Relaxation behavior provides specific information that indicates stress development with elapsed time for the determination of material characterization and constituting of material modeling. In addition, anomalous relaxation behavior of polymeric materials enables experimental analysis of some theoretical variables in constitutive equation. Equilibrium stress is one of the most prevailing variables in material modeling and it is generally considered as unmeasurable. In this study, evolution of equilibrium stress was examined with relaxation tests of two semi crystalline polymer materials, one of which was found to reach precise equilibrium stress levels. In accordance with this purpose, extensive relaxation tests were conducted on poly(lactic acid) and poly(lactic acid)/hydroxyapatite nanocomposites specimens at a wide range of temperatures from 23 ℃ and 55 ℃, and stress levels from 1 MPa to 50 MPa for poly(lactic acid) and 51 MPa for poly(lactic acid)/hydroxyapatite nanocomposites. All the specimens were subjected tensile loading–unloading and partial retraction process. The starting points of the relaxation test were chosen on unloading segment of stress–strain curves. Evolution of stress may decay, increase or decay then increase depending on the test point on unloading curves. Relaxation behavior of poly(lactic acid) and poly(lactic acid)/hydroxyapatite nanocomposites was simulated using viscoplasticity theory based on overstress for polymeric materials. Experimental results of poly(lactic acid) and poly(lactic acid)/hydroxyapatite nanocomposites were matched with numerical results of viscoplasticity theory based on overstress for polymeric materials, and viscoplasticity theory based on overstress for polymeric material model was found to have an aptitude for predicting anomalous relaxation behavior of poly(lactic acid) and poly(lactic acid)/hydroxyapatite nanocomposites. Additionally, the effect of temperature on relaxation time was investigated with using Kohlraush–Williams–Watts time-decay function. Modeling capability of Kohlrausch–Williams–Watts model was reasonable to predict short-term simple relaxation of poly(lactic acid) and poly(lactic acid)/hydroxyapatite nanocomposites. Responses of the model showed that interaction between relaxation time and environmental temperature was related to transition from glass state to rubbery state.
KhanFKremplE. Amorphous and semicrystalline solid polymers: experimental and modeling studies of their inelastic deformation behaviors. J Eng Mater Technol Trans ASME2006; 128: 64–72.
2.
ZhangCMooreID. Nonlinear mechanical response of high density polyethylene. Part I: experimental investigation and model evaluation. Polym Eng Sci1997; 37: 404–413.
3.
DusunceliNColakOU. High density polyethylene (HDPE): experiments and modeling. Mech Time-Dependent Mater2006; 10: 331–345.
4.
MouradAHIFouadHElleithyR. Impact of some environmental conditions on the tensile, creep-recovery, relaxation, melting and crystallinity behaviour of UHMWPE-GUR 410-medical grade. Mater Des2009; 30: 4112–4119.
5.
ZridaMLaurentHRioG, et al.Experimental and numerical study of polypropylene behavior using an hyper-visco-hysteresis constitutive law. Comput Mater Sci2009; 45: 516–527.
6.
CohenREBartczakZArgonAS. Evolution of the crystalline texture of high-density polyethylene during uniaxial compression. Macromolecules1992; 25: 4692–4704.
7.
G’sellCDahounA. Evolution of microstructure in semi-crystalline polymers under large plastic deformation. Mater Sci Eng A1994; 175: 183–199.
8.
CaelersHJMGovaertLEPetersGWM. The prediction of mechanical performance of isotactic polypropylene on the basis of processing conditions. Polymer (Guildf)2016; 83: 116–128.
9.
Brusselle-DupendNCangémiL. A two-phase model for the mechanical behaviour of semicrystalline polymers. Part I: large strains multiaxial validation on HDPE. Mech Mater2008; 40: 743–760.
10.
AyoubGZaïriFNaït-AbdelazizM, et al.Modelling large deformation behaviour under loading-unloading of semicrystalline polymers: application to a high density polyethylene. Int J Plast2010; 26: 329–347.
11.
DusunceliNAydemirB. The effects of loading history and manufacturing methods on the mechanical behavior of high-density polyethylene. J Elastomers Plast2011; 43: 451–468.
12.
OkerekeMIAkpoyomareAI. Two-process constitutive model for semicrystalline polymers across a wide range of strain rates. Polymer (Guildf)2019; 183: 121818–121818.
13.
GordeyevSAWardIM. Time dependent recovery of oriented polyethylene. J Mater Sci1999; 34: 4767–4773.
14.
JourdanCCavailleJYPerezJ. Mechanical relaxations in polypropylene: a new experimental and theoretical approach. J Polym Sci Part B Polym Phys1989; 27: 2361–2384.
15.
AriyamaT. Stress relaxation behavior after cyclic preloading in polypropylene. Polym Eng Sci1993; 33: 1494–1501.
16.
KhanFYeakleC. Experimental investigation and modeling of non-monotonic creep behavior in polymers. Int J Plast2011; 27: 512–521.
17.
KitagawaMZhouDShimadaK, et al.Anomalous behavior associated with unloading in polyethylene. Zair Soc Mater Sci Japan1999; 48: 592–597.
18.
HeymansNKitagawaM. Modelling ‘unsual’ behaviour after strain reversal with hierarchical fractional models. Rheol Acta2004; 43: 383–389.
19.
KitagawaMZhouDQuiJ. Stress–strain curves for solid polymers. Polym Eng Sci1995; 35: 1725–1732.
20.
DusunceliN. The unusual creep and relaxation behaviour of polypropylene. J Polym Eng2012; 32: 167–176.
KhanASBaigMHamidS, et al.Thermo-mechanical large deformation responses of Hydrogenated Nitrile Butadiene Rubber (HNBR): experimental results. Int J Solids Struct2010; 47: 2653–2659.
23.
WangJPengLFDengYJ, et al.A finite strain thermodynamically-based constitutive modeling and analysis of viscoelastic-viscoplastic deformation behavior of glassy polymers. Int J Plast2019; 122: 135–163.
24.
SchiaviAPratoA. Evidences of non-linear short-term stress relaxation in polymers. Polym Test2017; 59: 220–229.
25.
RicciJBenninTXingE, et al.Linear stress relaxation and probe reorientation: comparison of the segmental dynamics of two glassy polymers during physical aging. Macromolecules2019; 52: 8177–8186.
26.
AmoedoJLeeD. Modeling the uniaxial rate and temperature dependent behavior of amorphous and semicrystalline polymers. Polym Eng Sci1992; 32: 1055–1065.
27.
CastagnetS. High-temperature mechanical behavior of semi-crystalline polymers and relationship to a rubber-like ‘relaxed’ state. Mech Mater2009; 41: 75–86.
28.
SabirMIXuXLiL. A review on biodegradable polymeric materials for bone tissue engineering applications. J Mater Sci2009; 44: 5713–5724.
29.
ChenBKShenCHChenSC, et al.Ductile PLA modified with methacryloyloxyalkyl isocyanate improves mechanical properties. Polymer (Guildf)2010; 51: 4667–4672.
30.
TakayamaTTodoMTsujiH. Effect of annealing on the mechanical properties of PLA/PCL and PLA/PCL/LTI polymer blends. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater2011; 4: 255–260.
31.
FarahSAndersonDGLangerR. Physical and mechanical properties of PLA, and their functions in widespread applications — a comprehensive review. Adv Drug Deliv Rev2016; 107: 367–392.
32.
WangYLiMWangK, et al.Unusual structural evolution of poly(lactic acid) upon annealing in the presence of an initially oriented mesophase. Soft Matter2014; 10: 1512–1518.
33.
TakahashiKSawaiDYokoyamaT, et al.Crystal transformation from the α- to the β-form upon tensile drawing of poly(L-lactic acid). Polymer (Guildf)2004; 45: 4969–4976.
34.
MahendrasingamABlundellDJPartonM, et al.Time resolved study of oriented crystallisation of poly(lactic acid) during rapid tensile deformation. Polymer (Guildf)2005; 46: 6009–6015.
35.
RezguiFSwistekMHiverJM, et al.Deformation and damage upon stretching of degradable polymers (PLA and PCL). Polymer (Guildf)2005; 46: 7370–7385.
36.
WangYHanXPanJ, et al.An entropy spring model for the Young’s modulus change of biodegradable polymers during biodegradation. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater2010; 3: 14–21.
37.
ParkSDTodoMArakawaK, et al.Effect of crystallinity and loading-rate on mode i fracture behavior of poly(lactic acid). Polymer (Guildf)2006; 47: 1357–1363.
38.
MartinsCPintoVGuedesRM, et al.Creep and stress relaxation behaviour of PLA-PCL fibres – a linear modelling approach. Procedia Eng2015; 114: 768–775.
39.
Cooper-WhiteJJMackayME. Rheological properties of poly(lactides). Effect of molecular weight and temperature on the viscoelasticity of poly(l-lactic acid). J Polym Sci Part B Polym Phys1999; 37: 1803–1814.
40.
Sin LT, Rahmat AR and Rahman WAWA. Mechanical properties of poly(lactic acid). In: Sin LT and Tueen BS (eds) Polylactic acid. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier, 2013, pp.177–219..
41.
BaiardoMFrisoniGScandolaM, et al.Thermal and mechanical properties of plasticized poly(L-lactic acid). J Appl Polym Sci2003; 90: 1731–1738.
42.
PeregoGCellaGDBastioliC. Effect of molecular weight and crystallinity on poly(lactic acid) mechanical properties. J Appl Polym Sci1996; 59: 37–43.
43.
CarrascoFPagèsPGámez-PérezJ, et al.Processing of poly(lactic acid): characterization of chemical structure, thermal stability and mechanical properties. Polym Degrad Stab2010; 95: 116–125.
44.
WangMWuYLiYD, et al.Progress in toughening poly(lactic acid) with renewable polymers. Polym Rev2017; 57: 557–593.
45.
ZhangXSchneiderKLiuG, et al.Structure variation of tensile-deformed amorphous poly(l-lactic acid): effects of deformation rate and strain. Polymer (Guildf)2011; 52: 4141–4149.
46.
SweeneyJSpencerPNairK, et al.Modelling the mechanical and strain recovery behaviour of partially crystalline PLA. Polymers (Basel)2019; 11: 1342–1342.
47.
BergströmJSHaymanD. An overview of mechanical properties and material modeling of polylactide (PLA) for medical applications. Ann Biomed Eng2016; 44: 330–340.
48.
ZhouCGuoHLiJ, et al.Temperature dependence of poly(lactic acid) mechanical properties. RSC Adv2016; 6: 113762–113772.
49.
GuedesRMSinghAPintoV. Viscoelastic modelling of creep and stress relaxation behaviour in PLA-PCL fibres. Fibers Polym2017; 18: 2443–2453.
50.
DusuncelNDrozdovADTheilgaardN, et al.Thermo-mechanical response of poly(lactic acid)/hydroxyapatite nanocomposites: observations and modeling within the overstress concept. J Nanostructured Polym Nanocomposites2013; 9: 31–35.
51.
KremplE. Models of viscoplasticity some comments on equilibrium (back) stress and drag stress. Acta Mech1987; 69: 25–42.
52.
ChabocheJL. A review of some plasticity and viscoplasticity constitutive theories. Int J Plast2008; 24: 1642–1693.
53.
ChabocheJL. Constitutive equations for cyclic plasticity and cyclic viscoplasticity. Int J Plast1989; 5: 247–302.
54.
MillerA. An inelastic constitutive model for monotonic, cyclic, and creep deformation: part I – equations development and analytical procedures. J Eng Mater Technol Trans ASME1976; 98: 97–105.
55.
BodnerSRPartomY. Constitutive equations for elastic-viscoplastic strain-hardening materials. J Appl Mech Trans ASME1975; 42: 385–389.
56.
BodnerSRPartomIPartomY. Uniaxial cyclic loading of elastic–viscoplastic materials. J Appl Mech Trans ASME1979; 46: 805–810.
57.
KremplE. Relaxation behavior and modeling. Int J Plast2001; 17: 1419–1436.
58.
SehitogluH. Changes in state variables at elevated temperatures. J Eng Mater Technol Trans ASME1989; 111: 192–203.
59.
NeuRWScottDTWoodmanseeMW. Measurement and modeling of back stress at intermediate to high homologous temperatures. Int J Plast2000; 16: 283–301.
60.
LiWGazonasGBrownEN, et al.Thermomechanical model for monotonic and cyclic loading of PEEK. Mech Mater2019; 129: 113–138.
61.
NegahbanMGoelADelabarreP, et al.Experimentally evaluating the equilibrium stress in shear of glassy polycarbonate. J Eng Mater Technol Trans ASME2006; 128: 537–542.
62.
Goel A, Strabala K, Negahban M, et al. Experimentally evaluating equilibrium stress in uniaxial tests. Exp Mech 2010; 50: 709–716.
63.
TauheedFSarangiS. Damage-induced stress-softening and viscoelasticity of limited elastic materials. Mech Time-Dependent Mater2014; 18: 493–525.
64.
Elkhal LetaiefWHassineTGamaounF. Rate dependency during relaxation of superelastic orthodontic NiTi alloys after hydrogen charging. Shape Mem Superelasticity2016; 2: 121–127.
65.
NikoukalamMTSiderisP. Experimental characterization and constitutive modeling of polyurethanes for structural applications, accounting for damage, hysteresis, loading rate and long term effects. Eng Struct2019; 198: 109462–109462.
66.
ASTM INTERNATIONAL. Astm D638-14. Annu B ASTM Stand. Epub ahead of print 2014. DOI: 10.1520/D0638-14.1.
67.
DusunceliNDrozdovADTheilgaardN. Influence of temperature on viscoelastic–viscoplastic behavior of poly(lactic acid) under loading–unloading. Polym Eng Sci2017; 57: 239–247.
GoelAStrabalaKNegahbanM, et al.Experimentally evaluating equilibrium stress in uniaxial tests. Exp Mech2010; 50: 709–716.
70.
DippelBJohlitzMLionA. Thermo-mechanical couplings in elastomers – experiments and modelling. ZAMM Zeitschrift fur Angew Math und Mech2015; 95: 1117–1128.
71.
TamrakarSGaneshRSockalingamS, et al.Strain rate-dependent large deformation inelastic behavior of an epoxy resin. J Compos Mater2020; 54: 71–87.
72.
Hatami-MarbiniHEtebuE. A new method to determine rate-dependent material parameters of corneal extracellular matrix. Ann Biomed Eng2013; 41: 2399–2408.
73.
ChenQLiMYuanY, et al.Stress relaxation behaviour of high acyl gellan gels. Int J Food Sci Technol2013; 48: 2571–2579.
74.
Ramirez-GarciaMASloanSRNidenbergB, et al.Depth-dependent out-of-plane Young’s modulus of the human cornea. Curr Eye Res2018; 43: 595–604.
75.
BusbyGAGrantMHMacKaySP, et al.Confined compression of collagen hydrogels. J Biomech2013; 46: 837–840.
76.
VollachSCaciularuRShiloD. Equilibrium stress during the response of shape memory alloys to an abrupt heat pulse. Scr Mater2017; 141: 50–53.
77.
Krempl E. A small-strain viscoplasticity theory based on overstress. In: Krausz A and Krausz K (eds) Unified constitutive laws of plastic deformation. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 1996, pp.281–318.
78.
Krempl E. Creep-plasticity interaction. In: Altenbach H and Skrzypek JJ (eds) Creep and damage in materials and structures. New York, NY: Springer Vienna, 1999, pp.285–348.
79.
Krempl E and Ho K. Overstress model for solid polymer deformation behavior applied to Nylon 66. In: Schapery RA and Sun CT (eds) ASTM special technical publication. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM, 2000, pp.118–137.
80.
DusunceliN. Modeling finite deformation behavior of semicrystalline polymers under uniaxial loading-unloading. J Elastomers Plast2010; 42: 347–364.
81.
ColakOUDusunceliN. Modeling viscoelastic and viscoplastic behavior of high density polyethylene (HDPE). J Eng Mater Technol Trans ASME2006; 128: 572–578.
82.
McClungAJWRuggles-WrennMB. Strain rate dependence and short-term relaxation behavior of a thermoset polymer at elevated temperature: experiment and modeling. J Press Vessel Technol Trans ASME2009; 131: 031405–031405.
83.
DusunceliNColakOU. The effects of manufacturing techniques on viscoelastic and viscoplastic behavior of high density polyethylene (HDPE). Mater Des2008; 29: 1117–1124.
84.
WardIMHadleyDW. An introduction to the mechanical properties of solid polymers, Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, 1993.
