One of the main focuses in transportation engineering is the application of sandwich materials in order to create safer and efficient vehicles. The main focus of this study was the application of 3D computed tomography for analyzing the responses of sandwich panels with micro lattice core subjected to impact loading. Micro lattice specimens were manufactured using Ti-6Al-4V powder by means of a direct metal laser sintering system. A theoretical model was applied for predicting the failure initiation loads under impact loading. The predictions presented good consistency with the experimental measurements. The 3D computed tomography system was used for the analysis of the collapse modes of the micro lattice sandwich panels after low-velocity impact tests. Experimental and theoretical results proved that lightweight sandwich panels with micro lattice cores are excellent energy absorbers and, therefore, they could have significant applications in the transportation industry.
AbrateS. Impact on composite structures, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.
2.
AvalleMBelingardiGIbbaA. Mechanical models of cellular solids: Parameters identification from experimental tests. Int J Impact Eng2007; 34: 3–27.
3.
AbrateS. Criteria for yielding or failure of cellular materials. J Sandw Struct Mater2008; 10: 5–51.
4.
CrupiVKaraEEpastoGet al.Prediction model for the impact response of glass fibre reinforced aluminium foam sandwiches. Int J Impact Eng2015; 77: 97–107.
5.
NavarroPAbrateSAubryJet al.Analytical modeling of indentation of composite sandwich beam. Compos Struct2013; 100: 79–88.
6.
BelingardiGMartellaPPeroniL. Fatigue analysis of honeycomb-composite sandwich beams. Compos Part A: Appl Sci Manuf2007; 38: 1183–1191.
7.
BelingardiGCavatortaMPDuellaR. Material characterization of a composite-foam sandwich for the front structure of a high speed train. Compos Struct2003; 61: 13–25.
8.
CucinottaFGuglielminoERisitanoGet al.Assessment of damage evolution in sandwich composite material subjected to repeated impacts by means optical measurements. Procedia Struct Integrity2016; 2: 3660–3667.
9.
TaylorD. Fatigue-resistant components: What can we learn from nature? Proc IMechE. Part C: J Mechanical Engineering Science2015; 229: 1186–1193.
10.
GentaG. Are there severe limitations to the bioinspired approach in machine design? Proc IMechE. Part C: J Mechanical Engineering Science2016; 230: 1511–1520.
11.
BrandtMSunSLearyMet al.High-value SLM aerospace components: From design to manufacture. Adv Mater Res2013; 633: 135–147.
12.
CooperDThornbyJBlundellNet al.Design and manufacture of high performance hollow engine valves by additive layer manufacturing. Mater Des2015; 69: 44–55.
13.
CooperDEStanfordMKibbleKAet al.Additive manufacturing for product improvement at Red Bull Technology. Mater Des2012; 41: 226–230.
14.
RashedMGAshrafMMinesRAWet al.Metallic microlattice materials: A current state of the art on manufacturing, mechanical properties and applications. Mater Des2016; 95: 518–533.
15.
CuiXZhaoLWangZet al.Dynamic response of metallic lattice sandwich structures to impulsive loading. Int J Impact Eng2012; 43: 1–5.
16.
HundleyJMCloughECJacobsenAJ. The low velocity impact response of sandwich panels with lattice core reinforcement. Int J Impact Eng2015; 84: 64–77.
17.
LiuJPattofattoSFangDet al.Impact strength enhancement of aluminum tetrahedral lattice truss core structures. Int J Impact Eng2015; 79: 3–13.
18.
MinesRAWTsopanosSShenYet al.Drop weight impact behaviour of sandwich panels with metallic micro lattice cores. Int J Impact Eng2013; 60: 120–132.
19.
ShenYCantwellWMinesRet al.Low-velocity impact performance of lattice structure core based sandwich panels. J Compos Mater2014; 48: 3153–3167.
20.
CrupiVEpastoGGuglielminoE. Internal damage investigation of composites subjected to low velocity impact. Exp Technol2016; 50: 555–568.
21.
CrupiVKaraEEpastoGet al.Theoretical and experimental analysis for the impact response of glass fibre reinforced aluminium honeycomb sandwiches. J Sandw Struct Mater2018; 20: 42–69.
22.
BucciVCoriglianoPCrupiVet al.Experimental investigation on Iroko wood used in shipbuilding. Proc IMechE, Part C: J Mechanical Engineering Science2017; 231: 128–139.
23.
CoriglianoPCrupiVEpastoGet al.Experimental and theoretical analyses of Iroko wood laminates. Compos Part B: Eng2017; 112: 251–264.
24.
YanCHaoLHusseinAet al.Advanced lightweight 316 L stainless steel cellular lattice structures fabricated via selective laser melting. Mater Des2014; 55: 533–541.
25.
AlsallaHHaoLSmithC. Fracture toughness and tensile strength of 316 L stainless steel cellular lattice structures manufactured using the selective laser melting technique. Mater Sci Eng A: Struct2016; 669: 1–6.
26.
Tancogne-DejeanTSpieringsABMohrD. Additively-manufactured metallic micro-lattice materials for high specific energy absorption under static and dynamic loading. Acta Mater2016; 116: 14–28.
27.
Van BaelSKerckhofsGMoesenMet al.Micro-CT-based improvement of geometrical and mechanical controllability of selective laser melted Ti6Al4V porous structures. Mater Sci Eng A: Struct2011; 528: 7423–7431.
28.
LearyMMazurMElambasserilJet al.Selective laser melting (SLM) of AlSi12Mg lattice structures. Mater Des2016; 98: 344–357.
29.
Electro Optical Systems-EOS GmbH. EOS Titanium Ti64 material data sheet. http://www.eos.info/material-m, 2016 (accessed 17 May 2016).
30.
CrupiVKaraEEpastoGet al.Static behavior of lattice structures produced via direct metal laser sintering technology. Mater Des2017; 135: 246–256.
31.
ASTM Designation: D 3039/D 3039M-00. Standard test method for tensile properties of polymer matrix composites materials. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM, 2000.
32.
ASTM D 3518/D 3518M-94. Standard test method for in-plane shear response of polymer matrix composite materials by tensile test of a ± 45° laminate. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM, 1994.
33.
Radovan H, Ziak J, Teodor T, et al. Evaluation of custom-made implants using industrial computed tomography. In: 10th international conference on digital technologies (DT), 2014, pp.82–86. Zilina: IEEE.
34.
ChoySYSunCNLeongKFet al.Compressive properties of Ti-6Al-4V lattice structures fabricated by selective laser melting: Design, orientation and density. Addit Manuf2017; 16: 213–224.
35.
AtaeeALiYFraserDet al.Anisotropic Ti-6Al-4V gyroid scaffolds manufactured by electron beam melting (EBM) for bone implant applications. Mater Des2018; 137: 345–354.
36.
ZhuSChaiGB. Damage and failure mode maps of composite sandwich panel subjected to quasi-static indentation and low velocity impact. Compos Struct2013; 101: 204–214.
37.
Hoo FattMSParkKS. Dynamic models for low-velocity impact damage of composite sandwich panels-Part B: Damage initiation. Compos Struct2001; 52: 353–364.
38.
HasanRMinesRAShenEet al.Comparison of the drop weight impact performance of sandwich panels with aluminium honeycomb and titanium alloy micro lattice cores. Appl Mech Mater2010; 24: 413–418.
39.
RashedMGAshrafMMinesRAWet al.Metallic microlattice materials: A current state of the art on manufacturing, mechanical properties and applications. Mater Des2016; 95: 518–533.
40.
ShenYMckownSTsopanosSet al.The mechanical properties of sandwich structures based on metal lattice architectures. J Sandw Struct Mater2010; 12: 159–180.
41.
RajaneeshASridharIRajendranS. Impact modeling of foam cored sandwich plates with ductile or brittle faceplates. Compos Struct2012; 94: 1745–1754.
