The pre-1932 writings of Otto Kirchheimer are often described by researchers as the work of a young ‘left-Schmittian’, a radical Marxist who gave the anti-liberal critique and theoretical apparatus of his Doktorvater Carl Schmitt a new purpose for different ‘political ends’. The danger of this approach is that fundamental divisions between the societal conceptualizations of both theoreticians are ignored in lieu of apparent terminological similarity. Through the lens of economy, it is therefore the intent of this article to continue in the tradition of Alfons Söllner and Frank Schale, pushing against this assumed affinity and highlighting Otto Kirchheimer’s unique defense of liberal democracy.
BavajR. (2007) ‘Otto Kirchheimers Parlamentarismuskritik in der Weimarer Republik: Ein Fall von “Linksschmittianismus”?’ [Otto Kirchheimer’s Critique of Parliamentarianism in the Weimar Republic: A Case of ‘Left-Schmittianism’?], Vierteljahrshefte für Zeitgeschichte55(1): 33–51.
2.
KennedyE. (1987) ‘Carl Schmitt and the Frankfurt School’, Telos: A Quarterly Journal of Post Critical Thought71: 37–67.
3.
KennedyE. (2004) Constitutional Failure: Carl Schmitt in Weimar. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
4.
KirchheimerO. (1964) ‘Weimar und was dann? Analyse einer Verfassung’ [Weimar and What Then? Analysis of a Constitution], in his Politik und Verfassung [Politics and Constitution]. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag, pp. 9–57.
5.
KirchheimerO. (1996a) ‘Legality and Legitimacy’, in The Rule of Law Under Siege: Selected Essays of Franz L. Neumann and Otto Kirchheimer. Berkeley: University of California Press, pp. 44–63.
6.
KirchheimerO. (1996b) ‘Remarks on Carl Schmitt’s Legality and Legitimacy’, in The Rule of Law Under Siege: Selected Essays of Franz L. Neumann and Otto Kirchheimer. Berkeley: University of California Press, pp. 64–98.
7.
McCormickJ. P. (2004) ‘Identifying or Exploiting the Paradoxes of Constitutional Democracy? An Introduction to Carl Schmitt’s Legality and Legitimacy’, in Legality and Legitimacy, trans. SeitzerJ.. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, pp. xiii–xliii.
8.
MehringR. (2011) ‘Ein typischer Fall jugendlicher Produktivität’. Otto Kirchheimers Bonner Promotionsakte [‘“A Typical Case of Youthful Productivity”. Otto Kirchheimer’s Bonn Dissertation Record’], in Kritische Verfassungspolitologie; Das Staatsverständnis von Otto Kirchheimer [Critical Constitutional-Political Science: Otto Kirchheimer’s Understanding of the State]. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, pp. 141–76.
SchaleF. (2011) ‘Parlamentarismus und Demokratie beim frühen Otto Kirchheimer’ [Parliamentarianism and Democracy in Early Otto Kirchheimer], in Kritische Verfassungspolitologie; Das Staatsverständnis von Otto Kirchheimer [Critical Constitutional-Political Science; Otto Kirchheimer’s Understanding of the State]. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, pp. 141–76.
11.
ScheuermanW. (1996) ‘Introduction’, in The Rule of Law Under Siege: Selected Essays of Franz L. Neumann and Otto Kirchheimer. Berkeley: University of California Press, pp. 1–25.
12.
SchmittC. (1991a) Der Begriff des Politischen [The Concept of the Political]. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.
13.
SchmittC. (1991b) ‘Das Zeitalter der Neutralisierungen und Entpolitisierungen’ [The Age of Neutralizations and Depoliticizations], in Der Begriff des Politischen [The Concept of the Political]. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, pp.79–95.
14.
SchmittC. (2004) Legality and Legitimacy, trans. SeitzerJ.. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
15.
SöllnerA. (1983) ‘Linke Schüler der konservativen Revolution? – Zur politischen Theorie von Neumann, Kirchheimer und Marcuse am Ende der Weimarer Republik [Left Students of the Conservative Revolution? – On the Political Theory of Neumann, Kirchheimer and Marcuse at the End of the Weimar Republic], Leviathan11(2): 214–32.
16.
SöllnerA. (1986) ‘Jenseits von Carl Schmitt: Wissenschaftsgeschichtliche Richtigstellungen zur politischen Theorie im Umkreis der “Frankfurter Schule”’ [Beyond Carl Schmitt: Scientific-Historical Corrections to Political Theory in the Circle of the ‘Frankfurt School’], Geschichte und Gesellschaft12(4): 502–29.
