZhongR, et al.Computing systems for autonomous driving: state of the art and challenges. IEEE Internet Things J2021; 8: 6469–6486.
18.
ZengDYuZXiongL, et al.Driving-behavior-oriented trajectory planning for autonomous vehicle driving on urban structural road. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part D J Automob Eng2021; 235: 975–995.
19.
MentastiSMatteucciM. Multi-layer occupancy grid mapping for autonomous vehicles navigation. In: 2019 AEIT international conference of electrical and electronic technologies for automotive (Aeit automotive), Turin, Italy, 2–4 July 2019.
20.
GulFMirIAbualigahL, et al.A consolidated review of path planning and optimization techniques: Technical perspectives and future directions. Electron; 10: 2250. DOI: 10.3390/electronics10182250.
21.
RasekhipourYKhajepourAChenSK, et al.A potential field-based model predictive path-planning controller for autonomous road vehicles. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst2017; 18: 1255–1267.
22.
WerlingMZieglerJKammelS, et al.Optimal trajectory generation for dynamic street scenarios in a frenét frame. In: 2010 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation, Anchorage, AK, USA, 3–7 May 2010. pp. 987–993.
23.
ChuKKimJJoK, et al.Real-time path planning of autonomous vehicles for unstructured road navigation. Int J Automot Technol2015; 16: 653–668.
24.
LiBZhangY. Fast trajectory planning in cartesian rather than frenet frame: a precise solution for autonomous driving in complex urban scenarios. IFAC-PapersOnLine2020; 53: 17065–17070.
25.
LimWLeeSSunwooM, et al.Hierarchical trajectory planning of an autonomous car based on the integration of a sampling and an optimization method. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst2018; 19: 613–626.
26.
XuFWangHHuB, et al.Road boundaries detection based on modified occupancy grid map using millimeter-wave radar. Mob Networks Appl2020; 25: 1496–1503.
27.
ZieglerJStillerC. Fast collision checking for intelligent vehicle motion planning. In: 2010 IEEE intelligent vehicles symposium, La Jolla, CA, USA, 21–24 June 2010, pp. 518–522.
