Industrial Internet of Things on integrated preventive maintenance and enterprise-resource-planning systems: A case study of fastener forming manufacturing processes
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online May, 2023
Industrial Internet of Things on integrated preventive maintenance and enterprise-resource-planning systems: A case study of fastener forming manufacturing processes
The Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) has evolved industrial operations to be more efficient and reliable. The fastener forming process (FFP) used to rely on the judgments of in-process inspectors and experienced operators. Since no critical information was transmitted between machines, the machining status during production was unable to reveal. Now, with sensors installed in the machines of FFP, manufacturing data can be collected, analyzed, and responded to the machines. This IIoT-embedded FFP can not only carry out real-time data, pre-processing, and feature engineering but also enable optimally selecting classification algorithms for preventive maintenance. Consequently, the FFP establishes machine-health indicators for the production site and the heading process recognizes the abnormal situations between punches. The operator-delayed response leads to a great amount of loss that can be avoided. Besides, with the integration of enterprise resource planning (ERP) and manufacturing execution system (MES), this IIoT-embedded FFP converts receiving customer orders into work orders and coordinates operations and sales within enterprises. This system integration catches the status of various production indicators and further advances accurate materials preparation and inventory costs control. Overall, this IIoT-embedded FFP system becomes no necessity for increasing inventory and reserving backlog funds to cope with the impact of a vast number of scrap products. Finally, other types of machining processes or systems can adopt this systematic approach in the future.
LiDCChangSYChenTL, et al. Steps for the advanced product quality planning approach to improve product quality: a case of fastener manufacturing. Proc IMechE, Part B: J Engineering Manufacture2011; 225(9): 1621–1635.
2.
Zion Market Research. Global pharmaceutical continuous manufacturing market report. New York: Market Research Store, 2018.
3.
HooverJ.Factors that determine the adaptation of a leadership style: A case study in the 21st century manufacturing industry. Doctoral dissertation, Baker College, MI, 2020.
4.
GlaeserASelvarajVLeeK, et al. Remote machine mode detection in cold forging using vibration signal. Procedia Manuf2020; 48: 908–914.
5.
SongLLiXYangY, et al. Detection of micro-defects on metal screw surfaces based on deep convolutional neural networks. Sensors2018; 18(11): 3709.
6.
HsuBMWangTCShuMH.Lot-dependent sampling plans for qualifying long-term production capability with a one-sided specification. Comput Ind Eng2020; 146: 106583.
7.
ChanST.Digital transformation of family Small-to-Medium-Sized enterprises. Succession and Innovation in Asia’s Small-and-Medium-Sized Enterprises2021; 289–305.
HaldimannR.2016. High speed fastener inspection. SAE Technical Paper 2016-01-2145, 1–4.
10.
ChengFT.Industry 4.1: Intelligent Manufacturing with Zero Defects. Piscataway, NJ: Wiley-IEEE Press, 2022.
11.
RexFMTRavindranD. An integrated approach for optimal fixture layout design. Proc IMechE, Part B: J Engineering Manufacture2017; 231(7): 1217–1228.
12.
AtulSTBabuMCL. A review on effect of thinning, wrinkling and spring-back on deep drawing process. Proc IMechE, Part B: J Engineering Manufacture2019; 233(4): 1011–1036.
13.
BasakSPrasadKSMehtoA, et al. Parameter optimization and texture evolution in single point incremental sheet forming process. Proc IMechE, Part B: J Engineering Manufacture2020; 234(1-2): 126–139.
14.
JosuedaSilvaPAlvaresAJ.Investigation of tool wear in single point incremental sheet forming. Proc IMechE, Part B: J Engineering Manufacture2020; 234(1-2): 170–188.
15.
Perez-AlfaroIGil-HernandezDMuñoz-NavascuesO, et al. Low-cost piezoelectric sensors for time domain load monitoring of metallic structures during operational and maintenance processes. Sensors2020; 20(5): 1471.
16.
OmriNAl MasryZMairotN, et al. Industrial data management strategy towards an SME-oriented PHM. J Manuf Syst2020; 56: 23–36.
17.
VolkWGrochePBrosiusA, et al. Models and modelling for process limits in metal forming. CIRP Annals2019; 68(2): 775–798.
18.
Ashtari TalkhestaniBJungTLindemannB, et al. An architecture of an intelligent digital twin in a cyber-physical Production System. J Automatisierungstechnik2019; 67(9): 762–782.
19.
AvvaruVSBrunoGChiabertP, et al. Integration of PLM, MES and ERP systems to optimize the engineering, production and business. IFIP Adv Inf Commun Technol2020; 594: 70–82.
20.
EckerMHellfeierM.Forecast model for optimization of the massive forming Machine OEE. Lect Notes Mech Eng2019; 147–156.
21.
KamphakeGA.Digitalization in controlling. Digitization Controlling2020; 1549: 3–25.
22.
AberleL.A comprehensive guide to enterprise IoT project success. New York: IoT Agenda, 2015.
23.
MittalSKhanMARomeroD, et al. Smart manufacturing: characteristics, technologies and enabling factors. Proc IMechE, Part B: J Engineering Manufacture2019; 233(5): 1342–1361.
24.
WanJTangSShuZ, et al. Software-defined industrial Internet of things in the context of Industry 4.0. IEEE Sens J2016; 16(20): 1–7380.
25.
ChengFTKaoCAChenCF, et al. Tutorial on applying the VM technology for TFT-LCD Manufacturing. IEEE Trans Semicond Manuf2015; 28(1): 55–69.
26.
Ul RehmanSSinghPManickamS, et al. Towards Sustainable IoT Ecosystem. In: 2020 2nd International conference on industrial electrical and electronics (ICIEE), pp.135–138. Lombok: IEEE, 2020.
27.
HeKJiaMLiuC.A review of optimal sensor deployment to diagnose manufacturing systems. IEEE Access2018; 6: 27418–27432.
28.
HavardVSahnounMBettayebB, et al. Data architecture and model design for Industry 4.0 components integration in cyber-physical production systems. Proc IMechE, Part B: J Engineering Manufacture2021; 235(14): 2338–2349.
29.
ChengFTTiengHYangHC, et al. Industry 4.1 for wheel machining automation. IEEE Robot Autom Lett2016; 1(1): 332–339.
30.
LahintaAHarisIAbdillahT.Optimizing libraries’ content findability using Simple Object Access Protocol (SOAP) with multi-tier architecture. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng2017; 180(1): 12–61.
31.
HaliliFRamadaniE.Web services: A comparison of SOAP and REST services. Mod Appl Sci2018; 12(3): 175–183.
32.
KrishnanSWuE.Alphaclean: automatic generation of data cleaning pipelines. 2019. arXiv:1904.11827.
33.
Al-HashimiHTBasuhailAA.A proposed data partitioning approach on heterogeneous HPC platforms: Data locality perspective. IEEE Access2021; 9: 81432–81442.
34.
ChenBWanJShuL, et al. Smart factory of industry 4.0: Key technologies, application case, and challenges. IEEE Access2018; 6: 6505–6519.
35.
MourtzisDMilasNVlachouA.An Internet of things-based monitoring system for shop-floor control. J Comput Inf Sci Eng2018; 18(2): 021005.
36.
PriegoRIriondoNGangoitiU, et al. Agent-based middleware architecture for reconfigurable manufacturing systems. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2017; 92: 1579–1590.
37.
YehCSChenSLLiIC.Implementation of MQTT protocol based network architecture for smart factory. Proc IMechE, Part B: J Engineering Manufacture2021; 235(13): 2132–2142.
38.
ChenSQinYChenJG, et al. A forging method for reducing process steps in the forming of automotive fasteners. Int J Mech Sci2018; 137: 1–14.
39.
Joseph ManojRAnto PraveenaMDVijayakumarK. An ACO–ANN based feature selection algorithm for big data. Cluster Comput2019; 22: 3953–3960.
40.
GayathriRVasudevanSK.Internet of things based smart health monitoring of industrial standard motors. Indones J Electr Eng Inform2018; 6(4): 361–367.
41.
EpifancevKMishuraT.Problems and advantages of Scada systems when performing measurements at hazardous production technologies. J Phys Conf Ser2020; 1515(3): 032071.
42.
LeeJSiegelDLapiraER.Development of a predictive and preventive maintenance demonstration system for a semiconductor etching tool. Electrochem Soc2013; 52(1): 913–927.
43.
ZdravevskiELameskiPTrajkovikV, et al. Improving activity recognition accuracy in ambient-assisted living systems by automated feature engineering. IEEE Access2017; 5: 5262–5280.
44.
JalayerMOrsenigoCVercellisC.Fault detection and diagnosis for rotating machinery: A model based on convolutional LSTM, fast Fourier and continuous wavelet transforms. Comput Ind2021; 125: 103378.
45.
ChatterjeeAGVermaMKKumarA, et al. Scaling of a fast Fourier transform and a pseudo-spectral fluid solver up to 196608 cores. J Parallel Distr Comput2018; 113: 77–91.
46.
LiuYYuWDillonT, et al. Empowering IoT predictive maintenance solutions with AI: A distributed system for manufacturing plant-wide monitoring. IEEE Trans Ind Inform2022; 18(2): 1345–1354.
47.
AyvazSAlpayK.Predictive maintenance system for production lines in manufacturing: A machine learning approach using IoT data in real-time. Expert Syst Appl2021; 173: 4598–4598.
