The scope of this work is to provide a critical review on the expectations about the morphing wing technology against the current open issues and showstoppers.
In synergy to other emerging and promising technologies, morphing is asked for bridging the evident gap between the current growth trend of the aerospace compartment and its impact onto the environment. The potential of morphing, in particular, its primary impact on the aerodynamic efficiency of the aircraft, primed the investigation of different technologies, achieving interesting results but often highlighting limitations and showstoppers against the airworthiness regulations.
The authors focus their attention on some specific aspects that characterize the morphing wing attachments and that may represent weakness points for the maturation of the technology: the load transmission of the movable parts to the supporting wing box, the way the flexibility–rigidity paradox is addressed by specific critical components (the skin), the scalability dependence of the morphing architectures, and the specific aeroelastic behavior of the nonconventional architectures.
Ameduri S, Concilio A, Dimino I, et al. AIRGREEN2—Clean Sky 2 programme: adaptive wing technology maturation, challenges and perspectives. In: ASME conference on smart materials, adaptive structures and intelligent systems, San Antonio, Texas, 10–12 September 2018, paper no. SMASIS2018-8235. New York: ASME.
8.
Shape Adaptive Blades for Rotorcraft Efficiency. Project website, https://sabreproject.eu (2017, accessed 25 February 2020).
BotezRMKoreanschiAGaborOS, et al.Numerical and experimental transition results evaluation for a morphing wing and aileron system. Aeronaut J2018; 122: 747–784.
Advisory Council for Aviation Research and Innovation in Europe. Strategic Research and Innovation Agenda (SRIA), https://www.acare4europe.org/sria (2017, accessed 25 February 2020).
MoensF. Augmented aircraft performance with the use of morphing technology for a turboprop regional aircraft wing. Biomimetics2019; 4: 64.
29.
PrevitaliFArrietaAFErmanniP. Performance of a three-dimensional morphing wing and comparison with a conventional wing. AIAA J.. Epub ahead of print 16 September 2014. DOI: 10.2514/1.J052764.
30.
WilburMLMistryMPLorberPE, et al.Rotary wings morphing technologies: state of the art and perspectives. In: AConcilioIDiminoLLecce, et al.(eds). Morphing wing technologies large commercial aircraft and civil helicopters, 1st ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2018, pp. 759–797.
31.
BarbarinoSBilgenOAjajRM, et al.A review of morphing aircraft. J Intel Mat Syst Str2001; 22: 823–877.
32.
Concilio A, Dimino I, Ciminello M, et al. An adaptive trailing edge. In: Concilio A, Dimino I, Lecce L, et al. (eds) Morphing wing technologies large commercial aircraft and civil helicopters, 1st ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2018, pp.517–545.
33.
Kintscher M, Kirn J, Storm S, et al. Assessment of the SARISTU enhanced adaptive droop nose. In: Wölcken PC and Papadopoulos M (eds) Proceedings of the Smart Intelligent Aircraft Structures (SARISTU), 1st ed. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing, 2016, pp.113–140.
34.
DrezgaDKorianVRoockO, et al.Winglet design, manufacturing, and testing. In: PCWölckenMPapadopoulos (eds). Proceedings of the Smart Intelligent Aircraft Structures (SARISTU), 1st ed. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing, 2016, pp. 257–273.
35.
EssaYde la Escalera CutillasFMDiminoI, et al.Manufacturing and testing of smart morphing SARISTU trailing edge. In: PCWölckenMPapadopoulos (eds). Proceedings of the Smart Intelligent Aircraft Structures (SARISTU), 1st edition. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing, 2016, pp. 199–215.
36.
ChapkinWAWalgrenPFrankGJ, et al.Design and optimization of high-strain, cylindrical composite skins for morphing fuselages. Mater Des2020; 187: 1–9.
37.
Ameduri S. Influence of the elastic constraint on the functionality of integrated morphing devices. In: Concilio A, Dimino I, Lecce L, et al. (eds) Morphing wing technologies large commercial aircraft and civil helicopters, 1st ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2018, pp.401–428.
38.
Kuzmina S, Ishmuratov F, Zichenkov M, et al. Wind tunnel testing of adaptive wing structures. In: Concilio A, Dimino I, Lecce L, et al. (eds) Morphing wing technologies large commercial aircraft and civil helicopters, 1st ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2018, pp.713–755.
Hardy R. AFTI/F-111 mission adaptive wing technology demonstration program. In: Proceedings of the AIAA aircraft prototype and technology demonstrator symposium, air force museum, Dayton, Ohio, 23–24 March 1983, paper no. 83-1057.
41.
Boeing Advanced System Co. AFTI/F-111 mission adaptive wing briefing to industry. Report AFWAL-TR-88-3082, 5 December 1988, Seattle WA.
42.
NASA. Variable-camber systems integration and operational performance of the AFTI/F-111 mission adaptive wing. Technical Memorandum of NASA. Report no. TM-4370, April 1992, Edwards, CA.
43.
NASA. Measured and predicted pressure distributions on the AFTI-F-111 mission adaptive wing. Technical Memorandum of NASA. Report no. TM-100443, November 1988, Edwards, CA.
44.
NASA. Flight test results from a supercritical mission adaptive wing with a smooth variable camber. Technical Memorandum of NASA. Report no. TM-4415, November, 1992, Edwards, CA.
45.
ChanzyQKeaneAJ. Analysis and experimental validation of morphing UAV wings. Aeronaut J2018; 122: 390–408.
46.
MolinariGArrietaAFGuillaumeM, et al.Aerostructural performance of distributed compliance morphing wings: wind tunnel and flight testing. AIAA J.. Epub ahead of print 25 Aug 2016. DOI: 10.2514/1.J055073.
Herrera CY, Lung S, Ervin G, et al. Aeroelastic airworthiness assessment of the adaptive compliant trailing edge flaps. In: Proceedings of 46th Annual International Symposium of the Society of Flight Test Engineers, Lancaster, California, 14–17 September 2015.
49.
JenettBCalischSCellucciD, et al.Digital morphing wing: active wing shaping concept using composite lattice-based cellular structures. Soft Robot2017; 4: 33–48.
50.
Bellucci M, Noviello MC, Amoroso F, et al. Stress analysis of a morphing system. In: Concilio A, Dimino I, Lecce L, et al. (eds) Morphing wing technologies large commercial aircraft and civil helicopters, 1st ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2018, pp.451–488.
51.
Patiballa SK and Krishnan G. Estimating optimized stress bounds in early stage design of compliant mechanisms. J Mech Design. Epub ahead of print 12 April 2017. DOI: 10.1115/1.4036305.
52.
YouHJoeWYYunG. New concept for aircraft morphing wing skin: design, modeling, and analysis. AIAA J2019; 57: 1786–1792.
53.
Nagel C, Fiedler A, Schorsch O, et al. Design, manufacture, and testing of a seamless morphing concept for a smart aircraft wingtip. In: Proceedings of the 7th ECCOMAS thematic conference on smart structures and materials, Ponta Delgada, Azores, Portugal, 3–6 June 2015.
54.
Kikuta MT. Mechanical properties of candidate materials for morphing wings. PhD Thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Virginia, 2003.
55.
AmeduriSConcilioAPecoraR, et al.A single slotted morphing flap based on SMA technology. Smart Struct Syst2016; 17: 819–835.
56.
AmeduriSConcilioAPecoraR. A SMA based morphing flap: conceptual and advanced design. Smart Struct Syst2015; 16: 555–577.
57.
JaniJMLearyMSubicA, et al.A review of shape memory alloy research, applications and opportunities. Mater Des2014; 56: 1078–1113.
58.
DönmezBÖzkanB. Design and control of a shape memory alloy actuator for flap type aerodynamic surfaces. IFAC Proc Vol2011; 44: 8138–8143.
Zareie S, Alam MS, Seethaler RJ, et al. Effect of cyclic loads on shape memory alloy-based component of cable-stayed bridge. In: CSCE Annual Conference, Laval (Greater Montreal), Canada, 12–15 June, 2019.
61.
KaragiannisDStamatelosDKappatosV, et al.An investigation of shape memory alloys as actuating elements in aerospace morphing applications. Mech Adv Mater Struc2017; 24: 647–657.
62.
Ferreira JP and De Breuker R. A conceptual development of a shape memory alloy actuated variable camber morphing wing. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference in Aerospace for Young Scientists, Beijing, China, 12–13 November 2016.
63.
Leal PB, Stroud H, Sheahan E, et al. Skin-based camber morphing utilizing shape memory alloy composite actuators in a wind tunnel environment. In: Proceedings of AIAA/AHS Adaptive Structures Conference, Kissimmee, Florida, 8–12 January 2018, paper no. AIAA 2018-0799.
64.
JacobsSCoconnierCDiMaioD, et al.Deployable auxetic shape memory alloy cellular antenna demonstrator: design, manufacturing and modal testing. Smart Mater Struct2012; 21: 1–12.
65.
PelloneLAmeduriSFavaloroN, et al.SMA-based system for environmental sensors released from an unmanned aerial vehicle. Aerospace2017; 4: 1–22.
66.
SuhJEJeongSYHanJH. A two-dimensional modular deployable truss structure with bistability. J Intel Mat Syst Str2019; 30: 335–350.
67.
AmeduriSConcilioAFavaloroN, et al.A shape memory alloy application for compact unmanned aerial vehicles. Aerospace2016; 3: 1–18.
68.
WangZPPohLHZhuY, et al.Systematic design of tetra-petals auxetic structures with stiffness constraint. Mater Des2019, pp. 170: 1–15.
69.
PrawotoY. Seeing auxetic materials from the mechanics point of view: a structural review on the negative Poisson's ratio. Comp Mater Sci2012; 58: 140–153.
70.
WuWHuaWQianG, et al.Mechanical design and multifunctional applications of chiral mechanical metamaterials: a review. Mater Des2019, pp. 180: 1–13.
71.
ChillaraVSCDapinoMJ. Review of morphing laminated composites. Appl Mech Rev2020, pp. 72: 1–16.
72.
ChenYYinWLiuY, et al.Structural design and analysis of morphing skin embedded with pneumatic muscle fibers. Smart Mater Struct2011, pp. 20: 1–8.
73.
BubertEAWoodsBKSLeeK, et al.Design and fabrication of a passive 1D morphing aircraft skin. J Intel Mat Syst Str2010; 21: 1699–1717.
74.
WeidongLHuaZShengqiangZ, et al.In-plane corrugated cosine honeycomb for 1D morphing skin and its application on variable camber wing. Chin J Aeron2013; 26: 935–942.
75.
SunJLiuYLengJ. Mechanical properties of shape memory polymer composites enhanced by elastic fibers and their application in variable stiffness morphing skins. J Intel Mat Syst Str2015; 26: 2020–2027.
76.
NicassioFScarselliGPintoF, et al.Low energy actuation technique of bistable composites for aircraft morphing. Aerosp Sci Technol2018; 75: 35–46.
77.
MattioniFWeaverPMPotterKD, et al.Analysis of thermally induced multistable composites. Int J Solids Struct2008; 45: 657–675.
78.
Cui Y. Adaptive multistable flexible composite structures. PhD Thesis, Imperial College, UK, 2015.
79.
EmamSInmanD. A review on bistable composite laminates for morphing and energy harvesting. Appl Mech Rev2015, pp. 67: 1–15.
80.
Ameduri S and Concilio A. A shape memory alloy torsion actuator for static blade twist. J Intel Mat Syst Str2019; 30: 2605–2626.
81.
Blewins RD. Formulas for natural frequency and mode shape. 4th ed. Melbourne, FL: Krieger Publishing Company, 2001, pp.189–193.
82.
AjajRMBeaverstockCSFriswellMI. Morphing aircraft: the need for a new design philosophy. Aerosp Sci Technol2016; 49: 154–166.
ZhangSWangZ. Dynamic distributed morphing control of an aeroelastic wing for a small drone. J Aircraft2019, pp. 56: 1–18.
91.
UnlüsoyLYamanY. Aeroelastic behaviour of UAV wings due to morphing. Aircr Eng Aerosp Tec2017; 89: 30–38.
92.
HolmesDP. Elasticity and stability of shape changing structures. Curr Opin Colloid In2018; 4: 118–137.
93.
NovielloMCDiminoIConcilioA, et al.Aeroelastic assessments and functional hazard analysis of a regional aircraft equipped with morphing winglets. Aerospace2019, pp. 6: 1–19.
94.
AjajRMOmarFKDarabsehTT, et al.Flutter of telescopic span morphing wings. Int J Struct Stab Dy2019; 19: 1–24.
95.
UnlüsoyLYamanY. Aeroelastic behaviour of UAV wings due to morphing. Aircr Eng Aerosp Tec2017; 89: 30–38.
96.
KoreanschiAHeniaMGuillemetteO, et al.Flutter analysis of a morphing wing technology demonstrator: numerical simulation and wind tunnel testing. INCAS Bull2016; 8: 99–124.
97.
Carossa GM, Ricci S, De Gaspari A, et al. Adaptive trailing edge: specifications, aerodynamics, and exploitation. In: Woelcken PC and Papadopoulos M (eds) Smart intelligent aircraft structures (SARISTU)—proceedings of the final project conference. 1st ed. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing, 2016, pp.143–158.
98.
Dumont A. Adjoint-based aerodynamic shape optimization applied to morphing technology on a regional aircraft wing. In: Concilio A, Dimino I, Lecce L, et al. (eds) Morphing wing technologies large commercial aircraft and civil helicopters. 1st ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2018, pp.145–174.
99.
LiDGuoSXiangJ. Modeling and nonlinear aeroelastic analysis of a wing with morphing trailing edge. P I Mech Eng G-J Aer2013; 227: 619–631.
100.
StanfordBKBeranPS. Analytical sensitivity analysis of an unsteady vortex-lattice method for flapping-wing optimization. J Aircr2010; 47: 647–662.
101.
XieCWangLYangC, et al.Static aeroelastic analysis of very flexible wings based on non-planar vortex lattice method. Chin J Aeron2013; 26: 514–521.
102.
MaoSXieCYangL, et al.Static aeroelastic characteristics of morphing trailing-edge wing using geometrically exact vortex lattice method. Int J Aerospace Eng 2019; 2019: 1–15.
103.
WuZGYangC. Flight loads and dynamics of flexible air vehicles. Chin J Aeron2004; 17: 17–22.
104.
Langley Aeronautical Laboratory. Some low-speed studies of the effects of wing location on wing-deformation-body-freedom flutter. Report RM-L52I24, 5 November 1952. Washington, USA.
Love MH, Zink PS, Wieselmann PA, et al. Body freedom flutter of high aspect flying wings. In: 46th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics & materials conference, Austin, USA, 18–21 April 2005.
107.
SnyderMPSandersBEastepFE, et al.Vibration and flutter characteristics of a folding wing. J Aircr2009, pp. 46: 791–799.
108.
WuMXiaoTAngH, et al.Optimal flight planning for a Z-shaped morphing-wing solar-powered unmanned aerial vehicle. J Guid Control Dyn2018; 41: 497–505.
109.
WuMShiZXiaoT, et al.Energy optimization and investigation for Z-shaped sun-tracking morphing-wing solar-powered UAV. Aerosp Sci Technol2019; 91: 1–11.
110.
HuangCYangCWuZ, et al.Variations of flutter mechanism of a span-morphing wing involving rigid-body motions. Chin J Aeron2018; 31: 490–497.
111.
HuangRQiuZP. Transient aeroelastic responses and flutter analysis of a variable-span wing during the morphing process. Chin J Aeron2013; 26: 1430–1438.
112.
ZhangWSunLYangXD, et al.Nonlinear dynamic behaviors of a deploying-and-retreating wing with varying velocity. J Sound Vib2013; 332: 6785–6797.
113.
De Gaspari A, Ricci S, Travaglini L, et al. Active camber morphing wings based on compliant structures: an aeroelastic assessment. In: Proceedings of AIAA/AHS adaptive structures conference, Kissimmee, Florida, 5–9 January 2015.
114.
Collado M, Nava N, Cabás R, et al. Characterization results of a novel shape memory alloy and pin puller mechanisms based on this technology. In: Proceedings of the 14th European space mechanisms & tribology symposium, Constance, Germany, 28–30 September 2011.
