The two-stage sleeve control valve has been widely implemented in the high-pressure difference hydraulic system, whose function is to reduce hydrodynamic noise. The sleeve with orifices plays a significant role in reducing the hydrodynamic noise. The ratio of orifices diameter between the outer sleeve and inner sleeve, Ri, is investigated in this paper. The coupling effect of Ri on the flow field and hydrodynamic noise is analyzed deeply by URANS and FW-H model. Furthermore, the pressure, velocity, turbulent kinetic energy, and sound pressure level of the flow field are monitored. The results indicate that higher Ri will restrict the flow velocity in the orifices, and the distributed pressure drop of two sleeves will be even. The velocity of flow in the outer sleeve reduces from 130 m/s to 90 m/s with the increase of Ri. In addition, larger Ri can reduce the hydrodynamic noise and obtain higher flow capacity. When the Ri is 1.2, the sound power level distributes evenly in the gap, and the radiation intensity of the sound source is the smallest. The study can provide a reference for the design of sleeves in high-pressure control valves.
SingletonEW. An investigation into control valve-generated turbulence and noise with reference to the performance of downstream instrumentation. Measurement Control2004; 37: 182–191. DOI: 10.1177/002029400403700603.
2.
GuoCGaoMWangJ. Acoustic distribution study inside centrifugal pump impeller under different blade outlet angles using the Powell vortex sound theory. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part C: J Mech Eng Sci2020; 234: 2595–2609. DOI: 10.1177/0954406220908732.
3.
ChengM. A summary of acoustic characteristics and control techniques of underwater non-cavitation thruster. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part C: J Mech Eng Sci2019; 233: 6339–6356. DOI: 10.1177/0954406219844530.
4.
FanLHCaiGH. Exploration on Aerodynamic Noise Characteristics for Control Valve of Steam Turbine. Appl Mech Mater2012; 224: 395–400. DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.224.395.
5.
WeiLZhuGQianJ, et al.Numerical Simulation of Flow-Induced Noise in High Pressure Reducing Valve. PLoS One2015; 10: e0129050. 2015/06/11. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0129050.
6.
RyuJCheongCKimS, et al.Computation of internal aerodynamic noise from a quick-opening throttle valve using frequency-domain acoustic analogy. Appl Acoust2005; 66: 1278–1308. DOI: 10.1016/j.apacoust.2005.04.002.
7.
QianJ-yChenM-rJinZ-j, et al.A numerical study of heat transfer effects and aerodynamic noise reduction in superheated steam flow passing a temperature and pressure regulation valve. Numer Heat Transfer, Part A: Appl2020; 77: 873–889. DOI: 10.1080/10407782.2020.1746558.
8.
ZengL-fLiuG-wMaoJ-r, et al.Flow-induced vibration and noise in control valve. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part C: J Mech Eng Sci2015; 229: 3368–3377. DOI: 10.1177/0954406215570386.
9.
VoskoboinickVVoskoboinykOChertovO, et al.Hydrodynamic noise of pulsating jets through bileaflet mechanical mitral valve. Biomed Res Int2020; 2020: 1024096. 2020/06/23. DOI: 10.1155/2020/1024096.
10.
BerestovitskiyEGErmilovMAKizilovPI, et al.Research of an influence of throttle element perforation on hydrodynamic noise in control valves of hydraulic systems. Proced Eng2015; 106: 284–295. DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2015.06.037.
11.
PrekM. Flow-induced noise generation in a simple fluid valve model. Noise Control Eng J2004; 52: 5–12. DOI: 10.3397/1.2839736.
12.
BaumannHDJörgK. A method to estimate hydrodynamic noise produced in valves by submerged turbulent and cavitating water jets. Noise Control Eng J2004; 52: 49–55. DOI: 10.3397/1.2839740.
13.
CianferraMArmenioVIannielloS. Hydroacoustic noise from different geometries. Int J Heat Fluid Flow2018; 70: 348–362. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2017.12.005.
14.
HanTWangLCenK, et al.Flow-induced noise analysis for natural gas manifolds using LES and FW-H hybrid method. Appl Acoust2020; 159, 107101. DOI: 10.1016/j.apacoust.2019.107101.
15.
ZhangJYangQLvR, et al.Research on noise generation mechanism and noise reduction ball valve measures of ball valve. IEEE Access2020; 8: 15973–15982. DOI: 10.1109/access.2020.2967063.
16.
BoersmaBJ. Large Eddy Simulation of the sound field of a round turbulent jet. Theor Comput Fluid Dyn2004; 19: 161–170. DOI: 10.1007/s00162-004-0107-7.
17.
KarthikKJeyakumarSSebastinJS. Optimization of wavy cylinder for aerodynamic drag and aeroacoustic sound reduction using computational fluid dynamics analysis. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part C: J Mech Eng Sci2020; 235: 1979–1991. DOI: 10.1177/0954406220950353.
18.
XuWWangQWuD, et al.Simulation and design improvement of a low noise control valve in autonomous underwater vehicles. Appl Acoust2019; 146: 23–30. DOI: 10.1016/j.apacoust.2018.10.019.
19.
LiSHouJPanW, et al.Study on aerodynamic noise numerical simulation and characteristics of safety valve based on dipole and quadrupole. Acoust Aust2020; 48: 441–454. DOI: 10.1007/s40857-020-00201-6.
20.
MengWJonathanBFreundJB. Computational prediction of flow-generated sound. Annu Rev Fluid Mech2006; 38: 483–512. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.fluid.38.050304.092036.
21.
YangQWangM. Boundary-layer noise induced by arrays of roughness elements. J Fluid Mech2013; 727: 282–317. DOI: 10.1017/jfm.2013.190.
22.
KarimiMCroakerPSkvortsovA, et al.Numerical prediction of turbulent boundary layer noise from a sharp‐edged flat plate. Int J Numer Methods Fluids2019; 90: 522–543. DOI: 10.1002/fld.4733.
23.
NairVAleniusEBoijS, et al.Inspecting sound sources in an orifice-jet flow using Lagrangian coherent structures. Comput Fluids2016; 140: 397–405. DOI: 10.1016/j.compfluid.2016.09.001.
24.
YuanG-QJiangW-KHuaH-X. Hydroacoustic analysis of open cavity subsonic flow based on multiple parameter numerical models. J Hydrodynamics2015; 27: 668–678. DOI: 10.1016/s1001-6058(15)60529-7.
25.
ShaabanAAZiadaS. Acoustic response of multiple shallow cavities and prediction of self-excited acoustic oscillations. J Fluids Eng, 1402018; 140. DOI: 10.1115/1.4039516.
26.
SchlatterPBagheriSHenningsonDS. Self-sustained global oscillations in a jet in crossflow. Theor Comput Fluid Dyn2010; 25: 129–146. DOI: 10.1007/s00162-010-0199-1.
27.
MadjidSAminaSBenaissaA. Effect of orifice geometry on the development of slightly heated turbulent jets. J Fluids Eng2015; 137. DOI: 10.1115/1.4030677.
28.
AleyasinSSTachieMFKoupriyanovM. Statistical properties of round, square, and elliptic jets at low and moderate reynolds numbers. J Fluids Eng2017; 139. DOI: 10.1115/1.4036824.
29.
GablRRighettiM. Design criteria for a type of asymmetric orifice in a surge tank using CFD. Eng Appl Comput Fluid Mech2018; 12: 397–410. DOI: 10.1080/19942060.2018.1443837.
30.
WangY-PZhuC-NZhangG, et al.Numerical Analysis to the Effect of Guiding Plate on Flow Characteristics in a Ball Valve. Processes2020; 8: 69. DOI: 10.3390/pr8010069.
31.
GaoJWuF. Investigation of flow through the two-stage orifice. Eng Appl Comput Fluid Mech2019; 13: 117–127. DOI: 10.1080/19942060.2018.1561517.
32.
Garcia-AlcaideVMPalleja-CabreSCastillaR, et al.Numerical study of the aerodynamics of sound sources in a bass-reflex port. Eng Appl Comput Fluid Mech2017; 11: 210–224. DOI: 10.1080/19942060.2016.1277166.
