In order to predict the formability of lightweight materials, the flow stress and fracture behavior of AA5A06 aluminum alloy which is very sensitive to temperature and strain-rate were investigated in this study. First, a modified Misiolek constitutive equation with a work-soften term is proposed to calculate the flow stress of the sheet metal. To predict ductile fracture in sheet forming operations, Cockcroft-Latham damage criterion is applied here and ductile fracture threshold under each condition is estimated using Response Surface Method. Finally, warm hydroforming deep drawing tests were conducted at various conditions and the experiment results are compared with the numerical simulation result to evaluate the new model’s feasibility and accuracy in forecasting the mechanical response of the material in warm forming conditions. Results show that the proposed model has a good accuracy compared with the traditional power law models and the FEM simulation conforms well to the tests.
ChengYQZhangHChenZH, et al. Flow stress equation of AZ31 magnesium alloy sheet during warm tensile deformation. J Mater Process Technol2008; 208(1–3): 29–34.
2.
TsaoLCWuHYLeongJC, et al. Flow stress behavior of commercial pure titanium sheet during warm tensile deformation. Mater Des2012; 34: 179–184. 2012.
3.
DangKWangKLiuG. Dynamic softening and hardening behavior and the micro-mechanism of a TC31 high temperature titanium alloy sheet within hot deformation. Materials2021; 14(21): 6515.
4.
TeodosiuCHuZ. Evolution of the intragranular microstructure at moderate and large strains: Modelling and computational significance. In: “Simulation of materials processing: theory, methods and applications”, Proceedings of the 5th international conference on “numerical methods in industrial forming processes” (NUMIFORM ’95), Ithaca, New York, USA, June 18–21, 1995.
5.
MohamedMSFosterADLinJ, et al. Investigation of deformation and failure features in hot stamping of aa6082: experimentation and modelling. Int J Mach Tools Manuf2012; 53(1): 27–38.
6.
MarciniakZKuczyńskiK. Limit strains in the processes of stretch-forming sheet metal. Int J Mech Sci1967; 9(9): 609–620.
7.
AssempourAHashemiRAbriniaK, et al. A methodology for prediction of forming limit stress diagrams considering the strain path effect. Comput Mater Sci2009; 45(2): 195–204.
8.
BagheriaslRGhavamKWorswickM. Formability analysis of aluminum alloy sheets at elevated temperatures with numerical simulation based on the M-K method. AIP Conf Proc2011; 1353(1): 1517–1522.
9.
PanichSBarlatFUthaisangsukV, et al. Experimental and theoretical formability analysis using strain and stress based forming limit diagram for advanced high strength steels. Mater Des2013; 51: 756–766.
10.
BasakSPandaSK. Failure strains of anisotropic thin sheet metals: Experimental evaluation and theoretical prediction. Int J Mech Sci2019; 151: 356–374.
11.
CockcroftMLathamD. Ductility and the workability of metals. J Inst Met1968; 96: 33–39.
12.
OhSIChenCCKobayashiS. Ductile Fracture in Axisymmetric Extrusion and Drawing—Part 2: Workability in Extrusion and Drawing. J Manuf Sci Eng1979; 101(1): 36–44.
13.
AyadaM. Central bursting in extrusion of inhomogeneous materials. In: Proceedings of 2nd international conference on technology for plasticity, Stuttgart1987; vol. 1, pp.553–558. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
14.
LiuHYangYYuZ, et al. The application of a ductile fracture criterion to the prediction of the forming limit of sheet metals. J Mater Process Technol2009; 209(14): 5443–5447.
15.
MaXLiFLiJ, et al. Analysis of forming limits based on a new ductile damage criterion in st14 steel sheets. Mater Des2015; 68: 134–145.
16.
HashemiSJMoslemi NaeiniHLiaghatGH, et al. Prediction of bulge height in warm hydroforming of aluminum tubes using ductile fracture criteria. Arch Civil Mech Eng2015; 15(1): 19–29.
17.
JalilAHoseinpour GolloMSeyedkashiSH. Process analysis of hydrodynamic deep drawing of cone cups assisted by radial pressure. Proc IMechE, Part B: J Engineering Manufacture2017; 231(10): 1793–1802.
18.
ShaoZBaiQLiN, et al. Experimental investigation of forming limit curves and deformation features in warm forming of an aluminium alloy. Proc IMechE, Part B: J Engineering Manufacture2018; 232(3): 465–474.
19.
Duc-ToanNYoung-SukK. Combined numerical and experimental study to predict the forming limit curve of boron steel sheets at elevated temperatures. Proc IMechE, Part B: J Engineering Manufacture2020; 234(1–2): 189–203.
20.
HuGPanC. Investigation on deformation behavior of magnesium alloy sheet AZ31B in pulsating hydroforming. Proc IMechE, Part B: J Engineering Manufacture2021; 235(1–2): 198–206.
21.
MorchhaleAKotkundeNSinghSK, et al. Prediction of fracture limits of IN625 alloy by coupling ductile damage models and anisotropic yielding functions with the classical Marciniak and Kuczyński model. Proc IMechE, Part B: J Engineering Manufacture2022; 236(6–7): 894–907.
22.
KimJHSerpantiéABarlatF, et al. Characterization of the post-necking strain hardening behavior using the virtual fields method. Int J Solids Struct2013; 50(24): 3829–3842.
23.
EnamiK. The effects of compressive and tensile prestrain on ductile fracture initiation in steels. Eng Fract Mech2005; 72(7): 1089–1105.
24.
ZenerCHollomonJH. Effect of strain rate upon plastic flow of steel. J Appl Phys1944; 15(1): 22–32.
25.
MisiolekZKowalczykJKastnerP. Investigation of plastic flow stresses of Zn and its alloys. Arch Hutn1977; 22(1): 71–88.
26.
SafaeiMLeeMGDe WaeleW. Evaluation of stress integration algorithms for elastic–plastic constitutive models based on associated and non-associated flow rules. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng2015; 295: 414–445.
27.
OzturkFLeeD. Analysis of forming limits using ductile fracture criteria. J Mater Process Technol2004; 147(3): 397–404.
28.
TakudaHMoriKHattaN. The application of some criteria for ductile fracture to the prediction of the forming limit of sheet metals. J Mater Process Technol1999; 95(1–3): 116–121.
29.
QuanGZWangFBLiuYY, et al. Evaluation of varying ductile fracture criterion for 7075 aluminum alloy. Trans Nonferrous Met Soc China2013; 23(3): 749–755.
30.
GedikliHCoraÖNKoçM. Comparative investigations on numerical modeling for warm hydroforming of aa5754-o aluminum sheet alloy. Mater Des2011; 32(5): 2650–2662.
31.
PanickerSSPandaSK. Formability analysis of aa5754 alloy at warm condition: appraisal of strain rate sensitive index. Mater Today Proc2015; 2(4–5): 1996–2004.
