Described as a ‘sort of Human Genome Project for historical linguistics’, the Evolution of Human Languages Project (EHL) is dedicated to promoting long-range genealogical research into linguistic prehistory. Toward that end, its architects have sought to collect and coordinate evidence of every known human language, roughly 6000 in all, fostering an interdisciplinary and internationally accessible environment for the study of historical universals and contemporary diversity. This article investigates the roots and branches of the Global Lexicostatistical Database – a component project of the EHL. It pays special attention to strategies for encoding epistemological pluralism in a web-based archive of global proportions.
AronovaE. (2012) ‘The Congress for Cultural Freedom, Minerva, and the Quest for Instituting “Science Studies” in the Age of Cold War’, Minerva50: 307–37.
2.
BalgG. H. (1887–9) A Comparative Glossary of the Gothic Language, with Especial Reference to English and German. Mayville, WI: Balg.
3.
BaxterW. (2006) ‘Euloge: Sergej Anatolévič Starostin, March 24, 1953 – September 30, 2005’, Journal of Chinese Linguistics34: 164–6.
4.
BaxterW.Manaster RamerA. (1999) ‘Beyond Lumping and Splitting: Probabilistic Issues in Historical Linguistics’, in RenfrewC. (ed.) Time Depth in Historical Linguistics: Papers in the Prehistory of Languages. Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, pp. 167–88.
5.
BengstonJ.BlazekV. (2005) ‘Obituary of Sergei Anatolyevich Starostin (1953–2005)’, Journal of Indo-European Studies33: 307–14.
6.
BoasF. (1896) ‘The Limitations of the Comparative Method of Anthropology’, Science18: 901–8.
7.
BulatovaR. (1992) ‘Illich-Svitych: A Biographical Sketch’, in ShevoroshkinV. (ed.) Reconstructing Languages and Cultures: Abstracts and Materials from the First International Interdisciplinary Symposium on Language and Prehistory. Bochum: Brockmeyer, pp. 14–28.
8.
CampbellL.PoserW. J. (2008) Language Classification: History and Method. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9.
CannR.StonekingM.WilsonA. (1987) ‘Mitochondrial DNA and Human Evolution’, Nature325: 31–6.
10.
Cavalli-SforzaL. L. (2000) Genes, Peoples and Languages. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
11.
DastonL. (2012) ‘The Sciences of the Archive’, in KohlerR. E.OleskoK. M. (eds) Clio Meets Science: The Challenges of History. Osiris Vol. 27. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 156–87.
12.
DastonL., ed. (2017) Science in the Archives: Pasts, Presents, Futures. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
13.
DerridaJ.PrenowitzE. (1995) ‘Archive Fever: A Freudian Impression’, Diacritics25: 9–63.
14.
EmbletonS. (1986) Statistics in Historical Linguistics. Bochum: Brockmeyer.
15.
EmbletonS.JosephJ.NiedhereH. (1999) The Emergence of the Modern Language Sciences: Studies on the Transition from Historical-Comparative to Structural Linguistics in Honour of E. F. K. Koerner. Philadelphia & Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
16.
FangerauH.GeislerH.HallingT.MartinW., eds (2013) Classification and Evolution in Biology, Linguistics, and the History of Science: Concepts, Methods, Visualization. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag.
17.
GeislerH.ListJ. (2010) ‘Beautiful Trees on Unstable Ground: Notes on the Data Problem in Lexicostatistics’, in HettrichH. (ed.) Die Ausbereitung des Indogermanischen: Thesen aus Sprachwissenschaft, Archäologie und Genetik[The Diffusion of Indogermanic: Theses from Linguistics, Archaeology, and Genetics]. Wiesbaden: Reichert, pp. 1–10.
18.
GeislerH.ListJ. (2013) ‘Do Languages Grow on Trees? The Tree Metaphor in the History of Linguistics’, in FangerauH.GeislerH.HallingT.MartinW. (eds) Classification and Evolution in Biology, Linguistics, and the History of Science. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag, pp. 111–24.
19.
Gell-MannM. (1994) The Quark and the Jaguar: Adventures in the Simple and the Complex. New York: St Martin’s Griffin.
20.
Gell-MannM.PeirosI.StarostinG. (2009) ‘Distant Language Relationship: The Current Perspective’, Journal of Language Relationship1: 13–30.
21.
GreenbergJ. (1987) Language in the Americas. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
22.
HimmelmannN. P. (1998) ‘Documentary and Descriptive Linguistics’, Linguistics36: 161–95.
23.
HockH. (1991) Principles of Historical Linguistics. Berlin: De Gruyter.
24.
HymesD. (1960) ‘Lexicostatistics So Far’, Current Anthropology1: 3–44.
25.
JardineB.KeltyC. (2016) ‘Preface: The Total Archive’, in JardineB.KeltyC. (eds) Limn 6: The Total Archive. Available at:https://limn.it/preface-the-total-archive/(accessed 4 March 2018).
26.
JohnsonG. (1999) Strange Beauty: Murray Gell-Mann and the Revolution in Twentieth-Century Physics. New York: Vintage.
27.
JosephB.JandaR. (2003) The Handbook of Historical Linguistics. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
28.
KaplanJ. (2017) ‘From Lexicostatistics to Lexomics: Basic Vocabulary and the Study of Language Prehistory’, in AronovaE.von OertzenC.SepkoskiD. (eds) Data Histories. Osiris Vol32. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 202–23.
29.
KassianA.StarostinG.DyboA.ChernovV. (2010) ‘The Swadesh Wordlist: An Attempt at Specification’, Journal of Language Relationship4: 46–89.
30.
LewisW.FarrarS.LangendoenT. (2006) ‘Linguistics in the Internet Age: Tools and Fair Use’, in Proceedings of the EMELD ‘06 Workshop on Digital Language Documentation: Tools and Standards: The State of the Art. Available at: http://emeld.org/workshop/2006/papers/lewis.pdf(accessed 4 Dec 2015).
31.
MarkeyT. L.ShevoroshkinV. (1986) ‘Foreword’, in MarkeyT. LShevoroshkinV. (eds) Typology, Relationship, and Time. Ann Arbor: Karoma, pp. vii–xii
32.
(1987) ‘Michigan Professor Studies 25,000-year-old Language’, Ironwood Daily Globe, 30 May. Coverage of Shevoroshkin’s work even made it to New York’s Family Circle Magazine on 26 April 1988. Shevoroshkin Faculty File, The Bentley Library, University of Michigan.
33.
NewmanP. (1991) ‘An Interview with Joseph Greenberg’, Current Anthropology32: 453–67.
34.
PedersenH. (1903) ‘Turkische Lautgesetze’ [‘Turkish Sound Laws’], Zeitschrift der Deutschen Morgenländischen Gesellschaft57: 535–61.
35.
PinesD. (1985) Emerging Syntheses in Science: Proceedings of the Founding Workshops of the Santa Fe Institute. Santa Fe: Santa Fe Institute.
36.
PriestlyT. M. S. (1975) ‘Schleicher, Celakovsk´y, and the Family Tree Diagram: A Puzzle in the History of Linguistics’, Historiographia Linguistica2: 299–333.
37.
ReardonJ. (2016) ‘The Genomic Open’, in JardineB.KeltyC. (eds) Limn 6: The Total Archive. Available at:http://limn.it/the-genomic-open/ (
accessed 24 October 2016).
38.
RowenchuckK. (1992) ‘Remarks on the Symposium’, in ShevoroshkinV. (ed.) Reconstructing Languages and Cultures. Bochum: Brockmeyer, pp. 9–13.
39.
RubelJ. (1985) ‘On the Santa Fe Institute and the Question of Leadership’, in PinesD. (ed.) Emerging Syntheses in Science: Proceedings of the Founding Workshops of the Santa Fe Institute. Santa Fe: Santa Fe Institute.
40.
SalmonsJ. (1992) ‘A Look at the Data for Global Etymology *tik “Finger”’, in DavisG. W.IversonG. K. (eds) Explanation in Historical Linguistics. Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp. 207–28.
41.
SalmonsJ.JosephB. (1998) Nostratic: Sifting the Evidence. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
42.
SchleicherA. (1871) Compendium der Vergleichenden Grammatik der Indogermanischen Sprachen[A Compendium of the Comparative Grammar of the Indogermanic Languages], 3rd edn. Weimar: H. Böhlau.
43.
SelvinP. (1990) ‘First Words: U-M linguist Reconstructs the Language Humans Spoke About 100,000 Years Ago’, Detroit Free Press, 24 July: 1C.
44.
SepkoskiD. (2017) ‘The Database before the Computer?’, in AronovaE.von OertzenC.SepkoskiD. (eds) Data Histories. Osiris Vol 32. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 175–201.
45.
ShevoroshkinV. (1992) ‘A Symposium on the Deep Reconstruction of Languages and Cultures’, in ShevoroshkinV. (ed.) Reconstructing Languages and Cultures. Bochum: Brockmeyer, pp. 6–8.
StarostinG. (2010) ‘Preliminary Lexicostatistics as a Basis for Language Classification: A New Approach’, Journal of Language Relationship3: 79–116.
48.
StevensH. (2013) Life out of Sequence: A Data-Driven History of Bioinformatics. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
49.
StrasserB. (2006) ‘Collecting and Experimenting: The Moral Economies of Biological Research, 1960s–1980s’, in Max Planck Preprint Series, 310. Berlin: MPG, pp. 105–23.
50.
StrasserB. (2012) ‘Collecting Nature: Practices, Styles, and Narratives’, in KohlerR. E.OleskoK. M. (eds): Clio Meets Science: The Challenges of History. Osiris Vol. 27. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 303–40.
51.
SwadeshM. (1952) ‘Lexicostatistical Dating of Prehistoric Ethnic Contacts: With Special Reference to North American Indians and Eskimos’, Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society96: 452–63.
52.
TeeterK. (1963) ‘Lexicostatistics and Genetic Relationship’, Language39: 638–48.
Tower of Babel (2011b) The Global Lexicostatistical Database: General Description. Available at:http://starling.rinet.ru/new100/GLD.htm(accessed 11 October 2018).
55.
WichmannS.HolmanE.BrownC. (2016) The ASJP Database, 17. Available at: http://asjp.clld.org(accessed 27 Oct 2016).
56.
WilfordJ. N. (1987) ‘Linguists Dig Deeper into Origins of Language’, The New York Times, 24 November.
57.
WoodfordJ. (1988) ‘Visitors from USSR and Vietnam Report on Problems Facing their Nations’, Ann Arbor Observer (December): 14.
58.
WoodwardR. (2006) ‘Tower of Babel’, The American Scholar75: 44–62.
59.
WrightR. (1991) ‘Quest for the Mother Tongue’, The Atlantic267: 39–68.
