Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2012-7
Whatever happened to the ‘European’ in European social psychology? A study of the ambitions in founding the European Association of Experimental Social Psychology
This article studies the ambitions involved in founding the European Association of Experimental Social Psychology (EAESP) in the context of a differentiation between social psychology practised in Europe on the one hand and the United States on the other. To this end 8 key actors have been interviewed: 4 members of the very first Executive Committee (or Planning Committee as it was called then) as well as 4 key players of a second generation. Also the EAESP’s archives have been consulted. Moreover, data regarding the developments of EAESP’s membership and EAESP’s house journal, the European Journal of Social Psychology (EJSP), were used to assess to what extent the ambitions in developing a European social psychology have been realized. The conclusion is that, despite various successes, it remains questionable whether the founders’ aims have been fulfilled.
AllportF. (1924) Social Psychology. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
2.
BeauvaisJ-L. (2005) ‘Des danger d’une culture dominante dans les sciences psychologiques et sociales: la psychologie social et l’impact factor’ [The Dangers of a Dominant Culture in the Social and Psychological Sciences: Social Psychology and the Impact Factor], Cliniques Méditerranéennes71: 195–222.
3.
BeauvaisJ-L. (2009) ‘Classification des revues des psychologie en débat’ [The Classification of Psychological Reviews under Debate], Les Cahiers de Psychologie Politique(en ligne), sommaire du numéro 14 [Summary of Number 14] available @: http://lodel.irevues.inist.fr/cahierspsychologiepolitique/index.php?id=340
.
4.
BerghahnV. (1999) ‘Philanthropy and Diplomacy in the “American Century”’, Diplomatic History23: 393–419.
5.
CassottiP.MaassA. (1998) ‘The Current State of Experimental Social Psychology: a Survey among EAESP Members in Northern, Eastern, and Southern Europe’, European Bulletin of Social Psychology10: 8–19.
6.
DanzigerK. (2000) ‘Making Social Psychology Experimental: a Conceptual History, 1920–1970’, Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences36: 329–47.
7.
DoiseW. (1986) Levels of Explanation in Social Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8.
EmlerN.FiedlerK.LewickaM.MaassA.HopkinsN. (1990) ‘Editorial’, European Journal of Social Psychology20: 1–2.
9.
FarrR. (1991) ‘The Long Past and the Short History of Social Psychology’, European Journal of Social Psychology21: 371–80.
10.
FarrR. (1996) The Roots of Modern Social Psychology.
Oxford: Oxford University Press.
11.
GergenK. (2008) ‘On the Very Idea of Social Psychology’, Social Psychology Quarterly71: 331–7.
12.
GoodJ. (2000) ‘Disciplining Social Psychology: a Case Study of the Boundary Relations in the History of the Human Sciences’, Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences36: 383–403.
13.
GraumannC. (1988) ‘Introduction to a History of Social Psychology’, in HewstoneM.StroebeW.CodolJ.-P.StephensonG. (eds) Introduction to Social Psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 3–19.
14.
GreenwoodJ. (2000) ‘Individualism and the Social in Early American Social Psychology’, Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences36: 443–55.
15.
GreenwoodJ. (2004) The Disappearance of the Social in American Social Psychology. New York: Cambridge University Press.
16.
HaslamS. (2002) ‘Editorial’, European Journal of Social Psychology32: 1–2.
17.
HermanE. (1995) The Romance of American Psychology: Political Culture in the Age of Experts.
Berkeley: University of California Press.
18.
HouseJ. (2008) ‘Social Psychology, Social Science, and Economics: Twentieth-Century Progress and Problems, Twenty-First Century Prospects’, Social Psychology Quarterly71: 232–56.
19.
IsraelJ.TajfelH., eds (1972) The Context of Social Psychology: a Critical Assessment. London: Academic Press.
20.
JahodaG. (1986) ‘Nature, Culture and Social Psychology’, European Journal of Social Psychology16: 17–30.
21.
JahodaG. (2007) A History of Social Psychology.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22.
JasparsJ. (1986) ‘Forum and Focus: a Personal View of European Social Psychology’, European Journal of Social Psychology16: 3–15.
23.
LanzettaJ. (1963) ONR Report NR 177-276 on the European Conference on Experimental Social Psychology, Sorrento, Italy. EAESP, University Archives, KUL.
24.
MoscoviciS. (1976) Social Influence and Social Change. London: Academic Press.
25.
MoscoviciS. (1981) ‘On Social Representations’, in ForgasJ. (ed.) Social Cognition: Perspectives on Everyday Understanding.
London: Academic Press.
26.
MoscoviciS. (1989) ‘Preconditions for Explanation in Social Psychology’, European Journal of Social Psychology19: 407–30.
27.
MoscoviciS.MarkováI. (2006) The Making of Modern Social Psychology: The Hidden Story of How an International Social Science Was Created. Cambridge: Polity Press.
28.
OishiS.KesebirS.SnyderB. (2009) ‘Sociology: a Lost Connection in Social Psychology’, Personality and Social Psychology Review13: 334–53.
29.
RasmussenJ. (1966) ONR Technical report ONRL-C-10-66 on the Third European Conference on Experimental Social Psychology, Royaumont, France. EAESP, University Archives, KUL.
30.
SchachterS.NuttinJ.de MonchauxC.MaucorpsP.OsmerD.DuijkerH.RommetveitR.IsraelJ. (1954) ‘Cross-Cultural Experiments on Threat and Rejection’, Human Relations7: 403–39.
31.
SchererK. (1993) ‘Two Faces of Social Psychology: European and North American Perspectives’, Social Science Information32: 515–52.
32.
SchruijerS. (2010) ‘Is the EAESP a Cold War Baby? An Investigation into the Political Context of its Formation’(manuscript under review).
33.
SewellW. (1989) ‘Some Reflections on the Golden Age of Interdisciplinary Social Psychology’, Annual Review of Sociology15: 1–16.
34.
SibleyE. (1974) Social Science Research Council: The First Fifty Years. New York: SSRC.
35.
SmithP. (2005) ‘Is there an Indigenous European Social Psychology?’, International Journal of Psychology40: 254–62.
36.
SpearsR.MaassA. (2009) ‘Editorial’, European Journal of Social Psychology39: 1–2.
37.
SpiniD.ElcherothG.FiginiD. (2009) ‘Is there Space for Time in Social Psychology Publications? A Content Analysis across Five Journals’, Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology19: 165–81.
38.
StamH. (2006) ‘Introduction: Reclaiming the Social in Social Psychology’, Theory & Psychology16: 587–95.
39.
StamH.RadtkeH.LubekI. (2000) ‘Strains in Experimental Social Psychology: a Textual Analysis of the Development of Experimentation in Social Psychology’, Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences36: 365–82.
40.
SteinerI. (1974) ‘Whatever happened to the Group in Social Psychology?’, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology10: 93–108.
41.
StephensonG. (1988) ‘Applied Social Psychology’, in HewstoneM.StroebeW.CodolJ.-P.StephensonG. (eds) Introduction to Social Psychology.
Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 413–44.
42.
TajfelH. (1972) ‘Some Developments in European Social Psychology’, European Journal of Social Psychology2: 307–22.
43.
TajfelH. (1981) Human Groups and Social Categories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
44.
TajfelH. (1984) The Social Dimension. Cambridge and Paris: Maison des Sciences de l’Homme.
45.
TajfelH.TurnerJ. (1979) ‘The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Relations’, in AustinW.WorchelS. (eds) The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
46.
TightM. (2007) ‘Bridging the Divide: a Comparison Analysis of Articles in Higher Education Journals published inside and outside North America’, Higher Education53: 235–53.
47.
Van StrienP. (1997) ‘The American “Colonization” of Northwest European Social Psychology after World War II’, Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences33: 349–63.
48.
WittenbaumG.MorelandR. (2008) ‘Small-Group Research in Social Psychology: Topics and Trends over Time’, Social and Personality Compass2(1):187–203.
