Recent studies on understanding of natural flyers have encouraged researchers in development of micro aerial vehicles mimicking birds and insects such as hummingbirds, dragonflies, bats and many more. The vehicles find their applications in reconnaissance and situational awareness in combat field, search and rescue operations, biological and nuclear compromised sites and broadcasting and sports. The focus of this review is to assess recent progress in sub systems of these vehicles including drive mechanisms, actuation mechanisms and wing designs that define the aerodynamics, propulsion, stability, and control of the vehicles. Limited research has been carried out on drive mechanisms capable of producing figure-of-eight wingtip motion contrary to conventional four and five-bar linkage mechanisms along with modified planar and spherical attachments. Motor and piezoelectric actuation mechanisms are being used extensively in these vehicles due to lightweight and power efficiency as compared to non-conventional power sources. Wing shape and rigidity plays a key role in determining the required lift and thrust along with frequency limitations and material constraints. A relatively new field of structural and kinematic optimization for the development of a lightweight flapping vehicle with high endurance capability is also a part of this review. This review has pointed out the research gaps including 3-DoF piezoelectric kinematics, under-actuated mechanisms, structural contact analysis, limited static and dynamic structural analysis, limited fatigue analysis and development of optimization techniques.
Kim D-K and Han J-H. Smart flapping wing using macrofiber composite actuators. In: Smart structures and materials 2006: smart structures and integrated systems. p.61730F. SPIE Publications.
2.
TeohZE andWoodRJ. A flapping-wing microrobot with a differential angle-of-attack mechanism. In: Proceedings – IEEE international conference on robotics and automation, pp.1381–1388.
3.
BaekSSMaKY andFearingRS. Efficient resonant drive of flapping-wing robots. In: 2009. IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems, IROS, 2009, pp.2854–2860.
4.
ZdunichPBilykDMacMasterM, et al.
Development and testing of the mentor flapping-wing micro air vehicle. J Aircr2007;
44: 1701–1711.
5.
YoungJ andLaiJCS.Vortex Lock-In phenomenon in the wake of a plunging airfoil. AIAA J2007;
45: 485–490.
6.
PlatzerMFJonesKDYoungJ, et al.
Flapping wing aerodynamics: progress and challenges. AIAA J2008;
46: 2136–2149.
7.
SaneSP.The aerodynamics of insect flight. J Exp Biol2003;
206: 4191–4208.
8.
JongeriusSR andLentinkD.Structural analysis of a dragonfly wing. Exp Mech2010;
50: 1323–1334.
9.
LehmannFO.The mechanisms of lift enhancement in insect flight. Naturwissenschaften2004;
91: 101–122.
10.
EllingtonCP.The aerodynamics of hovering insect flight. VI. Lift and power requirements. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci1984;
305: 145–181.
11.
TruongTQPhanVHSaneSP, et al.
Pitching moment generation in an insect-mimicking flapping-wing system. J Bionic Eng2014;
11: 36–51.
12.
Nguyen Q, Chan WL and Debiasi M. Design, fabrication, and performance test of a hovering-based flapping-wing micro air vehicle capable of sustained and controlled flight. In: Conference: 2014 International Micro Air Vehicle Conference and Competition (IMAV 2014), Delft, The Netherlands, August 2014, pp. 18--25.
13.
ShyyWAonoHChimakurthiSK, et al.
Recent progress in flapping wing aerodynamics and aeroelasticity. Progr Aerosp Sci2010;
46: 284–327.
14.
HaiderNShahzadAMumtaz QadriMN, et al. Recent progress in flapping wings for micro aerial vehicle applications. Proc IMechE, Part C: J Mechanical Engineering Science2020. DOI: 10.1177/0954406220917426
15.
Mahendran S, Asokan R, Kumar A, et al. Development of the flapping wing for ornithopters: a numerical modelling. International Journal of Ambient Energy 2019; 1--8.
16.
FeshalamiBFDjavareshkianMHYousefiM, et al.
Experimental investigation of flapping mechanism of the black-headed gull in forward flight. Proc IMechE, Part G: J Aerospace Engineering2019;
233: 4333–4349.
17.
Forouzi FeshalamiBDjavareshkianMHZareeAH, et al.
The role of wing bending deflection in the aerodynamics of flapping micro aerial vehicles in hovering flight. Proc IMechE, Part G: J Aerospace Engineering2019;
233: 3749–3761.
18.
JafferisNTHelblingEFKarpelsonM, et al.
Untethered flight of an insect-sized flapping-wing microscale aerial vehicle. Nature2019;
570: 491–495.
WarrickDRTobalskeBW andPowersDR.Aerodynamics of the hovering hummingbird. Nature2005;
435: 1094–1097.
21.
Keennon M, Klingebiel K, Won H, et al. Development of the nano hummingbird: A tailless flapping wing micro air vehicle. In: 50th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, 2012, pp. 1--24. Reston, Virigina: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.
22.
KrooI andKunzP. Development of the mesicopter: a miniature autonomous rotorcraft Ilan Kroo, Peter Kunz Stanford University Stanford, CA. In: Vertical lift aircraft design conference (A00-26651 06-05),2000, pp.1–9.
23.
HoffJRamezaniAChungS-J, et al. Synergistic design of a bio-inspired micro aerial vehicle with articulated wings. In: Robotics: science and systems XII, pp.1–9.
24.
PhanHV andParkHC.Generation of control moments in an insect-like tailless flapping-wing micro air vehicle by changing the stroke-plane angle. J Bionic Eng2016;
13: 449–457.
25.
JangJ andYangG-H.Design of wing root rotation mechanism for dragonfly-inspired micro air vehicle. Appl Sci2018;
8: 1868.
26.
WoodRJ.The first takeoff of a biologically inspired at-scale robotic insect. IEEE Trans Robot2008;
24: 341–347.
27.
AvadhanulaSWoodRJCampoloD, et al. Dynamically tuned design of the MFI thorax. In: Proceedings – IEEE international conference on robotics and automation, pp.52–59.
28.
SreetharanPS andWoodRJ.Passive torque regulation in an underactuated flapping wing robotic insect. Auton Robot2011;
31: 225–234.
29.
FenelonMAAA andFurukawaT.Design of an active flapping wing mechanism and a micro aerial vehicle using a rotary actuator. Mech Mach Theory2010;
45: 137–146.
30.
GeorgeRBColtonMBMattsonCA, et al.
A differentially driven flapping wing mechanism for force analysis and trajectory optimization. Int J Micro Air Veh2012;
4: 31–49.
31.
ConnATBurgessSC andLingCS.Design of a parallel crank-rocker flapping mechanism for insect-inspired micro air vehicles. Proc IMechE, Part C: J Mechanical Engineering Science2007;
221: 1211–1222.
32.
NagaiHIsogaiKFujimotoT, et al.
Experimental and numerical study of forward flight aerodynamics of insect flapping wing. AIAA J2009;
47: 730–742.
33.
LiuH andAonoH.Size effects on insect hovering aerodynamics: an integrated computational study. Bioinspir Biomim2009;
4: 015002.
34.
TrimmerWSN.Microrobots and micromechanical systems. Sensors Actuators1989;
19: 267–287.
35.
MuellerDBruckHA andGuptaSK.Measurement of thrust and lift forces associated with drag of compliant flapping wing for micro air vehicles using a new test stand design. Exp Mech2010;
50: 725–735.
36.
NakataTLiuHTanakaY, et al.
Aerodynamics of a bio-inspired flexible flapping-wing micro air vehicle. Bioinspir Biomim2011;
6: 045002.
37.
Buck M, Razavi S, Derose R, et al. Controlled flight of a biologically. Science 2013; 340: 603--607.
38.
WoodRJFinioBKarpelsonM, et al. Progress on “pico” air vehicles. In: Springer tracts in advanced robotics, pp. 3–19.
39.
de CroonGCHEGroenMADe WagterC, et al.
Design, aerodynamics and autonomy of the DelFly. Bioinspir Biomim2012;
7: 025003.
40.
BungetG andSeeleckeS. BATMAV: a biologically inspired micro air vehicle for flapping flight: kinematic modeling. In: Active and passive smart structures and integrated systems,2008, p.69282F.
41.
BejgerowskiWGerdesJWGuptaSK, et al. Design and fabrication of a multi-material compliant flapping wing drive mechanism for miniature air vehicles. In: ASME 2010 international design engineering technical conferences and computers and information in engineering conference, pp.69–80.
42.
BejgerowskiWAnanthanarayananAMuellerD, et al.
Integrated product and process design for a flapping wing drive mechanism. J Mech Des2009;
131: 061006.
43.
ChattarajN andGanguliR.Active filter driver for piezo-actuators for flapping-wing micro air vehicles. Int J Micro Air Veh2016;
8: 21–28.
44.
PengYCaoJLiuL, et al.
A piezo-driven flapping wing mechanism for micro air vehicles. Microsyst Technol2017;
23: 967–973.
45.
Bruggeman B. Improving flight performance of DelFly II in hover by improving wing design and driving mechanism. Delft University of Technology, 2010.
46.
GerdesJWGuptaSK andWilkersonSA.A review of bird-inspired flapping wing miniature air vehicle designs. J Mech Robot2012;
4: 021003.
47.
MazharFShahA andOnSI. On the unsteady aerodynamics and design of flapping wing vehicles. In: Proceedings of 2020 17th international Bhurban conference on applied sciences and technology, IBCAST 2020, 2020, pp. 110–121. USA: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
48.
LiuT.Comparative scaling of flapping- and fixed-wing flyers. AIAA J2006;
44: 24–33.
49.
ShyyWAonoHKangC, et al. An introduction to flapping wing aerodynamics.2nd ed.Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
50.
KolomenskiyDMoffattHKFargeM, et al.
Vorticity generation during the clap-fling-sweep of some hovering insects. Theor Comput Fluid Dyn2010;
24: 209–215.
51.
LighthillMJ.On the Weis-Fogh mechanism of lift generation. J Fluid Mech1973;
60: 1–17.
52.
MillerLA andPeskinCS.A computational fluid dynamics of ‘clap and fling’ in the smallest insects. J Exp Biol2005;
208: 195–212.
53.
SuXCaoY andZhaoY.An unstructured mesh arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian unsteady incompressible flow solver and its application to insect flight aerodynamics. Phys Fluids2016;
28: 061901.
54.
Weis FoghT.Quick estimates of flight fitness in hovering animals, including novel mechanisms for lift production. J Exp Biol1973;
59: 169–230.
55.
BirchJMDicksonWB andDickinsonMH.Force production and flow structure of the leading edge vortex on flapping wings at high and low Reynolds numbers. J Exp Biol2004;
207: 1063–1072.
56.
Usherwood JR and Ellington CP. Aerodynamics of animal wings in revolution. J Exp Biol 2002; 205: 1565--1576.
57.
EllingtonCPBerg DenVC andWillmottAP.Leading-edge vortices in insect flight. Nature1996;
384: 626–630.
58.
DickinsonMHLehmannFO andSaneSP.Wing rotation and the aerodynamic basis of insect right. Science1999;
284: 1954–1960.
59.
BirchJM andDickinsonMH.The influence of wing-wake interactions on the production of aerodynamic forces in flapping flight. J Exp Biol2003;
206: 2257–2272.
60.
WangZJ.Dissecting insect flight. Annu Rev Fluid Mech2005;
37: 183–210.
61.
Lua KB, Lu H, Zhang XH, et al. Aerodynamics of two-dimensional flapping wings in tandem configuration. Physics of Fluids 2016; 28: 1--20
62.
FuJJHeflerCQiuHH, et al.
Effects of aspect ratio on flapping wing aerodynamics in animal flight. Acta Mech Sin2014;
30: 776–786.
63.
HarbigRRSheridanJ andThompsonMC.Reynolds number and aspect ratio effects on the leading-edge vortex for rotating insect wing planforms. J Fluid Mech2013;
717: 166–192.
64.
KruytJWQuicazán-RubioEMVan HeijstGF, et al.
Hummingbird wing efficacy depends on aspect ratio and compares with helicopter rotors. J R Soc Interface2014;
11.
65.
Li C and Dong H. Wake structure and aerodynamic performance of low aspect-ratio revolving plates at low reynolds number. In: 52nd Aerospace Sciences Meeting, 2014, pp. 1--10. National Harbor, Maryland: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.
66.
OzenCA andRockwellD. Flow structure on a rotating wing: effect of wing aspect ratio and shape. In: 51st AIAA aerospace sciences meeting including the new horizons forum and aerospace exposition 2013.
67.
DeVoriaAC andRinguetteMJ.Vortex formation and saturation for low-aspect-ratio rotating flat-plate fins. Exp Fluids2012;
52: 441–462.
68.
KhanZA andAgrawalSK. Design and optimization of a biologically inspired flapping mechanism for flapping wing micro air vehicles. In: Proceedings – IEEE international conference on robotics and automation, 2007, pp.373–378.
69.
ShahzadATianFBYoungJ, et al.
Effects of hawkmoth-like flexibility on the aerodynamic performance of flapping wings with different shapes and aspect ratios. Phys Fluids2018;
30.
70.
ShahzadATianFBYoungJ, et al. Effects of wing shape, aspect ratio and deviation angle on aerodynamic performance of flapping wings in hover. Phys Fluids November 2016; 28.
BungetG andSeeleckeS. Batmav – development and testing of a SMA-based bio-inspired flapping platform. In: ASME 2010 conference on smart materials, adaptive structures and intelligent systems, SMASIS 2010, pp.853–861.
73.
WangCWangCNingY, et al. Design and mechanical analysis of bionic foldable beetle wings. Appl Bionics Biomech2018. Epub ahead of print. DOI: 10.1155/2018/1308465.
74.
BekerCBilge ArikanK andKurtulusF. D. Design of a novel foldable flapping wing micro air vehicle. In: AIAC. 2017-138, 9’uncu Ankara Uluslararası Havacılık-Uzay Konferansı, 20-22 Eylü l 2017, Ankara, 2017, www.researchgate.net/publication/319980261 (2017, accessed 20 August 2020).
75.
JitsukawaTAdachiHAbeT, et al.
Bio-inspired wing-folding mechanism of micro air vehicle (MAV). Artif Life Robotics2017;
22: 203–208.
76.
MazaheriK andEbrahimiA.Experimental investigation on aerodynamic performance of a flapping wing vehicle in forward flight. J Fluids Struct2011;
27: 586–595.
77.
PourtakdoustSH andAliabadiSK.Evaluation of flapping wing propulsion based on a new experimentally validated aeroelastic model. Scientia Iranica2012;
19: 472–482.
78.
WhitneyJP andWoodRJ.Aeromechanics of passive rotation in flapping flight. J Fluid Mech2010;
660: 197–220.
79.
StanfordBSytsmaMAlbertaniR, et al.
Static aeroelastic model validation of membrane micro air vehicle wings. AIAA J2007;
45: 2828–2837.
80.
PornsinsirirakTN.Parylene MEMS technology for adaptive flow control of flapping flight. USA: California Institute of Technology.
WuPIfjuP andStanfordB.Flapping wing structural deformation and thrust correlation study with flexible membrane wings. AIAA J2010;
48: 2111–2122.
83.
WuPStanfordBBowmanW, et al.
Digital image correlation techniques for full-field displacement measurements of micro air vehicle flapping wings. Exp Tech2009;
33: 53–58.
84.
YousafRJavedA andShahzadA. Static structural and modal analysis of micro air vehicle flapping wing with varying stiffness structures. In: 16th international Bhurban conference on applied sciences and technology, pp.202–209. Islamabad, Pakistan: IEEE.
85.
AgrawalA andAgrawalSK.Design of bio-inspired flexible wings for flapping-wing micro-sized air vehicle applications. Adv Robot2009;
23: 979–1002.
86.
YinB andLuoH.Effect of wing inertia on hovering performance of flexible flapping wings. Phys Fluids2010;
22.
87.
PennycuickCJ.Predicting wingbeat frequency and wavelength of birds. J Exp Biol1990;
150: 171–185.
88.
DeakinMAB.Formulae for insect wingbeat frequency. J Insect Sci2010;
10: 96–99.
89.
FinioBMEumB andOlandC. Asymmetric flapping for a robotic fly using a hybrid power-control actuator. In: 2009. IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems, IROS 2009, pp. 2755–2762.
90.
KarasekMMuijresFTWagterCD, et al.
A tailless aerial robotic flapper reveals that flies use torque coupling in rapid banked turns. Science2018;
361: 1089–1094.
91.
GalińskiC andZbikowskiR.Insect-like flapping wing mechanism based on a double spherical scotch yoke. J R Soc Interface2005;
2: 223–235.
92.
PhillipsN andKnowlesK.Effect of flapping kinematics on the mean lift of an insect-like flapping wing. Proc IMechE, Part G: J Aerospace Engineering2011;
225: 723–736.
93.
WardTARezadadMFeardayCJ, et al.
A review of biomimetic air vehicle research: 1984-2014. Int J Micro Air Veh2015;
7: 375–394.
94.
BrodskyA.Vortex formation in the tethered flight of the peacock butterfly Inachis io L. (Lepidoptera, Nymphalidae) and some aspects of insect flight evolution. J Exp Biol1991;
95: 77–95.
95.
WoottonRJ.Leading edge section and asymmetric twisting in the wings of flying butterflies. J Exp Biol1993;
180: 105–117.
96.
SunM andLanSL.A computational study of the aerodynamic forces and power requirements of dragonfly (Aeschna juncea) hovering. J Exp Biol2004;
207: 1887–1901.
97.
FujikawaTHirakawaKOkumaS, et al.
Development of a small flapping robot. Motion analysis during takeoff by numerical simulation and experiment. Mech Syst Signal Process2008;
22: 1304–1315.
98.
TsaiBJ andFuYC.Design and aerodynamic analysis of a flapping-wing micro aerial vehicle. Aerosp Sci Technol2009;
13: 383–392.
99.
MazaheriK andEbrahimiA.Experimental investigation of the effect of chordwise flexibility on the aerodynamics of flapping wings in hovering flight. J Fluids Struct2010;
26: 544–558.
100.
OrlowskiCT andGirardAR.Dynamics, stability, and control analyses of flapping wing micro-air vehicles. Progr Aerosp Sci2012;
51: 18–30.
101.
MouXLLiuYP andSunM.Wing motion measurement and aerodynamics of hovering true hoverflies. J Exp Biol2011;
214: 2832–2844.
102.
BalasubramanianEChandrasekharUVelanSSS, et al.
Synthesis, analysis and 3D printing of flapping mechanisms. Int J Mater Product Technol2019;
59: 212–228.
103.
ChenZXuJLiuB, et al.
Structural integrity analysis of transmission structure in flapping-wing micro aerial vehicle via 3D printing. Eng Failure Anal2019;
96: 18–30.
104.
Mallik AK, Ghosh A and Dittrich G. Kinematic Analysis and Synthesis of Mechanisms. Rochester Institute of Technology, 1994.
105.
FenelonMAA andFurukawaT. Design of an active flapping wing mechansim and a micro aerial vehicle using a single rotary actuator. Amsterdam: Elsevier 2009, pp.137–146.
106.
NegrelloFSilvestriPLucifrediA, et al.
Preliminary design of a small-sized flapping UAV: II. Kinematic and structural aspects. Meccanica2016;
51: 1369–1385.
107.
BanalaSK andAgrawalSK.Design and optimization of a mechanism for out-of-plane insect winglike motion with twist. J Mech Des2005;
127: 841–844.
108.
Van BreugelFErn TeohZ andLipsonH. A passively stable hovering flapping micro-air vehicle. In: Flying insects and robots, pp.171–184.
109.
ŻbikowskiRGalińSkiC andPedersenCB.Four-bar linkage mechanism for insect like flapping wings in hover: concept and an outline of its realization. J Mech Des2005;
127: 817–824.
110.
MalikAMKhalidMSU andBarlasF. Modeling and simulation of kinematics for an active flapping and pitching mechanism. In: Proceedings of the world congress on engineering, pp.2–7.
111.
MadangopalRKhanZA andAgrawalSK.Biologically inspired design of small flapping wing air vehicles using Four-Bar mechanisms and quasi-steady aerodynamics. J Mech Des2005;
127: 809–816.
112.
Yang LJ, Cheng CM, Chiang YW et al. New flapping mechanisms of MAV “golden snitch”. In: Proceedings of 8th International Conference on Intelligent Unmanned Systems (ICIUS), Singapore, 22--24 October 2012.
113.
SreedharMPavanB andKrishnaDVA.Review on bio-mimitic robotic bird. Int J Trend Sci Res Dev2019;
3: 1259–1263.
114.
DargentTBaoXQGrondelS, et al.
Micromachining of an SU-8 flapping-wing flying micro-electro-mechanical system. J Micromech Microeng2009;
19: 085028.
115.
KimCJPisanoAPMullerRS, et al.
Polysilicon microgripper. Micromechanics and MEMS: Classic and Seminal Papers to 1990. Vol. 20, 1997, pp.203–206.
116.
Chan H, Lam J, Li W. A biomimetic flying silicon microchip: Feasibility study. In: International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics, Shenyang, 2004, pp. 447--451.
117.
GraceNF andSinghSB.Durability evaluation of carbon fiber-reinforced polymer strengthened concrete beams: experimental study and design. ACI Struct J2005;
102: 40–53.
118.
KarpelsonMWeiGY andWoodRJ. A review of actuation and power electronics options for flapping-wing robotic insects. In: Proceedings – IEEE international conference on robotics and automation, pp.779–786.
119.
PhangSK.System design methodology and implementation of micro aerial vehicles. 2014.
120.
Nguyen QV, Chan WL, Debiasi M. Performance test of a hovering flapping wing micro air vehicle with double wing clap-and-fling mechanism. In: International Micro Air Vehicle conference and competitions, 2015.
121.
SahaiRGallowayKCKarpelsonM, et al. A flapping-wing micro air vehicle with interchangeable parts for system integration studies. In: IEEE International conference on intelligent robots and systems, pp.501–506.
122.
ZhangJChengBRollJA, et al. Direct drive of flapping wings under resonance with instantaneous wing trajectory control. In: Proceedings – IEEE international conference on robotics and automation, 2013, pp.4029–4034.
123.
Rahn C and Tadigadapa S. High Performance Piezoelectric Actuators and Wings for Nano Air Vehicles (NAVs). State College, PA: Pennsylvania State University, 2012.
124.
GuoSLiD andWuJ.Theoretical and experimental study of a piezoelectric flapping wing rotor for micro aerial vehicle. Aerosp Sci Technol2012;
23: 429–438.
125.
WoodRJSteltzE andFearingRS.Optimal energy density piezoelectric bending actuators. Sensors Actuators A Phys2005;
119: 476–488.
126.
Cox EG, and Goldfarb M. Actuator Development for a Flapping Microbotic Microaerial Vehicle. SPIE Microrobotics Symposium, Boston, November 1998, Boston.
127.
WoodRJ. Liftoff of a 60mg flapping-wing MAV. In: IEEE international conference on intelligent robots and systems, pp.1889–1894.
128.
KhataitJPMukherjeeS andSethB.Compliant design for flapping mechanism: a minimum torque approach. Mech Mach Theory2006;
41: 3–16.
129.
KhanZA andAgrawalSK. Design of flapping mechanisms based on transverse bending phenomena in insects. In: Proceedings – IEEE international conference on robotics and automation, pp.2323–2328.
130.
Van TruongTKureemunUTanVBC, et al.
Study on the structural optimization of a flapping wing micro air vehicle. Struct Multidisc Optim2018;
57: 653–664.
131.
BergouAJRistrophLGuckenheimerJ, et al.
Supplementary materials for “fruit flies modulate passive wing pitching to generate in-flight turns”. Robotics2010;
104: 8–10.
132.
MaKYFeltonSM andWoodRJ. Design, fabrication, and modeling of the split actuator microrobotic bee. In: IEEE international conference on intelligent robots and systems, pp.1133–1140.
