I: Winch’s emphasis on philosophy’s concern with language and on rule-following; II: Winch’s misgivings about limits of analogy between rules and language; III: Rhees’ comparison of the unity of discourse with conversation, and claim that language makes sense if living makes sense; IV: Winch’s later emphasis on the fragility of conditions for understanding both between cultures and within our own.
Holland, R. F. (1980) ‘Is Goodness a Mystery?’, in R. F. Holland Against Empiricism. Oxford: Blackwell.
2.
Phillips, D. Z. (1999) Philosophy’s Cool Place. London and Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
3.
Phillips, D. Z. (unpublished) ‘Religion and the Hermeneutics of Contemplation’.
4.
Reprinted (1970) in R. RheesDiscussions of Wittgenstein. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
5.
Rhees, R. (1998) Wittgenstein and the Possibility of Discourse, ed. D. Z. Phillips. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6.
Rhees, R. (unpublished) ‘Philosophy and the Presocratics’.
7.
Rhees, R. (unpublished) ‘Plato and Dialectic’.
8.
Weil, S. (1962) ‘The Great Beast’, in her Selected Essays 1934-1943, trans. R. Rees. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
9.
Winch, P. (1972a) ‘Nature and Convention’, in P. Winch Ethics and Action. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
10.
Winch, P. (1972b) ‘Moral Integrity’, in P. Winch Ethics and Action. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
11.
Winch, P. (1987) Trying to Make Sense. Oxford: Blackwell.
12.
Winch, P. (1995) The Idea of a Social Science, 2nd edn.London: Routledge.
13.
Winch, P. (1996) ‘Doing Justice or Giving the Devil his Due’, in D. Z. Phillips (ed.) Can Religion Be Explained Away?London: Macmillan.
14.
Winch, P. (1997) ‘Can We Understand Ourselves?’, Philosophical Investigations20(3): 193-204.
15.
Winch, P. (forthcoming [2001]) ‘What Has Philosophy to Say to Religion?’, ed. D. Z. Phillips from the Peter Winch Archive (University of Wales, Swansea), Faith and Philosophy.
16.
Wittgenstein, L. (1980) Culture and Value. Oxford: Blackwell.
