CloughP. T.GregoryK.HaberB.ScannellR. J. (2014) ‘The Datalogical Turn’, in VanniniP. (ed.) Non-Representational Methodologies: Re-envisioning Research. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 146–64.
5.
GibbsA. (2010) ‘After Affect: Sympathy, Synchrony, and Mimetic Communication’, in GreggM.SeigworthG. J. (eds) The Affect Theory Reader. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, pp. 186–205.
6.
GriffithsP. E. (1997) What Emotions Really Are: The Problem of Psychological Categories. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
7.
HansenM. B. N. (2015) Feed-Forward: On the Future of Twenty-First-Century Media. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
8.
LeysR. (2011) ‘The Turn to Affect: A Critique’, Critical Inquiry37(3): 434–72.
9.
MassumiB. (1995) ‘The Autonomy of Affect’, Cultural Critique31: 83–109.
10.
MassumiB. (2002) Parables for the Virtual: Movement, Affect, Sensation. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
11.
PapouliasC.CallardF. (2010) ‘Biology’s Gift: Interrogating the Turn to Affect’, Body & Society16(1): 29–56.
12.
PedwellC. (2012a) ‘Affective (Self-) Transformations: Empathy, Neoliberalism and International Development’, Feminist Theory13(2): 163–79.
13.
PedwellC. (2012b) ‘Economies of Empathy: Obama, Neoliberalism, and Social Justice’, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space30(2): 280–97.
14.
PedwellC. (2013) ‘Affect at the Margins: Alternative Empathies in A Small Place’, Emotion, Space and Society8: 18–26.
15.
PedwellC. (2014) Affective Relations: The Transnational Politics of Empathy. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
16.
SedgwickE. K.FrankA. (1995) ‘Shame in the Cybernetic Fold: Reading Silvan Tomkins’, Critical Inquiry21(2): 496–522.
17.
SeigworthG. J.GreggM. (2010) ‘An Inventory of Shimmers’, in GreggM.SeigworthG. J. (eds) The Affect Theory Reader. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, pp. 1–25.