In recent years, a proliferation of books about empathy, cooperation and pro-social behaviours (Brooks, 2011a) has significantly influenced the discourse of the life-sciences and reversed consolidated views of nature as a place only for competition and aggression. In this article I describe the recent contribution of three disciplines – moral psychology (Jonathan Haidt), primatology (Frans de Waal) and the neuroscience of morality – to the present transformation of biology and evolution into direct sources of moral phenomena, a process here named the ‘moralization of biology’. I conclude by addressing the ambivalent status of this constellation of authors, for whom today ‘morality comes naturally’: I explore both the attractiveness of their message, and the problematic epistemological assumptions of their research programmes in the light of new discoveries in developmental and molecular biology.
AlexanderR. (1979) Darwinism and Human Affairs. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
2.
AlexanderR. (1987) The Biology of Moral Systems. New York: Aldine De Gruyter.
3.
AxelrodR. (1984) The Evolution of Cooperation. New York: Basic Books.
4.
AxelrodR.DionD. (1988) ‘The Further Evolution of Cooperation’, Science242: 1385–90.
5.
AxelrodR.HamiltonW. D. (1981) ‘The Evolution of Cooperation’, Science211: 1390–6.
6.
BarashD. (1977) Sociobiology and Behavior. New York: Elsevier.
7.
BarnesB.DupréJ. (2008) Genomes and What to Make of Them. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
8.
BatesonP. (1991) ‘Are there Principles of Behavioural Development?’, in BatesonP. (ed.) The Development and Integration of Behaviour: Essays in Honour of Robert Hinde. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 19–39.
9.
BatesonP.MameliM. (2007) ‘The Innate and the Acquired: Useful Clusters or a Residual Distinction from Folk Biology?’, Developmental Psychobiology49: 818– 31.
10.
BatesonP.MartinP. (1999) Design for a Life. New York: Simon & Schuster.
11.
BoellaL. (2008) Neuroetica. La morale prima della morale[Neuroethics: Morality before Morality]. Milan: Cortina.
12.
BonnieK. E.de WaalF. B. M. (2004) ‘Primate Social Reciprocity and the Origin of Gratitude’, in EmmonsR. A.McCulloughM. E. (eds) Psychology of Gratitude. Cary, NC: Oxford University Press.
13.
BorrelloM. (2005) ‘The Rise, Fall and Resurrection of Group Selection’, Endeavour29: 43–7.
14.
BowlerP. (1986) Theories of Human Evolution: A Century of Debate, 1844–1944. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
15.
BowlesS. (2009) ‘Did Warfare among Ancestral Hunter-Gatherers affect the Evolution of Human Social Behaviors?’, Science324: 1293–8.
16.
BowlesS.GintisH. (2004) ‘The Evolution of Strong Reciprocity: Cooperation in Heterogeneous Populations’, Theoretical Population Biology65: 17–28.
17.
BoydR.GintisH.BowlesS.RichersonP. J. (2003) ‘The Evolution of Altruistic Punishment’, PNAS100: 3531–5.
18.
BrooksD. (2011a) ‘Nice Guys finish First’, New York Times (17 May): A27.
19.
BrooksD. (2011b) The Social Animal: A Story of How Success Happens. London: Short Books.
BrownS. L.FredricksonB. L.WirthM. M.PoulinM. J.MeierE. A.HeaphyE. D.CohenM. D.SchultheissO. C. (2009) ‘Social Closeness increases Salivary Progesterone in Humans’, Hormones and Behavior56: 108–11.
22.
BullerD. (2006) Adapting Minds: Evolutionary Psychology and the Persistent Quest for Human Nature. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
23.
CareyN. (2012) The Epigenetics Revolution: How Modern Biology is Rewriting Our Understanding of Genetics, Disease and Inheritance. London: Icon Books.
24.
CarruthersP.LaurenceS.StichS., eds (2005–9) The Innate Mind, 3 vols.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
25.
ChangeuxJ.-P., ed. (1991) Fondements Naturels de L’Ethique[Natural Foundations of Ethics]. Paris: Odile Jacob.
26.
ChangeuxJ. P. (2004) The Physiology of Truth. Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press.
27.
ChangeuxJ.-P.DamasioA.SingerW.ChristenY., eds (2010) Neurobiology of Human Values. Berlin: Springer.
28.
ChangeuxJ. P.RicoeurP. (2000) What Makes Us Think?: A Neuroscientist and a Philosopher Argue about Ethics, Human Nature, and the Brain. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
29.
ChurchlandP. S. (2011) Braintrust: What Neuroscience Tells Us about Morality. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
30.
CohenS.Janicki-DevertsD. (2009) ‘Can We improve Our Physical Health by altering Our Social Networks?’, Perspectives on Psychological Science4: 375–8.
31.
CollierJ.StinglM. (1993) ‘Evolutionary Naturalism and the Objectivity of Morality’, Biology and Philosophy8: 47–60.
32.
CowieF. (1999) What’s Within? Nativism Reconsidered. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
33.
DamasioA. (2003) Looking for Spinoza: Joy, Sorrow, and the Feeling Brain. New York: Harcourt.
34.
DamasioA. (2006[1994]) Descartes’ Error: Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain. London: Vintage.
35.
DarwinC. (1982[1871]) The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
36.
DastonL. (2004) ‘The Morality of Natural Orders: The Power of Medea’, in PetersonG. B. (ed.) The Tanner Lectures on Human Values, vol. 24. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press, pp. 371–92.
37.
DawkinsR. (2006[1976]) The Selfish Gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
38.
de QuervainD. J.FischbacherU.TreyerV.SchellhammerM.SchnyderU.BuckA.FehrE. (2004) ‘The Neural Basis of Altruistic Punishment’, Science305: 1254–8.
39.
de WaalF. (1996) Good-Natured: The Origins of Right and Wrong in Human and Other Animals. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
40.
de WaalF. (2006) Primates and Philosophers: How Morality Evolved, ed. MacedoS.OberJ.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
41.
de WaalF. (2008) ‘Putting the Altruism back into Altruism: The Evolution of Empathy’, Annual Review of Psychology59: 279–300.
42.
de WaalF. (2009) The Age of Empathy: Nature’s Lessons for a Kinder Society. New York: Three Rivers Press.
43.
de WaalF.van RoosmalenA. (1979) ‘Reconciliation and Consolation among Chimpanzees’, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology5: 55–66.
44.
DugatkinL. A. (1997) Cooperation Among Animals: An Evolutionary Perspective. New York: Oxford University Press.
45.
DupréJ. (2012) Processes of Life: Essays in the Philosophy of Biology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
46.
ElmanJ.BatesE.JohnsonM.Karmiloff-SmithA.ParisiD.PlunkettK. (1996) Rethinking Innateness: A Connectionist Perspective on Development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
47.
FehrE.FischbacherU. (2003) ‘The Nature of Human Altruism’, Nature425: 785–91.
48.
FehrE.GächterS. (2002) ‘Altruistic Punishment in Humans’, Nature415: 137–40.
49.
FischbacherU.GächterS. (2002) ‘Strong Reciprocity, Human Cooperation, and the Enforcement of Social Norms’, Human Nature13: 1–25.
50.
FlackJ. C.de WaalF. (2000) ‘“Any Animal Whatever” Darwinian Building Blocks of Morality in Monkeys and Apes’, Journal of Consciousness Studies7: 1–29.
51.
Fox KellerE. (2000) The Century of the Gene. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
52.
FrancisR. (2012) Epigenetics: How Environment Shapes Our Genes. New York: Barnes & Noble.
53.
FrankR. H. (1988) Passions Within Reason: The Strategic Role of the Emotions. New York: W. W. Norton.
54.
GazzanigaM. S. (2005) The Ethical Brain. New York: Dana Press.
55.
GhiselinM. (1974) The Economy of Nature and the Evolution of Sex. Berkeley: University of California Press.
56.
GintisH. (2000) ‘Strong Reciprocity and Human Sociality’, Journal of Theoretical Biology206: 169–79.
57.
GolemanD. (2006) Social Intelligence: The New Science of Human Relationships. London: Hutchinson.
58.
GottliebG. (1997) Synthesizing Nature and Nurture: Prenatal Roots of Instinctive Behaviour. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
59.
GreeneJ. D. (2003) ‘From Neural “is” to Moral “ought”: What are the Moral Implications of Neuroscientific Moral Psychology?’, Nature Reviews Neuroscience4: 847–50.
60.
GreeneJ. D. (2008) ‘The Secret Joke of Kant’s Soul’, in Sinnott-ArmstrongW., Moral Psychology, vol. 3, The Neuroscience of Morality: Emotion, Brain Disorders and Development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 35–79.
61.
GreeneJ. D.CushmanF. A.StewartL. E.LowenbergK.NystromL. E.CohenJ. D. (2009) ‘Pushing Moral Buttons: The Interaction between Personal Force and Intention in Moral Judgment’, Cognition111: 364–71.
62.
GreeneJ.HaidtJ. (2002) ‘How (and Where) does Moral Judgment work?’, Trends in Cognitive Sciences6: 517–23.
63.
GreeneJ. D.SommervilleR. B.NystromL. E.DarleyJ. M.CohenJ. D. (2001) ‘An fMRI Investigation of Emotional Engagement in Moral Judgment’, Science293: 2105–8.
64.
GriffithsP. E. (1999) What Emotions Really Are: The Problem of Psychological Categories. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
65.
GriffithsP. E. (2002) ‘What is Innateness’, The Monist85: 70–85.
66.
GriffithsP. E. (2009) ‘The Distinction between Innate and Acquired Characteristics’, in Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, CA: Metaphysics Research Laboratory, Stanford University, accessible @: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/innate-acquired/
67.
GriffithsP. E.GrayR. D. (1994) ‘Developmental Systems and Evolutionary Explanation’, Journal of Philosophy6: 277–304.
68.
GriffithsP. E.MacheryE.LinquistS. (2009) ‘The Vernacular Concept of Innateness’, Mind & Language24: 605–30.
69.
GriffithsP. E.StotzK. (2007) ‘Gene’, in RuseM.HullD. (eds) Cambridge Companion to Philosophy of Biology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 85–102.
70.
HaidtJ. (2001) ‘The Emotional Dog and Its Rational Tail: a Social Intuitionist Approach to Moral Judgment’, Psychological Review108: 814–34.
71.
HaidtJ. (2007) ‘The New Synthesis in Moral Psychology’, Science316: 998–1002.
72.
HaidtJ. (2012) The Righteous Mind: Why Good People Are Divided by Politics and Religion. New York: Allen Lane.
73.
HaidtJ.BjorklundF. (2007) ‘Social Intuitionists answer Six Questions about Morality’, in Sinnott-ArmstrongW. (ed.) Moral Psychology, vol. 2, The Cognitive Science of Morality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 181–217.
74.
HaidtJ.JosephC. (2007) ‘The Moral Mind: How 5 Sets of Innate Moral Intuitions guide the Development of Many Culture-Specific Virtues, and Perhaps Even Modules’, in CarruthersP.LaurenceS.StichS. (eds) The Innate Mind, vol. 3.Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 367–91.
75.
HaidtJ.KesebirS. (2010) ‘Morality’, in FiskeS. T.GilbertD. T.LindzeyG. (eds) Handbook of Social Psychology. Oboken, NJ: Wiley, pp. 797–832.
76.
HamiltonW. D. (1964) ‘The Genetical Evolution of Social Behavior I and II’, Journal of Theoretical Biology7: 1–52.
77.
HauserM. (2006) Moral Minds: How Nature Designed Our Universal Sense of Right and Wrong. New York: HarperCollins.
78.
JablonkaE.LambM. J. (1995) Epigenetic Inheritance and Evolution: The Lamarckian Dimension. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
79.
JablonkaE.LambM. J. (2005) Evolution in Four Dimensions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
80.
JoyceR. (2001) The Myth of Morality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
81.
JoyceR. (2006) The Evolution of Morality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
82.
JoyceR. (2008) ‘What Neuroscience can (and cannot) contribute to Metaethics’, in Sinnott-ArmstrongW., Moral Psychology, vol. 3, The Neuroscience of Morality: Emotion, Brain Disorders and Development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 371–94.
Karmiloff-SmithA. (2009) ‘Nativism versus Neuroconstructivism: Rethinking the Study of Developmental Disorders’, Developmental Psychology45: 56–63.
86.
KayeH. L. (1986) The Social Meaning of Modern Biology: From Social Darwinism to Sociobiology. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
87.
KeltnerD. (2009) Born to Be Good: The Science of a Meaningful Life. New York and London: Norton.
88.
KeltnerD.MarshJ.SmithJ. A. (2010) The Compassionate Instinct: The Science of Human Goodness. New York: Norton.
89.
KoenigsM.YoungL.AdolphsR.TranelD.CushmanF.HauserM.DamasioA. (2007) ‘Damage to the Prefrontal Cortex increases Utilitarian Moral Judgements’, Nature446: 908–11.
90.
KokB. E.FredricksonB. L. (2010) ‘Upward Spirals of the Heart: Autonomic Flexibility, as Indexed by Vagal Tone, Reciprocally and Prospectively predicts Positive Emotions and Social Connectedness’, Biological Psychology85: 432–6.
91.
LehrmanD. S. (1953) ‘Critique of Konrad Lorenz’s Theory of Instinctive Behavior’, Quarterly Review of Biology28: 337–63.
92.
LehrmanD. S. (1970) ‘Semantic and Conceptual Issues in the Nature–Nurture Problem’, in AronsonR.TobachE.LehrmanD. S.RosenblattJ. S. (eds) Development and Evolution of Behavior. San Francisco, CA: Freeman, pp. 17–52.
93.
LevyN. (2007) Neuroethics: Challenges for the 21st Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
94.
LewkowiczD. J. (2010) ‘Nature and Nurture in Perception’, in Sage Encyclopaedia of Perception, ed. Goldstein.E.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, pp. 611–16.
95.
LewkowiczD. J. (2011) ‘The Biological Implausibility of the Nature–Nurture Dichotomy & What It means for the Study of Infancy’, Infancy16: 331–67.
96.
LinquistS.MacheryE.GriffithsP. E.StotzK. (2011) ‘Exploring the Folk-biological Conception of Human Nature’, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B366: 444–53.
97.
LozadaM.D’AdamoP.FuentesM. A. (2011) ‘Beneficial Effects of Human Altruism’, Journal of Theoretical Biology289: 12–16.
98.
MacheryE.MallonR. (2010) ‘Evolution of Morality’, in DorisJ. M. (ed.) The Moral Psychology Handbook. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 3–46.
99.
MacmillanM. (2000) An Odd Kind of Fame: Stories of Phineas Gage. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
100.
MameliM. (2005) ‘The Inheritance of Features’, Philosophy of Biology20: 365–99.
101.
MameliM. (2008) ‘On Innateness: The Clutter Hypothesis’, Journal of Philosophy55: 719–37.
102.
MameliM.BatesonP. P. G. (2006) ‘Innateness and the Sciences’, Biology and Philosophy22: 155–88.
103.
MameliM.BatesonP. (2011) ‘An Evaluation of the Concept of Innateness’, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B366: 436–43.
104.
MameliM.PapineauD. (2006) ‘The New Nativism: a Commentary on Gary Marcus’s The Birth of the Mind’, Biology and Philosophy21: 559–73.
105.
MarcusG. (2004) The Birth of the Mind. New York: Basic Books.
106.
MarcusG. (2005) ‘What Developmental Biology can tell Us about Innateness’, in CarruthersP.LaurenceS.StichS. (eds) The Innate Mind, vol. 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 23–33.
107.
MeaneyM. J. (2001) ‘Nature, Nurture, and the Disunity of Knowledge’, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences935: 50–61.
108.
MikhailJ. (2008) ‘Moral Cognition and Computational Theory’, in Sinnott-ArmstrongW., Moral Psychology, vol. 3, The Neuroscience of Morality: Emotion, Brain Disorders and Development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 81–91.
109.
MollJ.de Oliveira-SouzaR.EslingerP. J.BramatiI. E.Mourao-MirandaJ.AndreiuoloP. A.PessoaL. (2002) ‘The Neural Correlates of Moral Sensitivity: a Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Investigation of Basic and Moral Emotions’, Journal of Neuroscience22: 2730–6.
110.
MollJ.de Oliveira-SouzaR.ZahnR. (2008a) ‘The Neural Basis of Moral Cognition: Sentiments, Concepts, and Values’, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences1124: 161–80.
111.
MollJ.de Oliveira-SouzaR.ZahnR.GrafmanJ. (2008b) ‘The Cognitive Neuroscience of Moral Emotions’, in Sinnott-ArmstrongW., Moral Psychology, vol. 3, The Neuroscience of Morality: Emotion, Brain Disorders and Development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 1–17.
112.
MollJ.KruegerF.ZahnR.PardiniM.Oliveira-SouzaR.GrafmanJ. (2006) ‘Human Fronto-Mesolimbic Networks guide Decisions about Charitable Donation’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences103: 15623–8.
113.
MollJ.ZahnR.de Oliveira-SouzaR.KruegerF.GrafmanJ. (2005) ‘The Neural Basis of Human Moral Cognition’, Nature Reviews Neuroscience6: 799–809.
114.
MooreD. (2003) The Dependent Gene: The Fallacy of ‘Nature vs. Nurture’. New York: Holt.
115.
MossL. (2003) What Genes Can’t Do. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
116.
NicholsS. (2002) ‘Norms with Feeling: Toward a Psychological Account of Moral Judgment’, Cognition84: 223–36.
117.
NicholsS. (2004) Sentimental Rules: On the Natural Foundations of Moral Judgment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
118.
NowakM. (2006) ‘Five Rules for the Evolution of Cooperation’, Science314: 1560–3.
119.
NowakM. A.with HighfieldR. (2011) SuperCooperators: Evolution, Altruism and Human Behaviour, or, Why We Need Each Other to Succeed. Edinburgh: Canongate.
120.
OyamaS. (2000a[1985]) The Ontogeny of Information: Developmental Systems and Evolution. Durham, NC and London: Duke University Press.
121.
OyamaS. (2000b) Evolution’s Eye: A Systems View of the Biology–Culture Divide. Durham, NC and London: Duke University Press.
122.
OyamaSGriffithsP. E.GrayR. D. (2001) Cycles of Contingency: Developmental Systems and Evolution. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
123.
ParryS.DupréJ. (2010) Nature after the Genome. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
124.
PigliucciM. (2001) Phenotypic Plasticity: Beyond Nature and Nurture. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
125.
PiliavinJ.CharngH.-W. (1990) ‘Altruism: a Review of Recent Theory and Research’, Annual Review of Sociology16: 27–65.
126.
PrestonS. D.de WaalF. (2002) ‘Empathy: Its Ultimate and Proximate Bases’, Behavioral and Brain Sciences25: 1–72.
127.
PrinzJ. (2007) The Emotional Construction of Morals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
128.
PrinzJ. (2008) ‘Is Morality Innate?’, in Sinnott-ArmstrongW. (ed.) Moral Psychology, vol. 3, The Neuroscience of Morality: Emotion, Brain Disorders and Development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
129.
PrinzJ. (2009) ‘Against Moral Nativism’, in MurphyD.BishopM. (eds) Stich and His Critics. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 167–89.
130.
PrinzJ. (2012) Beyond Human Nature. New York: Penguin/Norton.
131.
RichardsR. (1986) ‘A Defence of Evolutionary Ethics’, Biology and Philosophy1: 265–93.
132.
RichardsR. (1987) Darwin and the Emergence of Evolutionary Theories of Mind and Behavior. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
133.
RichardsR. (1999) ‘Darwin's Romantic Biology: The Foundation of His Evolutionary Ethics’, in MaienscheinJ.RuseM. (eds) Biology and the Foundations of Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 113–53.
134.
RillingJ. K.GutmanD. A.ZehT. R.PagnoniG.BernsG. S.KiltsC. D. (2002) ‘A Neural Basis for Social Cooperation’, Neuron35: 395–405.
135.
RobertJ. S. (2004) Embryology, Epigenesis and Evolution: Taking Development Seriously. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
136.
RottschaeferW. A.MartinsenD. (1990) ‘Really taking Darwin Seriously: an Alternative to Michael Ruse’s Darwinian Metaethics’, Biology and Philosophy5: 149–73.
137.
RuseM. (1991) ‘The Significance of Evolution’, in SingerP. (ed.) A Companion to Ethics. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 500–10.
138.
SamuelsR. (2002) ‘Nativism in Cognitive Science’, Mind and Language17: 233–65.
139.
SegerstråleU. C. (2001) Defenders of the Truth: The Sociobiology Debate. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
140.
SheaN. (2012) ‘Genetic Representation explains the Cluster of Innateness-related Properties’, Mind & Language27: 466–93.
141.
SingerP. (2005) ‘Ethics and Intuitions’, The Journal of Ethics9: 331–52.
142.
SingerT.LammC. (2009) ‘The Social Neuroscience of Empathy’, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences1156: 81–96.
143.
Sinnott-ArmstrongW. (2008) Moral Psychology, vol. 3, The Neuroscience of Morality: Emotion, Brain Disorders and Development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
144.
SoberE.WilsonD. S. (1998) Unto Others: The Evolution and Psychology of Unselfish Behavior. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
145.
SpencerJ. P.,et al (2009) ‘Short Arms and talking Eggs: Why We should No Longer abide the Nativist–Empiricist Debate’, Child Development Perspectives3(2): 79–87.
146.
StentG. S. ed (1980) Morality as a Biological Phenomenon: The Presuppositions of Sociobiological Research. Berkeley: University of California Press.
147.
SterelnyK. (2010) ‘Moral Nativism: a Sceptical Response’, Mind & Language25: 279–97.
148.
SterelnyK.GriffithsP. (1999) Sex and Death: An Introduction to Philosophy of Biology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
149.
StotzK. (2006) ‘With Genes like That, Who needs an Environment? Postgenomics’ Argument for the Ontogeny of Information’, Philosophy of Science73: 905–17.
150.
StotzK. (2008) ‘The Ingredients for a Postgenomic Synthesis of Nature and Nurture’, Philosophical Psychology21: 359–81.
151.
StotzK.BostanciA.GriffithsP. E. (2006) ‘Tracking the Shift to “Post-Genomics”’, Community Genetics9: 190–6.
152.
StreetS. (2006) ‘A Darwinian Dilemma for Realist Theories of Value’, Philosophical Studies127: 109–66.
153.
SuhlerC. L.ChurchlandP. (2011) ‘Can Innate, Modular “Foundations” explain Morality? Challenges for Haidt’s Moral Foundations’, Theory Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience23: 2103–16.
154.
TriversR. (1971) ‘The Evolution of Reciprocal Altruism’, Quarterly Review of Biology46: 35–57.
155.
ValdesoloP.De StenoD. (2006) ‘Manipulations of Emotional Context shape Moral Judgment’, Psychological Science17: 476–7.
156.
VerplaetseJ. (2009) Localizing the Moral Sense: Neuroscience and the Search for the Cerebral Seat of Morality, 1800–1930. Dordrecht: Springer.
157.
VerplaetseJ.De SchrijverJ.VannesteS.BraeckmanJ., eds (2009) The Moral Brain: Essays on the Evolutionary and Neuroscientific Aspects of Morality. Dordrecht: Springer.
158.
WestM. J.KingA. P. (1987) ‘Settling Nature and Nurture into an Ontogenetic Niche’, Developmental Psychobiology20: 549–62.
159.
West-EberhardM. J. (2003) Developmental Plasticity and Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
160.
WheatleyT.HaidtJ. (2005) ‘Hypnotic Disgust makes Moral Judgments More Severe’, Psychological Science16: 780–4.
161.
WilliamsG. C. (1996[1966]) Adaptation and Natural Selection: A Critique of Some Current Evolutionary Thought. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
162.
WilsonD. S.WilsonE. O. (2007) ‘Rethinking the Theoretical Foundation of Sociobiology’, Quarterly Review of Biology82: 327–48.
163.
WilsonE. O. (1975) Sociobiology: The New Synthesis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
164.
WilsonE. O. (1978) On Human Nature. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
165.
YoungA. (2012) ‘The Social Brain and the Myth of Empathy’, Science in Context25: 401–24.
166.
ZakP. (2012) The Moral Molecule: The Source of Love and Prosperity. New York: Penguin.
