In the current study, a two-phase simulation of a tidal helical turbine was performed that contrasts with previous studies in two ways. First, the current research simulated the turbine in different states of immersion in water, whereas previous studies simulated turbines mostly in single-phase conditions and full immersion in water. Second, the present study used a horizontal-axis turbine, whereas previous research employed a vertical-axis helical turbine or Darrius turbine. In this study, a simulation was conducted using the volume of fluid method in ANSYS Fluent 18. Results indicated that the complete immersion of the turbine in water generated a high torque, thereby reducing the efficiency of the device. To determine the conditions with the highest efficiency, immersion rates of 100%, 75%, 50%, and 25% in water were examined, and a configuration with best power coefficient (Cp = 0.175 in TSR = 0.47) was found in 25% immersion. In immersion rate of 25%, resistant pressure on blades was minimum.
AbatzoglouNBoivinS. A review of biogas purification processes. Biofuels Bioprod Biorefining2009; 3: 42–71.
2.
GajK. Applicability of selected methods and sorbents to simultaneous removal of siloxanes and other impurities from biogas. Clean Technol Environ Policy2017; 19: 2181–2189.
3.
DivsalarAEntesariNDodsMNet al.A UV photodecomposition reactor for siloxane removal from biogas: modeling aspects. Chem Eng Sci2018; 192: 359–370.
4.
DivsalarASunLDodsMet al.Feasibility of siloxane removal from biogas using a UV photodecomposition technique. Ind Eng Chem Res2018; 57(22): 7383–7394. .
5.
Tsotsis TT, Egolfopoulos F, Nair N, et al. Catalytic removal of gas phase contaminants. United States patent US 9,700,747, 11 July 2017.
6.
EgbertGDRayRD. Significant dissipation of tidal energy in the deep ocean inferred from satellite altimeter data. Nature2000; 405: 775.
7.
GarrettCCumminsP. The power potential of tidal currents in channels. Proc R Soc Lond A: Math Phys Eng Sci2005; 461: 2563–2572.
Roc T. Numerical modelling for hydrodynamic impact and power assessments of tidal current turbine arrays. PhD Thesis, University of Plymouth, 2013.
10.
YangBShuXW. Hydrofoil optimization and experimental validation in helical vertical axis turbine for power generation from marine current. Ocean Eng2012; 42: 35–46.
11.
LariKRahmaniH. Distribution tidal wave energy and its applications in coasts of Iran. J Basic Appl Sci Res2012; 2: 449–460.
12.
PatelAPPatelMV. Optimization of helical spring for minimum weight by using harmony search algorithm. Int J Appl Innov Eng Manage2014; 3: 313–317.
13.
RaoARScanlanJPKeaneAJ. Applying multiobjective cost and weight optimization to the initial design of turbine disks. J Mech Des2007; 129: 1303–1310.
14.
BiglariMValipourMSRahmanyH. Technical feasibility study of energy generation from the tide in southern coasts of Iran using helical turbines. J Appl Environ Biol Sci2015; 5: 39–48.
15.
MilneIADayAHSharmaRNet al.The characterisation of the hydrodynamic loads on tidal turbines due to turbulence. Renew Sustain Energy Rev2016; 56: 851–864.
16.
BelloniCSWilldenRHHoulsbyGT. An investigation of ducted and open-centre tidal turbines employing CFD-embedded BEM. Renew Energy2017; 108: 622–634.
17.
FrostCHEvansPSHarroldMJet al.The impact of axial flow misalignment on a tidal turbine. Renew Energy2017; 113: 1333–1344.
18.
NuernbergMTaoL. Experimental study of wake characteristics in tidal turbine arrays. Renew Energy2018; 127: 168–181.
19.
GebreslassieMGTaborGRBelmontMR. Investigation of the performance of a staggered configuration of tidal turbines using CFD. Renew Energy2015; 80: 690–698.
20.
GebreslassieMGSanchezSOTaborGRet al.Experimental and CFD analysis of the wake characteristics of tidal turbines. Int J Marine Energy2016; 16: 209–219.
21.
GuoXYangJGaoZet al.The surface wave effects on the performance and the loading of a tidal turbine. Ocean Eng2018; 156: 120–134.
22.
ZhouJWWangDZ. Simulation of tidal stream turbine working near free surface. Appl Mech Mater2013; 361: 291–295.
23.
MarshPRanmuthugalaDPenesisIet al.Numerical simulation of the loading characteristics of straight and helical-bladed vertical axis tidal turbines. Renew Energy2016; 94: 418–428.
24.
ElbatranAHAhmedYMShehataAS. Performance study of ducted nozzle Savonius water turbine, comparison with conventional Savonius turbine. Energy2017; 134: 566–584.
25.
BouhalTRajadOKousksouTet al.CFD performance enhancement of a low cut-in speed current Vertical Tidal Turbine through the nested hybridization of Savonius and Darrieus. Energy Convers Manage2018; 169: 266–278.
26.
RahmaniHBiglariMValipourMSet al.Assessment of the numerical and experimental performance of screw tidal turbines. Proc IMechE Part A: J Power and Energy2018; 0(0): 1–14.
27.
LaínSLópezOQuinteroBet al.Design optimization of a vertical axis water turbine with CFD. Alternative energies, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 2013, pp. 113–139.
28.
HirtCWNicholsBD. Volume of fluid (VOF) method for the dynamics of free boundaries. J Comput Phys1981; 39: 201–225.
29.
DargahiB. Experimental study and 3D numerical simulations for a free-overflow spillway. J Hydraul Eng2006; 132: 899–907.
30.
Fluent Manual. Manual and user guide of fluent software, New York: Fluent Inc., 2005.
31.
RahimzadehHMaghsoodiRSarkardehHet al.Simulating flow over circular spillways by using different turbulence models. Eng Appl Comput Fluid Mech2012; 6: 100–109.
32.
FoxRWMcDonaldATPritchardPJ. Introduction to fluid mechanics, 6th ed. New York: John Willy & Sons, 2004.
33.
ShepherdDG. Principles of turbomachinery, New York: Macmillan, 1956. .
34.
DaughertyRLIngersollAC. Fluid mechanics: with engineering applications, New York: Tata McGraw-Hill Education, 1965.
35.
DavaniAARonneyPD. A jet-stirred chamber for turbulent combustion experiments. Combust Flame2017; 185: 117–128.
36.
DavaniAARonneyPD. A jet-stirred apparatus for turbulent combustion experiments. Bull Am Phys Soc2015, pp. 20.
37.
WilcoxDC. Turbulence modeling for CFD, 3rd ed. La Canada, CA: DCW Industries, 2006.
38.
JafaryarMKamraniRGorji-BandpyMet al.Numerical optimization of the asymmetric blades mounted on a vertical axis cross-flow wind turbine. Int Commun Heat Mass Transfer2016; 70: 93–104.
