A macroscopic thermal finite element analysis modeling platform for laser-based additive manufacturing is presented and validated. Its key characteristics include highly automated creation of simulation scenarios and increased computational efficiency. An investigation is carried out proving thermal shells a viable alternative to traditional solid elements, for building smaller and faster models. Full parameterization allows for rapid creation of specific modeling instances/scenarios. The use of shell elements, combined with model reduction techniques and advanced solver technology, result in very significantly reduced simulation times, compared to conventional modeling methods. Validation of the presented platform is carried out by comparison to results from other numerical models as well as experiments identified in the literature. Very good agreement for a wide range of materials and process parameters attest to its accuracy and universal application. This platform is the necessary basis for an Integrated Multiscale Modeling framework for systematically studying thermal patterns thereby ultimately increasing the scope of simulation to complete layers and whole parts.
KruthJPWangXLaouiT. Lasers and materials in selective laser sintering. Assem Autom2003; 23: 357–371.
2.
WilliamsJDDeckardCR. Advances in modeling the effects of selected parameters on the SLS process. Rapid Prototyp J1998; 4: 90–100.
3.
KruthJPLevyGKlockeF. Consolidation phenomena in laser and powder-bed based layered manufacturing. CIRP Ann - Manuf Technol2007; 56: 730–759.
4.
KhairallahSAAndersonA. Mesoscopic simulation model of selective laser melting of stainless steel powder. J Mater Process Technol2014; 214: 2627–2636.
5.
OlevskyEA. Theory of sintering: from discrete to continuum. Mater Sci Eng R Rep1998; 23: 41–100.
6.
GusarovAVKruthJP. Modelling of radiation transfer in metallic powders at laser treatment. Int J Heat Mass Transf2005; 48: 3423–3434.
7.
YuriC. Investigations of light transfer in powder bed. Phys Procedia2011; 12: 279–284.
8.
BordèreSBernardDVincentS. Towards 3D simulation of sintering processes. In: Computational methods and experiments in materials characterization III, Southampton, UK: WIT Press, 2007.
9.
YangLGanYZhangY. Molecular dynamics simulation of neck growth in laser sintering of different-sized gold nanoparticles under different heating rates. Appl Phys A2011; 106: 725–735.
10.
KörnerCAttarEHeinlP. Mesoscopic simulation of selective beam melting processes. J Mater Process Technol2011; 211: 978–987.
11.
Zeng K, Pal D and Stucker B. A review of thermal analysis methods in Laser Sintering and Selective Laser Melting. In: Solid freeform fabrication symposium, Austin, TX, 2012, pp.796–814.
12.
KolossovSBoillatEGlardonR. 3D FE simulation for temperature evolution in the selective laser sintering process. Int J Mach Tools Manuf2004; 44: 117–123.
13.
LiRShiYLiuJ. Effects of processing parameters on the temperature field of selective laser melting metal powder. Powder Metall2009; 48: 186–195.
14.
GusarovAVSmurovI. Modeling the interaction of laser radiation with powder bed at selective laser melting. Phys Procedia2010; 5: 381–394.
15.
PatilRBYadavaV. Finite element analysis of temperature distribution in single metallic powder layer during metal laser sintering. Int J Mach Tools Manuf2007; 47: 1069–1080.
16.
DongLMakradiAAhziS. Three-dimensional transient finite element analysis of the selective laser sintering process. J Mater Process Technol2009; 209: 700–706.
17.
ShuaiCFengPGaoC. Simulation of dynamic temperature field during selective laser sintering of ceramic powder. Math Comput Model Dyn Syst2013; 19: 1–11.
18.
YinJZhuHKeL. Simulation of temperature distribution in single metallic powder layer for laser micro-sintering. Comput Mater Sci2012; 53: 333–339.
19.
DaiKShawL. Finite element analysis of the effect of volume shrinkage during laser densification. Acta Mater2005; 53: 4743–4754.
20.
DaiKShawL. Thermal and mechanical finite element modeling of laser forming from metal and ceramic powders. Acta Mater2004; 52: 69–80.
21.
MatsumotoMShiomiMOsakadaK. Finite element analysis of single layer forming on metallic powder bed in rapid prototyping by selective laser processing. Int J Mach Tools Manuf2002; 42: 61–67.
22.
DaiKShawL. Thermal and stress modeling of multi-material laser processing. Acta Mater2001; 49: 4171–4181.
23.
Keller N and Ploshikhin V. New Method for fast predictions of residual stress and distortion of AM parts. In: Solid freeform fabrication symposium, Austin, TX, USA, 2014.
24.
PoncheRKerbratOMognolP. A novel methodology of design for Additive Manufacturing applied to Additive Laser Manufacturing process. Robot Comput Integr Manuf2014; 30: 389–398.
25.
AdamGAOZimmerD. Design for additive manufacturing — Element transitions and aggregated structures. CIRP J Manuf Sci Technol2014; 7: 20–28.
26.
KingWAndersonATFerenczRM. Overview of modelling and simulation of metal powder bed fusion process at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. Mater Sci Technol2015; 31: 957–968.
27.
Pal D, Patil N, Zeng K, et al. An integrated approach to cyber-enabled additive manufacturing simulations using physics based, coupled multiscale process modeling. In: Proceedings of 24th annual international solid freeform fabrication symposium, Austin, TX, USA, 2013, pp.1–18.
28.
ANSYS Mechanical APDL Theory Reference. 2013.
29.
ShiomiMYoshidomeAAbeF. Finite element analysis of melting and solidifying processes in laser rapid prototyping of metallic powders. Int J Mach Tools Manuf1999; 39: 237–252.
30.
JeffersAEBeataPA. Generalized shell heat transfer element for modeling the thermal response of non-uniformly heated structures. Finite Elem Anal Des2014; 83: 58–67.
31.
HuJDangDShenH. A finite element model using multi-layered shell element in laser forming. Opt Laser Technol2012; 44: 1148–1155.
32.
ANSYS Mechanical APDL Element Reference. 2013.
33.
ANSYS Mechanical APDL Command Reference. 2013.
34.
KershawS. The incomplete Cholesky-conjugate solution of systems. J Comput Phys1978; 26: 43–65.
35.
Rothberg E and Gupta A. Practical aspects and experiences Parallel ICCG on a hierarchical memory multiprocessor - Addressing the triangular solve bottleneck. Rep No STAN-CS-90-1330, 1990.
36.
JiangZYHuWPThomsonPF. Solution of the equations of rigid–plastic FE analysis by shifted incomplete Cholesky factorisation and the conjugate gradient method in metal forming processes. J Mater Process Technol2000; 102: 70–77.
37.
WuX. A 3-D finite-element algorithm for DC resistivity modelling using the shifted incomplete Cholesky conjugate gradient method. Geophys J Int2003; 154: 947–956.
38.
MeijerinkJ-avan der VorstH-a. An iterative solution method for linear systems of which the coefficient matrix is a symmetric M-matrix. Math Comput1977; 31: 148–148.
39.
SongBDongSLiaoH. Process parameter selection for selective laser melting of Ti6Al4V based on temperature distribution simulation and experimental sintering. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2011; 61: 967–974.
