In this paper, a hybrid model is used to investigate the dynamic behavior of planetary gears. Sun-gear, planets, and ring-gear are modeled using lumped parameters elements, while planet carrier is integrated via a condensed finite element model. This approach intends to be more precise than the traditional lumped parameter models while keeping acceptable computational times. In some aeronautical applications, tooth lead modifications can be necessary to counterbalance the effect of planet carrier deflections on tooth load distribution. This study focuses on the influence of various lead modifications on the dynamic behavior of double helical planetary gears over a broad range of loads.
VijayakarS. A combined surface integral and finite element solution for a three-dimensional contact problem. Int J Numer Methods Eng1991; 31: 525–545.
2.
ParkerRGAgasheVVijayakarSM. Dynamic response of a planetary gear system using a finite element/contact mechanics model. J Mech Des2000; 122(3): 304–310.
3.
SinghAKahramanALigataH. Internal gear strains and load sharing in planetary transmission: model and experiments. J Mech Des2008; 130(7): 917–928.
4.
AbousleimanVVelexP. A hybrid finite element/lumped parameter model for quasi-static and dynamic analyses of planetary/epicyclic gear sets. Mech Mach Theory2006; 41: 725–748.
5.
AbousleimanVVelexPBecquerelleS. Modeling of spur and helical gear planetary drives with flexible ring gears and planet carriers. J Mech Des2007; 129: 95–106.
6.
ChapronMVelexPBecquerelleS. Dynamic behavior of planetary gears with compliant ring-gears and supporting structures – influence of profile and lead modifications. Proc Power Transm2017; II: 577–583.
7.
TerauchiYNadanoHNoharaM. On the effect of the tooth profile modification on the dynamic load and the sound level of a spur gear. Bull JSME1982; 25(207): 1474–1481.
8.
MohamadENKomoriMMurakamiH, et al.Analysis of general characteristics of transmission error of gears with convex modification of tooth flank form considering elastic deformation under load. J Mech Des2009; 131(6): 061015.
9.
BruyèreJVelexP. A simplified multi-objective analysis of optimum profile modifications in spur and helical gears. Mech Mach Theory2014; 80: 70–83.
10.
VelexPBruyèreJGuX. An alternative approach to the definition of profile modifications in high-contact-ration spur gears. J Mech Des2015; 137: 032602.
11.
LinHHOswaldFBTownsendDP. Dynamic loading of spur gears with linear or parabolic tooth profile modifications. Mech Mach Theory1994; 29(8): 1115–1129.
12.
ChapronMVelexPBruyèreJ, et al.Optimization of profile modifications with regard to dynamic tooth loads in single and double-helical planetary gears with flexible ring-gears. J Mech Des2016; 138(2): 023301.
13.
VelexPChapronMFakhfakhH, et al.On transmission errors and profile modifications minimizing dynamic tooth loads in multi-mesh gears. J Sound Vib2016; 379: 28–52.
14.
VelexPMaatarM. A mathematical model for analyzing the influence of shape deviations and mounting errors on gear dynamic behavior. J Sound Vib1996; 191: 629–660.
15.
Chapron M. Comportement dynamique de train planétaire/épicycloïdal avec erreurs d'assemblage, écarts de forme et structures déformables – optimisation des corrections de dentures. Thèse de doctorat, INSA Lyon, 2016.
