Integrity assessment of thin-walled tubular components such as nuclear reactor fuel pins during postulated and beyond-design-basis accident scenarios is an important issue for limiting the release of radioactivity into the surrounding fluid. The fracture resistance behaviour of these tubes cannot be evaluated using standard ASTM techniques. It is because of the inability of these axially cracked specimens to meet the stringent plane strain requirement due to their geometry and the high ductility of the zirconium alloy used for their fabrication. Moreover, the measurement of crack growth during the testing by conventional methods is a cumbersome process and sometimes it is not possible to use them due to the small size of these specimens. Alternative methods such as load-normalization and load-separation techniques are suitable for these types of situations. In this article, the crack growth data during loading of the axially cracked tubular specimens have been evaluated using a load-separation method. Several specimens have been tested in order to evaluate their fracture resistance behaviour. These specimens have different values of initial crack lengths. A modified procedure for the estimation of the material constant ‘m’ has been developed in this study so that data from multiple specimens can be used. This will lead to a more reliable estimation of crack growth during the loading process. The J–R curves, obtained using the current method, have also been compared with those obtained using load-normalization technique. It was observed that this modified method of load separation is a convenient and reliable technique for the evaluation of fracture resistance behaviour of non-standard specimens.
NorthwoodD. O.The development and applications of zirconium alloys. Mater. Des., 1985, 6(2), 58–70.
2.
MeyerR. O.McCardellR. K.ChungH. M.DiamondD. J.ScottH. H.A regulatory assessment of test data for reactivity initiated accidents. Nucl. Saf., 1996, 37(4), 271–288.
3.
SridharanK.HarringtonS. P.JohnsonA. K.LichtJ. R.AndersonM. H.AllenT. R.Oxidation of plasma surface modified zirconium alloy in pressurized high temperature water. Mater. Des., 2007, 28(4), 1177–1185.
4.
GouY.LiY.LiuY.ChenH.YingS.Evaluation of a delayed hydride cracking in Zr–2.5Nb CANDU and RBMK pressure tubes. Mater. Des., 2009, 30(4), 1231–1235.
5.
FuketaT.SasajimaH.SugiyamaT.Behavior of high-burnup PWR fuels with low-tin zircaloy-4 cladding under reactivity initiated accident conditions. Nucl. Technol., 2001, 133, 50–62.
6.
ChungH. M.KassnerT. F.Cladding metallurgy and fracture behaviour during reactivity-initiated accidents at high burnup. Nucl. Eng. Des., 1998, 186, 411–427.
7.
LinkT. M.KossD. A.MottaA. T.Failure of zircaloy cladding under transverse plane-strain deformation. Nucl. Eng. Des., 1998, 186, 379–394.
8.
ASTM Standard E 1820-01. Standard test method for measurement of fracture toughness, Vol. 03.01, 2000, pp.1–21 (ASTM, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania).
9.
Rashid, Y. R., Lemaignan, C., and Strasser, A. Evaluation of fracture toughness and extension in fuel cladding, American Nuclear Society, Park City, UT, April 2000.
10.
Hsu, H. H., Chien, K. F., Chu, H. C., and Liaw, P. K. An X-specimen test for determination of thin walled tube fracture toughness. In Fatigue and fracture mechanics (Ed. R. Chona), 2001, vol. 32, ASTM STP 1406, pp. 214–226 (American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania).
11.
ArseneS.BaiJ.New approach to measuring transverse properties of structural tubing by a ring test. ASTM J. Test. Eval., 1996, 24(6), 386–391.
12.
Sainte CatherineC.Le BoulchD.CarassouS.RamasubramanianN.LemaignanC.An internal conical mandrel technique for fracture toughness measurements on nuclear fuel cladding. ASTM J. Test. Eval., 2006, 34(5), 373–382.
13.
GrigorievV.JosefssonB.LindA.RosborgB.A pin-loading tension test for evaluation of thin-walled tubular materials. Scr. Metall. Mater., 1995, 33(1), 109–114.
14.
Grigoriev, V., Josefsson, B., and Rosborg, B. Fracture toughness of zircaloy cladding tubes. In Zirconium in nuclear industry. Proceedings of the 11th International Symposium (Eds. E. R. Bradely and G. P. Sabol), 1996, ASTM STP 1295, pp. 431–447 (American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania).
15.
Josefsson, B. and Grigoriev, V. Modified ring tensile testing and a new method for fracture toughness testing of irradiated cladding. In Proceedings of the European Working Group Hot Laboratories and Remote Handling Meeting, Petten, Netherlands, 14–16 May 1996, pp. 1–14.
16.
BertschJ.HoffelnerW.Crack resistance curve determination of tube cladding material. J. Nucl. Mater., 2006, 352, 116–125.
17.
YagnikS. K.RamasubramanianN.GrigorievV.Sainte-CatherineC.BertschJ.AdamsonR.KuoR.-C.MahmoodS. T.FukudaT.EfsingP.OberländerB. C.Round-robin testing of fracture toughness characteristics of thin-walled tubing. J. ASTM Int., 2008, 5(2), 1–21.
18.
Grigoriev, V. and Jakobsson, R. Application of the pin loading tension test to measurements of delayed hydride cracking velocity in zircaloy cladding, SKI Rapport 00:57, Studsvik Nuclear AB, SE-611 82 Nyköping, Sweden, November 2000.
19.
GrigorievV.JakobssonR.Delayed hydrogen cracking velocity and J-integral measurements on irradiated BWR cladding. J. ASTM Int., 2005, 2(8), 1–16.
20.
BertolinoG.MeyerG.IpiñaJ. P.Degradation of the mechanical properties of zircaloy-4 due to hydrogen embrittlement. J. Alloys Compd., 2002, 330–332, 408–413.
21.
BertolinoG.MeyerG.PerezI. J.Effects of hydrogen content and temperature on fracture toughness of zircaloy-4. J. Nucl. Mater., 2003, 320, 272–279.
22.
BertolinoG.MeyerG.PerezI. J.In-situ crack growth observation and fracture toughness measurement of hydrogen charged zircaloy-4. J. Nucl. Mater., 2003, 322, 57–65.
23.
Fukuda, T., Itagaki, N., Kamimura, J., Mozumi, Y., and Furuya, T. Fracture toughness of hydrogen-absorbed zircaloy-2 cladding tube. Paper No. 21. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Nuclear Fuel ENS Top Fuel 2003/ ANS LWR Fuel Performance Meeting, Wurzburg, Germany, 16–19 March 2003.
24.
Edsinger, K., Davies, J. H., and Adamson, R. B. Degraded fuel cladding fractography and fracture behaviour. In Zirconium in nuclear industry: 12th International symposium (Eds. G. P. Sabol and G. D. Moan), 2000, ASTM STP 1354, pp. 316–339(American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania).
25.
Videm, K. and Lunde, L. Stress corrosion cracking and growth formation of pellet-clad interaction defects. In Zirconium in nuclear industry: 4th International symposium (Eds. J. H. Schemel and T. P. Papazoglou), 1979, ASTM STP 681, pp. 230–237(American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania).
26.
Nakatsuka, M., Kubo, T., and Hayashi, Y. Fatigue behavior of neutron irradiated zircaloy-2 fuel cladding tubes. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Symposium on Zirconium in the nuclear industry, (Eds. C. M. Eucken and A. M. Garde), 1991, ASTM STP 1132, pp. 230–245 (American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania).
27.
Grigoriev, V., Josefsson, B., Rosborg, B., and Bai, J. A novel fracture toughness testing method for irradiated tubing-experimental results and 3D numerical evaluation. In Transactions of the 14th International Conference on Structural mechanics in reactor technology, Lyon, France, 17–22 August 1997, 57–64.
28.
LiW., Studies of fracture in thin-wall and thin-film structures by use of cohesive zone model approach, 2003 (Doctoral Dissertation, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana).
29.
ZavattieriP. D.Modeling of crack propagation in thin-walled structures using a cohesive model for shell elements. Trans. ASME J. Appl. Mech., 2006, 73, 948–958.
30.
LiW.SiegmundT.An analysis of crack growth in thin-sheet metal via a cohesive zone model. Eng. Fract. Mech., 2002, 69(18), 2073–2093.
31.
CirakF.OrtizM.PandolfiA.A cohesive approach to thin-shell fracture and fragmentation. Comput. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng., 2005, 194(21–24), 2604–2618.
32.
SamalM. K.SanyalG.ChakravarttyJ. K.An experimental and numerical study of the fracture behaviour of tubular specimens in a pin-loading-tension set-up. J. Mech. Eng. Sci., 2010, 224(1), 1–12.
33.
SamalM. K.SanyalG.ChakravarttyJ. K.Estimation of fracture behavior of thin walled nuclear reactor fuel pins using pin-loading-tension (PLT) test. Nucl. Eng. Des., 2010, 240, 4043–4050.
34.
SanyalG.SamalM. K.RayK. K.ChakravarttyJ. K.SuriA. K.BanerjeeS.Prediction of J–R curves of thin-walled fuel pin specimens in a PLT setup. Eng. Fract. Mech., 2011, 78, 1029–1043.
35.
SamalM. K.SanyalG.ChakravarttyJ. K.Investigation of failure behavior of two different types of zircaloy clad tubes used as nuclear reactor fuel pins. Eng. Fail. Anal, 2011, in press. doi:10.1016/j.engfailanal.2011.06.009.
36.
DhiaA. B.BaiJ. B.FrancoisD.3D finite element analyses of a new fracture toughness testing method for tubular structures. Int. J. Press. Vessels Pip., 1997, 71, 189–195.
37.
Ernst, H. A., Paris, P. C., Rossow, M., and Hutchinson, J. W. Analysis of load-displacement relationships to determine J-R curve and tearing instability material properties. In Proceedings of the Fracture mechanics: Eleventh Conference (Ed. C. W. Smith), 1979, ASTM STP 677, pp. 581–599 (American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania).
38.
HerreraR.LandesJ. D.A direct J-R curve analysis of fracture toughness tests. J. Test. Eval., 1988, 16(5), 427–449.
39.
LandesJ. D.HerreraR.A new look at J-R curve analysis. Int. J. Fract., 1988, 36, 9–14.
40.
LandesJ. D.ZhouZ.LeeK.HerreraR.Normalization method for developing J-R curves with the LMN function. J. Test. Eval., 1991, 19(4), 305–311.
41.
SharobeamM. H.LandesJ. D.The load separation criterion and methodology in ductile fracture mechanics. Int. J. Fract., 1991, 47(2), 81–104.
42.
SharobeamM. H.LandesJ. D.The load separation and ηpl development in precracked specimen test records. Int. J. Fract., 1993, 59(3), 213–226.
43.
Cassanelli, A. N., Ortiz, H., Wainstein, J. E., and de Vedia, L. A. Separability property and load normalization in AA 6061-T6 aluminum alloy. In Fatigue and fracture mechanics, vol. 32, 2001, ASTM STP 1406, pp. 49–72 (American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania).
44.
DzuganJ.ViehrigH. W.Application of the normalization method for the determination of J-R curves. Mater. Sci. Eng., 2004, A387–389, 307–311.
45.
ZhuX. K.JoyceJ. A.J-resistance curve testing of HY80 steel using SE(B) specimens and normalization method. Eng. Fract. Mech., 2007, 74(14), 2263–2281.
46.
ZhuX. K.LamP. S.ChaoY. J.Application of normalization method to fracture resistance testing for storage tank A285 carbon steel. Int. J. Press. Vessels Pip., 2009, 86(10), 669–676.
47.
BaldiF.RiccòT.High-rate J-testing of toughened polyamide 6/6: applicability of the load separation criterion and the normalization method. Eng. Fract. Mech., 2005, 72(14), 2218–2231.
48.
MorhainC.VelascoJ. I.Determination of J-R curve of polypropylene copolymers using the normalization method. J. Mater. Sci., 2001, 36(6), 1487–1499.
49.
SalazarA.RodríguezJ.The use of the load separation parameter Spb method to determine the J-R curves of polypropylenes. Polym. Test., 2008, 27(8), 977–984.
50.
VaradarajanR.DappE. K.RimnacC. M.Static fracture resistance of ultra high molecular weight polyethylene using the single specimen normalization method. Polym. Test., 2008, 27(2), 260–268.
51.
WainsteinJ.VediaL. A.CassanelliA. N.A study to estimate crack length using the separability parameter Spb in steels. Eng. Fract. Mech., 2003, 70(17), 2489–2496.
52.
WainsteinJ.FrontiniP. M.CassanelliA. N.J-R curve determination using the load separation parameter Spb method for ductile polymers. Polym. Test., 2004, 23, 591–598.
53.
Chen BaoC.CaiL.Estimation of the J-resistance curve for Cr2Ni2MoV steel using the modified load separation parameter Spb method. J Zhejiang Univ. Sci. A (Appl. Phys. Eng.), 2010, 11(10), 782–788.
54.
Kumar, V., German, M. D., and Shih, C. F. An engineering approach for elastic–plastic fracture analysis, EPRI report no. NP-1931, Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, California, 1981.
55.
WilsonC. D.ManiP.Plastic J-integral calculations using the load separation method for the double edged notched tensile specimen. Eng. Fract. Mech., 2008, 75, 5177–5186.
