A Discrete Boltzmann Model(DBM) based on the Shakhov model for detonation is proposed. Compared with the DBM based on the Bhatnagar–Gross–Krook (BGK) model, the current model has a flexible Prandtl numbers and consequently can be applied to a much wider range of detonation phenomena. Besides the Hydrodynamic Non-Equilibrium (HNE) behaviors usually investigated by the Navier–Stokes model, the most relevant Thermodynamic Non-Equilibrium (TNE) effects can be probed by the current model. The model is validated by some well-known benchmarks, and some steady and unsteady detonation processes are investigated. As for the von Neumann peak relative to the wave front, it is found that (i) (within the range of numerical experiments) the peak heights of pressure, density, and flow velocity increase exponentially with the Prandtl number, the maximum stress increases parabolically with the Prandtl number, and the maximum heat flux decreases exponentially with the Prandtl number and (ii) the peak heights of pressure, density, temperature and flow velocity, and the maximum stress within the peak are parabolically increase with the Mach number, the maximum heat flux decreases exponentially with the Mach number.
RenZLuZHouL, et al.Numerical simulation of turbulent combustion: scientific challenges. Sci China Phys Mech Astron2014; 57(8): 1495–1503.
2.
RenZWangBXiangG, et al.Supersonic spray combustion subject to scramjets: Progress and challenges. Prog Aerospace Sci2019; 105: 40–59.
3.
JuY. Recent progress and challenges in fundamental combustion research. Adv Mech2014; 44(20): 201402.
4.
YangYWangHPopeSB, et al.Large-eddy simulation/pdf modeling of a non-premixed co/h2 temporally evolving jet flame. Proc Combustion Inst2013; 34(1): 1241–1249.
5.
WangYMovagharAWangZ, et al.Laminar flame speeds of methane/air mixtures at engine conditions: performance of different kinetic models and power-law correlations. Combustion and Flame2020; 218: 101–108.
6.
WangYHanWChenZ. Effects of stratification on premixed cool flame propagation and modeling. Combustion and Flame2021; 229: 111394.
7.
LiuFGaoYHanW, et al.The investigation on soot characteristics of gasoline/diesel blends in a laminar co-flow diffusion flame. Energy & Fuels2018; 32: 7841–7850.
8.
YaoMMaTWangH, et al.A theoretical study on the effects of thermal barrier coating on diesel engine combustion and emission characteristics - sciencedirect. Energy2018; 162: 744–752.
9.
MaTFengLWangH, et al.Analysis of near wall combustion and pollutant migration after spray impingement. Int J Heat Mass Transfer2019; 141: 569–579.
10.
Kolera-GokulaHEchekkiT. Direct numerical simulation of premixed flame kernelcvortex interactions in hydrogencair mixtures. Combustion and Flame2006; 146(1/2): 155–167.
11.
NiXWengCXuH, et al.Numerical analysis of heat flow in wall of detonation tube during pulse detonation cycle. Appl Therm Eng2021; 187: 116528.
12.
WatanabeHMatsuoAChinnayyaA, et al.Numerical analysis of the mean structure of gaseous detonation with dilute water spray. J Fluid Mech2020: 887, A4.
13.
MaTChenDWangH, et al.Influence of thermal barrier coating on partially premixed combustion in internal combustion engine. Fuel2021; 303(2–3): 121259.
14.
ZhouRWangJP. Numerical investigation of flow particle paths and thermodynamic performance of continuously rotating detonation engines. Combustion and Flame2012; 159(12): 3632–3645.
15.
XuAShanYChenF, et al.Progress of mesoscale modeling and investigation of combustion multiphase flow (in Chinese). Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica2021; 42(12): 625842.
16.
XuAZhangGYingY, et al.Progress of discrete Boltzmann modeling and simulation of combustion system (in chinese). Acta Physica Sinica2015; 64(4): 184701. DOI: 10.7498/aps.64.184701.
17.
LiuHKangWQiZ, et al.Molecular dynamics simulations of microscopic structure of ultra-strong shock waves in dense helium. Front Phys2016; 11(6): 197–207.
18.
LiuHZhangYKangW, et al.Molecular dynamics simulation of strong shock waves propagating in dense deuterium, taking into consideration effects of excited electrons. Phys Rev E2017; 95(2): 023201.
XuAChenJSongJ, et al.Progress of discrete Boltzmann study on multiphase complex flows (in chinese). Acta Aerodynamica Sinica2021; 39(3): 138–169.
21.
XuASongJChenF, et al.Modeling and analysis methods for complex fields based on phase space (in chinese). Chin J Comput Phys2021; 38(6): 631–660.
22.
JiYLinCLuoKH. Three-dimensional multiple-relaxation-time discrete Boltzmann model of compressible reactive flows with nonequilibrium effects. AIP Adv2021; 11(4): 045217.
23.
LinCSuXZhangY. Hydrodynamic and thermodynamic nonequilibrium effects around shock waves: Based on a discrete Boltzmann method. Entropy2020; 22(12): 1397.
LinCLuoKH. Mesoscopic simulation of nonequilibrium detonation with discrete Boltzmann method. Combustion and Flame2018; 198: 356–362.
26.
ChenLLaiHLinC, et al.Specific heat ratio effects of compressible Rayleigh-Taylor instability studied by discrete Boltzmann method. Front Phys2021; 16(5): 52500. DOI: 10.1007/s11467-021-1096-3.
27.
XuAZhangGZhangY, et al.Discrete Boltzmann model for implosion and explosion related compressible flow with spherical symmetry. Front Phys2018; 13(5): 135102.
28.
SucciS. The lattice Boltzmann equation for fluid dynamics and beyond. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2001.
29.
ShanXChenH. Lattice Boltzmann model for simulating flows with multiple phases and components. Phys Review E1993; 47(3): 1815–1819.
30.
ZhangYQinREmersonDR. Lattice Boltzmann simulation of rarefied gas flows in microchannels. Phys Review E2005; 71(4): 047702.
31.
AmbruVESofoneaV. Quadrature-based Lattice Boltzmann models for rarefied gas flow. Flowing Matter, 2019.
32.
ChenFXuAZhangG, et al.Multiple-relaxation-time lattice Boltzmann approach to compressible flows with flexible specific-heat ratio and Prandtl number. EPL (Europhysics Letters)2010; 90(5): 54003.
33.
LiQLuoKGaoY, et al.Additional interfacial force in lattice Boltzmann models for incompressible multiphase flows. Phys Rev E2012; 85(2): 026704.
34.
WangZWeiYQianY. A simple direct heating thermal immersed boundary-lattice Boltzmann method for its application in incompressible flow. Comput Mathematics Appl2020; 80(6): 1633–1649.
WangYZhongCCaoJ, et al.A simplified finite volume lattice Boltzmann method for simulations of fluid flows from laminar to turbulent regime, part i: numerical framework and its application to laminar flow simulation. Comput Mathematics Appl2020; 79(5): 1590–1618.
37.
SaadatMHBöschFKarlinIV. Semi-Lagrangian lattice Boltzmann model for compressible flows on unstructured meshes. Phys Rev E2020; 101(2): 023311.
38.
FeiLDuJLuoKH, et al.Modeling realistic multiphase flows using a non-orthogonal multiple-relaxation-time lattice Boltzmann method. Phys Fluids2019; 31(4): 042105.
39.
QiuRBaoYZhouT, et al.Study of regular reflection shock waves using a mesoscopic kinetic approach: curvature pattern and effects of viscosity. Phys Fluids2020; 32(10): 106106.
40.
QiuRZhouTBaoY, et al.Mesoscopic kinetic approach for studying nonequilibrium hydrodynamic and thermodynamic effects of shock wave, contact discontinuity, and rarefaction wave in the unsteady shock tube. Phys Rev E2021; 103(5): 053113.
41.
SunD. A discrete kinetic scheme to model anisotropic liquid–solid phase transitions. Appl Mathematics Lett2020; 103: 106222.
42.
SunDXingHDongX, et al.An anisotropic lattice Boltzmann–phase field scheme for numerical simulations of dendritic growth with melt convection. Int J Heat Mass Transfer2019; 133: 1240–1250.
43.
ZhanCChaiZShiB. A lattice Boltzmann model for the coupled cross-diffusion-fluid system. Appl Mathematics Comput2021; 400: 126105.
44.
HuangQTianFYoungJ, et al.Transition to chaos in a two-sided collapsible channel flow. J Fluid Mech2021; 926: A15.
45.
WangHTianFLiuX. Lattice Boltzmann model for interface capturing of multiphase flows based on the Allen-Cahn equation. Chin Phys B2021; 31(2): 024701.
46.
LiuYXiaJWanK, et al.Simulation of char-pellet combustion and sodium release inside porous char using lattice Boltzmann method. Combustion and Flame2020; 211: 325–336.
47.
EsfahanianVGhadyaniM. Improvement of the instability of compressible lattice Boltzmann model by shock-detecting sensor. J Mech Sci Technol2015; 29(5): 1981–1991.
48.
GhadyaniMEsfahanianV. A more robust compressible lattice Boltzmann model by using the numerical filters. J Mech2014; 30(05): 515–525.
49.
MohsenGVahidEMohammadTR. The use of shock-detecting sensor to improve the stability of lattice Boltzmann model for high Mach number flows. Int J Mod Phys C2015; 26(1): 1550006.
50.
XuAGZhangGCGanYB, et al.Lattice Boltzmann modeling and simulation of compressible flows. Front Phys2012; 7(5): 582–600.
51.
XuALinCZhangG, et al.Multiple-relaxation-time lattice Boltzmann kinetic model for combustion. Phys Rev E1995; 91(4): 043306.
52.
ZhangYXuAZhangG, et al.Kinetic modeling of detonation and effects of negative temperature coefficient. Combustion and Flame2016; 173: 483–492.
53.
LinCXuAZhangG, et al.Double-distribution-function discrete Boltzmann model for combustion. Combustion and Flame2016; 164: 137–151.
54.
ZhangYXuAZhangG, et al.Discrete Boltzmann method for non-equilibrium flows: based on Shakhov model. Computer Phys Commun2019; 238: 50–65.
55.
ZhangYXuAZhangG, et al.Discrete ellipsoidal statistical bgk model and Burnett equations. Front Phys2018; 13(3): 135101.
56.
LinCLuoKHXuA, et al.Multiple-relaxation-time discrete Boltzmann modeling of multicomponent mixture with nonequilibrium effects. Phys Rev E2021; 103(1): 013305.
57.
ChenFXuAZhangG. Viscosity, heat conductivity, and Prandtl number effects in the Rayleigh–Taylor instability. Front Phys2016; 11(6): 114703.
58.
ChenFXuAZhangG. Collaboration and competition between Richtmyer–Meshkov instability and Rayleigh–Taylor instability. Phys Fluids2018; 30(10): 102105.
59.
ZhangDXuAZhangY, et al.Two-fluid discrete Boltzmann model for compressible flows: based on ellipsoidal statistical Bhatnagar-Gross-Krook. Phys Fluids2020; 32: 126110.
60.
ShakhovEM. Generalization of the Krook kinetic relaxation equation. Fluid Dyn1968; 3(5): 95–96.
