Review symposium

Bloor D. (1976) Knowledge and Social Imagery. London: Routledge.

Brock A. C. (2011) ‘Review Symposium: a Tale Full of Sound and Fury but What does it signify?’, History of the Human Sciences 24(1): 108–13.

Buchanan R. D. (2010) Playing with Fire: The Controversial Career of Hans J. Eysenck. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Buchanan R. D. (2011) ‘Research Report: doing a Biography of Hans J. Eysenck’, History of Psychology 14: 210–210.

Daston L. (2001) ‘Scientific Objectivity with and without Words’, in Becker P. Clark W. (eds) Little Tools of Knowledge: Historical Essays on Academic and Bureaucratic Practices. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, pp. 259–84.

Eysenck H. J. (1997) Rebel with a Cause, revised and expanded edn. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.

Eysenck M. (2010) ‘Scrupulously Fair-Minded: Book Review of Buchanan 2010’, The Psychologist 23: 736–736.

Gross A. G. (1990) The Rhetoric of Science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Hall J. (2011) ‘Review of Playing with Fire: The Controversial Career of Hans J. Eysenck’, History of the Human Sciences 24(1): 114–18.

Linker B. (2007) ‘Resuscitating the “Great Doctor”: the Career of Biography in Medical History’, in öderqvist T. S (ed.) TheHistory and Poetics of Scientific Biography. Aldershot, Hants: Ashgate, pp. 221–39.

McManus C. (2010) ‘Evidence Based’, Times Literary Supplement (15 October): 36.

Nicholson I. (2011) ‘Courting Controversy’, PsycCRITIQUES (29 June): 56, release 26, article 1.

Pettit M. (2011) ‘The Controversialist as Scientific Persona’, History and Philosophy of Psychology 13: 60–60.

Porter T. M. (1995) Trust in Numbers: The Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Rafter N. H. (2006) ‘H. J. Eysenck in Fagin’s Kitchen: the Return to Biological Theory in 20^th- Century Criminology’, History of the Human Sciences 19(4): 37–56.

Rushton J. P. (2010) ‘Disappointing, Self-Righteous, Social Constructionism’, Personality and Individual Differences 50: 124–124.

Söderqvist T. (2007) ‘“No Genre of History fell under More Odium than that of Biography”: the Delicate Relations between Scientific Biography and the Historiography of Science’, in öderqvist T. S (ed.) The History and Poetics of Scientific Biography. Aldershot, Hants: Ashgate, pp. 241–62.

Soyland A. J. (1994) Psychology as Metaphor. London: Sage.

Winston A. (2011) ‘Review of Playing with Fire: The Controversial Career of Hans J. Eysenck’, Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences 47: 211–211.