Stress concentration is one of the disadvantages of flexure hinges. It limits the range of motion and reduces the fatigue life of mechanisms. This article designs flexure hinges by using stress-constrained topology optimization. A weighted-sum method is used for converting the multi-objective topology optimization of flexure hinges into a single-objective problem. The objective function is presented by considering the compliance factors of flexure hinges in the desired and other directions. The stress constraint and other constraint conditions are developed. An adaptive normalization of the P-norm of the effective von Mises stresses is adopted to approximate the maximum stress, and a global stress measure is used to control the stress level of flexure hinges. Several numerical examples are performed to indicate the validity of the method. The stress levels of flexure hinges without and with stress constraints are compared. In addition, the effects of mesh refinement and output spring stiffness on the topology results are investigated. The stress constraint effectively eliminates the sharp corners and reduces the stress concentration.
HowellLL. Compliant mechanisms, New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2001.
2.
LobontiuNGarciaE. Analytical model of displacement amplification and stiffness optimization for a class of flexure-based compliant mechanisms. Comput Struct2003; 81: 2797–2810.
3.
WangHZhangX. Input coupling analysis and optimal design of a 3-DOF compliant micro-positioning stage. Mech Mach Theory2008; 43: 400–410.
4.
CulpepperMLAndersonG. Design of a low-cost nano-manipulator which utilizes a monolithic, spatial compliant mechanism. Precis Eng2004; 28: 469–482.
5.
FatikowS. Automated nanohandling by microrobots, London: Springer, 2007.
6.
ZouTAngelesJ. Structural and instrumentation design of a microelectromechanical systems biaxial accelerometer. Proc Inst Mech Eng, Part C2014; 228: 2440–2455.
7.
HuangSCDaoTP. Design and analysis of a 2-DOF compliant mechanism for nano scale positioning. Int J Innovation Appl Stud2015; 10: 226–236.
8.
LobontiuN. Compliant mechanisms: Design of flexure hinges, CRC Press, 2002.
9.
ParosJMWeisbordL. How to design flexure hinges. Mach Des1965; 37: 151–156.
10.
LobontiuNPaineJSNGarciaEet al.Design of symmetric conic-section flexure hinges based on closed-form compliance equations. Mech Mach Theory2002; 37: 477–498.
11.
YongYKLuTFHandleyDC. Review of circular flexure hinge design equations and derivation of empirical formulations. Precis Eng2008; 32: 63–70.
TianYShirinzadehBZhangD. Closed-form compliance equations of filleted V-shaped flexure hinges for compliant mechanism design. Precis Eng2010; 34: 408–418.
17.
HuJFXieWJLiPet al.Comparative analysis of parabolic and hyperbolic flexure hinges using closed-form equations. Adv Mater Res2012; 503: 880–883.
18.
WangRZhouXZhuZet al.Compliant linear-rotation motion transduction element based on novel spatial helical flexure hinge. Mech Mach Theory2015; 92: 330–337.
19.
VallanceRRHaghighianBMarshER. A unified geometric model for designing elastic pivots. Precis Eng2008; 32: 278–288.
20.
ZelenikaSMunteanuMGDe BonaF. Optimized flexural hinge shapes for microsystems and high-precision applications. Mech Mach Theory2009; 44: 1826–1839.
21.
XiaoSLiY. Optimal design, fabrication, and control of an micropositioning stage driven by electromagnetic actuators. IEEE Trans Ind Electron Control Instrum2013; 60: 4613–4626.
22.
DaoTPHuangSC. Robust design for a flexible bearing with 1-DOF translation using the Taguchi method and the utility concept. J Mech Sci Technol2015; 29: 3309–3320.
23.
GómezJFBookerJDMellorPH. 2D Shape optimization of leaf-type crossed flexure pivot springs for minimum stress. Precis Eng2015; 42: 6–21.
24.
De LeonDMAlexandersenJFonsecaJSOet al.Stress-constrained topology optimization for compliant mechanism design. Struct Multidiscip Optim2015; 52: 929–943.
25.
ZhuBLZhangXMFatikowS. Design of single-axis flexure hinges using continuum topology optimization method. Sci China Technol Sci2014; 57: 560–567.
26.
Liu M, Zhang XM and Fatikow, S. Topology optimization of large-displacement flexure hinges. In: ASME 2015 international design engineering technical conference, Boston, USA, 2–5 August 2015, paper no. DETC2015-46444. New York: ASME.
27.
BendsoeMP. Optimization of structural topology, shape, and material [M], Berlin etc: Springer, 2013. .
28.
SigmundO. On the design of compliant mechanisms using topology optimization. Mech Struct Mach1997; 25: 493–524.
29.
LarsenUDSignundOBouwstaS. Design and fabrication of compliant micromechanisms and structures with negative Poisson's ratio. J Microelectromech Syst1997; 6: 99–106.
RozvanyGINSobieszczanski-SobieskiJ. New optimality criteria methods: Forcing uniqueness of the adjoint strains by corner-rounding at constraint intersections. Struct Optim1992; 4: 244–246.
38.
BruggiM. On an alternative approach to stress constraints relaxation in topology optimization. Struct Multidiscip Optim2008; 36: 125–141.
