Riblet is one of the most promising passive drag reduction techniques in turbulent flows. In this paper, hot-wire measurements on a turbulent boundary layer perturbed by a drag-reducing riblet surface are carried out to further understand the riblet effects on the turbulent flows and the drag reduction mechanism. Compared with the smooth case, different energy variations in the near-wall region and the logarithmic region are observed over riblets. Then, by using a spectral filter of a given wavelength, the time series of the hot-wire data are decomposed into large- and small-scale components. It is indicated that large-scale structures in the logarithmic region impose a footprint (amplitude modulating effect) on the near-wall small-scale structures. By quantifying this footprint, it is found that the interactions between large- and small-scale structures over riblets are weakened in the near-wall region. Furthermore, the bursting process of large and small scales is studied. For both large- and small-scale structures, a shorter bursting duration and a higher bursting frequency are observed over the riblet surface, which indicates that riblets impede the formation of large- and small-scale bursting events. The flow physics behind these phenomena are also discussed in detail.
BixlerGDBhushanB. Biofouling: lessons from nature. Phil Trans R Soc A2012; 370: 2381–2417.
4.
BixlerGDBhushanB. Bioinspired rice leaf and butterfly wing surface structures combining shark skin and lotus effects. Soft Matter2012; 8: 11271–11284.
5.
KriegerK. Do pool sharks swim faster? New swimsuits with tiny ridges modeled on sharkskin are all the rage. Experts are split, though, about whether the high-tech suits reduce drag. Science2004; 305: 636–638.
6.
ChamorroLPArndtREASotiropoulosF. Drag reduction of large wind turbine blades through riblets: Evaluation of riblet geometry and application strategies. Renew Energ2013; 50: 1095–1105.
7.
RehmanSAlamMAlhemsL, et al.Horizontal axis wind turbine blade design methodologies for efficiency enhancement – a review. Energies2018; 11: 506.
8.
Walsh M. Turbulent boundary layer drag reduction using riblets. In: AIAA 20th aerospace sciences meeting, Orlando, FL, 11–14 January 1982.
9.
BechertDWBruseMHageW, et al.Experiments on drag-reducing surfaces and their optimization with an adjustable geometry. J Fluid Mech1997; 338: 59–87.
10.
YangYMing-MingZXue-SongL. Numerical investigation of V-shaped riblets and an improved model of riblet effects. Proc IMechE, Part C: J Mechanical Engineering Science2018; 232: 1622–1631.
11.
Garcia-MayoralRJimenezJ. Hydrodynamic stability and breakdown of the viscous regime over riblets. J Fluid Mech2011; 678: 317–347.
12.
JiaoFSayad SaraviSChengK. Investigation on an integrated approach to design and micro fly-cutting of micro-structured riblet surfaces. Proc IMechE, Part C: J Mechanical Engineering Science2017; 231: 3291–3300.
13.
SasamoriMIihamaOMamoriH, et al.Parametric study on a sinusoidal riblet for drag reduction by direct numerical simulation. Flow Turbul Combust2017; 99: 47–69.
14.
SasamoriMMamoriHIwamotoK, et al.Experimental study on drag-reduction effect due to sinusoidal riblets in turbulent channel flow. Exp Fluids2014; 55: 1828.
15.
BoomsmaASotiropoulosF. Direct numerical simulation of sharkskin denticles in turbulent channel flow. Phys Fluids2016; 28: 035106.
16.
Walsh M and Lindemann A. Optimization and application of riblets for turbulent drag reduction. In: AIAA 22nd aerospace sciences meeting, Reno, NV, 9–11 January 1984.
17.
BenschopHOGBreugemWP. Drag reduction by herringbone riblet texture in direct numerical simulations of turbulent channel flow. J Turbul2017; 18: 717–759.
18.
DebisschopJRNieuwstadtFTM. Turbulent boundary layer in an adverse pressure gradient-effectiveness of riblets. AIAA J1996; 34: 932–937.
19.
BoomsmaASotiropoulosF. Riblet drag reduction in mild adverse pressure gradients: a numerical investigation. Int J Heat Fluid Flow2015; 56: 251–260.
20.
Bacher E and Smith C. A combined visualization-anemometry study of the turbulent drag reducing mechanisms of triangular micro-groove surface modifications. In: AIAA shear flow control conference, Boulder, CO, 12–14 March 1985.
21.
ChoiHMoinPKimJ. Direct numerical simulation of turbulent flow over riblets. J Fluid Mech1993; 255: 503–539.
22.
ChoiKS. Near-wall structure of a turbulent boundary layer with riblets. J Fluid Mech1989; 208: 417–458.
23.
GrünebergerRHageW. Drag characteristics of longitudinal and transverse riblets at low dimensionless spacings. Exp Fluids2011; 50: 363–373.
24.
ParkerKSayersAT. The effect of longitudinal microstriations and their profiles on the drag of flat plates. Proc IMechE, Part C: J Mechanical Engineering Science1999; 213: 775–785.
25.
LeeSJLeeSH. Flow field analysis of a turbulent boundary layer over a riblet surface. Exp Fluids2001; 30: 153–166.
26.
MartinSBhushanB. Fluid flow analysis of a shark-inspired microstructure. J Fluid Mech2014; 756: 5–29.
27.
HuangCLiuDWeiJ. Experimental study on drag reduction performance of surfactant flow in longitudinal grooved channels. Chem Eng Sci2016; 152: 267–279.
HwangJSungHJ. Influence of large-scale motions on the frictional drag in a turbulent boundary layer. J Fluid Mech2017; 829: 751–779.
30.
MaXSchröderA. Reduced-order coherent structures in active flow separation control using a bio-inspired flapping actuator. Proc IMechE, Part C: J Mechanical Engineering Science2018; 232: 2536–2545.
31.
YangSQLiSTianHP, et al.Tomographic PIV investigation on coherent vortex structures over shark-skin-inspired drag-reducing riblets. Acta Mech Sinica2016; 32: 284–294.
32.
MamoriHYamaguchiKSasamoriM, et al.Dual-plane stereoscopic PIV measurement of vortical structure in turbulent channel flow on sinusoidal riblet surface. Eur J Mech B: Fluids2019; 74: 99–110.
33.
MathisRHutchinsNMarusicI. Large-scale amplitude modulation of the small-scale structures in turbulent boundary layers. J Fluid Mech2009; 628: 311–337.
34.
HutchinsNMarusicI. Large-scale influences in near-wall turbulence. Phil Trans R Soc A2007; 365: 647–664.
35.
TangZJiangNZhengX, et al.Bursting process of large-and small-scale structures in turbulent boundary layer perturbed by a cylinder roughness element. Exp Fluids2016; 57: 79.
36.
MathisRMontyJPHutchinsN, et al.Comparison of large-scale amplitude modulation in turbulent boundary layers, pipes, and channel flows. Phys Fluids2009; 21: 111703.
37.
GanapathisubramaniBHutchinsNMonty JP, et al.Amplitude and frequency modulation in wall turbulence. J Fluid Mech2012; 712: 61–91.
38.
JacobiIMcKeonBJ. Phase relationships between large and small scales in the turbulent boundary layer. Exp Fluids2013; 54: 1481.
39.
TalluruKMBaidyaRHutchinsN, et al.Amplitude modulation of all three velocity components in turbulent boundary layers. J Fluid Mech2014; 746: 1481.
40.
Tropea C and Yarin AL. Springer handbook of experimental fluid mechanics. New York: Springer Science & Business Media, 2007.
41.
HansonRELavoiePNaguibAM, et al.Transient growth instability cancelation by a plasma actuator array. Exp Fluids2010; 49: 1339–1348.
42.
RebbeckHChoiKS. A wind-tunnel experiment on real-time opposition control of turbulence. Phys Fluids2006; 18: 035103.
43.
BaiHLZhouYZhangWG, et al.Active control of a turbulent boundary layer based on local surface perturbation. J Fluid Mech2014; 750: 316–354.
44.
LeeSJChoiYS. Decrement of spanwise vortices by a drag-reducing riblet surface. J Turbul2008; N23: 1–15.
45.
BechertDWBartenwerferM. The viscous flow on surfaces with longitudinal ribs. J Fluid Mech1989; 206: 105–129.
46.
BannierAGarnierÉSagautP. Riblet flow model based on an extended FIK identity. Flow Turbul Combust2015; 95: 351–376.
47.
NickelsTBMarusicIHafezS, et al.Evidence of the law in a high-Reynolds-number turbulent boundary layer. Phys Rev Lett2005; 95: 074501.
48.
DurstFZanounESPashtrapanskaM. In situ calibration of hot wires close to highly heat-conducting walls. Exp Fluids2001; 31: 103–110.
49.
Bentley RE, Uncertainty in measurement: the ISO guide. 5th ed. National Measurement Institute, Sydney, Australia, 2005.
50.
LigraniPMBradshawP. Spatial resolution and measurement of turbulence in the viscous sublayer using subminiature hot-wire probes. Exp Fluids1987; 5: 407–417.
51.
HutchinsNNickelsTBMarusicI, et al.Hot-wire spatial resolution issues in wall-bounded turbulence. J Fluid Mech2009; 635: 103–136.
PopeSB. Turbulent flows, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.
54.
ChinCCHutchinsNOoiASH, et al.Use of direct numerical simulation (DNS) data to investigate spatial resolution issues in measurements of wall-bounded turbulence. Meas Sci Technol2009; 20: 115401.
55.
RobinsonSK. Effects of riblets on turbulence in a supersonic boundary layer. AIAA Paper1988, pp. 88–2526.
56.
VinuesaRHitesMHWarkCE, et al.Documentation of the role of large-scale structures in the bursting process in turbulent boundary layers. Phys Fluids2015; 27: 105107.
