Beyond following rules: Teaching research ethics in the age of the Hoffman Report

Abstract

The Hoffman Report scandal demonstrates that ethics is not objective and ahistorical, contradicting the comforting progressive story about ethics many students receive. This modern-day ethical failure illustrates some of the weaknesses of the current ethics code: it is rule-based, emphasizes punishments for noncompliance, and assumes a rational actor who can make tricky ethical decisions using a cost–benefit analysis. This rational emphasis translates into pedagogy: the cure for unethical behavior is more education. Yet such an approach seems unlikely to foster ethical behavior in the real world, either for students or for mature scientists. This article argues for an alternative ethical system and a different way of teaching ethical behavior. Virtue ethics emphasizes the development of ethical habits and traits through regular practice and reflection. We show how virtue ethics complements a feminist approach to science, in which scientists are encouraged to reflect on their own biases, rather than attempting to achieve an impossible objectivity. Our article concludes with pedagogical suggestions for teaching ethical behavior as a practical and intelligent skill.

Keywords

ethics feminism humanism research ethics teaching

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aalbers

Teo

(2017) ‘The American Psychological Association and the Torture Complex’, Journal für Psychologie 25(1): 179–204.

Abramson

(1999) ‘Hume on Cultural Conflicts of Values’, Philosophical Studies 94(1–2): 173–87.

Adair

J. G.

Lindsay

R. C. L.

Carlopio

(1983) ‘Social Artifact Research and Ethical Regulations: Their Impact on the Teaching of Experimental Methods’, Teaching of Psychology 10(3): 159–62.

Agnew Cochran

Fozard Weaver

(2017) ‘Can Virtue Be Learned? An Exploration of Student Learning Experiences in Ethics Courses and Their Implications for Influencing Moral Character’, Teaching Theology and Religion 20(3): 243–56.

Allport

G. W.

(1921) ‘Personality and Character’, Psychological Bulletin 18(9): 441–55.

Allport

G. W.

Vernon

P. E.

(1930) ‘The Field of Personality’, Psychological Bulletin 27(10): 677–730.

Annas

(2005) ‘Comments on John Doris’s Lack of Character’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 71(3): 636–42.

Annas

(2011) Intelligent Virtue. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Anscombe

G. E. M.

(1958) ‘Modern Moral Philosophy’, Philosophy 33(124): 1–19.

10.

APA (2013) APA Guidelines for the Undergraduate Psychology Major: Version 2.0. Washington, DC: APA, available at: https://www.apa.org/ed/precollege/about/psymajor-guidelines.pdf.

11.

APA (2017) ‘Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct’, available at: https://www.apa.org/ethics/code/ethics-code-2017.pdf.

12.

Bachiochi

Everton

Evans

Fugere

Escoto

Letterman

Leszczynski

(2011) ‘Using Empirical Article Analysis to Assess Research Methods Courses’, Teaching of Psychology 38(1): 5–9.

13.

Banks

Armstrong

Carter

Graham

Hayward

Henry

Strachan

(2013) ‘Everyday Ethics in Community-Based Participatory Research’, Contemporary Social Science 8(3): 263–77.

14.

Baumeister

R. F.

Exline

J. J.

(1999) ‘Virtue, Personality, and Social Relations: Self-Control as the Moral Muscle’, Journal of Personality 67(6): 1165–94.

15.

Baumeister

R. F.

Vohs

K. D.

Funder

D. C.

(2007) ‘Psychology as the Science of Self-Reports and Finger Movements: Whatever Happened to Actual Behavior?’, Perspectives on Psychological Science 2(4): 396–403.

16.

Baumrind

(1964) ‘Some Thoughts on Ethics of Research: After Reading Milgram’s “Behavioral Study of Obedience”’, American Psychologist 19(6): 421–3.

17.

Baumrind

(1971) ‘Principles of Ethical Conduct in the Treatment of Subjects: Reactions to the Draft Report of the Committee on Ethical Standards in Psychological Research’, American Psychologist 26(10): 887–96.

18.

Baumrind

(1972) ‘Reactions to the May 1972 Draft Report of the Ad Hoc Committee on Ethical Standards in Psychological Research’, American Psychologist 27(11): 1083–6.

19.

Baumrind

(1975) ‘Metaethical and Normative Considerations Governing the Treatment of Human Subjects in the Behavioral Sciences’, in Kennedy

E. C.

(ed.) Human Rights and Psychological Research: A Debate on Psychology and Ethics. New York, NY: Thomas Y. Crowell, pp. 37–68.

20.

Baumrind

(1978) ‘Nature and Definition of Informed Consent in Research Involving Deception’, in The Belmont Report: Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects (Appendix, Vol. 2, DHEW Publication No. OS 78-0014). Washington, DC: National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research, pp. 23–171.

21.

Baumrind

(1979) ‘IRBs and Social Science Research: The Costs of Deception’, IRB: Ethics & Human Research 1: 1–4.

22.

Baumrind

(1985) ‘Research Using Intentional Deception: Ethical Issues Revisited’, American Psychologist 40(2): 164–74.

23.

Baumrind

(1990) ‘Doing Good Well’, in Fisher

C. B.

Tryon

W. W.

(eds) Ethical Issues in Applied Developmental Psychology. Norwood, NJ: Ablex, pp. 17–28.

24.

Baumrind

(1992) ‘Leading an Examined Life: The Moral Dimension of Daily Conduct’, in Kurtines

W. M.

Axmitia

Gewirtz

J. L.

(eds) The Role of Values in Psychology and Human Development. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley, pp. 256–80.

25.

Bernstein

J. W.

(2017) ‘Skeletons in the Closet: The American Psychological Association Under Scrutiny’, International Journal of Applied Psychoanalytic Psychology 14(2): 143–51.

26.

Bersoff

D. N.

(1994) ‘Explicit Ambiguity: The 1992 Ethics Code as an Oxymoron’, Professional Psychology: Research and Practice 25(4): 382–7.

27.

Bland

E. D.

(2010) ‘Finding Self, Forming Virtue: The Treatment of Narcissistic Defenses in Marriage Therapy’, Journal of Psychology and Christianity 29(2): 158–65.

28.

Borger

(2020, 22 January) ‘Guantánamo: Psychologist Tells of ‘Abusive Drift’ in Treatment of Terror Suspects’, The Guardian, available at: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/jan/22/guantanamo-psychologist-tells-of-abusive-drift-in-treatment-of-terror-suspects.

29.

Bowie-Sexton Purcell

(2013) ‘Flourishing Bodies: Disability, Virtue, Happiness’, PhD thesis, Boston College.

30.

Centre for Social Justice and Community Action, Durham University, and National Co-ordinating Centre for Public Engagement (2012) Community-Based Participatory Research: A Guide to Ethical Principles and Practice. Bristol: NCCPE, available at: https://www.publicengagement.ac.uk/how-we-help/our-publications/community-based-participatory-research-guide-to-ethical-principle.

31.

Chopik

W. J.

Bremner

R. H.

Defever

A. M.

Keller

V. N.

(2018) ‘How (and Whether) to Teach Undergraduates About the Replication Crisis in Psychological Science’, Teaching of Psychology 45(2): 158–63.

32.

Clegg

J. W.

(2022) Good Science: Psychological Inquiry as Everyday Moral Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

33.

Croom

(2014) ‘Vindicating Virtue: A Critical Analysis of the Situationist Challenge Against Aristotelian Moral Psychology’, Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science 48(1): 18–47.

34.

Danziger

(1990) Constructing the Subject: Historical Origins of Psychological Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

35.

Dill

D. D.

(1982) ‘The Structure of the Academic Profession: Toward a Definition of Ethical Issues’, Journal of Higher Education 53(3): 255–67.

36.

Doherty

W. J.

Boss

P. G.

(1991) ‘Values and Ethics in Family Therapy’, in Gurman

A. S.

Kniskern

D. P.

(eds) Handbook of Family Therapy: Vol. 2. New York, NY: Brunner/Mazel, pp. 606–37.

37.

Doris

(2002) Lack of Character: Personality and Moral Behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

38.

Douglas

(2009) Science, Policy, and the Value-Free Ideal. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.

39.

Eidelson

Arrigo

J. M.

(2015, 30 July) ‘Op-Ed: How the American Psychological Assn. Lost Its Way’, LA Times, available at: https://www.latimes.com/opinion/op-ed/la-oe-arrigo-psychologists-apa-report-20150729-story.html.

40.

Flanagan

J. C.

(1954) ‘The Critical Incident Technique’, Psychological Bulletin 51(4): 327–58.

41.

Fuller

R. C.

(2006) ‘American Psychology and the Religious Imagination’, Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences 42(3): 221–35.

42.

Gewirth

(1978) Reason and Morality. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

43.

Gill

M. B.

(2011) ‘Humean Moral Pluralism’, History of Philosophy Quarterly 28(1): 45–64.

44.

Gilligan

(1982) In a Different Voice: Women’s Conceptions of Self and Morality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

45.

Gómez

J. M.

Smith

C. P.

Gobin

R. L.

Tang

S. S.

Freyd

J. J.

(2016) ‘Collusion, Torture, and Inequality: Understanding the Actions of the American Psychological Association as Institutional Betrayal’, Journal of Trauma and Disassociation 17(5): 527–44.

46.

Green

C. D.

(2015) ‘Why Psychology Isn’t Unified, and Probably Never Will Be’, Review of General Psychology 19(3): 207–14.

47.

Handelsman

M. M.

(2017) ‘A Teachable Ethics Scandal’, Teaching of Psychology 44(3): 278–84.

48.

Harman

(2009) ‘Skepticism About Character Traits’, Journal of Ethics 13(1): 235–42.

49.

Henrich

Heine

S. J.

Norenzayan

(2010) ‘The Weirdest People in the World?’, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33(2–3): 61–83.

50.

Hoffman

D. H.

Carter

D. J.

Lopez

C. R. V.

Benzmiller

H. L.

Guo

A. X.

Latifi

S. Y.

Craig

D. C.

(2015) Report to the Special Committee of the Board of Directors of the American Psychological Association: Independent Review Relating to APA Ethics Guidelines, National Security Interrogations, and Torture. Chicago, IL: Sidley Austin LLP, available at: https://psychcentral.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/APA-FINAL-Report-7.2.15.pdf.

51.

Homiak

(2016) ‘Moral Character’, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, available at: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2016/entries/moral-character/.

52.

Hursthouse

(1999) On Virtue Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

53.

Kim

Rutherford

(2015) ‘From Seduction to Sexism: Feminists Challenge the Ethics of Therapist–Client Sexual Relations in 1970s America’, History of Psychology 18(3): 283–96.

54.

Kleinberg

(2016) ‘How Organizational Hunger May Have Contributed to the American Psychological Association’s Scandal Over the Ethics of Torture’, International Journal of Group Psychotherapy 66(4): 475–91.

55.

Knapp

S. J.

Gottlieb

M. C.

Handelsman

M. M.

(2018) ‘The Benefits of Adopting a Positive Perspective in Ethics Education’, Training and Education in Professional Psychology 12(3): 196–202.

56.

Korn

J. H.

(1984) ‘Coverage of Research Ethics in Introductory and Social Psychology Textbooks’, Teaching of Psychology 11(3): 146–9.

57.

Kosits

R. D.

(2004) ‘Of Faculties, Fallacies and Freedom: Dilemma and Irony in the Secularization of American Psychology’, History of Psychology 7(4): 340–66.

58.

Kura

K. M.

Shamsuddin

F. M.

Chauhan

(2014) ‘Effects of Honor Codes and Classroom Justice on Students’ Deviant Behavior’, Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences 112: 77–86.

59.

Lewis

N. A.

(2006, 7 June) ‘Military Alters the Makeup of Interrogation Advisers’, New York Times, available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2006/06/07/washington/07detain.html.

60.

LoCicero

Jull-Patterson

Lee Gray

Marlin

R. P.

Sweeney

N. M.

Boyd

J. W.

(2016) ‘Enabling Torture: APA, Clinical Psychology Training and the Failure to Disobey’, Peace and Conflict 22(4): 345–55.

61.

McCabe

D. L.

Trevino

L. K.

Butterfield

K. D.

(2002) ‘Honor Codes and Other Contextual Influences on Academic Integrity: A Replication and Extension to Modified Honor Code Settings’, Research in Higher Education 43(3): 357–78.

62.

McCoy

A. W.

(2006) A Question of Torture, CIA Interrogation From the Cold War to the War on Terror. New York, NY: Metropolitan Books.

63.

McCoy

A. W.

(2007) ‘Science in Dachau’s Shadow: Hebb, Beecher, and the Development of CIA Psychological Torture and Modern Medical Ethics’, Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences 43(3): 401–17.

64.

McCullough

M. E.

Snyder

C. R.

(2000) ‘Classical Sources of Human Strength: Revisiting an Old Home and Building a New One’, Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology 19(1): 1–10.

65.

Morawski

J. G.

(1982) ‘Assessing Psychology’s Moral Heritage Through Our Neglected Utopias’, American Psychologist 37(10): 1082–95.

66.

Morawski

J. G.

(2014) ‘Reflexivity’, in Teo

(ed.) The Encyclopedia for Critical Psychology. New York, NY: Springer, pp. 1653–60.

67.

Morawski

J. G.

(2015) ‘Epistemological Dizziness in the Psychological Laboratory: Lively Subjects, Anxious Experimenters and Experimental Relations, 1950-1970’, Isis 106(3): 567–97.

68.

Morling

(2021) Research Methods in Psychology: Evaluating a World of Information (4th ed.). New York, NY: W. W. Norton.

69.

National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research (1979) The Belmont Report: Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research (DHEW Publication No. OS 78-0012). Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, available at: https://videocast.nih.gov/pdf/ohrp_belmont_report.pdf.

70.

Nicholson

(2003) Inventing Personality: Gordon Allport and the Science of Selfhood. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

71.

Nisbett

R. E.

(1990) ‘The Anti-creativity Letters: Advice From a Senior Tempter to a Junior Tempter’, American Psychologist 45(9): 1078–82.

72.

Nosek

B. A.

(2017) ‘Center for Open Science: Strategic Plan’, available at: https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/x2w9h.

73.

Nosek

B. A.

Bar-Anan

(2012) ‘Scientific Utopia: I. Opening Scientific Communication’, Psychological Inquiry 23(3): 217–43.

74.

O’Doherty

K. C.

Burgess

M. M.

(2013) ‘Public Deliberation to Develop Ethical Norms and Inform Policy for Biobanks: Lessons Learnt and Challenges Remaining’, Research Ethics 9(2): 55–77.

75.

Pettifor

J. L.

(1996) ‘Ethics: Virtue and Politics in the Science and Practice of Psychology’, Canadian Psychology 37(1): 1–12.

76.

Pettit

(2013) The Science of Deception: Psychology and Commerce in America. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

77.

Pope

K. S.

(2016) ‘The Code Not Taken: The Path From Guild Ethics to Torture and Our Continuing Choices’, Canadian Psychology 57(1): 51–9.

78.

Pope

K. S.

(2018, 22 July) ‘The American Psychological Association Outsources Adjudication of Ethics Complaints: 5 Far-Reaching Consequences’, Articles, Research, & Resources in Psychology, available at: https://kspope.com/ethicsoutsourcing.php.

79.

Reinders

(2008) Receiving the Gift of Friendship: Profound Disability, Theological Anthropology, and Ethics. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.

80.

Richards

(1995) ‘“To Know Our Fellow Men to Do Them Good”: American Psychology’s Enduring Moral Project’, History of the Human Sciences 8(3): 1–24.

81.

Riger

(1992) ‘Epistemological Debates, Feminist Voices: Science, Social Values, and the Study of Women’, American Psychologist 47(6): 730–40.

82.

Roberts

R. C.

Wood

W. J.

(2007) Intellectual Virtues: An Essay in Regulative Epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

83.

Rogerson

M. D.

Gottlieb

M. C.

Handelsman

M. M.

Knapp

Younggren

(2011) ‘Nonrational Processes in Ethical Decision Making’, American Psychologist 66(7): 614–23.

84.

Rozin

(2009) ‘What Kind of Empirical Research Should We Publish, Fund, and Reward?: A Different Perspective’, Perspectives on Psychological Science 4(4): 435–9.

85.

Ruiz

Warchal

(2014) ‘Ethics as an Undergraduate Psychology Outcome: When, Where, and How to Teach It’, Psychology Learning & Teaching 13(2): 120–8.

86.

Rutherford

(2006) ‘The Social Control of Behavior Control: Behavior Modification, Individual Rights, and Research Ethics in America, 1971–1979’, Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences 42(3): 203–20.

87.

Schoen

(2017) ‘The Culture of Interrogation: Evaluating Detainees at Guantanamo Bay’, International Journal of Applied Psychoanalytic Psychology 14(2): 133–42.

88.

Sherif

C. W.

(1979) ‘Bias in Psychology’, in Sherman

J. A.

Beck

E. T.

(eds) A Prism of Sex: Essays in the Sociology of Knowledge. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press, pp. 93–133.

89.

Slife

B. D.

(2012) ‘Virtue Ethics in Practice: The Greenbrier Academy’, Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 32(1): 35–42.

90.

Solovey

Cravens

, eds. (2012) Cold War Social Science: Knowledge Production, Liberal Democracy, and Human Nature. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.

91.

Stark

(2010) ‘The Science of Ethics: Deception, the Resilient Self, and the APA Code of Ethics, 1966–1973’, Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences 46(4): 337–70.

92.

Stark

(2012) Behind Closed Doors: IRBs and the Making of Ethical Research. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

93.

Stark

(2015, 21 July) ‘Why Ethics Codes Fail’, Inside Higher Ed, available at: https://www.insidehighered.com/views/2015/07/21/essay-why-scholarly-ethics-codes-may-be-likely-fail.

94.

Summers

(2008) ‘Making Sense of the APA: A History of the Relationship Between Psychology and the Military’, Psychoanalytic Dialogues 18(5): 614–37.

95.

‘Teaching Resources’ (n.d.) Gesell = Gazelle, available at: https://gesellequalsgazelle.wordpress.com/teaching-resources/.

96.

Tenbrunsel

Messick

D. M.

(2004) ‘Ethical Fading: The Role of Self-Deception in Unethical Behavior’, Social Justice Research 17(2): 223–36.

97.

Teo

(2019) ‘Academic Subjectivity, Idols, and the Vicissitudes of Virtues in Science: Epistemic Modesty Versus Epistemic Grandiosity’, in O’Doherty

K. C.

Osbeck

L. M.

Schraube

Yen

(eds) Psychological Studies of Science. Cham: Palgrave, pp. 31–48.

98.

Thomas

N. K.

(2017) ‘Gaslighting, Betrayal and the Boogeyman: Personal Reflections on the American Psychological Association, PENS and the Involvement of Psychologists in Torture’, International Journal of Applied Psychoanalytic Psychology 14(2): 125–32.

99.

Tjeltveit

A. C.

(2003) ‘Implicit Virtues, Divergent Goods, Multiple Communities: Explicitly Addressing Virtues in the Behavioral Sciences’, American Behavioral Scientist 47(4): 395–414.

100.

Vande Kemp

(1999) ‘Diana Baumrind: Researcher and Critical Humanist’, in Moss

(ed.) Humanistic and Transpersonal Psychology: Historical and Biographical Sourcebook. New York, NY: Greenwood Press, pp. 249–59.

101.

Verplanken

Aarts

(1999) ‘Habit, Attitude, and Planned Behaviour: Is Habit an Empty Construct or an Interesting Case of Goal-Directed Automaticity?’, European Review of Social Psychology 10(1): 101–34.

102.

Vogler

(2008) Reasonably Vicious. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

103.

Weisstein

(1971) Psychology Constructs the Female: Or, the Fantasy Life of the Male Psychologist. Boston, MA: New England Free Press.

104.

Welch

(2017) ‘The American Psychological Association and Torture: How Could It Happen?’, International Journal of Applied Psychoanalytic Psychology 14(2): 116–24.

105.

Wolfe

(2018) Freedom’s Laboratory: The Cold War Struggle for the Soul of Science. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

106.

Wood

(2017) ‘Habit in Personality and Social Psychology’, Personality and Social Psychology Review 21(4): 389–403.

107.

You

Ruiz

Warchal

(2018) ‘The Presentation of Ethics in Undergraduate Psychology Syllabi’, Teaching of Psychology 45(4): 346–50.