This work focuses on the numerical prediction of the sound transmission of wooden windows in the low frequency range. In this context, the finite element method is used to solve the multiphysics problem. This choice is justified by the fact that this approach is suitable for the resolution of fluid-structure interaction problems in low frequencies, due in particular to its flexibility in taking into account the coupling between domains and the geometrical and material complexities of the structures. To reach the desired objective, experimental modal analyses of the main components of a window, and then of a complete one, are performed in order to calibrate the numerical models. Then, a configuration that combines free-fields on both sides of the structure is employed to evaluate the intrinsic acoustic response of the window. The numerical results for a symmetric and an asymmetric glazing are compared to experimental ones to evaluate the efficiency and validity of the developed models.
ISO 12354 : Acoustique du bâtiment -- Calcul de la performance acous-tique des bâtiments à partir de la performance des éléments : Partie 3: Isolement aux bruits aériens venus de l'extérieur, 2017.
2.
DíazCPedreroA.An experimental study on the effect of rolling shutters and shutter boxes on the airborne sound insulation of windows. Appl Acoust2009;
70: 369–377.
3.
PietrzkoSMaoQ.Vibration identification and sound insulation of triple glazing. Noise Cont Engng J2013;
61: 345–354.
4.
NaticchiaBCarbonariA.Feasibility analysis of an active technology to improve acoustic comfort in buildings. Build Environ2007;
42: 2785–2796.
5.
ISO 10140 : Acoustique -- Mesurage en laboratoire de l'isolation acous-tique des éléments de construction : Partie 1 : Rales d'application pour produits particuliers, 2016.
6.
ISO 10140 : Acoustique -- Mesurage en laboratoire de l'isolation acous-tique des éléments de construction : Partie 2 : Mesurage de l'isolation au bruit aérien, 2013.
7.
ISO 10140 : Acoustique -- Mesurage en laboratoire de l'isolation acous-tique des éléments de construction : Partie 4 : Exigences et modes opératoires de mesure, 2013.
8.
ISO 10140 : Acoustique -- Mesurage en laboratoire de l'isolation acous-tique des éléments de construction : Partie 5 : Exigences relatives aux installations et appareillage d'essai, 2013.
9.
NélisseHNicolasJ.Characterization of a diffuse field in a reverberant room. J Acoust Soc Am1997;
101: 3517–3524.
UtleyWA.Single leaf transmission loss at low frequencies. J Sound Vib1968;
8: 256–261.
12.
KihlmanTNilssonAC.The effects of some laboratory designs and mounting conditions on reduction index measurements. J Sound Vib1972;
24: 349–364.
13.
JonesRE.Intercomparisons of laboratory determinations of airborne sound transmission loss. J Acoust Soc Am1979;
66: 148–164.
14.
FahyF.Sound and structural vibration: radiation, transmission, and response.
Cambridge, MA:
Academic Press, 1987.
15.
PedersenDBRolandJRaabeG, et al.
Measurement of the low-frequency sound insulation of building components. Acta Acustica United Acustica2000;
86: 495–505.
16.
PratoASchiaviA.Sound insulation of building elements at low frequency: a modal approach. Energy Procedia2015;
78: 128–133.
17.
UngerEE.Statistical energy analysis of vibrating systems. J Eng Ind1967;
89: 626–632.
18.
LyonRH.Statistical energy analysis of dynamical systems. Theory and application.
Cambridge, MA:
MIT Press, 1975.
19.
MaxitLGuyaderJ-L. Statistical modal energy distribution analysis(smeda). In: Proceedings of sixth international congress on sound and vibration, Copenhagen, Denmark, 5--8 July 1999.
20.
TadeuAAntónioJMP.Acoustic insulation of single panel walls provided by analytical expressions versus the mass law. J Sound Vib2002;
257: 457–475.
21.
ShorterPJLangleyRS.Vibro-acoustic analysis of complex systems. J Sound Vib2005;
288: 669–699.
22.
SantosPTadeuA.Acoustic insulation provided by a single wall separating two contiguous tunnels via BEM. J Sound Vib2002;
257: 945–965.
23.
SgardFCAtallaNNicolasJ.Numerical model for the low frequency diffuse field sound transmission loss of double-wall sound barriers with elastic porous linings. J Acoust Soc Am2000;
108: 2865–2872.
24.
MaluskiSPSGibbsBM.Application of a finite-element model to low-frequency sound insulation in dwellings. J Acoust Soc Am2000;
108: 1741–1751.
25.
MagliacanoDOuisseMKhelifA, et al.
Computation of dispersion diagrams for periodic porous materials modeled as equivalent fluids. Mech Syst Signal Process2020;
142: 106749.
26.
GimenoSR.Study of the acoustic insulation through domestic windows. Masterof the acouEscuela Politecnica Superior De Gandia, 2012.
27.
KwapiszLMaurinAJakubowskiP. Numerical modelling of sound transmission through the window type partition. In: Symposium Vibrations In Physical Systems, Bdlewo koło Poznania, Polska, 9--13 May 2016, p.27.
28.
LøvholtFNorèn-CosgriffKMadshusC, et al.
Simulating low frequency sound transmission through walls and windows by a two-way coupled fluid structure interaction model. J Sound Vib2017;
396: 203–216.
29.
MathysJ.Low-frequency noise and acoustical standards. Appl Acoust1993;
40: 185–199.
30.
BedonCAmadioC.Mechanical analysis and characterization of igus with different silicone sealed spacer connections-part 1: experiments. Glass Struct Eng2020;
5: 301–325.
31.
BedonCAmadioC.Mechanical analysis and characterization of igus with different silicone sealed spacer connections – part 2: modelling. Glass Struct Eng2020;
5: 327–346.
32.
GuyaderJ-LLesueurC.Acoustic transmission through orthotropic multilayered plates, part ii: transmission loss. J Sound Vib1978;
58: 69–86.
33.
SoussiCAucejoMLarbiW, et al. Sound transmission through double-glazed window: Numerical and experimental analyses. In Proceedings of the 23rd international congress on acoustics, ICA 2019, integrating the 4th EAA Euroregio, Aachen, Germany, 9–13 September 2019.
34.
PierceADBeyerRT.Acoustics: an introduction to its physical principles and applications. 1989 edition. 3rd ed. New York, Acoustical Society of America, 1989.
35.
LarbiWDeüJ-FOhayonR.A new finite element formulation for internal acoustic problems with dissipative walls. Int J Numer Meth Engng2006;
68: 381–399.
36.
LarbiWDeüJ-FOhayonR.Vibration of axisymmetric composite piezoelectric shells coupled with internal fluid. Int J Numer Meth Engng2007;
71: 1412–1435.
37.
LarbiWDeüJ-FOhayonR.Vibroacoustic analysis of double-wall sandwich panels with viscoelastic core. Comput Struct2016;
174: 92–103.
38.
Jeong C.-H. Diffuse sound field: challenges and misconceptions. In: Proceedings of internoise 2016, Hamburg, Germany, 2016, pp.1015–1021.
39.
VérILBeranekLL.Noise and vibration control engineering. Principles and applications. 2nd ed.
Hoboken:
Wiley, 2006.
40.
FahyFJGardonioP.Sound and structural vibration – radiation, transmission and response. 2nd ed.
Amsterdam:
Elsevier, 2007.
41.
GuillaumePVerbovenPVanlanduitS. A poly-reference implementation of the least-squares complex frequency-domain estimator. In: Proceedings of IMAC 21, the international modal analysis conference, Kissimmee, Florida, USA, 3--6 February 2003.
42.
El-KafafyMPeetersBDe TroyerT, et al. Polymax plus estimator: better estimation of the modal parameters and their confidence bounds. In: Proceedings of international noise and vibration conference ISMA 2014, Leuven, Belgium, 15--17 September 2014.
43.
BedonCFasanMAmadioC.Vibration analysis and dynamic characterization of structural glass elements with different restraints based on operational modal analysis. Buildings2019;
9: 13.
44.
Free Field Technologies. Actran 17.1 user’s guide. Installation, operations, theory and utilities. volume 1. Belgium: Free Field Technologies,2017.
45.
ISO 338:2016. Bois de structure – Classes de résistance.
46.
ISO 14080:2013. Structures en bois – Bois lamellé collé et bois massif reconstitué – Exigence.
47.
AllemangRJ.The modal assurance criterion – twenty years of use and abuse. J Sound Vib2003;
37: 14–23.
48.
BedonC.Issues on the vibration analysis of in-service laminated glass structures: analytical, experimental and numerical investigations on delaminated beams. Appl Sci2019;
9: 3928.
49.
BedonC.Diagnostic analysis and dynamic identification of a glass suspension footbridge via on-site vibration experiments and FE numerical modelling. Compos Struct2019;
216: 366–378.
