This study investigated the wear prediction of BTA drills for laminated Inconel 625 deposited metal and FeCr alloy materials using 3D finite element modelling. High interface temperature owing to increased cutting speed enhances the abrasive wear mechanism of Inconel 625, while FeCr alloy exhibits a predominantly adhesive wear mechanism. The interface temperature and normal pressure required as inputs for tool-wear prediction were obtained using response surface methodology (RSM), which was developed by combining the central composite design (CCD) with finite element method simulation. This approach significantly improved the computational efficiency and provides accurate predictions with the calibrated friction model. A modified Usui wear model was established considering the sensitivity of temperature to wear rate for Inconel 625. A significant improvement in prediction accuracy was observed compared with the original Usui equation. The proposed tool-wear prediction model was validated through experimental tests. The maximum predicted flank wear width deviations for the outer and intermediate edges of BTA drill were 2% and 7%, respectively. The results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed BTA drill wear-prediction approach for laminated materials with different wear characteristics, providing theoretical guidance for cutting-parameter optimisation and tool-replacement strategies.
Pratheesh KumarSElangovanSMohanrajR, et al. A review on properties of Inconel 625 and Inconel 718 fabricated using direct energy deposition. Mater Today Proc2021; 46: 7892–7906.
2.
AlvarãesCPSandesSSJorgeJCF, et al. Microstructural characterization of Inconel 625 nickel-based alloy weld cladding obtained by electroslag welding process. J Mater Eng Perform2020; 29: 3004–3015.
3.
TerekhovVKhizhovMMironovaL. Quality assessment of pressed joints of heat-exchanger tube-tube sheets. Mater Today Proc2021; 38: 1348–1350.
4.
UedaSYagishitaTMaenoJ, et al. Development of deep hole drilling technology for tube sheet of steam generator. In: 2014 22nd international conference on nuclear engineering, Prague, Czech Republic, 7–11 July 2014.
5.
HanXLiuZFengY. Experimental research on the deep-hole boring of pure niobium tube. Proc IMechE, Part B: J Engineering Manufacture2020; 234: 1124–1132.
6.
HuangWZhangXWuC, et al. Tool wear prediction in ultrasonic vibration-assisted drilling of CFRP: a hybrid data-driven physics model-based framework. Tribol Int2022; 174: 107755.
7.
BiermannDBleicherFHeiselU, et al. Deep hole drilling. CIRP Ann2018; 67: 673–694.
8.
HaddagBNouariMMoufkiA. Experimental analysis of the BTA deep drilling and a new analytical thermomechanical model for assessment of cutting forces and BTA drill design. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2020; 106: 455–469.
9.
LoureiroDDinizAEFarinaAB, et al. The influence of turning parameters on surface integrity of nickel alloy 625. Proc IMechE, Part B: J Engineering Manufacture2018; 232: 1837–1847.
10.
MagriADinizAESuyamaDI. Evaluating the use of high-pressure coolant in turning process of Inconel 625 nickel-based alloy. Proc IMechE, Part B: J Engineering Manufacture2018; 232: 1182–1192.
11.
SagarCKPriyadarshiniAGuptaAK, et al. Experimental investigation of tool wear characteristics and analytical prediction of tool life using a modified tool wear rate model while machining 90 tungsten heavy alloys. Proc IMechE, Part B: J Engineering Manufacture2021; 235: 242–254.
12.
YıldırımÇVKıvakTSarıkayaM, et al. Evaluation of tool wear, surface roughness/topography and chip morphology when machining of Ni-based alloy 625 under MQL, cryogenic cooling and CryoMQL. J Mater Res Technol2020; 9: 2079–2092.
13.
SaleemMQMumtazS. Face milling of Inconel 625 via wiper inserts: evaluation of tool life and workpiece surface integrity. J Manuf Process2020; 56: 322–336.
14.
YuanXQiuHZengF, et al. Microstructural evolution and mechanical properties of Inconel 625 superalloy fabricated by pulsed microplasma rapid additive manufacturing. J Manuf Process2022; 77: 63–74.
15.
Ananda-KumarRKMoscoso-KingsleyWJacobG, et al. Machining behavior of additively manufactured and cast-wrought nickel-based superalloy (IN 625). Procedia Manuf2018; 26: 595–606.
16.
SalviHVesuwalaHRavalP, et al. Sustainability analysis of additive + subtractive manufacturing processes for Inconel 625. Sustain Mater Technol2023; 35: e00580.
17.
SarıkayaMGuptaMKTomazI, et al. A state-of-the-art review on tool wear and surface integrity characteristics in machining of superalloys. CIRP J Manuf Sci Technol2021; 35: 624–658.
18.
HoierPMalakizadiAStuppaP, et al. Microstructural characteristics of Alloy 718 and Waspaloy and their influence on flank wear during turning. Wear2018; 400–401: 184–193.
19.
HoierPMalakizadiAKlementU, et al. Characterization of abrasion- and dissolution-induced tool wear in machining. Wear2019; 426–427: 1548–1562.
20.
MalakizadiAHajaliTSchulzF, et al. The role of microstructural characteristics of additively manufactured Alloy 718 on tool wear in machining. Int J Mach Tools Manuf2021; 171: 103814.
21.
HuaJLiYMouW, et al. An accurate cutting tool wear prediction method under different cutting conditions based on continual learning. Proc IMechE, Part B: J Engineering Manufacture2022; 236: 123–131.
22.
HouWGuoHLuoL, et al. Tool wear prediction based on domain adversarial adaptation and channel attention multiscale convolutional long short-term memory network. J Manuf Process2022; 84: 1339–1361.
23.
LiYLiuCHuaJ, et al. A novel method for accurately monitoring and predicting tool wear under varying cutting conditions based on meta-learning. CIRP Ann2019; 68: 487–490.
24.
XieLJSchmidtJSchmidtC, et al. 2D FEM estimate of tool wear in turning operation. Wear2005; 258: 1479–1490.
25.
EliasJVAsamsSMathewJ. Worn tool geometry–based flank wear prediction in micro turning. Proc IMechE, Part B: J Engineering Manufacture2020; 234: 710–719.
26.
YueCLiMZhangM, et al. The modified constitutive model considering strain-temperature coupling and dynamic recrystallization effective for FEM simulation of milling process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2022; 119: 1217–1232.
27.
MalakizadiAHosseinkhaniKMarianoE, et al. Influence of friction models on FE simulation results of orthogonal cutting process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2017; 88: 3217–3232.
28.
BinderMKlockeFDoebbelerB. An advanced numerical approach on tool wear simulation for tool and process design in metal cutting. Simul Model Pract Theory2017; 70: 65–82.
29.
CourbonCFabreDMethonG, et al. A 3D modeling strategy to predict efficiently cutting tool wear in longitudinal turning of AISI 1045 steel. CIRP Ann2021; 70: 57–60.
30.
MalakizadiAGruberHSadikI, et al. An FEM-based approach for tool wear estimation in machining. Wear2016; 368–369: 10–24.
31.
NooraieRYSafariMPakA. Tool wear estimation in machining based on the flank wear inclination angle changes using the FE method. Mach Sci Technol2020; 24: 425–445.
32.
MalakizadiACedergrenSSurreddiKB, et al. A methodology to evaluate the machinability of Alloy 718 by means of FE simulation. In: International conference on advanced manufacturing engineering and technologies, Stockholm, Sweden, 27–30 October 2013, pp.95–106. Stockholm: NEWTECH.
33.
LotfiMJahanbakhshMAkhavan FaridA. Wear estimation of ceramic and coated carbide tools in turning of Inconel 625: 3D FE analysis. Tribol Int2016; 99: 107–116.
34.
LiXShiZDuanN, et al. Cutting performance investigation based on the variable friction model by considering sliding velocity and limiting stress. Proc IMechE, Part B: J Engineering Manufacture2020; 234: 1113–1123.
35.
DengBHeQDePaivaJM, et al. A novel approach to cutting tool edge design based on initial wear stage. J Mater Process Technol2022; 304: 117561.
36.
RamkumarKDMulimaniSSAnkitK, et al. Effect of grain boundary precipitation on the mechanical integrity of EBW joints of Inconel 625. Mater Sci Eng A2021; 808: 140926.
37.
GuanQLuSLuY, et al. Study on the modified power-law constitutive model for the FEM cutting simulation of Inconel 625 deposited metal using the electroslag welding process. J Manuf Process2022; 81: 881–892.
38.
KaschnitzEKaschnitzLHeugenhauserS. Electrical resistivity measured by millisecond pulse heating in comparison with thermal conductivity of the superalloy Inconel 625 at elevated temperature. Int J Thermophys2019; 40: 27.
39.
KongJZhangTDuD, et al. The development of FEM based model of orthogonal cutting for pure iron. J Manuf Process2021; 64: 674–683.
40.
JiangFZhangTYanL. Estimation of temperature-dependent heat transfer coefficients in near-dry cutting. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2016; 86: 1207–1218.
41.
PengBBergsTSchraknepperD, et al. Development and validation of a new friction model for cutting processes. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2020; 107: 4357–4369.
42.
Karthik PandiyanGPrabaharanT. Optimization of machining parameters on AA6351 alloy steel using response surface methodology (RSM). Mater Today Proc2020; 33: 2686–2689.
43.
OlovsjöSNyborgL. Influence of microstructure on wear behaviour of uncoated WC tools in turning of Alloy 718 and Waspaloy. Wear2012; 282–283: 12–21.
44.
PolvorosaRSuárezAde LacalleLNL, et al. Tool wear on nickel alloys with different coolant pressures: comparison of Alloy 718 and Waspaloy. J Manuf Process2017; 26: 44–56.
