This article, based on a presentation at the Future of the History of the Human Sciences workshop (2016), discusses some of the potential benefits and pitfalls of digital humanities (DH) tools and approaches for historians of the human sciences. It reviews some of the major approaches that form DH and draws on the author’s experience as part of a team creating a large DH resource to consider the complications presented by these.
CohenD.MandlerP. (2015) ‘The History Manifesto: A Critique’, American Historical Review120(2): 530–42.
2.
GoldM. K., ed. (2012) Debates in the Digital Humanities. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
3.
GoldM. K.KleinL. F., eds (2016) Debates in the Digital Humanities 2016. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
4.
GrahamS.MilliganI.WeingartS. (2016) Exploring Big Historical Data: The Historian’s Macroscope. London: Imperial College Press.
5.
GreenC. D. (2016) ‘A Digital Future for the History of Psychology’, History of Psychology19(3): 209–19.
6.
GreenC. D.FeinererI.BurmanJ. T. (2015a) ‘Searching for the Structure of Early American Psychology: Networking Psychological Review, 1894-1908’, History of Psychology18(1): 15–31.
7.
GreenC. D.FeinererI.BurmanJ. T. (2015b) ‘Searching for the Structure of Early American Psychology: Networking Psychological Review, 1909-1923’, History of Psychology18(2): 196–204.
8.
GuldiJ.ArmitageD. (2014) The History Manifesto. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Updated digital edition published February 2017, doi.org/10.1017/9781139923880
9.
HitchcockT. (2013) ‘Confronting the Digital, or, How Academic History Writing Lost the Plot’, Cultural and Social History10: 9–23.
10.
HitchcockT.ShoemakerR.HowardS.McLaughlinJ.. (2012) London Lives, 1690-1800 (www.londonlives.org, version 1.1, 24 April 2012). Last accessed 1 January 2019.
11.
JacobsN. (2016) ‘Summary of The History Manifesto’, Isis107(2): 311–14.
12.
JuolaP. (2015) ‘The Rowling Case: A Proposed Standard Analytic Protocol for Authorship Questions’, Digital Scholarship in the Humanities30(s1): i100–i113.
13.
KohA. (2014) ‘Niceness, Building, and Opening the Genealogy of the Digital Humanities: Beyond the Social Contract of Humanities Computing’, Differences25(1): 93–106.
14.
KoplenigA. (2017) ‘The Impact of Lacking Metadata and the Measurement of Cultural and Linguistic Change using the Google NGram Data Sets – Reconstructing the Composition of the German Corpus in Times of WWII’, Digital Scholarship in the Humanities32(1): 169–88.
15.
Locating London’s Past (www.locatinglondon.org, version 1.0, 17 December 2011). Last accessed 1 January 2019.
PrescottA. (2018) ‘Searching for Dr Johnson: The Digitisation of the Burney Newspaper Collection’, in BrandtzaegS. G.GoringP.WatsonC. (eds) Travelling Chronicles: News and Newspaper from the Early Modern Period to the Eighteenth Century. Leiden: Brill, pp. 51–71.
22.
RosenzweigR. (2003) ‘Scarcity or Abundance? Preserving the Past in a Digital Era’, American Historical Review108(3): 735–62.
