A 2D plane strain finite element program has been developed to investigate very high cycle fatigue in wind turbine roller bearings due to rolling contact. Focus is on fatigue in the inner ring, where the effect of residual stresses and hardness variation along the depth is accounted for. Both classic Hertzian and elastohydrodynamic lubrication theories have been used to model the pressure distribution acting on the inner raceway and results are compared according to the Dang Van multiaxial fatigue criterion. The contact on the bearing raceway is simulated by substituting the roller with the equivalent contact pressure distribution. The material used for the simulations is taken to be an AISI 52100 bearing steel and linear elastic behavior is here assumed. The effect of different residual stress distributions is also studied, as well as the effect of variable hardness along the depth, relating its values to the fatigue limit parameters for the material. It is found that both for Hertzian and elastohydrodynamic lubrication contacts, the Dang Van criterion predicts that fatigue failure will first occur in the subsurface region and that, regardless of the specific pressure distribution used, the hardness distribution can have a significant influence on the safety against failure for bearings subjected to very high cycle fatigue loading.
Arabian-HoseynabadiHOraeeHTavnerPJ. Failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA) for wind turbines. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst2010; 32: 817–824.
2.
AmiratYBenbouzidMEHAl-AhmarE. A brief status on condition monitoring and fault diagnosis in wind energy conversion systems. Renew Sust Energy Rev2009; 13: 2629–2636.
3.
BlauPJWalkerLRXuH. Wear analysis of wind turbine gearbox bearings, Final Report. Oak Ridge, TN: Oak Ridge National Laboratory, 2010.
4.
Smolders K, Feng Y, Long H, et al. Reliability analysis and prediction of wind turbine gearboxes. In: EWEC—European Wind Energy Conference, Warsaw, Poland, 20–23 April 2010.
5.
FernandesCMartinsRCSeabraJHO. Friction torque of cylindrical roller thrust bearings lubricated with wind turbine gear oils. Tribol Int2013; 59: 121–128.
6.
SpinatoFTavnerPJvan BusselGJW. Reliability of wind turbine subassemblies. IET Renew Power Gener2009; 3(4): 387–401.
7.
YangMChengbingHXinxinF. Institutions function and failure statistic and analysis of wind turbine. Phys Procedia2012; 24: 25–30.
8.
KotzalasMNDollGL. Tribological advancements for reliable wind turbine performance. Philos T Roy Soc A2010; 368: 4829–4850.
9.
SadeghiFJalalahmadiBSlackTS. A review of rolling contact fatigue. J Tribol2009; 131(4): 041403–041403.
10.
Ragheb A and Ragheb M. Wind turbine gearboxes technologies. In: Proceedings of the 1st international nuclear and renewable energy conference, Amman, Jordan, 21–24 March 2010.
11.
LaiJLundTRydénK. The fatigue limit of bearing steels—Part I: A pragmatic approach to predict very high cycle fatigue strength. Int J Fatigue2012; 37: 166–167.
12.
EvansM-H. White structure flaking (WSF) in wind turbine gearbox bearings: Effects of ‘butterflies’ and white etching cracks (WEC). J Mater Sci Technol2012; 28: 3–22.
13.
GrabulovAPetrovRZandbergenHW. ESBD investigation of the crack initiation and TEM/FIB analysis of the microstructural changes around the cracks formed under rolling contact fatigue. Int J Fatigue2010; 32: 576–583.
14.
Greco A, Sheng S, Keller J, et al. Material wear and fatigue in wind turbine systems. Wear 2013; 302(1–2): 1583–1591.
15.
Cerullo M. Application of Dang Van criterion to rolling contact fatigue in wind turbine roller bearings. Proceeding of the 13th International Conference of Fracture – ICF13, Beijing, China, 16–21 June 2013.
16.
SinesGBehaviour of metals under complex static and alternating stresses. In: SinesGWaismanJL (eds). Metal fatigue, New York: McGraw-Hill, 1959, pp. 145–169.
17.
Findley WN. A theory for the effect of mean stress on fatigue life of metals under combined torsion and axial load or bending. Journal of Engineering for Industry 1959; 81: 301–306.
18.
Matake T. An explanation on fatigue limit under combined stress. Bull JSME 1977; 20: 257.
19.
McDiarmidDL. A shear-stress based critical-plane criterion of multiaxial fatigue failure for design and life prediction. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct1994; 17(12): 1475–1484.
20.
PapadopoulosIV. Fatigue polycyclique des metaux: une nouvelle approche, PhD Thesis, specialite: Mecanique, Ecole des Ponts et Chaussees, France, 1987.
21.
Dang VanK. Sur la resistance a la fatigue des metaux, PhD Thesis. Paris: Scientifique et Technologique l’Armement France, 1973.
22.
Dang VanKMacro–micro approach in high-cycle multiaxial fatigue. In: McDowellDLEllisR (eds). Advances in multiaxial fatigue, ASTM STP 1191. Philadelphia: ASTM, 1993, pp. 120–130.
23.
BerangerASBerardJVVittoriJFA fatigue life assessment methodology for automotive components. In: MarquisGSolindJ (eds). Fatigue Design 1995 Symposium Procedings, Helsinki, ESIS Publication 22. Elsevier Science, 1997.
24.
BernasconiAFilippiniMFolettiS. Multiaxial fatigue of a railwheel steel under non-proportional loading. Int J Fatigue2006; 28: 663–672.
25.
CiavarellaMMonnoFDemelioG. On the Dang Van fatigue limiting rolling contact fatigue. Int J Fatigue2006; 28: 852–863.
26.
CiavarellaMMonnoF. A comparison of multiaxial fatigue criteria as applied to rolling contact fatigue. Tribol Int2010; 43: 2139–2144.
27.
DesimoneHBernasconiABerettaS. On the application of Dang Van criterion to rolling contact fatigue. Wear2006; 260: 568–571.
28.
JacobsonBOHamrockBJ. Non-Newtonian fluid model incorporated into elastohydrodynamic lubrication of rectangular contacts. J Tribol1984; 106: 275–282.
29.
Private communications with Professor P. Klit and S.Janakiraman.
30.
SureshS. Fatigue of materials, 2nd edn. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006, pp. 253–254.
31.
DavoliPBernasconiAFilippiniM. Independence of the torsional limit upon a mean shear stress. Int J Fatigue2003; 25: 471–480.
32.
HeywoodRB. Designing against fatigue, London: Chapman and Hall Ltd, 1962.
33.
DalanTJStress range. In: OJHorger (ed). ASME handbook, metal engineering design, New York, 1953.
34.
ISO 281:2007, Rolling bearings—dynamic load ratings and rating life.
35.
MurakamiY. Metal fatigue: Effects of small defects and nonmetallic inclusions, Oxford: Elsevier, 2002, pp. 5–8.
36.
AtzoriBMeneghettiGSusmelL. Material fatigue properties for assessing mechanical components weakened by notches and defects. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct2005; 28: 83–97.
37.
RoessleMLFatemiA. Strain-controlled fatigue properties of steels and some simple approximations. Int J Fatigue2000; 22: 495–511.
38.
DonzellaGPetrogalliCMazzùA. Application of a failure assessment diagram under rolling contact to components with hardness variable along the depth. Eng Procedia2011; 10: 746–751.
39.
DonzellaGPetrogalliCMazzùA. A failure assessment diagram for components subjected to rolling contact loading. Int J Fatigue2010; 32: 256–268.
40.
SantosECKidaKHondaT. Fatigue strength improvement of AISI E52100 bearing steel by induction heating and repeated quenching. Mater Sci2011; 47(5): 677–682.
41.
Voskamp AP. Microstructural changes during rolling contact fatigue. PhD Thesis, Technical University of Delft, Netherlands, 1996.
