Pipe junctions are found in many engineering systems. It is often desirable to predict the pressures within such systems. Steady flow pressure loss coefficients can be defined that attempt to characterize the effects of the junction on the flow. These coefficients are usually established experimentally, but empirical and analytical expressions exist that allow some of the loss coefficients for junctions to be calculated. In the paper, simple expressions are presented that allow all of the loss coefficients for a three pipe T-junction, with any lateral branch angle or area ratio, to be calculated. The coefficients obtained using these expressions are compared with measured values. The steady flow pressure loss coefficients calculated in this way have been applied to the simulation of the propagation of a shock wave through a T-junction. Predictions of the mean pressure levels show good correlation with measurements.
WinterboneD. E.PearsonR. J.Design Techniques for Engine Manifolds, 1999 (Professional Engineering Publications, London and Bury St Edmunds).
2.
WoodD. J.ReddyL. S.FunkJ. E.Modelling pipe networks dominated by junctions. J. Hydraul. Engng, ASCE, 1993, 119(8), 949–958.
3.
BlaisdellF. W.MansonP. W.Loss of energy at sharpedged pipe junctions in water conveyance systems. US Department of Agriculture, Technical Bulletin 1283, August 1963.
4.
BlaisdellF. W.MansonP. W.Energy loss at pipe junctions. J. Irrig. and Drainage Div., ASCE, 1967, 93(IR3), 59–78.
5.
NicholsJ. R.Techniques for the design of exhaust manifolds with pulse-converters. PhD thesis, University of Manchester Institute of Science and Technology, 1984.
6.
Al-NaibY. M. T.Air flow losses in branching circular metal ducts. PhD thesis, University of Manchester Institute of Science and Technology, 1978.
7.
RussE. HeadLosses in wyes and manifolds. J. Hydraul. Div., ASCE, 1970, 96(HY3), 593–608.
8.
KuoT. W.ChangS.Three dimensional steady flow computations in manifold-type junctions and a comparison with experiment. SAE paper 932511, 1993.
9.
KuoT. W.KhalighiB.Numerical study on flow distribution in T-junctions and a comparison with experiment. In Proceedings of ASME International Combustion Engines Division Spring Meeting, Marietta, Ohio, 23-26 April 1995, pp. 31–38.
10.
KlellV. M.SamsT.WimmerA.Berechnung der Strömung in Rohrverzweigungen. Motortechnische, December 1998, 844–851.
11.
DimitriadisC.LeschzinerM. A.WinterboneD. E.AlexanderG. I.SierensR.Computation of three-dimensional flow in manifold-type junctions. In Proceedings of ASME Symposium on Flows and Related Phenomena in Reciprocating I.C. Engines, Miami Beach, Florida, 1985, pp. 57–61.
12.
FlamangP.SierensR.Experimental and theoretical analysis of the flow in exhaust pipe junctions. In IMechE Conference, 1989, paper C382/082, pp. 461–469.
13.
EDSU 73022. Pressure losses in three-leg pipe junctions: dividing flows, Engineering Sciences Data Unit, London, 1973.
14.
EDSU 73023. Pressure losses in three-leg pipe junctions: combining flows, Engineering Sciences Data Unit, London, 1973.
15.
MillerD. S.Internal Flow. A Guide to Losses in Pipe and Duct Systems, 1971 (BHRA, Cranfield).
16.
GardelA.Les pertes de charge dans les écoulements au travers de branchementsen té. Bull. Tech. Suisse Romande, 1957, 83(9), 123–130.
17.
GardelA.Les pertes de charge dans les écoulements au travers de branchementsen té. Bull. Tech. Suisse Romande, 1957, 83(10), 143–148.
18.
ItoH.ImaiK.Energy losses at 90° pipe junctions. J. Hydraul. Engng, ASCE, 1973, 99(9), 1353–1368.
19.
SerreM.OdgaardA. J.ElderR. A.Energy losses at combining pipe junction. J. Hydraul. Engng, ASCE, 1994, 120(7), 808–830.
20.
OkaK.NozakiT.ItoH.Energy losses due to combination flow at tees. Jap. Soc. Mech. Engrs Int. J., Ser. B, 1996, 39(3), 489–498.
21.
BinghamJ. F.BlairG. P.An improved branched pipe model for multi-cylinder automotive engine calculations. Proc. Instn Mech. Engrs, Part D, Journal of Automobile Engineering, 1985, 199(D1), 65–77.
22.
BassettM. D.PearsonR. J.WinterboneD. E.Estimation of steady flow loss coefficients for pulse converter junctions in exhaust manifolds. In 6th IMechE International Conference on Turbocharging and Air Management Systems, 3-5 November 1998, pp. 209–218.
23.
FlamangP.Studie van de stroming in juncties van uitlaat-systemen van opgeladen dieselmotoren. PhD thesis, Rijksuniversiteit, Gent, 1989.
24.
HagarW. H.An approximate treatment of flow in branches and bends. Proc. Instn Mech. Engrs, Part C, Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science, 1984, 198(C4), 63–69.
25.
BensonR. S.WoolattD.WoodsW. A.Unsteady flow in simple branch systems. Proc. Instn Mech. Engrs, 1963-4178(3I(iii)), 24–49.
26.
BassettM. D.PearsonR. J.WinterboneD. E.BattenP.Investigation of shock wave interaction with branched ducts. In 22nd International Symposium on Shock Waves, Imperial College, London, 18-23 July 1999, paper 3060.
27.
BassettM. D.WinterboneD. E.PearsonR. J.Modelling engines with pulse converted exhaust manifolds using one-dimensional techniques. SAE paper 2000-01-0290, 2000.
28.
DaneshyarH.PearsonR. D.Unsteady flow through a four-way branch in the exhaust system of a multi-cylinder engine. J. Mech. Engng Sci., 1971, 13(4), 253–265.
29.
Abou-HaidarN. I.DixonS. L.Pressure losses in combining subsonic flows through branched ducts. Trans. ASME, 1992, 114, 264–270.
30.
RamamurthyA. S.ZhuW.Combining flows in 90° junctions of rectangular closed conduits. J. of Hydraul. Engng, ASCE, 1997, 123(11), 1012–1019.
KinneE.Contribution to the knowledge of hydraulic losses in branches. Hydraul. Inst. Tech., Hoschule-Munchen, 1931, (4), 70–93.
33.
De CorteD.DeprezM.Studie van de stroming in een pulse converter. MSc thesis, University of Gent, 1984.
34.
BassettM. D.PearsonR. J.WinterboneD. E.CloughE.Visualisation of wave propagation in a three-pipe junction. In IMechE International Conference on Optical Methods and Data Processing in Heat and Fluid Flow, City University, London, 16-17 April 1998, paper C541/044/98, 503-512.
