The present research work explores genetically optimized skew laminates, whose stacking sequence has been varied to maximize their fundamental frequencies with the help of an efficient optimization algorithm. Genetic algorithm, rather than being applied blindly with empirical parameters, is tuned with respect to the problem at hand. Following an extensive study, genetic algorithm parameters are selected carefully so as to ensure a robust optimized stacking sequence. The sensitivity of ply angles is also investigated so as to warrant against marginal manufacturing perturbations. The safe limit for variation of ply angles without much hampering the frequency is also recommended. Validation with existing solutions illustrates the efficiency of the procedure. A wide range of results with rectangular/ skew plates of different layers having symmetric/ antisymmetric ply-orientations, subject to different boundary conditions are solved, which demonstrate the efficacy of the approach.
KalitaKHaldarS. Eigenfrequencies of simply supported taper plates with cut-outs. Struct Eng Mech2017; 63: 103–113.
2.
TopalUDedeTOzturkHT. Stacking sequence optimization for maximum fundamental frequency of simply supported antisymmetric laminated composite plates using teaching–learning-based optimization. KSCE J Civil Eng2017; 21: 2281–2288.
3.
ChiongR. Nature-inspired algorithms for optimisation, New York: Springer, 2009.
4.
ZangHZhangSHapeshiK. A review of nature-inspired algorithms. J Bionic Eng2010; 7: S232–S237.
5.
BoussaidILepagnotJSiarryP. A survey on optimization metaheuristics. Inform Sci2013; 237: 82–117.
6.
NaritaY. Layerwise optimization for the maximum fundamental frequency of laminated composite plates. J Sound Vib2003; 263: 1005–1016.
7.
KayikciRSonmezFO. Design of composite laminates for optimum frequency response. J Sound Vib2012; 331: 1759–1776.
8.
VosoughiARForkhorjiHDRoohbakhshH. Maximum fundamental frequency of thick laminated composite plates by a hybrid optimization method. Compos Part B: Eng2016; 86: 254–260.
9.
BarrosoESParenteEde MeloAMC. A hybrid PSO-GA algorithm for optimization of laminated composites. Struct Multidisc Optim2017; 6: 2111–2130.
10.
ApalakZGApalakMKEkiciRet al.Layer optimization for maximum fundamental frequency of rigid point-supported laminated composite plates. Polym Compos2011; 32: 1988–2000.
11.
LiuQPaavolaJ. Lightweight design of composite laminated structures with frequency constraint. Compos Struct2016; 156: 356–360.
12.
RoqueCMCMartinsPALS. Maximization of fundamental frequency of layered composites using differential evolution optimization. Compos Struct2018; 183: 77–83.
13.
ApalakMKKarabogaDAkayB. The artificial bee colony algorithm in layer optimization for the maximum fundamental frequency of symmetrical laminated composite plates. Eng Optim2014; 46: 420–437.
14.
CookRDet al.Concepts and applications of finite element analysis, New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2007.
15.
PanditMKHaldarSMukhopadhyayM. Free vibration analysis of laminated composite rectangular plate using finite element method. J Reinf Plast Compos2007; 26: 69–80.
16.
KalitaKRamachandranMRaichurkarPet al.Free vibration analysis of laminated composites by a nine node isoparametric plate bending element. Adv Compos Lett2016; 25: 108–116.
17.
JonesRM. Mechanics of composite materials, Washington, DC: Scripta Book Company, 1975.
18.
GoldbergDE. Genetic algorithms, New Delhi: Pearson Education India, 2006.
19.
MillsKLFillibenJJHainesAL. Determining relative importance and effective settings for genetic algorithm control parameters. Evolut Comput2015; 23: 309–342.
De JongK. Genetic algorithms: A 30 year perspective. In: Perspectives on adaptation in natural and artificial systems. Oxford University Press2005, pp. 11–11.
22.
SivakumarKIyengarNGRDebK. Optimum design of laminated composite plates with cutouts using a genetic algorithm. Compos Struct1998; 42: 265–279.
23.
Schaffer J, Carruana R, Eshelman L, and Das R. A study of control parameters affecting online performance of genetic algorithms for function optimization. In: Proceedings of the third international conference on genetic algorithms, San Meteo, CA, USA, 1989.
24.
KapoorVDeySKhuranaAP. An empirical study of the role of control parameters of genetic algorithms in function optimization problems. Int J Comput Appl2011; 31: 20–26.
25.
De JongKA. Analysis of the behavior of a class of genetic adaptive systems, USA: Doctoral Dissertation, University of Michigan, 1975.
26.
DigalakisJGMargaritisKG. On benchmarking functions for genetic algorithms. Int J Comput Math2001; 77: 481–506.
27.
LiuGRChenSC. Flaw detection in sandwich plates based on time-harmonic response using genetic algorithm. Comput Meth Appl Mech Eng2001; 190: 5505–5514.
28.
Arenas M, Valdivieso P, Garcia A, et al. Statistical analysis of parameter setting in real-coded evolutionary algorithms. In: Parallel problem solving from nature, PPSN XI, 2010, pp. 452–461.
29.
NagendraSJestinDGurdalZet al.Improved genetic algorithm for the design of stiffened composite panels. Comput Struct1996; 58: 543–555.
AksuGAliR. Determination of dynamic characteristics of rectangular plates with cutouts using a finite difference formulation. J Sound Vib1976; 44: 147–158.
32.
TateDMSmithAE. Expected allele coverage and the role of mutation in genetic algorithms. In: ICGA1993, pp. 31–37.
